Masters in Public Administration Viva Defense Compliance Report

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

MASTERS IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION VIVA DEFENSE COMPLIANCE REPORT

To Chairperson Proposal Defense

DR. KARIM SSESANGA

Thru: Supervisors

1. DR. LAZARUS NABAHO


2. DR. ALFRED WAMURUBU

From Participant

NAMAYANJA MARY CAROLINE 18/MPA/KLA/WKD/0021

Date: 17th September, 2021

OBSERVATIONS OF THE CORRECTIONS MADE SUPERVISOR’S


PANEL INDICATING THE PAGES COMMENT
1 The historical, theoretical, some light on how
conceptual and contextual transformational leadership
perspectives are written well, and manifests itself in Kiruddu
clear to the reader. Nonetheless, I Hospital which is the study
suggest that in the historical setting was included
perspective the candidate should
throw some light on how
transformational leadership
manifests itself in Kiruddu Hospital
which is the study setting
2 The candidate should capture the Population and conclusions
population and conclusions which were included in abstract
are missing in the abstract.
3 The candidate should cite sources to sources were cited to support
support claims made claims made
4 Some in-text references are not All in-text references were
reflected on the reference page reflected on the reference page
5 In the contextual background of the The contextual background was
study. The researcher is just re-visited
discussing the background of the
hospital. What about what is
happening at the hospital in relation
to the variables of the study
6 The statement is not stated clearly Problem statement was re-
and the gap is not established visited
7 The literature review doesn’t spell The literature review was
out clearly the gap to be filled by the revisited to spell out clearly the
study gap to be filled by the study
8 The dependable variable is ignored The dependable variable
in literature review included in literature review
9 The candidate should justify much Fraenkel & Wallen (2009) was
more clearly in scholarly manner the sued to justify purposive
choice of purposive sampling sampling in scholarly manner
technique and how convenience
sampling was effected
10 section for ethical consideration Ethical consideration was re-
should be re written because it has written to remove gaps
gaps
11 Why adapt a cross sectional design Descriptive cross-sectional
when the researcher is examining design was the right design to
the relationship between variables be used and hence corrected
12 Use formula to calculate the sample Morgan and Krejcie Table 1970
size (see appendix V) was used
calculate the sample size
13 The analysis lacks research voice Research voice to give
give implications of your findings implications your findings was
included
14 The candidate should-spell out very The hypothesis was spelt out
clearly the hypothesis that has been very Clearly
accepted or rejected for the good
leader
15 The chapter five is inadequately The chapter five was re-visited
cited and many of the in- text and adequately cited and many
references are missing on the of the in- text references
reference page included on the reference page

You might also like