PEV Team Worksheet
PEV Team Worksheet
PEV Team Worksheet
General Information
University:
College:
Department:
Visit Dates:
Type of Visit: General/Interim
Corresponding Criteria Issue:
Editor:
Email:
Mobile:
Team Chair:
Email:
Mobile:
PEV 1:
Email:
Mobile:
PEV 2:
Email:
Mobile:
Evaluation Background
(Summarize all evaluation steps taken since receiving SAR for the first time)
Self-Assessment Report first submission date:
Self-Assessment Report first review date:
Self-Assessment Report second submission date (if any):
Self-Assessment Report second review date (if any):
First visit (General Visit) date (if any):
Second visit (Interim Visit) date (if any):
For each shortcoming, please allocate Deficiency (D), Weakness (W) and/or
Concern (C) in the appropriate box. If a potential shortcoming changes in
level or is resolved during the campus visit, reallocate new judgment. This
worksheet is to be filled jointly by the team.
1
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
2
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
ii) An ability to produce engineering designs that meet desired needs within certain constraints by applying
both analysis and synthesis in the design process.
iii) An ability to create and carry out proper measurement and tests with quality assurance, analyze and
interpret results, and utilize engineering judgment to make inferences.
iv) An ability to skillfully communicate orally with a gathering of people and in writing with various
managerial levels.
v) An ability to perceive ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering cases and make brilliant
judgments taking into account the consequences in worldwide financial, ecological and societal consider.
vi) An ability to perceive the continual necessity for professional knowledge growth and how to find, assess,
assemble and apply it properly.
vii) An ability to work adequately on teams and to set up objectives, plan activities, meet due dates, and
manage risk and uncertainty.
2.2 Relating GOs to PEOs
2.2.1 How the GOs prepare graduates to attain the PEOs.
Criterion 3: Curriculum Pre-visit Post-visit
3.1 Program Structure and Content
3.1.1 Study Plan: adequate attention and time to each component including summer training.
3.1.2 Alignment with PEOs: consistent with the objectives of the program and institution
3.1.3 Attainment of GOs: support the development of a range of intellectual and practical skills and
attainment of GOs
3.1.4 Prerequisite Structure: Showing dependency and integration of a balanced curriculum
3.1.5 Subject Areas Requirements: (in terms of hours and depth) including mathematics and basic
sciences, engineering topics appropriate to the field of study and general education.
3.1.6 Major Design Experience: that prepares students for engineering practice where public health
and safety, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors must be considered.
3.1.7 Teaching and Learning Strategies: How program teaching/learning and assessment strategies
are appropriate to, consistent with, and support the attainment of GOs.
3.2 Relating Courses Learning Outcomes to GOs
3.2.1 Abbreviated syllabus of each course must be available showing CLOs.
3
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
3.2.2 Mapping CLOs to GOs: How the courses learning outcomes actually lead to the achievement of
graduate outcomes. The relationships of CLOs to GOs need preparing a “Course Portfolios”.
Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement Pre-visit Post-visit
4.1 Achievement of Graduate outcomes
4.1.1 Assessment Processes: used to gather data upon which the evaluation of each student outcome is
based.
4.1.2 Frequency of Assessment Processes
4.2.5.1 What does the Quality Management System provide for PEOs, GOs and curriculum review?
4.2.5.2 Industrial Advisory Committee: The feedback and inputs from stakeholders.
4
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
5.1.3 High-school grades for freshman admissions for past five years.
5.2 Student Performance and Progress
5.2.1 Processes by which student performance is evaluated in relation to student learning outcomes.
5
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
6
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
6.4.2 Role of scientific research achievements in the professional development of the faculty.
6.4.3 Role of the offered post-graduate programs in the professional development of the faculty.
6.5 Faculty Authority and Responsibility
6.5.1 Role of the faculty with respect to course creation, modification, and evaluation
6.5.2 Role of the faculty in the definition and revision of PEOs and GOs and their role in the
attainment of the GOs
6.5.3 Roles of others on campus (e.g. dean or provost) with respect to these areas
7.1.3 How clearly tasks are assigned, and authorities are delegated.
7.1.4 How effective is the organizational structure in serving the Quality Management System.
7
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
8
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet
9
Iraqi Council of Accreditation for Eng. Education, Program Evaluation Team Worksheet