The document compares and contrasts key articles from the 1973 and 1987 Philippine Constitutions. It analyzes the preambles, Article I on national territory, Article II on principles and policies, and Article III. For the preambles, it notes the 1973 version is simpler while the 1987 version includes more details. Article I is similar between the versions but the 1987 version modernized some language. Article II in the 1987 Constitution expands on principles and policies by dividing them into 28 sections. Article III shifts its focus from citizenship in 1973 to bill of rights in 1987.
The document compares and contrasts key articles from the 1973 and 1987 Philippine Constitutions. It analyzes the preambles, Article I on national territory, Article II on principles and policies, and Article III. For the preambles, it notes the 1973 version is simpler while the 1987 version includes more details. Article I is similar between the versions but the 1987 version modernized some language. Article II in the 1987 Constitution expands on principles and policies by dividing them into 28 sections. Article III shifts its focus from citizenship in 1973 to bill of rights in 1987.
The document compares and contrasts key articles from the 1973 and 1987 Philippine Constitutions. It analyzes the preambles, Article I on national territory, Article II on principles and policies, and Article III. For the preambles, it notes the 1973 version is simpler while the 1987 version includes more details. Article I is similar between the versions but the 1987 version modernized some language. Article II in the 1987 Constitution expands on principles and policies by dividing them into 28 sections. Article III shifts its focus from citizenship in 1973 to bill of rights in 1987.
The document compares and contrasts key articles from the 1973 and 1987 Philippine Constitutions. It analyzes the preambles, Article I on national territory, Article II on principles and policies, and Article III. For the preambles, it notes the 1973 version is simpler while the 1987 version includes more details. Article I is similar between the versions but the 1987 version modernized some language. Article II in the 1987 Constitution expands on principles and policies by dividing them into 28 sections. Article III shifts its focus from citizenship in 1973 to bill of rights in 1987.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
Name __ NEIL VINCENT V.
BOCO_____________________ Score __________ __
Subject and Section __Readings in Philippine History ___________ Date _July 29, 2020___
Activity: Comparison and Contrast of Philippine Constitution
To compare is to tell how two or more things are alike. To contrast is to tell how two or more things are different. Clue words such as like or as show comparisons. Clue words such as but or unlike show contrasts. Often authors don’t use clue words. Readers must make comparisons for themselves. Use this chart to compare and contrast the 1973 and 1987 Philippine Constitution.
1. Compare and contrast the PREAMBLES.
2. Compare and contrast Article 1.
PREAMBLE COMPARISON 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION It starts with asking the Divine for help and it is In 1973, this Constitution was the same accompanied by what was promoting the Constitution, as it continues to call for help. From constitution and embodying to ensure that the the divine being, and that will follow Stating the states also develop well kind of a legislative legislative examples, it also notes the regime incorporate. promotions, the protection, creation and constitutional form.
PREAMBLE CONTRAST 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION The 1973 Constitution was the earlier edition, it's The Constitution of 1987 is the amended edition easy and it's straight to the point, but it lacked of the Constitution of 1973. This has specific some terms and details since it's the first edition. information for this, and terms and other details have been applied to it. ARTICLE 1 COMPARISON 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION They are in the Article in the Constitution of 1973 The national territory covers the archipelago of Same with Article I of the 1987 Constitution. As the Philippines, including all the islands and the waters of the archipelagos and the islands are waters embraced therein, and all other territories linked between, and whatever its size and length over which the Philippines has sovereignty or measures. The Rivers of the Archipelago Inland jurisdiction, consisting of its coastal, fluvial and waters considered, subject to the right of aerial areas, including its territorial sea, seabed, International boats move innocently. The subsoil, island shelves and other submerged national territory includes the archipelago of the areas. Its inclusion and territorial waters. The Philippines, including all the islands and waters Philippines claimed by historic title, and confirms claimed therein, and all the other territories its argument about the disputed regime of the belonging to the Philippines by historical right or islands. legal designation, including the territorial sea, the seas, the subsoil, the seabed, the insular shelves and the other submarine areas in which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 1 CONTRAST 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION It is still understandable, but its style is more The version has fewer words, or certain words formal and old-like, the earlier version has terms have changed, and are more modernized that produced long sentences. The Constitution compared to the earlier edition. The Constitution of 1973 which constitutes the national territory of 1987 incorporates a revised concept of of the Philippines Archipelago, and all other areas national territory with the deletion of a legal or with historical or legal status belonging to the historical reference to the land claimed. Philippines, or over which the Philippines has control or jurisdiction. ARTICLE 2 COMPARISON 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION Article II of the Constitution of 1973 consists of In this Constitution they are identical with the Statements of values and procedures that split 1973 Constitution but also this Constitution into pieces, and each sections contradict clearly broken down into parts of this concepts of consensus. Is composed of the Constitution State the values and policies of the declaration of principles and state policies. State.
ARTICLE 2 CONTRAST 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION In the earlier version of the Constitution, Article II In the later edition, Article II is divided into 28 is divided into only ten parts which consist of all sections, where those 28 sections were also the nation's principles and state policies. divided into two parts, the first part of which is about the theory, and the second part as state policies. It signifies that it’s a democratic and republican State.
ARTICLE III COMPARISON
1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION The article in the earlier version talks about The later version is exactly the same as the earlier sections on a given land. This speaks of a certain edition, where the article addresses sections on a property which is important in the state. specific property. That this article is required to complete the entire institution. ARTICLE III CONTRAST 1973 CONSTITUTION 1987 CONSTITUTION The earlier version specifies on Citizenship of This describes the Bill of Rights, in the later Article III. edition of Article III. This will be done by the time of what is the being of a human right and it will be done by no rule of religion establishment and other terms set out in this Article.
