The Mundell-Fleming Model
The Mundell-Fleming Model
The Mundell-Fleming Model
net/publication/319743870
CITATIONS READS
0 6,232
1 author:
Peijie Wang
University of Plymouth
174 PUBLICATIONS 787 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Peijie Wang on 03 May 2018.
The Mundell-Fleming model works with the assumption that prices are fixed. This
means that the aggregate supply curve is flat (horizontal in the extreme) and in-
come is determined by the aggregate demand only. Therefore, analysis in this
chapter is in the IS-LM framework, extended to incorporate the external sector –
the balance of payments, to become IS–LM–BP analysis, as studied in Section 5.2
of the previous chapter. The model has been originated in a series of papers and
collections by Mundell (1960, 1961, 1962, 1963 and 1964) and Fleming (1962 and
1971). The background, history and development of the Mundell-Fleming model
can be found in Mundell (2001) and Obstfeld (2001), which the interested reader
may refer to.
This chapter examines the effects of monetary policy and fiscal policy under
various assumptions on exchange rate regimes and capital mobility in the IS-LM-
BP framework. Specifically, we analyse and discuss the effects and effectiveness
of monetary policy and fiscal policy under the following scenarios: perfect capital
mobility or small open economy (SOE) with flexible exchange rates and fixed ex-
change rates respectively; and imperfect capital mobility or non-SOE with flexible
exchange rates and fixed exchange rates respectively. Under each of the scenarios
the effects of monetary policy changes and fiscal policy changes are considered
respectively, so there are eight sets of individual cases. Finally we compare the
outcomes and comment on the use of one policy against the other under certain
circumstances.
Under perfect capital mobility (PCM), the domestic interest rate, after enduring a
shock such as a monetary/fiscal expansion/contraction, returns to its original level
eventually. In the SOE case, the original level of the interest rate is the world rate
of interest. We know from the standard closed economy IS-LM analysis that a
change in monetary policy shifts the LM curve while a change in fiscal policy
shifts the IS curve. In an open economy, one policy change may shift both LM and
IS curves. For example and under a flexible exchange rate regime, a monetary ex-
104 6 The Mundell-Fleming Model
pansion has direct effect on the LM curve and shifts the LM curve towards the
right initially; then the resulted increase in the exchange rate (depreciation) has the
consequence of moving the IS curve to the right as well, a phenomenon similar to
the effect of a fiscal expansion. Likewise and under a fixed exchange rate regime,
a fiscal expansion has direct effect on the IS curve and shifts the curve towards the
right initially. However, since the exchange rate is fixed, the deterioration in the
current account may not be exactly offset by the amount of capital inflows, lead-
ing to an adjustment or change in official reserves and money supply. This conse-
quently changes the LM curve position. From such preliminary reasoning, we be-
come aware that, in an open economy, the economy may benefit from the
implementation of a policy in more areas and to a larger extent than in a closed
economy. The opposite is also true and the economy can be put in a state of com-
plete mess.
(1). Monetary expansion: the LM curve in the i-Y plane shifts from
M to M 'M .
JY Mi JY M i
P P
1
Slightly different from the analysis in Chapter 5, we use the nominal exchange rate S in
this chapter in place of the real exchange rate Q, so the Q-Y plane become the S-Y plane.