Engineers Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical: Hydraulic Transport of Solid Material in Pipes
Engineers Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical: Hydraulic Transport of Solid Material in Pipes
Engineers
http://pme.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://pme.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://pme.sagepub.com/content/169/1/563.refs.html
What is This?
INTRODUCTION Notation.
For many years the hydraulic transport of solids in pipes has C Concentration by true volume in the mixture delivered.
been successfully applied in a few specialized fields such as CD Drag coefficient.
dredging, land reclamation, and the winning of some minerals. D Diameter of pipe.
One important installation is that at Copper Cliff, Ontario, d Solid particle diameter.
where 4 million tons a year of tailings are transported by pipeline
Ordinary water friction coefficient in hf = f jj, g
L 02
over a distance of 73 miles. Another pipeline 53 miles long is f
being used to transport 1 million tons a year of fine coal to a z Hydraulic gradient along pipe carrying solids, ft. of water
power station at Carling in France. This pipe is 15 inches in head per ft. of pipe.
diameter and is fed by five 400-h.p. centrifugal pumps. Even for Hydraulic gradient along pipe with water alone at same
comparatively short distances, however, the power requirements speed.
are large, especially when big solids are to be moved: as an 4 Volumetric concentration in pipe.
example, in the construction of the Beauharnois Power Canal S Specific gravity of solid particles referred to the density
in Canada one 1,500-h.p., %inch pump was used to deliver of water.
120 tons per hr. of rock crushed to 5 inches, through 2,000 Nominal velocity in pipe, ft. per sec.
feet. Net velocity of solid particles, ft. per sec.
Existing installations for hydraulic transport utilize special Free falling velocity of solid particles, ft. per sec.
centrifugal pumps whose impellers are capable of passing the Real speed of water in vertical flow.
largest pieces likely to occur in the mixture. Sometimes the , I
Density of solid particles.
solids and water in the desired proportions are fed to a hopper yL Densky of liquid.
connected to the suction branch of the pump. The pump then
delivers the mixture into the pipeline at a pressure sufficient to
TJ
?;# Overall efficiencjr of pbmp.
--
Overall efficiencv of hvdraulic liftinz svstems.
overcome the friction resistance and any static head. Where the
solids are to be recovered, screening or other separating plant is
used at the delivery of the pipeline. In suction dredging, prior E X P E R I M E N T A L TEST P L A N T S
mixing before the pump is not possible and it is necessary to rely Several experimental installations have been used to study the
on the skill of the operator to keep the suction mouth-piece close flow of mixtures in pipes. In the 3-inch pipe system, the mixture
enough to the river bed to entrain a large quantity of material was kept in suspension by agitation in a 700-gallon storage tank.
without starving the pump of water. A centrifugal pump, driven by a 25-h.p. variable-speed motor,
There is considerable interest today in the possibilities of was fed from this tank and the mixture delivered along the test
hydraulic transport in other fields, such as the moving of coal pipeline and returned to the storage tank. For flow measurement
in bulk. Earth- and debris-moving plants are often required on the delivery was diverted into a weighing tank. Part of this
temporary sites and the simplicity of hydraulic transport is then installation is shown in Fig. 1, Plate 1. With this test plant the
the major factor in determining its widespread use. For per- secondary methods of measuring flow and concentration, used in
manent installations, however, such as the feeding of coal to a a later 6-inch pipe system, were tested.
power station, reliability and economic factors are relatively In the laboratory, it is advantageous to be able to work with
more important. For this reason more precise knowledge of the high concentrationsof solids and at low velocities in the unstable-
mechanism of the flow in pipes is needed so that reliable flow region. It has been found that experimental systems are
estimates can be made of the power consumption and the size much more stable when a feeder is used to introduce the solids
and cost of the plant required for major projects. Large-scale into the pipeline after the water has been pumped up to pressure
laboratory and plant studies are now in progress to provide the separately. With such an arrangement it is easy to deliver, at
basic information on plant operation and the design of new low speeds, mixtures of coal and water at concentrations up to
machinery. 35 per cent by true volume through pipe systems similar to that
shown in Fig. lb, Plate 1.
The MS. of this paper was received at the Institution on 15th A small installation using 13-inch transparent pipe has been
October 1954. For a report of the meeting in London, on 25th March very useful. In this plant the solids are injected by the original
1955, at which this paper was presented, see p. 586.
1* Deputy Director of Research, British Hydromechanics Research I t iWhen
n c h reciprocating feeder made in 1952.
the flow of mixtures in pipelines is being studied the
Association, Harfow, Essex.
t Research Engineer, British Hydromechanics Research Association, diaculties of measurement are considerably greater than with
Harlow, Essex. water alone. Besides the flow rate, there is also the concentration
a
w
0.10
0.09
0-08
0.07
+-
:ONCENTRATION--
TRUE VOLUME,
Fig. 4. Curve of fi-iw)/c Plotted Against Velocity
$-inch coal flowing with water in a 3-inch pipe; the excess pressure
drop is proportional to concentration.
1.0 2-0 I
z1 /ns
13
;
14
I
15
116
density of the particle. For spheres it is easy to calculate the
settling velocity by equating the fluid drag to its submerged
VELOCITY-FT. PER SEC.
weight :
Q For flow in horizontal pipe.
046
0.14
where the drag coefficient cDis a known function of the Reynolds
number vsd/v.Graphs showing this function have been published
w
g 0.12 frequently, for example, by Durand and Condolios (1952) and
Worster (1952).
!
d
i
0.10 When the particles are not spherical but of irregular shape
Y their settling velocity is reduced, sometimes greatly. Particles of
a.
&
0.08 ordinary irregularity such as gravel or coal have a settling velocity
3
UJ
0.06
of about a half or a third that of a sphere of the same ‘sieve size’.
The presence of a pipe wall diminishes the settling velocity
c’ 0.04
Y
below that of a freely falling particle. A single particle falling in
a pipe three times its diameter has its settling velocity halved.
0.02 However, this effect does not seem to be present with swarms
of particles falling: tests on the effect of concentration on the
0 settling velocity of large particles indicate a linear reduction in
0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011
VELOCITY-FT. PER SEC.
settling velocity with increasing concentration: at 30 per cent
concentration by volume the settling velocity has fallen to about
b For flow in vertical pipe. 0.6 or 0.7 of the free falling velocity of single particles. This
reduction is greater with finer solids.
Fig. 9. System Characteristics In most instances the settling velocity of solids in water is
small, as may be seen in Table 2.
The maximum size of solids that can be passed through a pipe
is not easy to fix. At low concentrations and high velocities single
lumps almost as big as the pipe will even pass safely around pipe
bends. It seems that the essential requirement at moderate speeds
is that the sliding bed of solids should leave sufficient free space Screen Free fall, ft. per sec. Settling velocity at
above it for the largest particles to turn over freely. Clearly, size, 30 per cent concentration,
inches ft. per sec.
therefore, the maximum size of solids being transported depends,
at these speeds, on the concentration in the pipe. For instance,
in a 6-inch horizontal pipe a rather low speed for handling coal
1 Gravel 1 Coal I Gravel I ~
Coal
is about 5 ft. per sec. At this speed the concentration present in
the pipe is about 28 per cent when the delivered concentration
is 20 per cent. Since the voids of a closely packed bed of coal are
about 50 per cent, the coal bed occupies a depth of slightly more
than half the pipe diameter, leaving only 3 inches of clear space
above it. In this case the maximum safe size of coal would be
about 2 inches. At higher concentrations or lower speeds this As may be seen from Fig. 7 a a mean velocity of double the
would be reduced. The rule that the maximum size of solids is settling velocity would be quite adequate for transport up a
limited to one-third of the pipe diameter is only applicable at vertical pipe, that is, 3 ft. per sec. for 3-inch coal. But if a coal-
moderate concentrations if the speeds are low. raising system is made of the same pipe throughout then the
The speeds that correspond to the minimum in the friction velocities must be determined from the requirements of any
curves increase as the square root of pipe diameter and of the horizontal or sloping sections in the pipeline. These velocities
density under water (s-I). Approximate values are given in will always be large in comparison with those sufficient for safe
Table 1 for reasonable concentrations of 20 or 25 per cent of vertical lifting, but it hardlv seems worth increasinp: the size of
-
I
4.5
3,7
2.8
1.3
0.8
b
Fig. 1. Experimental 3-inch Pipe System at the British Hydromechanics Research Association (B.H.R.A.)
[I.Mech.E., 19551
Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at University of Leeds on August 19, 2014
Plate 2 HYDRAULIC TRANSPORT OF SOLID MATERIAL I N PIPES
Fig. 18. Part of Ring Pipe Used for Measuring Coal Degradation Fig. 20. Wear on the 8-inch Hammersmith Coal Pipeline
Wall thicknesses of 0.25 inch and 0.15 inch at top and bottom
respectively.
SCREEN
SURFACE
PLANT CIRCULATING PUMP
w
SUMP
i
PRESSURE VESSELS
RETURN
WATER
DISCHARGE VESSEL
1 , WATER DISPLACED
B Y COAL
:
i:l
ANNULAR
PIT
BOTTOM
[I.Mech.E., 19551
SECONDARY
Fig. 15. Disk Feeder
WATER FLOW
f
I 7
1,000- 500
500
400
400
0 - 0 0
4 6 8 10 I2 14 16 4 6 8 10 I2 14 16 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
VELOCITY-FT. PER SEC. VELOCITY-FT. PER SEC. VELOCITY-FT. PER SEC.
a Pressure drop plotted against b Horsepower per mile plotted c Coal delivery plotted against
velocity. against velocity. velocity.
Fig. 21. Performance of a 12-inch Pipeline Transporting Coal
Discussion
Mr. G. A. WAUCHOPE (Member), in opening the discussion, said per hr. of mixture containing 50 tons of coal. The system had
that he had followed the matter of the transportation of solids been driven by a 110-h.p. motor, and the scheme had worked
with very great interest for a number of years. As the authors more or less satisfactorily for some time. It had been a very
had said, it was not a new subjecr. It was a very old one. I n large plant for the capacity in the light of the latest information.
saying that it was more than half a century old, he thought the Since that time until about 1951, as far as he was aware,
authors were underestimating its age : it was probably much practically no interest had been taken in the subject. Then,
older than that. He believed that suction dredgers had been used simultaneously, attention began to be given to it in the United
for at least seventy-five years. States, France, and Great Britain.
Suction-dredging in the past-probably what was being Coal pumping, which had been dormant, was not the only
discussed was more akin to that than any other form of the type of transportation of solids which had been used. In the
hydraulic movement of solids-had been used as a tool by the meantime, developments in ash-handling had involved a con-
civil engineer. The most important concerns had been its siderable amount of pumping of solids.
availability, the ease in getting it to the job, and its ease of use In the period 1951-52 thought began to be given to it; and
on the job. the Americans, the French, and the British had got to work;
In the past there had not been a great effort to examine care- and the authors had played a leading part in obtaining a much
fully what happened in the pump which was used in suction more exact knowledge about what happened in the pipeline
dredging, or in the pipe. It had been found satisfactory to be than had ever been known previously. What the authors were
able to move a certain quantity of material in the simplest way doing was finding out what were the correct velocities, the
possible. correct concentrations, and the correct sizes of pipe to deal most
As the authors had mentioned, nearly forty years previously- economically with transportation problems.
perhaps, rather more than that-Mr. C. C. Bell, electrical It was vital to have that information because with a pipeline
engineer to the Hammersmith Council, had been farseeing of a certain size it was most important to keep the concentration
enough to install a coal-pumping system to pump coal from the as constant as possible. I n dredging, and in suction-dredging in
wharf by the Thames to the power station. It might be of interest particular, it was extremely difficult to control the rate of con-
if he were to add one or two details to those in the paper. The centration or, rather, to control the concentrations so that the
length of the pipeline had been, he believed, 2,035 feet, and the rate of flow of solids was constant. Therefore, everything had to
pipe had been 8 inches in diameter. Two gravel pumps connected be done on a liberal scale. For example, it would perhaps be un-
in series had been employed, being supposed to pump 60,000 gal. reasonable to take as a base a higher percentage of concentration
used for ash. The size of the pipe and the width of the impeller and heating for many years to come. It would be a great achieve-
at its narrowest part would be observed. If larger solids were ment if hydraulic transportation of coal were to give to the
to be passed, it would be necessary to increase that width, and community the benefits of increased availability and reduced
in so doing the efficiency of the pump would be reduced. That costs, and, even more important, if it minimized the grave danger
was one of the reasons why that type of pump would not neces- to health of the presence of coal dust in mines and made the
sarily be very efficient for large solids. The normal maximum winning of coal a more congenial occupation.
head was about 200 feet, so that for high heads it was necessary
to put a number in series, which presented a special design Mr. L. E. PROSSER, B.Sc. (Eng.) ( M e m b e r ) , said that he wished
problem. to emphasize some of the broader economic implications of the
On the question of feeders, it was possible that many more work of the authors.
devices would be invented before the correct solution was
reached, and many more systems might be adopted. What he * WAUCHOPE,
G . A. 1953 Colliery Engineering, p. 415, ‘Moving Coal
had in mind in that connexion was a possible combination of a by Pipeline’.
L
0I 0.5 0.2l 0.1
MIPI.
-
0.05 0.02 U 0.01 ,s U
MIC~ONS
2,
He would be interested to know what effect the presence in
the mixture of sulphur, pyrites, and clay would haveinregard
to corrosion, erosion, and blockages.
SIZE OF GRAIN If coal slurry was allowed to stand in a pipe for a considerable
period, he asked whether the pipe could be easily cleared and
Fig. 23. Granulometric Analysis Before Tests of Fly Ash what would be the effect of gas release from the coal.
from Portobelb Power Station Used in Investigation On p. 568, reference had been made to the pumping system at
Carling. That system included specially designed quick-closing
valves immediately after the pump discharge, to resist reverse-
Curve 1 Mean sample taken from wave effects in the event of a sudden shut-down of the plant.
A Drum No. 21 He asked whether the authors considered that the expense and
B Drums Nos. 20,23, and 26 inclusion of such equipment was absolutely necessary.
C All sixteen drums The authors had referred on p. 571 to a method of concentra-
D Drum No. 19* tion measurement by gamma-ray absorption. He had reason to
6 -
Ld
e Hydraulic transport from pit bottom. f Hydraulic transport from coal face.
Communications
Mr. N. BROOK(Leeds) wrote, in reference to the section on and if the actual concentration in the region of the meter were
Measurements, that it was a relief to note that the authors did known, that correction would bring the coefficient of discharge
not claim an accuracy of greater than f 10 per cent. The details nearer to 0-975. If the discrepancy between the coefficient for
of tests with a venturi-type nozzle were interesting and the use the meter when transporting solids and when passing clean water
of mixture density in calculating the discharge was especially so. could be accounted for in that way, the results would confirm the
Experiments were being carried out in the Mining Depart- tests carried out in France, referred to in the paper, in which the
ment of the University of Leeds, using a non-standard Venturi meter (an eccentric nozzle) was horizontal and the differential
of diameter ratio 0.85 for measurement of upward vertical flow pressure was expressed in feet of water.
in a %inch pipe and the limited number of test results so far There was a great need for a simple and reliable method of
available showed that, when pumping crushed bakelite of a size concentration measurement.
range of -&+ inch, the coefficient of discharge of 0.975f0.2 per Experience with the vertical-flow method of concentration
cent was modified to 0.90f0.75 per cent when the meter measurement described ia the paper showed that that method
differential was expressed in feet of water; if the differential was was difficult to apply in small-scale testing. The vertical height
calculated in feet of mixture, the coefficient was then 0.926 *0.69 of pipe used had to be greatly shortened (down to 1 foot for a
per cent. The results of that modification to the readings were 2-inch diameter pipe, compared with the 10-20 feet mentioaed
not 2s encouraging as had been the experience of the authors. in the paper) in order that the frictional pressure loss due to
Another method had been used to attempt to account for the clear water could be compensated by a reasonable amount of
difference in discharge coefficient; in that method a term, contraction, i.e. a contraction which would allow solids to pass
corresponding to the excess pressure difference due to the 2nd not cause blockage. It followed that a sensitive manometer
mixture density, was subtracted from the meter differential was necessary to measure the small pressure difference on rhe
head ;that term was calculated from the vertical height between 1 foot of pipe; owing PO the presence of solids and to the COE-
the pressure tappings and the delivered concentration. That siderable fluctuation in manometer levels which occurred no
modified the coefficient of discharge to 0.929f0.44 per cent; great accuracy could be secured.
s-. 3
I
0.5
0
0 0.050 0400 0.150
yxP) 2m
1 1 I I
1 I 1 :%1
0 10-15 104 (smooth’, 2.25 0.0150
2-30-5.25 104 (rough) ‘ 2.25 0-0187
150 (smooth) 0.0156
x
0 i::: 150 (rough) 0.0183
8
2, /
HI’GH -
PRESSURE INLET
LU6Rl?ATlNG
WATER INLET
Authors’ Reply
Mr. R. C. WORSTER and Dr. D. F. DENNYwrote, in reply to of reliable theories on the flow mechanics of mixtures. It was the
the discussion and communications, that the contributions had absence of such a theory that made it impossible to standardize
considerably extended the scope of the paper and shown the one method of presenting test data as suggested by Mr. Smith.
wide interest taken in the pumping of solid materials. The restricted nature of knowledge of the subject was well
Brigadier Bagnold had put forward a number of important illustrated by the case of pneumatic conveying of dry cement
views cn the flow mechanics of solid particles in water. The referred to by Mr. Smith: if the air speed in his pipeline was
constancy of the ratio of shear stress to normal stress proposed about 50 ft. per sec., transverse turbulent velocities would be
by him was verified, at least qualitatively, by the results shown about 3 ft. per sec. Since the free falling velocity of the particles
in Figs. 33 and 34. The first graph showed measured values of was probably of the same order as, and their size so much smaller
than, that of the turbulent eddies, an appreciable part of their
weight would be carried by air turbulence. Fig. 5 referred only
to the type of mixture flow where the whole weight of the
particles bore on the bottom of the pipe. That aspect had been
dealt with in some detail by Bagnold (1955)*.
The suggestion that the energy dissipated in turbulence by
the falling component of the particle motion was simply additive
to the energy dissipated in fluid motion alone was not acceptable
to them, and experiments in the related field of open-channel
transport of solid particles in a turbulent bed showed that
the presence of the particles could greatly reduce the fluid
turbulence components (Vanoni 1946)t.
Mr. Durand and Mr. Condolios had pointed out that the type
of correlation given in Fig. 5 differed from theirs (Durand and
Condolios 1952), and had then proceeded to compare the test
data on the flow of coal mixtures given in Fig. 3 with their
Fig. 33. Variation of the Concentration Actually Present correlation (Fig. 28). The resulting discrepancy was one of the
in the Pipe very reasons why they (the authors) preferred to show :heir
+-inch coal; 3-inch brass pipe. results as in Fig. 5. The two correlations were in fact identical
Delivered concentration, so long as the hydraulic friction coefficientf remained constant.
per cent Mr. Durand (Durand and Condolios 1952) had shown that the
+ 13-17 mean curve in his correlation was represented by
e 18-22
0 23-21