Gattaca

Download as odt, pdf, or txt
Download as odt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Parker Hollingsworth

Dr. Steven Peck


Bio 370
11 October 2010
October 9th

Movie Review: Gattaca

Gattaca, directing by Andrew Niccol is a science fiction movie exploring the role of genetics in

future society. In this future world, each individual's life is based on what his or her genome contains.

Geneticists can even analyze fertilized eggs before birth, and pick the one which will develop into the

most “fit” individual. Gatttaca explores bioethical issues that may surface in the future, as well as some

issues that scientists and doctors face today. The biggest question this movie explores is whether or not

it is ethical to genetically engineer a human being, even if the engineered human being will

theoretically benefit society, more than the non-engineered human being would.

When we analyze this issue, we can see there are valid arguments that it is ethical, and ones

that say it is not . Genetically engineered human beings would be smarter, more athletic, better

communicators, harder workers, and even healthier. This movie specifically explores the issue of

creating healthier individuals. The main character, Vincent is born genetically unaltered, and at birth he

is determined to have a 99% probability of heart problems. His parents decide later to have another

child, but this time have him genetically engineered to be disease free.

According to virtue ethics, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism, genetically engineering

people to prevent them from developing diseases would be ethical. It's inherently good. It's providing

the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Children won't have to suffer the emotional

pain of watching their parents die from heart failure. Companies won't have financial complications

because their keystone-CEO is forced to retire early due to liver cancer. There are a lot of good, ethical

things that can occur because of genetic engineering. There are also a lot of bad, unethical things
waiting just down the slippery slope.

Like this movie portrays, people's futures and life goals could be could be completely

determined by the sequence of amino acids in their DNA. If people were born with inferior genes, they

would be stuck with inferior careers their whole life. According to deontological ethics, this would be

very unethical. Individuals would be sacrificed, and used as the means of having a more successful

society. Society as a whole would benefit, but many individuals would suffer. This situation would be

analogous to medieval Europe , or 19th century America. Instead of racism, or discrimination based on

the caste system, there would be a “geneticism”--where people are discriminated against because of

their genetic makeup. The movie references this issue. In this future society it is technically illegal to

discriminate on the basis of genes, but it is a law that no one realistically abides by.

In conclusion, the way people use genetics in this futuristic society is unethical. By analyzing

this situation through a deontological perspective we can see how the good of an individual would be

sacrificed for the whole. People would not be treated as ends in themselves, therefor violating the

deontological groundwork. People are instilled with an unalienable right of the pursuit of happiness.

The characters in Gattaca violated this right through extreme discrimination. People should not be

characterized as inferior on the basis of race, ethnicity, and especially their genome. These are

characteristics of ourselves we cannot control or change. Every individual should be given a chance to

achieve their lifelong goals and dreams; success occurs when people achieve their goals. Inflicting a

human being with the curse of never being successful is unethical.

You might also like