TER Sample
TER Sample
TER Sample
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
THE REQUIREMENTS
IN THE LICENSURE EXAMINATIONS FOR
PROFESSIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS
SUBMITTED BY:
FEBRUARY 2020
i
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
I hereby submit the Technical Design Analysis Report for the Technical
Engineering Report entitled “Electrical System Design of ABRECO 5
MVA Substation at Pidigan, Abra (Revised)” in compliance with the
requirements of the new electrical engineering law for the application of
Professional Electrical Engineer (PEE).
I hope you will find this Technical Design Analysis Report in order and will
satisfactorily comply with the requirements for the Professional Electrical
Engineer (PEE) Licensure Examination.
Respectfully yours,
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................... 3
3
REPORT INTRODUCTION
4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
5
Figure 2 Layout of Proposed Pidigan Substation
For the purpose of study, the single line diagram of the existing
and proposed distribution system and are shown in Figure 3 and Figure
5.
In order for the readers to appreciate it further, a map based
single line diagram was devised using maps.openrouteservice.org for
the existing and proposed distribution system and are shown in Figure
4 and Figure 6.
6
Figure 3 Existing SLD of ABRECO Distribution System
7
Feeder 5
Feeder 5
Feeder 3
Feeder 5
Feeder 3
Feeder 2
Feeder 4
Feeder 1
Feeder 2
Feeder 4
Feeder 2
Feeder 4
Feeder 2
8
Figure 5 Proposed SLD of Pidigan Substation
9
Feeder 5
Feeder 5
Feeder 5
Feeder 4
5 MVA Pidigan
Substation
Feeder 7 Feeder 1
Feeder 6
Feeder 4
Feeder 4
Feeder 6
10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
11
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
c. The SCC values were calculated. The respective OCPDs were also
evaluated and are capable of interrupting the maximum calculated
fault. Moreover, the safety margin of the OCPDs are above 10%.
12
B. Recommendation
As a result of the evaluation and the summary of results based on the
manual calculations presented in the Technical Engineering Report, the
author has come up with the following recommendations.
13
VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS
The calculated voltage drop for Feeder 6 and Feeder 7 of the Proposed
Pidigan Substation are shown on the Table 1.
Receiving
Line Section Length
Average Voltage
Per Unit
Line %VD 13,200 V
Voltage
From To (meters) Current Sending
Voltage
Tapping
Tpri 500 13.71 0.0135% 0.99986 68,990.66
Pt
Tsec MVSG 15 69.50 0.0104% 0.99990 13,196.84
Feeder 6
MVSG F6 12 38.10 0.0042% 0.99985 13,196.28
F6 F2032 300 38.01 0.0363% 0.99949 13,191.50
F2032 F2033 780 37.93 0.0941% 0.99855 13,179.07
F2033 F2034 1,120 37.80 0.1347% 0.99720 13,161.30
F2034 F2035 960 37.18 0.1136% 0.99607 13,146.31
F2035 F2036 1,010 35.28 0.1134% 0.99493 13,131.35
F2036 F2037 870 33.60 0.0930% 0.99400 13,119.08
F2037 F2038 950 31.87 0.0963% 0.99304 13,106.37
F2038 F2039 980 31.07 0.0969% 0.99207 13,093.58
F2039 F2040 1,210 30.13 0.1160% 0.99091 13,078.28
F2040 F2041 1,285 28.41 0.1161% 0.98975 13,062.95
F2041 F2042 940 26.93 0.0805% 0.98895 13,052.32
F2042 F2043 1,250 26.26 0.1044% 0.98790 13,038.54
F2043 F2044 950 25.15 0.0760% 0.98714 13,028.51
F2044 F2045 1,210 23.84 0.0918% 0.98622 13,016.39
F2045 F2046 1,000 22.58 0.0718% 0.98551 13,006.91
F2046 F2047 1,220 22.01 0.0854% 0.98465 12,995.64
F2047 F2048 930 21.43 0.0634% 0.98402 12,987.27
F2048 F2049 960 20.14 0.0615% 0.98340 12,979.15
F2049 F2050 970 18.94 0.0584% 0.98282 12,971.44
F2050 F2051 1,260 17.77 0.0712% 0.98211 12,962.04
Feeder 7
MVSG F7 12 30.04 0.0042% 0.99985 13,196.28
F7 F2032 300 29.90 0.0285% 0.99957 13,192.52
F2032 F2031 970 29.62 0.0914% 0.99858 13,179.43
F2031 F2030 920 27.95 0.0818% 0.99773 13,168.28
F2030 F2029 950 26.47 0.0800% 0.99640 13,150.74
F2029 F2028 1,270 25.29 0.1022% 0.99505 13,132.82
F2028 F2027 970 24.61 0.0759% 0.99417 13,121.33
F2027 F2026 1,300 24.06 0.0995% 0.99301 13,105.95
F2026 F2025 950 23.76 0.0718% 0.99232 13,096.89
F2025 F2024 1,260 23.59 0.0945% 0.99113 13,081.11
F2024 F2023 1,120 22.66 0.0807% 0.99011 13,067.62
F2023 F2022 965 21.98 0.0675% 0.98908 13,054.04
14
F2022 F2021 950 20.57 0.0622% 0.98832 13,044.11
F2021 F2020 1,280 19.90 0.0810% 0.98709 13,027.84
F2020 F2019 925 18.86 0.0555% 0.98659 13,021.18
F2019 F2018 1,300 18.36 0.0759% 0.98546 13,006.37
F2018 F2017 1,105 16.64 0.0585% 0.98492 12,999.19
F2017 F2016 980 15.96 0.0497% 0.98415 12,989.07
15
UTILITY METERING
(3) SURGE ARRESTERS 54 kV, MCOV 42 kV, 350 kV BIL
INCOMING NGCP 69 kV, 3P,+ GND, 60 Hz
STATION CLASS, OUTDOOR TYPE
150.2 MVA 2LG SC, X/R 4.8 from UTILITY
(3) UTILITY PTs 72,500:115V
ACSR 336.4 22/7, 3/8" OHGW for NEUTRAL IEEE ACCURACY CLASS 0.3 Z, 350 kV BIL
10 A, 200 V
52
(1) SF6 CIRCUIT BREAKER, LIVE TANK
72.5 kV, 2.5 kA, 31.5 KAIC, SF 714%, 350 kV BIL
MVSG FAULT POINT SLG FAULT 2.366 kA (3) SURGE ARRESTERS 10 kV, MCOV 8.4 kV, 110 kV BIL
INDOOR TYPE (1) 15 kV, CU BUS BAR 3-3/16" x 1 1/2" - 480 A, 358 MCM
800 A, 25 kAIC, 110 kV BIL
(3) BCTs, 200:5, 12.5 VA, C200, B-2 (3) BCTs, 200:5, 12.5 VA, C200, B-2
OUTDOOR, 15 kV, 110 kV BIL OUTDOOR, 15 kV, 110 kV BIL
DIGITAL OVERCURRENT
52
MVSG, DRAW OUT, 15 kV, 800 A
16 KAIC, 110 kV BIL
DIGITAL OVERCURRENT
52 MVSG, DRAW OUT, 15 kV, 800 A
16 KAIC, 110 kV BIL
PROTECTIVE RELAY TYPE TESTED, SF 323% PROTECTIVE RELAY TYPE TESTED, SF 323%
FEEDER 6 FEEDER 7
16
SHORT CIRCUIT CALCULATIONS
The three phase fault, line to line fault, single line to ground fault,
and double line to ground fault were tabulated in Table 2. The per unit fault
currents were multiplied with the base current per voltage level to arrive
with the actual fault current
17
F2024 653.66 407.14 814.29 818.94 818.94
F2023 596.81 375.86 751.73 775.20 775.20
F2022 555.14 352.43 704.85 740.94 740.94
F2021 519.38 331.98 663.95 709.94 709.94
F2020 477.85 307.83 615.65 671.89 671.89
F2019 451.72 292.42 584.83 646.75 646.75
F2018 419.46 273.15 546.30 614.33 614.33
F2017 395.43 258.64 517.28 589.15 589.15
F2016 376.30 246.98 493.97 568.43 568.43
Maximum Maximum
Available Available % Safety % Safety
Device Location Symmetrical Peak Margin Margin
Fault Asymmetrical (Interrupting) (Peak)
Current Fault Current
69 kV side
1,228.30
SF6 CB of Pidigan 2,256.70 2465% 3445%
(F1)
Substation
VCB Outgoing
2,364.82
Feeder Feeder 3,916.49 577% 1994%
(F3)
6 Bus
VCB Outgoing
2,364.82
Feeder Feeder 3,916.49 577% 1994%
(F4)
7 Bus
18
Table 4 Impedance SLD with Fault Location
Note:
MVA Base : 100 MVA
Primary Voltage : 69 kV
Secondary Voltage : 13.2 kV
%Z of 5 MVA Power Transformer : 7%
19
Location Legend Designation
Z1puU Positive Sequence Impedance of Utility
Utility
Z2puU Negative Sequence Impedance of Utility
(NGCP)
Z0puU Zero Sequence Impedance of Utility
Z1pu336 Positive Sequence Impedance of 500 m TX line
336.4 AWG
Z2pu336 Negative Sequence Impedance of 500 m TX line
ACSR
Z0pu336 Zero Sequence Impedance of 500 m TX line
Z1puT Positive Sequence Impedance of Transformer
Power
Z2puT Negative Sequence Impedance of Transformer
Transformer
Z0puT Zero Sequence Impedance of Transformer
Z1puMVSG Positive Sequence Impedance of Switchgear
MV
Z2puMVSG Negative Sequence Impedance of Switchgear
Switchgear
Z0puMVSG Zero Sequence Impedance of Switchgear
Z1puF6 Positive Sequence Impedance of Feeder 6
Feeder 6 Z2puF6 Negative Sequence Impedance of Feeder 6
Z0puF6 Zero Sequence Impedance of Feeder 6
Z1puF7 Positive Sequence Impedance of Feeder 7
Feeder 7 Z2puF7 Negative Sequence Impedance of Feeder 7
Z0puF7 Zero Sequence Impedance of Feeder 7
References:
1. IEEE 242
2. UP-NEC, Competency Training and Certification Program in Electric
Power Distribution System Engineering
20
PROTECTION COORDINATION STUDY
After calculating for the TCC and instantaneous settings for the
OCPDs, the values were plotted on a log-log graph and are shown on
Figure 8 and Figure 9.
0.1 0.16 s
30K Minimum Melting
Fuse Cutout 5MVA INRUSH 12X FLA at 0.1s
0.01
10.00 100.00 1,000.00 10,000.00
5 MVA 69-13.2 kV
Delta-Wye Grounded F7 VCB
1 69 kV SF6
25K Clearing
VCB Feeder 7 0.20 s
21
After calculating for the TCC and instantaneous settings for the
protective devices, the values were plotted on a log-log graph and are
shown on Figure 10 and Figure 11.
1 69 kV SF6
1 69 kV SF6
25K Clearing
VCB Feeder 7
0.18 s
0.01
10.00 100.00 1,000.00 10,000.00
22
Table 5 Protection Coordination Table
Relay CT Device
Count Location Setting Value
ID Ratio Function
ANSI Extremely
Inverse
51
Ipickup = 2.39 A
Time Dial (TD) = 6.82
ANSI Extremely
Inverse
51N
Pidigan Ipickup = 2.39 A
Substation Time Dial (TD) = 3.87
1 PCB 600:5
Primary Side I>disabled
Protection I>>pickup= 39.05 A
50
I>>delay= 0.16 s
I>>>disabled
I>disabled
I>>pickup= 18.47 A
50N
I>>delay= 0.18 s
I>>>disabled
ANSI Extremely
Inverse
51
Ipickup = 1.9 A
Time Dial (TD) = 7
ANSI Extremely
Inverse
51N
Ipickup = 12.48 A
Feeder 6
Time dial (TD) = 2
2 VCBF6 Feeder 200:5
I>disabled
Protection
I>>pickup= 85.91 A
50
I>>delay= 0.14 s
I>>>disabled
I>disabled
I>>pickup= 48.77 A
50N
I>>delay= 0.14 s
I>>>disabled
ANSI Extremely
Inverse
51
Ipickup = 1.5 A
Time Dial (TD) = 7
ANSI Extremely
Inverse
51N
Ipickup = 13.57 A
Feeder 7
Time Dial (TD) = 2
3 VCBF7 Feeder 200:5
I>disabled
Protection
I>>pickup= 85 A
50
I>>delay= 0.12 s
I>>>disabled
I>disabled
I>>pickup= 48.77 A
50N
I>>delay= 0.16 s
I>>>disabled
23
On Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, and Figure 11, the graph explains
that the selection of fuse cutouts, OCPDs, and power transformer are
properly coordinated to each other.
The OCPDs will isolate the fault. The thermal and mechanical
damage curves of the 5 MVA Power Transformer are also shown to verify
the limit of the operating area of the equipment.
The magnetizing inrush currents of the 5 MVA Power Transformer
are also shown in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, and Figure 11 to verify
the circuit breakers will not trip during the transformer startup.
Therefore, the system shows that if fault occurs in the
downstream, the first protective device downstream will trip first without
affecting the upstream protective device.
References:
1. IEEE 242
2. UP-NEC, Competency Training and Certification Program in
Electric Power Distribution System Engineering
24
ARC-FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS
Incident Arc-Flash
PPE
Equipment Energy Boundary FR Clothing System
Category
(cal/cm2) (m)
Untreated natural fiber
69 kV 4.84 1.87 1
long-sleeve shirt
FR long-sleeve
13.2 kV
1.35 1.87 0 (minimum arc rating of
Feeder 6
4), worn over
untreated cotton T-
13.2 kV
1.35 1.87 0 shirt with FR pants
Feeder 7 (minimum arc rating of
8)
25
References:
1. IEEE Standard 1584-2018
2. NFPA 70E 2018 Edition
26