FS2 Episode 3 Edited
FS2 Episode 3 Edited
FS2 Episode 3 Edited
Field Study
Experiencing the Teaching- Learning Process
Submitted by:
Roselyn P. Victori
Professional Education Earner
Group A- Second Semester 2017-2018
Submitted to:
Benjamin Bloom cited three (3) domains of knowledge – cognitive, psychomotor and
affective. Kendall and Marzano also gave three (3) groups of learning – information (declarative
knowledge), metacognitive procedures (procedural knowledge) and psychomotor procedures
(motor or physical skills). This Episode will focus on these domains of knowledge and learning.
My Performance Criteria
Concrete examples:
Information:
Mental Procedures- Conducting proofs and figuring the length of the side of a right
triangle
Concrete examples:
Psychomotor – Researching on the level of air pollution in the locality and on the
causes of air pollution
Grade Level: 6 Subject Area: Mathematics School: Sto. Tomas Central Elementary School
Grade Level: 6 Subject Area: Physical Education School: Sto. Tomas Central Elementary School
Grade Level: 10 Subject Area: English School: Taguibo Agricultural Vocational High School
My Analysis
1. Were the lessons focused on information / cognitive domain only or mental procedures only
or psychomotor procedures/ physical skills only? Or were the lessons combinations of two or
three? Explain our answer.
The lessons were combinations of two or three domains. In the three classes that I’ve observed,
the three resource teachers had applied the cognitive domain which is focused on information
such as vocabulary, terms, facts, concepts, principle, hypothesis, theory. Psychomotor which is
about skills and affective which teach students which is more about values and attitudes.
2. Were the lessons focused on cognitive content only or pschomotor content only or affective
content only? Or were the lessons combinations ot two or three? Explain your answer.
The lessons were in combination of two or more domains because it is mandated and based on
the learning competencies provided by the Department of Education for the teachers to be
more effective in teaching.
3. What was the effect on learning when teaching was focused on only one domain?
If teaching is focused only on one domain, for instance, just the cognitive domain, students will
tend to forget all the information since it is not practiced through psychomotor domain and
woul not be motivated since they do not know what is the importance of learning that topic.
4. Is it really possible to teach only in one domain like affective only or cognitive only or
psychomotor only? Or based on Kendall’s and Marrzano’s taxonomy, information only or
mental procedures only or psychomotor procedures only? Explain your answer.
Teaching should be a combination of three. Through cognitive domain learners are introduced
with informations which is essential in mental (thinking) processes. Psychomotor domain on the
other hand plays an important role in linking mental activity with physical movements, skills,
and reactions to environmental stimuli. It develops learners perception or being able to process
sensory information and respond accordingly.
Kendall’s and Marrzano’s knowledge taxonomy and Bloom taxonomy of learning activities does
not contradict with each other. Bloom’s taxonomy is a combination of Kendal’s and Marrzano’s
knowledge taxonomy.
My Reflections
To make my teaching-learning activity more meaningful and more relevant, I will apply
what I had learned from the domains of knowledge and learning activities from Bloom, Kendall, and
Marzano. This would ensure that during class, the learners thinking, emotion/feeling,
physical/kinaesthetic) is enhanced and developed. It is more relevant when I will teach cognitive
domain with the psychomotor and affective domain because it enhance skill development, participation,
and collaboration between all students. It also maximize students’ learning opportunities.
Integrating Theory and Practice
Direction: Read the situation then answer the questions.
Teacher Mila taught the parts of a microscope, demonstrated how to focus it under the low
power objective, then asked 3 students to try to focus it with her guidance as the class looked on.
She asked the class if the 3 students did focus the microscope correctly and ended her lesson citing
the “don’ts” and explaining the “why’s” behind the “don’ts” in focusing the microscope. Before she
did all these, she asked the class if it is/is not important for them to learn how to focus the
microscope.
1. Based on Kendall’s and Marzano’s new taxonomy, in what domains was Teacher Mila’s lesson?
2. Which part of Teacher Mila’s lesson consists of mental procedure (procedural knowledge)?
A. I only C. II only
B. I, II and III D. I and II
3. Based on Bloom’s taxonomy, which part of Teacher Mia’s lesson is in the psychomotor domain?
4. If Teacher Mila’s lesson objective/ intended learning outcome is “to focus the microscope
correctly”, could she have just shown the class how to do it without explaining the parts of the
microscope and their corresponding functions?
a. No
b. Yes, 21st Century students learn skill very fast.
c. Yes, but risky
d. No, it is basic for students to know the function of each part. This guides the students on
how to focus the microscope.
5. If explaining and demonstrating are necessary for Teacher Mila to realize her lesson objective/
intended learning outcome, what does this imply on lesson planning and development for whole
and meaningful learning.
Cognitive
Explains the indicators for fitness.
Affective
Cooperates in the group tasks given.
Psychomotor
Shows a scenario of one of the health-related fitness
components.
Psychomotor procedures
Observation 3