Journal of Cleaner Production: Leiming Wang, Shenghua Yin, Aixiang Wu

Journal of Cleaner Production 279 (2021) 123705
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Cleaner Production

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro
Review
Ore agglomeration behavior and its key controlling factors in heap

leaching of low-grade copper minerals
Leiming Wang a, b, Shenghua Yin a, b, *, Aixiang Wu b
a
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education of China for High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines, University of Science and Technology Beijing,
Beijing, 100083, China
b
School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The particle segregation, stratification, excessive feed size of non-agglomerated heaps chronically leads
Received 28 November 2019 to poor heap permeability and leaching efficiency. Thus, owing to well-developed dual pore structure,
Received in revised form desirable liquid retention and better leachability, the ore agglomeration has been widely utilized to
28 July 2020
recover copper metals from copper sulfides and oxides. To better understand the effect of agglomerations
Accepted 9 August 2020
Available online 23 August 2020
behavior on leaching reactions and promote its operating condition, the typical findings of industrial
cases, controlling factors and leaching mechanisms are critically reviewed in this study. Specifically, this
Handling Editor: Prof. Jiri Jaromir Klemes paper basically discusses three pivotal questions tightly related to the industrial requirements: 1) the
process of efficiently obtaining the well-shaped, leachable ore agglomerations via key factors and pa-
Keywords: rameters; 2) the evaluation of the single agglomeration or agglomerated heaps via quality evaluation and
Ore agglomeration procedure controlling; 3) the effect of ore agglomeration on enhanced leaching behavior via mass
Heap leaching transfer, dual pore structure and flow behavior. Relied on these typical research progress and break-
Copper sulfide throughs, this paper proposed prospect opinions and potential studies that offer a good reference to
Copper oxide
operation of industrial agglomerated heaps.
Enhanced leaching
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Application of industrial agglomeration heaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Key parameters and process controlling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. Agglomeration preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.1. Mineralogy and chemical composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.2. Particle size distribution (PSD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.3. Binders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.4. Device and its setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.5. Curing and additives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2. Quality evaluation of agglomeration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2.1. Direct inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2.2. Wet/dry strength and stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.2.3. Leachability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3. Mass transfer and enhanced leaching mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3.1. Mass transfer enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3.2. Bio/chemical compaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3.3. Pre-treatment methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4. Dual-pore structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
* Corresponding author. Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education of China for High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines, University of Science and Technology
Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (S. Yin).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123705
0959-6526/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2 L. Wang et al. / Journal of Cleaner Production 279 (2021) 123705
3.4.1. Intra-/inter-particle porosity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

3.4.2. Minerals inlay and dual-pore porosity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4.3. Leaching and dual-pores evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.5. Flow behavior and percolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.5.1. Flow paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.5.2. Liquid retention and hysteresis behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.5.3. Heap permeability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.6. Commercial issues and controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4. Conclusion and prospect outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Declaration of competing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. Introduction pollution (Jerez, 2017; Li et al., 2014). It resulted in serious envi-

ronmental pollution and casualties in mines, which did not meet
Copper minerals are the fundamental natural resources that the requirements of cleaner production and sustainable develop-
heavily supported the economic development, which are one of the ment, and required transformation and exploration of suitable
important chips in industrial constructions. According to Henckens copper mining methods (Calvo et al., 2016). As an efficient,
et al. (2019), more than 80% of industrial raw materials and 70% of environmental-friendly and low-cost mining method, the solution
agricultural materials were relied on the mining engineering, mining has been widely utilized in the United States, Canada, China,
especially for copper minerals developments. Thus, the exploration Chile, South Africa and India, therefore, plenty of industrial copper
of strategic metal minerals like chalcopyrite, pyrite and chalcocite is recovery cases are successfully built to process low-grade minerals,
essential issue, which is tightly related to electricity, construction, waste printed circuit boards (PCBs) and tailings (Ilankoon et al.,
military, aerospace and communication around the world (Johnson, 2018). Judging by the differences of ore particle size distribution
2014; Petersen, 2016). (PSD), agglomeration, crushing, irrigation and operation parame-
However, the average grade of copper minerals gradually ters (John, 2011), the solution mining could be basically divided into
decreased after long, excessive mining period. For instance, the in-situ leaching (ISL), dump leaching (DL), heap leaching (HL), vat
data from Intelligence Mine showed that the average grade of leaching (VL) and agglomerated heap leaching (AHL). Table 1 pro-
copper minerals become obviously lower and lower in Bingham posed the key parameters and its common controlling factors in the
Canyon Mine of the United States (Fig. 1). Moreover, unlike energy industrial applications.
minerals (e.g. coal, oil), the copper mineral resources are less In 1970s, to ameliorate the undesirable leaching condition and
endowed that secondary minerals occupy a dominant percentage, obtain better extraction efficiency, the agglomeration and its pro-
which the average copper grade is less than 0.87% in China (Yin cessing controls were firstly mentioned in Nevada of the United
et al., 2018b). Due to the consideration of high-period infrastruc- States (Johnson and Roberto, 1997; Potter, 1981). As Fig. 2 shows,
ture and high crushing costs, it is not an ideal method to recycle the basic operating procedure of agglomerated heap could be
from low-grade copper minerals using the conventional under- described that: 1) the coarse ores were crushed into fine or small
ground or surface mining methods (Chen et al., 2016). particles in the crushers; 2) the chemical binders (e.g. sulfuric acid
Moreover, the traditional and extensive mining process has solution) were mixed with crushed ores, and obtained agglomer-
caused many environmental problems, such as: surface subsidence, ations in the drummer; 3) agglomeration curing period; 4) stacking
underground rock burst, farmland damage, and groundwater and leaching process. Differentiated by the agglomeration device,
the ore agglomeration is commonly divided into the drum
agglomeration (accounted for 69%) and conveyor agglomeration
(31%). The liquid retention of agglomerated heap is much desirable
due to its well-developed intra-particle pores, which obviously
improve the mass transfer and accelerate leaching reaction. Based
on the industrial data, the permeability in the agglomerated heaps
could improve by 10e100 times, the leaching time could shorten by
1/3e1/2 times, the acid consumption could reduce by 20e30%, and
the Cu extraction rate could increase by 10e30%. As a result, ore
agglomeration is thought as one of key strategies in the extraction
of copper oxides, copper sulfides, laterite nickels, and uranium
minerals (Lin et al., 2005; McClelland et al., 1983).
In short, as an effective, innovate methods, ore agglomerations
directly affected the intra-particle pores and liquid retention of
heap, thus, potentially affecting the recovery of valuable metallic
minerals (Bleiwas, 2012; Schaefer and Nirschl, 2010). Similar with
the other technological processing methods, ore agglomeration has
its own suitable operation condition and distinctive advantages
(Petersen, 2017). According to Bouffard (2005), the concept of
“5Ws” (who, what, when, where, and why) was firstly proposed
Fig. 1. Evolution of copper ore mill grade at the Bingham Canyon Mine, USA.
(Fig. 3) to correspondingly describe the basic features of crushed
L. Wang et al. / Journal of Cleaner Production 279 (2021) 123705 3
Table 1
Key parameters and features of typical solution mining.
Type Particle size/mm Crushing Agglomeration Irrigation rate//L$m2 h1 Heap height/m Leaching period/year Leaching extraction/%
ISL þ1000 No / / / Cu: >5 5e50

U: 1e3
DL 1000 þ 30 No No 2e15 8e75 Cu:>10 20e85
Au: 2e6
Hl 100 þ 5 Yes Majority 2e15 2e10 Cu: 1e4 40e97
Ni: 1e5
U: 1e3
Au: 0.1e2
VL 10 þ 0.5 Yes Depended 10e50 1e5 4e30 days 80e97
AHL 1þ0.25 Yes Yes 2e15 1e5 / 70e97
Fig. 2. Scheme of industrial ore heap with agglomeration process.
ore agglomerations. It mainly includes the following five aspects: 2012c). The intra-particle porosity of agglomerated heaps
suitable feed minerals (who), definition & basic procedure (what), obviously improved by eliminating immigration of fine pow-
optimal condition (when), agglomeration equipment and device ders. At the same time, the undesirable flow paths clogging,
(where), and operation advantages (why). particle segregation and particle stratification appeared in
The agglomerated heaps could mainly have three distinctive stacking process were basically avoided (van Staden and
advantages than non-agglomerated heaps, which were tightly Petersen, 2019, 2018; Wang et al., 2020b).
related to pore structure, fluid seepage condition and bio/chemical
reaction efficiency. The details descriptions were expressed as 2) Avoiding the premature formation of preferential flow or un-
follow: desirable flow behavior. Driven by gravity and capillary forces,
the liquid spread randomly in industrial heaps where the un-
1) Ameliorating the dual-pore structure (i.e. inter- and intra- saturated and saturated liquid condition simultaneously co-
particle pore) of unsaturated agglomerated heaps. The pore existed (Fagan et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2007). The well-
network of non-agglomerated ore heaps mainly composed of developed pore structure of agglomeration delayed the un-
inter-particle pores, whereas the intra-particle pores were un- timely formation of preferential flow paths (Fig. 4b). The over-
developed. The ore agglomeration composed of core and porous much immigration or even compaction of fine particle in
shell (Fig. 4a), where fine particles attached on the surface of agglomerated heaps were hard to appear due to desirable
coarse particles. Thus, the potential flow paths were more permeability and developed dual porosity. Thus, the liquid
develop in agglomerated heaps (Chamberlin, 1981; Nosrati et al., diffused and disturbed more uniform in agglomeration heaps.
Fig. 3. 5Ws (who, what, when, where, and why) for crushed ore agglomeration processes.
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of pore structure and flow paths of agglomeration in particle-scale and bed-scale.
3) Enhancing mass transfer and bio/chemical reaction in the solid- 2. Application of industrial agglomeration heaps
liquid interfaces. Under the coupled effect of electrostatic van
der Waals adsorption and chemical reaction cementation, the Commonly, the ore agglomeration is regarded as a pretreatment
adjacent fine particles adhered and formed well-developed method before stacking, which widely utilizes to promote heap
intra-particle pores. These intra-particle pores provided the leaching operation. To better obtain the well-shaped agglomera-
potential paths of liquid spreading, bacteria adsorption and tions, the additional costs including crushing, chemical binders and
leaching reaction, which obviously increase the leaching effi- agglomeration device setups should be carefully considered. In this
ciency (Cross et al., 2006; Van Der Merwe et al., 2004). As a situation, it was more adapted to recovery precious metal resources
result, the performance of liquid retention behavior in such as copper, gold, laterite nickel, uranium and silver minerals,
agglomerated heap was obviously promoted that reflected by a instead of iron minerals. To clearly display some industrial opera-
desirable steady liquid holdup, it accelerated the oxygen, ferric/ tions of agglomerated heaps, Fig. 5 summarized the typical indus-
ferrous ions and heat diffusion (Ahmadlouydarab et al., 2011). trial metal heaps using ore agglomeration methods. The ore
Besides, some additives such as acidic ferric chloride, acidic agglomeration were widely utilized in the industrial agglomerated
cupric chloride, sulfuric acid solution could also be incorporated heaps located in the west coasts of the United States, Canada and
in agglomerated preparation, which could promote the peak Cu Chile (Johnson, 2018). Besides, the ore agglomeration were also
extraction rate (Yin et al., 2020). utilized in the copper oxides or heaps with high-content clay, muds
Fig. 5. Typical heaps of valuable metal using ore agglomeration method.

and powders (Yin et al., 2018a). According to Bouffard (2008), lots 3.1. Agglomeration preparation
of industrial agglomerated heaps of copper minerals were suc-
cessfully built in Zaldívar Copper Mine, Collahuasi Copper Mine, 3.1.1. Mineralogy and chemical composition
Cerro Colorado Copper Mine in Chile, and Nevada heap operation in The mineralogy features include the chemical component,
the United States. mineral composition and rock hardness and so on, which tightly
To better reveal the operation condition of agglomerated heaps, affected the mining and pre-processing methods (Olubambi et al.,
Table 2 summarized the pivotal operation parameters in agglom- 2007). In the agglomeration procedure, the ore mineralogy
erated heaps of copper, gold and silver minerals (Bouffard, 2008; mainly affected chemical binders, additives, crushing size,
Velarde, 2005). As Table 2 showed, the agglomerations were both agglomeration drum parameters and even with/without bacterial
suitable for not only copper oxides but also copper sulfides. The pre-inoculation (Nosrati et al., 2014). In this regard, Quaicoe et al.
chemical binders used in agglomeration procedure were mainly (2014) studied the effect of feed mineralogy on the agglomeration
divided into three types: organic binders (e.g. cellulose), inorganic behavior and heap porosity by controlling the chemical composi-
binders (e.g. stucco, acid-proof) and polymer binders (e.g. poly- tion condition (i.e. clay: kaolinite, Na-exchanged smectite; oxide:
acrylamide). The agglomeration of copper oxides did not need the hematite, quartz). As shown in Fig. 7a, the results indicated that
long-period curing, the lowest required grade of copper oxides and better porosity and mineralogy exposure were obtained under the
sulfides were 1.45% and 1.00%, respectively. The peak Cu extraction intervention of higher mass fraction sulfuric acid solution (40 wt%).
rate of copper sulfide and oxides were both over 70%. Due to the Meanwhile, Shayestehfar et al. (2008) considered the mineralogy
complex mineralogy compositions, the leaching period of copper features of copper oxides agglomerations in Sarcheshmeh Copper
sulfides was longer than 200 days. Mine, Iran. He proposed that the oxyhydroxide gradually formed
and filled the open voids around the quartz grains in acidic leaching
period (Fig. 7b).
3. Key parameters and process controlling According to Walting H.R. (2006), the copper sulfides were well
known as its complexity of mineralogy composition, which
The ore agglomeration was one of complicated industrial simultaneously contained various metal minerals (e.g. chalcocite,
processes affected by the physical, chemical and even biological chalcopyrite, bornite and pyrite). Commonly, the feed raw ores
factors simultaneously (Herna ndez-lo
pez et al., 2011; Urtubia and undergoes multi-step crushing and bonding to obtain well-shaped
Suarez, 2020). Overall, as Fig. 6 showed, the key factors affected structural agglomerations, thus, the ore agglomerations were pro-
agglomeration were basically divided into the following six as- cessed by mechanical and chemical activation duration (Mejdoub
pects: 1) agglomeration preparation (e.g. mineralogy, chemical et al., 2017), it could accelerate to liberate valuable grains
composition, particle size distribution, chemical binders/addi- reserved in raw copper minerals. Besides, the ore agglomeration
tives, agglomerated device and its operation parameters, curing preparation assisted by acidic chloride solution presented a po-
time); 2) agglomeration quality evaluation (e.g. direct visual in- tential method to effectively recover copper sulfides (Wang et al.,
spection, wet/dry strength, leachability, structural stability); 3) 2020c). The acidic ferric chloride solution was uniformly sprayed
dual-pore structure features (e.g. inter-/intra-particle porosity, on ore particles, which promoted the agglomerated behavior and
mineral inlay, pore evolution with minerals dissolution); 4) bio/ bonding efficiency. However, the effect of feed mineralogy libera-
chemical bonding behavior (e.g. mass transfer, bio/chemical tion on the intra-particle porosity and mass diffusion were still not
compaction, pre-treatment media of sulfate chloride solution); 5) well-known (Albijanic et al., 2011).
flow behavior and percolation (e.g. flow paths, liquid retention &
spread, heap permeability); 6) commercial issues and process 3.1.2. Particle size distribution (PSD)
controls (e.g. operation costs, environmental protection issues). The raw feed ores collected from surface/underground mining
The research findings in these aforementioned aspects would be process were crushed into the wide particle size distribution (PSD),
carefully and detailed discussed in the following sections of this which roughly ranged from 30 mm to 0.075 mm (even finer). The
paper. crushing devices were mainly concluded of jaw crusher, cone
Table 2
Key parameters in agglomerated heaps of copper oxides, sulfides, uranium and nickel ores.
Parameter Ore types
Copper oxides Copper sulfides Uranium Nickel ores
Ore grade/% 0.45e1.45 0.8e1.0 150e1000 ppm 0.3e2.5

Processing capillarity/Mtpa 3e56 3e21 1.4e36 0.7e3
Crushed diameter/mm 10e38 10e18 / 25e70
Heap height/m 3e10 4e11 6 4e6
Permeability evaluation good good good poor
Leaching agents H2SO4/NH3 Fe2(SO4)3/H2SO4 H2SO4/Na2CO3 H2SO4
Dosages of leaching agents/kg$t1 8e75 6e18 15e40 >300
Irrigation rite/L$m2$t1 4e15 4e8 5e15 5e10
Binders type / Nalco-Extract ore 9560; cement Polymeric binder (Hi-Tex 82200TM);
Nalco anonic flocculant OPTIMIER 9960; Polyacrylamide OPTIMER AA 182H™
Stucco;
Ployacrylamide
Dosages of binders 2.5e40 1e40 15e60 5e150
Curing time / 24e240 14e336 24e168
Production costs/US$$lb1 1.05 0.90 / /
Investment costs/US$$lb1 30e40 35 26e75 160e350
Leaching time/d 40e180 200e600 40e100 120e250
Leaching rate/% 70e86 70e80 60e80 65e85
Fig. 6. Key parameters and essential controlling issues of ore agglomerations heap.
Fig. 7. The mineralogy liberation and pore features of agglomeration (a) and ore morphology (b).
crusher, roll crusher, high pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) (Ergu and like liquid bridge, the pore structure of ore agglomeration was
Benzer, 2006; Ghorbani et al., 2013). Due to the large spans of PSD, unstable without the assistance of chemical binders. Therefore, to
the proportion between fine and coarse particles was commonly obtain an ideal adhesion and cohesion condition, some key chem-
undesirable (Ghorbani et al., 2011). The PSD of feed materials ical binders, such as stucco, acid-proof cements and Portland
should be artificially controlled instead of randomly used in the cement were added into the agglomeration preparation of indus-
stacking process. However, the feed PSD of copper sulfides was trial heaps (Yin et al., 2020).
coarser, which was different from the high-clay minerals (e.g. Fig. 8 showed the coupled connection of hydraulic, chemical and
laterite nickels, copper oxides). The fine particles (or powders) physical among adjacent ore particles under the assistance of
wrapped around coarse ores under the assistance of binders and chemical binders. The chemical binders effectively bonded adjacent
additives. particles by accelerating the formation of liquid bridges, liquid films
Overall, the PSD of feed materials directly influenced the and solid bridges (Raj Kumar and Malayalamurthi, 2017). The
agglomeration diameter, dual-pore porosity, compressive strength bonding mechanism was firstly mentioned by Rumpf H. (1990) and
and potential fines immigration behavior. The PSD of feed ores Pietsch (2003, 2001) that bonding effects of binders could consist of
could be commonly evaluated by the uneven coefficient Cu and coupled factors, including a) solid bridge, b) adhesion and cohesion
curvature coefficient Cc. According to Yin et al. (2016), a higher forces, c) surface tension and capillary pressure, d) attraction forces
proportion of fine particles actually increased the structural between solids, and e) interlocking bonds. Thus, the fine and coarse
strength of agglomerations, whereas it potentially lead to heap particles was bonded under the natural bonding, physical adhesion
compaction with minerals dissolution attacked by acidic solution. and chemical reaction, even biological film absorption, ultimately
On the contrary, the excessive higher proportion of coarse particles obtaining agglomerations with well-developed porosity, structural
led to the poor bonding and enlargement behavior because of the strength, and desirable leachability. In 2009, Lewandowski and
weaken contacts among coarse particles (Pepin et al., 2000; Kawatra (2009a) systematically summarized chemical binders
Sebastia-Saez et al., 2018). Besides, to better quantitatively under- utilized in agglomerated heaps of copper minerals. Differentiated
stand the effect of PSD on the fine particle immigrations, adhesion, from chemical features, these agglomerated binders were divided
collision and enlargement behavior, the numerical simulations (e.g. into organic binders, inorganic binders and polymer binders.
discrete element method (DEM)) using the mathematical model Table 3 summarized the current industrial/laboratory binders and
(e.g. non-linear spring-dashpot type contact models) were also its key features applied in copper agglomerated heaps.
proposed. The simulation results revealed that desirable reaction Based on the physical/chemical features, the chemical binders
interface gradually exposed in the core enlarging process, resulting had their own merits and potential disadvantages. For instance,
in a higher Cu extraction rate. Besides, the PSD of feed ores affected Kodali et al. (2011) evaluated the effect of stucco binders on ag-
particle deformation and internal core formation (Liu et al., 2000; glomerations of copper oxides and sulfides in Zaldivar Copper Mine
Mishra et al., 2002). (Fig. 9a). The results showed that the intra-particle porous pore
massively formed and surrounded the agglomerated cores under
3.1.3. Binders the effect of stucco hydration reactions. The non-ionic and cationic
Driven by the chemical and physical adsorption forces, the polyacrylamides (Lewandowski and Kawatra, 2009b; Michaels,
adhesion/cohesion phenomenon easily appeared and observed 1954) were also used as agglomerated additives or flocculants
among adjacent coarse and fine particles in agglomerated heaps assisted by hydrogen bonding (Fig. 9b). The results revealed that
(Degodya and Shavakuleva, 2019). Some undesirable adhesion and polyacrylamides could significantly prevent fine particles migra-
cohesion forces could lead to adverse results, including fine particle tion, whereas it was still faced with the potential negative effects on
immigration, heap compaction, preferential flow and lower Cu the environmental pollution. Moreover, based on the studies of
extraction rate, especially in non-agglomerated heaps (Wu et al., Quaicoe et al. (2013), the effect of the initial mass fraction of sulfuric
2009). Owing to weak connections between adjacent particles acid solution (H2SO4) on agglomeration behavior was detected in
Fig. 8. Typical physical and chemical binding mechanism assisted by chemical binders.
Table 3
Chemical binders utilized in agglomerated heaps/experiments of copper minerals.
Type Binder Description of basic features
Organic Lignin Negligible resistance to sulfuric acid solution.

binders Cellulose Negligible resistance to acid solution.
Tall oil pitch It could improve the stability of agglomeration heap, while the long-term behavior was not desirable and still being
discussed in progress
Inorganic Sulfuric acid solution (H2SO4) It was commonly used in the mixture of copper sulfide and oxide minerals, the structural stability of agglomeration in
binders long-period leaching process was needed to be evaluated
Stucco (CaSO4$1/2H2O) It was used to obtain agglomeration using mixture minerals of copper oxides and sulfides, forming the porous layer
attached on the surface of agglomerations
Biometek-WLAG001 It was suitable to leach the mixture of copper oxides (65.79%) and sulfides. The bacteria activity was not influenced
when its concentration was over 4 g L1
Portland cement It played binding effects by forming the crystalized ettringite under the effect of stucco hydration reactions
Polymer Acrylamide/acrylic acid It was commonly regarded as flocculant which could bond fine particles and decreased immigration, whereas
Binders copolymers/polyacrylamide detoxification and potential environmental pollution needed to be further considered
Extract-Ore 9560 It was one type of acrylamide/acrylate polymer and commonly used with cement
PloyDADMAC It was used in mixture of copper oxides and sulfides and not good at the controlling of fine particles/powders
immigrations
Polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) It was used as flocculant and had good agglomerated preference indicated by soaking, saturated leaching and long-term
unsaturated leaching
Waste treatment additive It had a desirable agglomerated behavior, which was indicated by soaking, saturated leaching and long-term
unsaturated leaching
Fig. 9. Chemical binders and its bonding mechanisms. (a) stucco, (b) polyacrylamide, (c) sulfuric acid solution (H2SO4).
the laboratory scale (Fig. 9c). It indicated that the agglomeration potential environmental protects were considered as the key
diameter was tightly related to chemical composition and mass operation parameters of ore agglomeration.
fraction of binders. Therefore, whether the type of agglomeration
binders was, it played roles like “contacting bridge” existed in
adjacent particles to enhance the mutual absorption until these 3.1.4. Device and its setup
particles attached or bonded each other (Huang et al., 2019). The agglomeration devices and its parameter setup were deci-
Wherein, the binder type, mass fraction, operation costs and sive factors affected the agglomeration quality and economic costs.
As shown in Fig. 10, differentiated from agglomerated device, the
Fig. 10. Current industrial agglomeration device and its compositions. (a) drum agglomeration, (b) conveyor/belt agglomeration; (c) disc/pan agglomeration.
industrial agglomerations divided into three types: drum agglom- result. The curing period, environmental temperature, additives in
eration (Fig. 10a), conveyor/belt agglomeration (Fig. 10b), and disc/ curing process should be emphatically considered in industrial
pan agglomeration (Fig. 10c). The structure and composition of cases. For instance, the hydration reaction occurred and improve
these agglomeration devices were simplified into four key systems: agglomeration strength under the assistance of stucco binders. Lu
driving operation systems (i.e. electric motor), agglomerating body et al. (2017) investigated the minerals dissolution in the acid
system (i.e. drum, conveyor/belt, or disc/pan), additives system (e.g. curing period, the results revealed that copper oxides could be
stucco and cement) and materials transporting systems (i.e. input dissolved in the acidic condition. It led to the enrichment of Cu2þ,
of feed particles and output of wetted agglomeration products). The Fe3þ and Fe2þ in the acidic leaching media and eventually obtained
data showed that the drum agglomeration occupied nearly 70% of squez-ye
a desirable Cu extraction rate (Fig. 11a). Further, Vela venes
the total industrial utilization, which regarded as was the most et al. (2018) focused on the copper-bearing sulfide minerals con-
commonly used device. sisted of chalcopyrite (89.3 wt%) and chalcocite (7.2 wt%), he found
In term of ore agglomeration drum, the rolling speed (rpm), that the longer curing period assisted by high-concentration chlo-
rolling angle ( ), drum sizes (length/diameter, L/D) and running ride solution could shorten the leaching period and decreased the
period (mins) were commonly defined as important detected pa- irrigation requirements of industrial cases (Fig. 11b). Relied on
rameters. Nosrati et al. (2012a) developed a novel lab-scale these previous studies, the desirable curing condition could be
agglomeration drum and emphatically discussed the potential ef- described that: longer curing time, 20 ± 5 C environmental tem-
fects of process variables (e.g. drum rolling speed, running period) perature and enough additive media (6 wt% or higher). Of course,
on agglomeration behavior. The results showed that the size of the parameter setup of curing condition in industrial cases syn-
shaped agglomeration was sensitive to drum speed if the running thetically affected by the chemical composition, feed mineralogy,
period was over 8 min. According to Miller (2009), the effect of thus it should be evaluated by not only agglomeration quality but
drum size, curing time, outflow heights, clay density and additive also the industrial operation costs.
position, eventually proposing the referred mathematical model to
select operation parameters of industrial agglomerated drums. 3.2. Quality evaluation of agglomeration
During the collisions and attachments of wetted fine particles, the
structure design including scraper, keels and additive dippers of 3.2.1. Direct inspection
agglomerated drums also should be considered, which heavily To quantitatively define the bonding, leaching and also breakage
affected the diameter enlargement of ore agglomerations. behavior of agglomeration, the quality evaluation of ore agglom-
erations could divide into direct inspection, wet/dry strength and
3.1.5. Curing and additives leachability (Luo et al., 2017). Above all, the first step was to make
The wetted shaped agglomerations were obtained in the output sure whether the well-shaped agglomeration particles could be
of agglomeration drums, whereas these wetted particles were not obtained. The direct inspection was immediateness evaluation by
suitable to be directly piled in ore heaps due to a lower structural means of visual observation: 1) whether the well-shaped agglom-
strength of agglomerations. To further optimize this condition, the eration can be efficiently obtained under the different agglomera-
curing period and suitable additives (e.g. deionized water) was tion conditions; 2) what’s the morphological characteristic of ore
applied after agglomeration drum procedure (McClelland, 1986). agglomeration surface; and 3) how’s the bonding behavior of
During the curing process, the chemical binders reacted with adjacent shaped agglomerations. The previous studies revealed
ores and eventually the reaction products bonded ore particles as a that the agglomerated bonding was poor and hard to obtained
Fig. 11. Chemical analysis and leaching behavior of copper minerals under controlled curing condition.
well-shaped agglomerations if the proportion of coarse particles is influenced by the effect of overlying pressure on the structure
higher. On the contrary, the well-shaped agglomerations were easy stability of agglomerated heaps (Nosrati et al., 2012b). Nosrati
to obtain when the proportion of finer feed particle was higher, tested the agglomeration mechanism (Fig. 12b). To further under-
whereas the diameter of agglomerations was non-uniform (Xu stand the effect of compressive stress on the fracture and structure
et al., 2013). The PSD of ore agglomeration could be roughly failure, Wong et al. (1987) proposed the fracture/failure stress
divided into three types: uniform graded size, well graded size and calculation method of ore agglomerations, shown in Eq. (2).
gap graded size. This compaction behavior of adjacent well-shaped
agglomerations could directly be observed via measuring the 2:8Pmax
sf ¼ (2)
height decrease of agglomerated heaps. pd2
Where sf is stress led to fracture and failure, d is diameter of
3.2.2. Wet/dry strength and stability
agglomeration.
The structural strength and potential breakage appeared during
the agglomeration leaching could affect the inter-/intra-particle
porosity and potential flow paths formation (Blackmore, 2015), 3.2.3. Leachability
even threated the slope stability of agglomerated heaps. According The majority objectives of agglomeration process were to
to Garcia and Jorgensen (1997), this mechanical behavior and enhance the mineral grains liberation, create more chemical/bio-
structural stability of agglomerations were commonly evaluated by chemical reaction interface and eventually obtain a higher copper
the wet strength (single agglomerated particle scale) and dry extraction rate (Johnson, 2018; Rawlings, 2002), Thus, in the
strength (agglomerated heap scale). Besides, the Shatter drop test, laboratory-scale studies, the saturated acid soaking test (single ore
and Kappes percolation test were also used in the quality evalua- agglomeration particle) and unsaturated column leaching (heaps
tion of ore agglomeration. As aforementioned by the former sec- stacked by ore agglomeration particles) were commonly used to
tions, the stripping and migration behavior of fine particles/ evaluate the agglomeration leachability. The key evaluated pa-
powders commonly occurred and became gradually severe along rameters of pregnant leaching solution (PLS) was included of ion
with the saturated acid soaking process. As shown in Fig. 12a and concentration (e.g. Cu2þ, Fe2þ/Fe3þ, Ca2þ), pH value, oxidation
Eq. (1), Lewandowski quantitively describe the fine particles/ reduction potential (ORP), soluble oxygen concentration, and
powders migration (after acid soaking process). mineralogy composition of ore agglomeration. To detect the
detailed chemical features in the leaching period, some chemical
Mout analyses such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron micro-
F¼ 100% (1)
M10 mesh scope (SEM), Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) and Atomic
Force Microscope (AFM) were considered in the soak/column
Where F is the fine migration parameter, Mout is the total weight of leaching process (Palaniandy, 2015; Watling et al., 2014).
fine particles migrated out of ore agglomerations, M-10 mesh is the Currently, the contradiction between stable structure and better
total weight of 10 mesh fines available in ore agglomerations. leachability needed to be reconciled. For instance, the stucco binder
Generally, the dry strength was equivalent to the compressive could play an efficient bonding effects, whereas excessive high-
stress of dry agglomerations (after curing period), which tightly content stucco could accelerate acid-proof substance layers via
Fig. 12. Mechanical tests in the wet/dry strength evaluation of agglomerations.
hydration reaction (such as calcium sulfate, etc.) and this undesir- distribution that heat dissipated from the internal to the surface or
able acid-proof products layers prevented mass transfer and edges of heaps; 4) the proliferation and leaching ability of bacterial
extraction of internal valuable minerals (Lewandowski et al., 2010; community (e.g. Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans (A.f) and Acid-
Lu et al., 2007). On the contrary, even though a low-content stucco thiobacillus thiooxidans (A.t)) were tightly relied on condition,
could obtain loose, porous layers and higher liquid retention, it where the oxygen and acidic ionic media were required. Owing to
easily led to severe agglomeration disintegration, undesirable heap the well-developed pore structure of agglomerated heaps, the mass
compaction and weak leaching phenomenon. transfer process was further enhanced. Based on the previous
studies, the mass transfer was promoted from these following as-
3.3. Mass transfer and enhanced leaching mechanism pects (Carlesi et al., 2016; Delgado, 2006): 1) porous substance
layers of agglomeration (porous shell shown in Fig. 4a) could ob-
3.3.1. Mass transfer enhancement tained a better liquid retention and a higher mass fraction of sol-
The heap leaching was complex reacting system contained well- uble ions; 2) pore structure (commonly quantified by porosity) in
developed pore structure, where types of masses co-existed, agglomerated heaps was more uniform, which decreased the un-
including gas (e.g. soluble oxygen concentration), reaction fluid, timely formation of preferential flow and improved the liquid
heat and microbial communities (Wang et al., 2020c). The exis- saturation of heaps; 3) pivotal binders and additives (e.g. stucco,
tences of undesirable mass transfer and distribution were inferred cement, ferric chloride media, cupric chloride media, etc.) were
in the non-agglomeration heap (Bouffard and Dixon, 2009; Cross added in agglomeration preparation, which could ameliorate the
et al., 2006; McBride et al., 2015; Nimmo et al., 2012; Ogbonna chemical reaction, biological activity and copper extraction rate by
et al., 2005): 1) gas (such as oxygen) could not reach the internal mainly controlling the ORP and reaction activation energy. Besides,
of heaps and tend to escape along inter-particle paths even under in the gas-fluidized bed, it was also revealed that the agglomera-
the assistance of enhanced aerations; 2) types of fluid flow (pref- tions were positive related to the mass transfer and leaching ki-
erential flow and matrix flow) co-existed and the liquid retention netics (Khalilitehrani et al., 2019).
gradually reached the steady state in the non-agglomerated heaps
once the irrigation condition was confirmed, it could lead to a 3.3.2. Bio/chemical compaction
significant non-uniform of liquid distribution and potential blind With the gradual dissolution of valuable minerals, the bio/
leaching regions (Fig. 13a); 3) the undesirable temperature chemical compaction commonly appeared in agglomerated heaps,
Fig. 13. Flow behavior and bonding behavior in non-agglomerated/agglomerated heaps.

especially in the high-saturated liquid condition. Since ore ag- of inter-particle pores and intra-particle pores in agglomerated
glomerations are structurally recombined via the crushing, bonding heaps. As shown in Fig. 4a, the potential paths of mass transfer, fluid
and curing process, thus, the structure variation (e.g. spontaneous flow and oxygen migration appeared in unsaturated packed beds.
bonding, compaction and sedimentation) could be easily observed, Types of pores co-existed in the single agglomeration particle,
especially under the undesirable PSD, binders and liquid distribu- including: 1) exposed pores (located in the surface of agglomera-
tion condition. This undesirable particle compaction could block tion), 2) open pores (connected pores/paths between surface and
the flow paths and led to non-uniform liquid distribution (Orr, internal of agglomeration), and 3) closed pores (totally located in
2002). This bio/chemical compaction was mainly driven by bio/ the internal of agglomeration). Therefore, the dual-pore structure
chemical reaction and biological film attachments. With the in- should be seriously considered to leaching reaction. Due to porous
crease of saturated condition (Fig. 13b), the bio/chemical compac- shells of agglomeration particles, the dual pore structure (inter-/
tion behaviors were basically divided into the pendular bonding, intra-particle porosity) was much better in the agglomerated heaps
funicular bonding, capillary bonding, droplet bonding (Mort, 2005). instead of heaps packed by glass beads or crushed ores (Ilankoon
The agglomeration particles disintegrated mainly due to the and Neethling, 2012a; Ilankoon, 2012).
dissolution of valuable minerals or alkaline gangue under acidic Currently, the quantified descriptions of this dual-pore structure
solution erosion. It easily resulted in the disturbance of the heap were basically divided into two types: 1) using the mathematical
disintegration and compaction under the gravity of the overlying equation calculation to obtain parameters of the wet/dry bulk
granules and the surrounding stress (Chetty, 2018). In specific, in density and total/wet porosity of packed bed; 2) using the X-ray
terms of copper oxides, the heap compaction was mainly related to computed tomography (CT), micro CT (mCT) scanner and MATLAB to
the acidic consumed reaction and caused by the dissolution of obtain porosity distribution of agglomerated heaps (Lawrence and
alkaline gangue minerals (e.g. CaSO4, etc.); in terms of copper sul- Jiang, 2017; Lin et al., 2005). Commonly, the heap porosity using
fides (e.g. chalcopyrite, chalcocite, etc.), the leaching bacteria could realistic CT scanning and imaging algorithm methods were more
be pre-intervened in the preparation of agglomerations. As a accurate than the experimental tests.
consequence, these microbial ecology and biofilm could accelerate
mineral dissolution (Yin et al., 2019). However, these bio-product 3.4.2. Minerals inlay and dual-pore porosity
films composed of reaction products and bacteria could chroni- Whether feed particles were agglomerated or not, the inlay
cally attached on the surface or voids of mineral grains, which status of valuable copper mineral grains was various and basically
potentially accelerated the bio/chemical compaction and led to a divided into five types (Rossi, 1990): 1) absolute exposure on the
lower permeability of agglomerated heaps. ore surface, 2) direct exposure via pores or cracks, 3) indirect
exposure via pore or cracks only after leaching reaction, 4) partial
3.3.3. Pre-treatment methods exposure via particle surface edges, 5) non-exposure and totally
The pre-treatments methods mean that some additives were located inside agglomerations. In ore heaps packed by copper sul-
introduced in the preparing procedure before putting crushed feed fide minerals, different types of metal minerals (such as chalcopy-
ores into agglomerated drums or conveyor belts. The pre-treatment rite, chalcocite, pyrite, etc.) simultaneously co-existed. Thus, this
partially increased the cost due to crushing device, agglomeration, complicated mineralogy inlay further extended the leaching period
binders and additives other procedures (Kodali, 2010). In terms of (Anovitz and Cole, 2015). The undesirable distribution of mineral
copper sulfides, the acidic seawater-based media such as chloride grains negatively accelerated the minerals dissolution. In the
ion solution (e.g. acidic ferric chloride, acidic cupric chloride, etc.) agglomerated heaps, the particle crushing and porous shells were
could be effectively utilized to dissolve the chalcopyrite and chal- an easy approach to further exposed valuable mineral grains.
cocite (Hashemzadeh et al., 2019). This acidic ionic media could
improve the ORP and reaction activation energy of leaching system 3.4.3. Leaching and dual-pores evolution
without the intervention of bacterial community. The previous Notably, the compaction and distortion of pore structure were
studies showed that the high-content chloride ions solution was not totally avoided both in agglomerated and non-agglomerated
added into ore agglomerated heaps using direct mixed or indirect heaps. Under the attacks of acidic leaching solution, some valu-
wetted methods. Besides, the crushing process and PSD were the able metal mineral grains and alkaline gangue minerals gradually
common controlling measures to adjust the agglomeration dissolved and liberated from host ores in the leaching process
enlargement. In terms of copper oxides with a high-mud content or (Petersen and Dixon, 2003), which led to deformations (expansion
mixture minerals (copper oxides and sulfides), some porous and compression) of intra- and inter-particle pores in agglomerated
organic materials (e.g. straw, fiber rods) were also involved to heaps (Fig. 14b).
ameliorate bioleaching/leaching condition (Yin et al., 2019). This This porosity of agglomeration heaps was closely related to
type of additives could prevent the compactions caused by exces- leaching process (Hoummady et al., 2017). During acidic erosions of
sive fine particles. Similarly, the fiber materials could also form leaching solution, the original surface bonding layers was gradually
porous structure with many potential flow paths or pipes in destroyed and acid-proof layers of reaction products formed. Thus,
agglomeration. The hydrolysis reaction of fibers could produce the porosity of agglomerated heaps continuously evolved, which
celluloses under acid solution condition, accelerating the formation could be roughly expressed that: 1) the average porosity of upper
of sulfuric acid solution (Zhang et al., 2020). In this regard, the locations obviously increased due to the mineral dissolution and
additive of these straws could not only improve leaching efficiency, downward migration of fine particles; 2) the average porosity of
but also realize the reuse and recycle of wastes crop straws, which middle locations roughly increased; 3) the average porosity of
had a good potential to reuse the agricultural wastes in the bottom locations slightly increased or even potentially decreased
hydrometallurgy. due to the fine particles deposition and compactions.
3.4. Dual-pore structure 3.5. Flow behavior and percolation
3.4.1. Intra-/inter-particle porosity 3.5.1. Flow paths

The agglomeration was composed of powders, fine particle and Relied on the accepted opinions, heap leaching was unsaturated
coarse particle. Conventionally, these void spaces were composed leaching reaction system with dual-pore structure (Fig. 15a),
Fig. 14. 2-D CT image and 3-D reconstruction of pore structure of agglomeration (before and after leaching).
Fig. 15. Schematic of flow behavior and liquid hysteresis in the dual-pore packed beds.
wherein the flow paths were complicated and mainly included two flow or lower saturation regions. To better understand the flow
types: 1) preferential flow driven by gravity forces (Li et al., 2018); behavior, transient visualization technological methods have ob-
2) diffusion flow driven by capillarity forces (Fernando et al., 2019, tained remarkable progresses, including X-ray CT, Magnetic Reso-
2018). The ore particle segregation, particle stratification, even nance Imaging (MRI), Electric Capacitance Tomography (ECT),
inserted fine interlayers widely occurred in the non-agglomerated Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Particle Tracking Velocity
heaps, (Wang et al., 2020a; Zhang and Liu, 2017). Owing to the (PTV) and so on (Dhawan et al., 2012; Fagan et al., 2014; Liu et al.,
differences of PSD, solid density and rough surface, the acidic 2009; Thaker et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2002). These visualized mea-
leaching solution tended to flow into large-size pore throats, and surements have promoted the understanding of flow behavior in
flow bypass packed beds with a lower permeability area (Fig. 4b). saturated/unsaturated packed bed at the meso- and even micro-
The liquid spread condition of agglomerated heaps was obvi- scale (Gvirtzman and Roberts, 1991). However, the mostly visual-
ously ameliorated due to well-developed intra- and inter-particle ized studies mainly focused on the liquid spread in unsaturated
pores. The liquid uniformly flowed downward instead of prefer- heaps with poor intra-particle porosity (i.e. glass beads heaps,
ential flow in agglomerated heaps (Wang et al., 2020a). As a result, crushed ore heaps), the studies of flow behavior in agglomerated
the ameliorations effectively improve liquid diffusion in the intra- heaps with well-developed porosity were still not well known.
particle pores, and avoid the undesirable bypass flow, preferential
Fig. 16. Industrial costs of major consumptions in the operation of agglomerated heaps.
3.5.2. Liquid retention and hysteresis behavior

The leaching solution was the important medium, which con- Q = A ¼ ðK DPÞ = mL (3)
tained the soluble oxygen, valuable metal ions, heat, and microbial
communities. Therefore, the liquid retention in unsaturated heaps Where K is the permeability (cm2), Q is the flow rate (cm3/s), A is
was tightly related to mass transfer and leaching efficiency the area of cross section, DP is the pressure difference (rgh), r is
(Ahmadlouydarab et al., 2011). The immobile liquid and mobile water density (0.001 kg/cm3), g is gravitational acceleration
liquid co-existed in the preferential/matrix flow paths of unsatu- (9.82 m/s2), DP/L is the water surface slope or gradient. To increase
rated heaps. The liquid retention of unsaturated heaps reached the modelling accuracy, some optimized mathematical models
steady state once the preferential flow paths formed, which means were also proposed to describe the flow behavior in unsaturated
that the liquid spreading became stable (Vethosodsakda et al., heaps. For example, HeeCheneZhang Lattice Boltzmann Model
2013). The liquid retention in unsaturated heaps was quantita- (LBM), the coupled Navier-Stokes and Brinkman’s equation,
tively characterized via liquid holdup value, residual liquid holdup improved vinegar & wellington calibration (CO2) and the trained
value and relative liquid holdup. The (residual) liquid holdup of neural network (Lin et al., 2010; Miao et al., 2019, 2017a, 2017b)
unsaturated ore packed bed will increase if a higher irrigation rate were proposed and visualized the flow behavior. Besides, the
(or superficial flow velocity) was introduced; besides, the residual intervention of chemical binders and additives could improve the
liquid holdup was sensitive to agglomeration diameter while the hydraulic conductivity, increase the heap permeability, and
liquid holdup value was mainly affected by the irrigation condition decrease the bulk density and reduce fine particle migration
(Ilankoon and Neethling, 2012b). (Chamberlin, 1986).
The liquid hysteresis behavior was defined as the liquid was not
completely flow out of unsaturated packed bed after irrigation
3.6. Commercial issues and controls
(Fig. 15b), which led to the stagnant regions where the immobile
liquid reserved (Maiti et al., 2005). The liquid hysteresis behavior
To date, the heap leaching and agglomeration technological
was more obvious in agglomerated heaps where the inter- and
process have been widely utilized in the metal recovery from
intra-particle pores co-existed. The hysteresis loop under different
copper oxides/sulfides, gold, and laterite nickel. There are around
irrigation condition commonly used to describe the liquid holdup
90% copper and 71% gold produced by heap leaching in the North
behavior in unsaturated ore packed bed. The liquid hysteresis was
and South America. According to Manning and Kappes (2005), the
less significant if the average porosity of agglomerated heaps was
majority costs of industrial operation could be divided into nine
lower, in which the preferential flow played a more dominated role.
parts (Fig. 16): surface/underground mining (26%), crushing (18%),
Thus, the liquid hysteresis behavior directly affected by the irriga-
recovery plant (17%), agglomeration/stacking (14%), closure (7%),
tion parameters and feed ores, resulting in the huge differences of
support issues (6%), leaching operation (4%), site maintenance (4%)
mass transfer, bio/chemical reaction and leaching efficiency.
and reagents (4%). In terms of the agglomeration process, the costs
of binders and additives was regarded as another pivotal issues in
3.5.3. Heap permeability the industrial operation. For instance, the average consumption of
Heap permeability mainly controlled by the efficient porosity cements is 10 kg/t. The agglomeration operating parameters should
directly influencing the flow behavior and steady liquid distribu- be carefully confirmed based on the mining costs and minerals
tion. The undesirable heap permeability led to a poor Cu extraction quality. Moreover, due to the strict requirement of environmental
rate. Normally, the heap permeability was described by classic protection, the efficient removals of hazardous materials and acid
equation of the soil mechanics and osmotic mechanics. In the dual- solution were thought as big deals to figure out (Bian et al., 2012).
pore structure of agglomerated heaps, the Darcy flow equation was The boundary control and case management were layout to avoid
simplify used in the description of heap permeability, shown in Eq. the undesirable leakage of acidic leaching solution. In summary, the
(3). optimization of operation costs should be carefully considered in
the agglomerated heaps, especially for the crushing, chemical detection methods devices (e.g. high-precision load cell, inser-
binders, recovery plant setup and agglomeration device. ted LabView software, etc.), calculation simulation software (e.g.
computational fluid dynamics (CFD), COMSOL Multiphysics,
4. Conclusion and prospect outlook etc.) were gradually invented. The potential effects of different
initial condition (e.g. irrigation rate/superficial flow velocity, ore
As an effective pretreatment method, ore agglomeration has particle size, initial moisture content, etc.) on the flow behavior
been widely introduced into the recovery of valuable mineral re- (e.g. liquid hysteresis and preferential flow paths) should be
sources, especially the high-mud minerals (e.g. laterite nickels, further explored. Moreover, as an additive pre-treatment pro-
copper oxides), and other valuable minerals that require this pre- cess, the operation costs of agglomerations preparations (e.g.
treatment to enhance the leaching reaction (e.g. secondary copper crushing process, binders/additives, environmental protection)
sulfides, laterite nickel, and uranium). should be also essentially considered in industrial agglomerated
In this paper, the key aspects of ore agglomerations related to heaps.
agglomeration preparation procedure, quality evaluation, mass
transfer and enhanced mechanism, dual-pore structure definition, Declaration of competing interest
flow behavior, percolation mechanism, commercial issues and
operation controls are carefully summarized and discussed. The The authors declare that they have no known competing
previous studies explicitly showed that the ore agglomeration financial interests or personal relationships that could have
method is a complexity process, mainly including: 1) physical is- appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
sues (e.g. fine particle migration, compaction driven by gravity and
capillary forces, etc.), 2) chemical issues (e.g. reaction bonding us- Acknowledgements
ing chemical binders, etc.) and even 3) biological issues (e.g. mi-
crobial community and its species successions, etc.). In the The authors sincerely acknowledge financial supports from the
agglomerated heaps, these aforementioned issues are considered Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
and evaluated by extraction efficiency and production costs. Thus, 51734001), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Uni-
exploring a low-cost and high-efficient ore agglomerated method versities (No. FRF-TP-18-003C1, FRF-BD-19-001B), the National
was the key procedure in industrial cases. To realize this ultimate Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (No. 51722401) and the
purpose, this study proposed four prospects and potential studies: National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.
2016YFC0600704). Moreover, the authors emphatically clarified
❖ Exploring an efficient, low-cost binders or additives. Some that this critical review could not finished without the great sup-
chemical binders/additives still have technological obstacles ports from the references mentioned in this paper.
needed to consider before the industrial operations, such as
stucco (ore agglomerations mixed with massive calcium sulfate Abbreviations
were not conducive to subsequent leaching and costs), poly-
acrylamide (the potential environmental pollution risks, cost AFM Atomic Force Microscope
considerations and suitable minerals). Thus, accompanied with AHL Agglomerated Heap Leaching
the usage of new materials and waste materials (e.g. straws, CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics
etc.), some novel binders needed to be gradually innovated and DEM Discrete Element Method
eventually applied in industrial cases. The enhanced mechanism DL Dump Leaching
of binders/additives needed to depth understood. HL Heap Leaching
❖ Improving the description precision of dual porosity in HPGR High Pressure Grinding Rolls
agglomerated heaps. Previous studies and theories mainly LBM Lattice Boltzmann Model
focused on heap leaching with a weak intra-particle porosity ORP Oxidation Reduction Potential
(crushed ore, etc.), or soil mechanics where the diameter of feed PCB Printed Circuit Board
particles was much lower (laterite nickel ores). Due to the PLS Pregnant Leaching Solution
porous shell surrounded single agglomeration, the boundary PIV Particle Image Velocimetry
identification of adjacent agglomerations was very difficult and PTV Particle Tracking Velocity
required a higher precision or better optimization of imaging PSD Particle Size Distribution
algorithm. These potential studies included: 1) the dynamic MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging
evolution of inter-particle and intra-particle porosity via the ISL In-Situ Leaching
undisturbed detection and 3-D reconstruction; 2) artificial VL Vat Leaching
controlling methods of pore structure to obtain a higher heap X-ray CT X-ray Computed Tomography
permeability and extraction efficiency. mCT Micro Computed Tomography
❖ Revealing the bonding mechanism of coupled physical, chemical
and biological issues. The bonding behavior was tightly related References
to pore structure, slope stability heap compaction, and leaching
efficiency. To better understand the bonding behavior, the Ahmadlouydarab, M., Liu, Z.S., Feng, J.J., 2011. Interfacial flows in corrugated
microchannels: flow regimes, transitions and hysteresis. Int. J. Multiphas. Flow
coupled experiments involved of micro-scale (e.g. AFM, SEM, 37, 1266e1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.08.003.
EDS, etc.), meso-scale (e.g. X-ray CT, mCT, MRI scanning, etc.), Albijanic, B., Amini, E., Wightman, E., Ozdemir, O., Nguyen, A.V., Bradshaw, D.J., 2011.
macro-scale (e.g. ion concentration, pH/Eh, activation energy, A relationship between the bubble particle attachment time and the miner-
alogy of a copper sulphide. ore 24, 1335e1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/
etc.) and even genetic-scale (e.g. 16S rDNA sequencing, Hi-C
j.mineng.2011.06.005.
tests, etc.) should be carried out. Besides, the coupled physical Anovitz, L.M., Cole, D.R., 2015. Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore
field model and mathematical simulation considered coupled structures. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 80, 61e164. https://doi.org/10.2138/
key parameters could be carried out to fill this study vacancy. rmg.2015.80.04.
Bian, Z., Miao, X., Lei, S., Chen, S.E., Wang, W., Struthers, S., 2012. The challenges of
❖ Ameliorating the liquid retention and permeability in dual-pore reusing mining and mineral-processing wastes. Science 84 337, 702e703.
structure of agglomerated heaps. To date, the in-situ, real-time https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224757.
Blackmore, S., 2015. The Role of Hydrology, Geochemistry and Microbiology in Flow Huang, Z., Feng, S., Tong, Y., Yang, H., 2019. Enhanced “contact mechanism” for
and Solute Transport through Highly Heterogeneous, Unsaturated Waste Rock interaction of extracellular polymeric substances with low-grade copper-
at Various Test Scales. The University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/ bearing sulfide ore in bioleaching by moderately thermophilic Acidithiobacillus
10.14288/1.0166611. caldus. J. Environ. Manag. 242, 11e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Bleiwas, D.I., 2012. Estimated Water Requirements for Gold Heap-Leach Operations. j.jenvman.2019.04.030.
USGS Open File Report, 2012-1085. Ilankoon, I.M.S.K., Neethling, S.J., 2012a. Liquid flow behaviour in unsaturated
Bouffard, S.C., 2008. Agglomeration for heap leaching: equipment design, heaps,heap leaching, hydrometallurgy, modeling. In: 26th International Mineral
agglomerate quality control, and impact on the heap leach process. Miner. Eng. Processing Congress, IMPC 2012: Innovative Processing for Sustainable Growth
21, 1115e1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2008.02.010. - Conference Proceedings (New delhi, India).
Bouffard, S.C., 2005. Review of agglomeration practice and fundamentals in heap Ilankoon, I.M.S.K., Neethling, S.J., 2012b. Hysteresis in unsaturated flow in packed
leaching. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 26, 233e294. https://doi.org/10.1080/ beds and heaps. Miner. Eng. 35, 1e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/
08827500590944009. j.mineng.2012.05.007.
Bouffard, S.C., Dixon, D.G., 2009. Modeling the performance of pyritic biooxidation Ilankoon, I.M.S.K., Tang, Y., Ghorbani, Y., Northey, S., Yellishetty, M., Deng, X.,
heaps under various design and operating conditions. Hydrometallurgy 95, McBride, D., 2018. The current state and future directions of percolation
227e238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.06.002. leaching in the Chinese mining industry: challenges and opportunities. Miner.
Calvo, G., Mudd, G., Valero, Alicia, Valero, Antonio, 2016. Decreasing ore grades in Eng. 125, 206e222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.06.006.
global metallic mining: a theoretical issue or a global reality? Resources. Ilankoon, S.K., 2012. Hydrodynamics of Unsaturated Particle Beds Pertaining to
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5040036. Heap Leaching. Imperial College London. https://doi.org/10.25560/10567.
Carlesi, C., Cortes, E., Dibernardi, G., Morales, J., Mun ~ oz, E., 2016. Ionic liquids as Jerez, C.A., 2017. Biomining of metals: how to access and exploit natural resource
additives for acid leaching of copper from sulfidic ores. Hydrometallurgy 161, sustainably. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 1191e1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-
29e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.01.012. 7915.12792.
Chamberlin, P.D., 1986. Agglomeration: cheap insurance for good recovery when John, L.W., 2011. The art of heap leaching - the fundamentals. In: Percolation
heap leaching gold and silver ores. Min. Eng. 38, 1105e1109. Leaching: the Status Globally and in Southern Africa. The Southern African
Chamberlin, P.D., 1981. Heap leaching and pilot testing of gold an silver ores. In: Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM), Misty Hills, pp. 17e42.
Mining Congress Journal. Precious-Metals Symposium. Nevada Bureau of Mine, Johnson, D.B., 2018. The evolution, current status, and future prospects of using
Sparks, pp. 77e83. biotechnologies in the mineral extraction and metal recovery sectors. Minerals
Chen, L., Huang, L., Me ndez-García, C., Kuang, J., Hua, Z., Liu, J., Shu, W., 2016. Mi- 8, 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8080343.
crobial communities, processes and functions in acid mine drainage ecosys- Johnson, D.B., 2014. Biomining-biotechnologies for extracting and recovering
tems. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 38, 150e158. https://doi.org/10.1016/ metals from ores and waste materials. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 30, 24e31.
j.copbio.2016.01.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.04.008.
Chetty, D., 2018. Acid-gangue interactions in heap leach operations: a review of the Johnson, D.B., Roberto, F.F., 1997. Heterotrophic acidophiles and their roles in the
role of mineralogy for predicting ore behaviour. Minerals 8, 47. https://doi.org/ bioleaching of sulfide minerals. In: Biomining. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
10.3390/min8020047. pp. 259e279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06111-4_13.
Cross, M., Bennett, C.R., Croft, T.N., McBride, D., Gebhardt, J.E., 2006. Computational Khalilitehrani, M., Olsson, J., Daryosh, F., Rasmuson, A., 2019. The morphology of the
modeling of reactive multi-phase flows in porous media: applications to metals deposited particles after a wet agglomerate normal surface impact. Powder
extraction and environmental recovery processes. Miner. Eng. 19, 1098e1108. Technol. 345, 796e803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.065.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2006.05.004. Kodali, P., Depci, T., Dhawan, N., Wang, X., Lin, C.L., Miller, J.D., 2011. Evaluation of
Degodya, E.Y.E., Shavakuleva, O.P., 2019. Effect of liquid glass on the surface prop- stucco binder for agglomeration in the heap leaching of copper ore. Miner. Eng.
erties of different minerals. Mater. Today Proc. 11, 72e76. https://doi.org/ 24, 886e893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2011.03.024.
10.1016/j.matpr.2018.12.109. Lawrence, M., Jiang, Y., 2017. Porosity, pore size distribution, micro-structure. In:
Delgado, J.M.P.Q., 2006. A critical review of dispersion in packed beds. Heat Mass Bio-Aggregates Based Building Materials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 39e71.
Tran. 42, 279e310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-005-0019-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1031-0_2.
Dhawan, N., Safarzadeh, M.S., Miller, J.D., Moats, M.S., Rajamani, R.K., Lin, C.L., 2012. Lewandowski, K.A., Eisele, T.C., Komar Kawatra, S., 2010. Agglomeration for copper
Recent advances in the application of X-ray computed tomography in the heap leaching. In: XXV International Mineral Processing Congress 2010. IMPC,
analysis of heap leaching systems. Miner. Eng. 35, 75e86. https://doi.org/ 2010.
10.1016/j.mineng.2012.03.033. Lewandowski, K.A., Kawatra, S.K., 2009a. Binders for heap leaching agglomeration.
Ergu, L., Benzer, H., 2006. High pressure grinding rolls ( HPGR ) applications in the Miner. Metall. Process. 26, 1e24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403413.
cement industry. Miner. Eng. 19, 130e139. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Lewandowski, K.A., Kawatra, S.K., 2009b. Polyacrylamide as an agglomeration ad-
j.mineng.2005.08.011. ditive for copper heap leaching. Int. J. Miner. Process. 91, 88e93. https://doi.org/
Fagan, M.A., Ngoma, I.E., Chiume, R.A., Minnaar, S., Sederman, A.J., Johns, M.L., 10.1016/j.minpro.2009.01.004.
Harrison, S.T.L., 2014. MRI and gravimetric studies of hydrology in drip irrigated Li, T., Wu, A., Feng, Y., Wang, H., Wang, L., Chen, X., Yin, S., 2018. Coupled DEM-LBM
heaps and its effect on the propagation of bioleaching micro-organisms. Hy- simulation of saturated flow velocity characteristics in column leaching. Miner.
drometallurgy 150, 210e221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.04.022. Eng. 128, 36e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.08.027.
Fernando, W.A.M., Ilankoon, I.M.S.K., Chong, M.N., Syed, T.H., 2018. Effects of Li, Z., Ma, Z., van der Kuijp, T.J., Yuan, Z., Huang, L., 2014. A review of soil heavy metal
intermittent liquid addition on heap hydrodynamics. Miner. Eng. 124, 108e115. pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci. Total
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.05.016. Environ. 468e469, 843e853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.090.
Fernando, W.A.M., Ilankoon, I.M.S.K., Krishnan, S.G., Chokshi, V., 2019. The effects of Lin, C.L., Miller, J.D., Garcia, C., 2005. Saturated flow characteristics in column
packing shape and structure on liquid distribution of heap leaching systems: leaching as described by LB simulation. Miner. Eng. 18, 1045e1051. https://
addition of PCBs as non-ore particles. Hydrometallurgy 187, 149e157. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.02.006.
doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.05.010. Lin, C.L., Videla, A.R., Miller, J.D., 2010. Advanced three-dimensional multiphase flow
Ghorbani, Y., Becker, M., Mainza, A., Franzidis, J.P., Petersen, J., 2011. Large particle simulation in porous media reconstructed from X-ray Microtomography using
effects in chemical/biochemical heap leach processes - a review. Miner. Eng. 24, the He e chen e Zhang Lattice Boltzmann Model. Flow Meas. Instrum. 21,
1172e1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2011.04.002. 255e261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.02.008.
Ghorbani, Y., Mainza, A.N., Petersen, J., Becker, M., Franzidis, J., Kalala, J.T., 2013. Liu, G., Lan, J. an, Cao, Y., Huang, Z., Cheng, Z., Mi, Z., 2009. New insights into
Investigation of particles with high crack density produced by HPGR and its transient behaviors of local liquid-holdup in periodically operated trickle-bed
effect on the redistribution of the particle size fraction in heaps. Miner. Eng. reactors using electrical capacitance tomography (ECT). Chem. Eng. Sci. 64,
43e44, 44e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2012.08.010. 3329e3343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.04.008.
Gvirtzman, H., Roberts, P.V., 1991. Pore scale spatial analysis of two immiscible Liu, L.X., Litster, J.D., Associates, G., Road, H.H., 2000. Coalescence of deformable
fluids in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 27, 1165e1176. https://doi.org/ granules in wet granulation processes. AIChE J. 46, 529e539. https://doi.org/
10.1029/91WR00303. 10.1002/aic.690460312.
Hashemzadeh, M., Dixon, D.G., Liu, W., 2019. Modelling the kinetics of chalcocite Lu, J., Dreisinger, D., West-Sells, P., 2017. Acid curing and agglomeration for heap
leaching in acidified ferric chloride media under fully controlled pH and po- leaching. Hydrometallurgy 167, 30e35. https://doi.org/10.1016/
tential. Hydrometallurgy 186, 275e283. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.hydromet.2016.10.019.
j.hydromet.2019.04.025. Lu, J., Dreisinger, D., West-Sells, P., 2007. Acid curing and agglomeration. In: Inter-
Henckens, M.L.C.M., Biermann, F.H.B., Driessen, P.P.J., 2019. Mineral resources national Symposium on Copper Hydrometallurgy, pp. 453e464. Toronto.
governance: a call for the establishment of an international competence center Luo, Z.G., Zhou, H., Zhang, T., You, Y., Zhang, L.J., Zou, Z.S., Shen, Y.S., 2017. DEM study
on mineral resources management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141, 255e263. of blockage behaviour of cohesive fine particles in a packed structure of large
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.033. particles. Powder Technol. 314, 102e109. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Herna ndez-lo pez, M.F., Ortiz, C., Bonilla, C.A., Giron ~ oz, J.F., 2011. Modeling
as, J., Mun j.powtec.2016.08.053.
changes to the hydrodynamic characteristics of agglomerated copper tailings. Maiti, R., Khanna, R., Nigam, K.D.P., 2005. Trickle-bed reactors: porosity-induced
Hydrometallurgy 109, 175e180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.07.001. hysteresis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 6406e6413. https://doi.org/10.1021/
Hoummady, E., Golfier, F., Cathelineau, M., Truche, L., Durupt, N., Blanvillain, J.J., ie049347r.
Neto, J., Lefevre, E., 2017. A multi-analytical approach to the study of uranium- McBride, D., Gebhardt, J.E., Croft, T.N., Cross, M., 2015. Modeling the hydrodynamics
ore agglomerate structure and porosity during heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy of heap leaching in sub-zero temperatures. Miner. Eng. 90, 77e88. https://
171, 33e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.04.011. doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2015.11.005.
McClelland, G.E., 1986. Agglomerated and unagglomerated heap leaching behavior doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.066.
is compared in production heaps. Min. Eng. 38, 500e503. Rawlings, D.E., 2002. Heavy metal mining using microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56,
McClelland, G.E., Pool, D.L., Eisele, J.A., 1983. Agglomeration-Heap Leaching Oper- 65e91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161052.
ations in the Precious Metals Industry. Inf. Circ. - United States, Bur. Mines. Rumpf, H., 1990. Particle Technology. Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.1088/
Mejdoub, R., Hammi, H., Khitouni, M., Sun ~ ol, J.J., M’nif, A., 2017. The effect of pro- 0031-9112/25/6/016.
longed mechanical activation duration on the reactivity of Portland cement: Schaefer, B., Nirschl, H., 2010. Electrohydrodynamic transport in nanoporous packed
effect of particle size and crystallinity changes. Construct. Build. Mater. 152, beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 6320e6326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.025.
1041e1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.008. Sebastia-Saez, D., Gu, S., Ramaioli, M., 2018. Effect of the contact angle on the
Miao, X., Gerke, K.M., Sizonenko, T.O., 2017a. Advances in Water Resources A new morphology, residence time distribution and mass transfer into liquid rivulets:
way to parameterize hydraulic conductances of pore elements : a step towards a CFD study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 176, 356e366. https://doi.org/10.1016/
creating pore-networks without pore shape simplifications. Adv. Water Resour. j.ces.2017.09.046.
105, 162e172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.04.021. Shayestehfar, M.R., Nasab, S.K., Mohammadalizadeh, H., 2008. Mineralogy ,
Miao, X., Narsilio, G.A., Wu, A., Yang, B., 2017b. A 3D dual pore-system leaching petrology , and chemistry studies to evaluate oxide copper ores for heap
model . Part 1 : study on fl uid fl ow. Hydrometallurgy 167, 173e182. https:// leaching in Sarcheshmeh copper mine. Kerman , Iran 154, 602e612. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.11.015. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.100.
Miao, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Wei, N., Li, X., 2019. Improved Vinegar & Wellington Thaker, A.H., Karthik, G.M., Buwa, V.V., 2019. PIV measurements and CFD simula-
calibration for estimation of fluid saturation and porosity from CT images for a tions of the particle-scale fl ow distribution in a packed bed. Chem. Eng. J. 374,
core flooding test under geologic carbon storage conditions. Micron 124, 189e200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.053.
102703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2019.102703. Urtubia, R., Su arez, F., 2020. Stochastic representation of the agglomeration pro-
Michaels, A.S., 1954. Aggregation of suspensions by polyelectrolytes. Ind. Eng. cess : implications on the saturation variability in a dynamic heap leach. Hy-
Chem. 46, 1485e1490. drometallurgy 191, 105158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105158.
Miller, G., 2009. Agglomeration drum selection and design process. Miller Metal- Van Der Merwe, W., Maree, C., Nicol, W., 2004. Nature of residual liquid holdup in
lurgical Sevices. packed beds of spherical particles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 8363e8368. https://
Mishra, B.K., Thornton, C., Bhimji, D., 2002. A preliminary numerical investigation of doi.org/10.1021/ie0494521.
agglomeration in a rotary drum. Miner. Eng. 15, 27e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/ van Staden, P.J., Petersen, J., 2019. The effects of simulated stacking phenomena on
S0892-6875(01)00194-7. the percolation leaching of crushed ore, Part 2: Stratification. Miner. Eng. 131,
Mort, P.R., 2005. Scale-up of binder agglomeration processes. Powder Technol. 150, 216e229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.11.021.
86e103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2004.11.025. van Staden, P.J., Petersen, J., 2018. The effects of simulated stacking phenomena on
Nimmo, J.R., Survey, U.S.G., Park, M., 2012. Preferential flow occurs in unsaturated the percolation leaching of crushed ore, Part 1: Segregation. Miner. Eng. 128,
conditions. Hydrol. Process. 26, 786e789. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8380. 202e214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.08.045.
Nosrati, A., Addai-mensah, J., Robinson, D.J., 2012a. Hydrometallurgy Drum Velarde, G., 2005. Agglomeration control for heap leaching processes. Miner. Pro-
agglomeration behavior of nickel laterite ore : effect of process variables. Hy- cess. Extr. Metall. Rev. 26, 219e231. https://doi.org/10.1080/
drometallurgy 125e126, 90e99. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 08827500590943974.
j.hydromet.2012.05.016. squez-ye
Vela venes, L., Torres, D., Toro, N., 2018. Leaching of chalcopyrite ore
Nosrati, A., Addai-Mensah, J., Robinson, D.J., 2012b. Drum agglomeration behavior agglomerated with high chloride concentration and high curing periods. Hy-
of nickel laterite ore: effect of process variables. Hydrometallurgy 125e126, drometallurgy 181, 215e220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.10.004.
90e99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2012.05.016. Vethosodsakda, T., Free, M.L., Janwong, A., Moats, M.S., 2013. Evaluation of liquid
Nosrati, A., Quast, K., Xu, D., Skinner, W., Robinson, D.J., Addai-mensah, J., 2014. retention capacity measurements as a tool for estimating optimal ore
Agglomeration and column leaching behaviour of nickel laterite ores : effect of agglomeration moisture content. Int. J. Miner. Process. 119, 58e64. https://
ore mineralogy and particle size distribution. Hydrometallurgy 146, 29e39. doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2012.12.005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.03.004. Wang, L., Yin, S., Wu, A., 2020a. Visualization of flow behavior in ore segregated
Nosrati, A., Skinner, W., Robinson, D.J., Addai-Mensah, J., 2012c. Microstructure packed beds with fine interlayers. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 1e13. https://
analysis of Ni laterite agglomerates for enhanced heap leaching. Powder doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2059-3.
Technol. 232, 106e112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.016. Wang, L., Yin, S., Wu, A., Chen, W., 2020b. Effect of stratified stacks on extraction
Ogbonna, N., Petersen, J., Dixon, D.G., 2005. HeapSim - unravelling the mathematics and surface morphology of copper sulfides. Hydrometallurgy 191, 105226.
of heap bioleaching. In: Computational Analysis in Hydrometallurgy, 35th https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105226.
Annual Hydrometallurgy Meeting, pp. 225e240. http://www.ma.hw.ac.uk/ Wang, L., Yin, S., Wu, A., Chen, W., 2020c. Synergetic bioleaching of copper sulfides
~nneoma/papers/SAIMMpaper.pdf. using mixed microorganisms and its community structure succession. J. Clean.
Olubambi, P.A., Ndlovu, S., Potgieter, J.H., Borode, J.O., 2007. Effects of ore miner- Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118689, 118689.
alogy on the microbial leaching of low grade complex sulphide ores. Hydro- Watling, H.R., Collinson, D.M., Li, J., Mutch, L.A., Perrot, F.A., Rea, S.M., Reith, F.,
metallurgy 86, 96e104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.10.008. Watkin, E.L.J., 2014. Bioleaching of a low-grade copper ore, linking leach
Orr, S., 2002. Enhanced heap leaching: I. Insights. ME/SME J. 54, 1e19. chemistry and microbiology. Miner. Eng. 56, 35e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Palaniandy, S., 2015. Impact of mechanochemical effect on chalcopyrite leaching. j.mineng.2013.10.023.
Int. J. Miner. Process. 136, 56e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2014.10.005. Wu, A., Yin, S., Qin, W., Liu, J., Qiu, G., 2009. The effect of preferential flow on
Pepin, X., Rossetti, D., Iveson, S.M., Simons, S.J.R., 2000. Modeling the evolution and extraction and surface morphology of copper sulphides during heap leaching.
rupture of pendular liquid bridges in the presence of large wetting hysteresis. Hydrometallurgy 95, 76e81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.04.017.
J. Colloid Interface Sci. 232, 289e297. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.7182. Wu, A., Yin, S., Yang, B., Wang, J., Qiu, G., 2007. Study on preferential flow in dump
Petersen, J., 2017. Unravelling the complexity of heap bioleaching. In: Solid State leaching of low-grade ores. Hydrometallurgy 87, 124e132. https://doi.org/
Phenomena. Trans Tech Publications, pp. 246e249. https://doi.org/10.4028/ 10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.03.001.
www.scientific.net/SSP.262.246. Xu, D., Liu, L.X., Quast, K., Addai-Mensah, J., Robinson, D.J., 2013. Effect of nickel
Petersen, J., 2016. Heap leaching as a key technology for recovery of values from laterite agglomerate properties on their leaching performance. Adv. Powder
low-grade ores e a brief overview. Hydrometallurgy 165, 206e212. https:// Technol. 24, 750e756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2013.03.013.
doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.09.001. Yin, F., Afacan, A., Nandakumar, K., Chuang, K.T., 2002. Liquid holdup distribution in
Petersen, J., Dixon, D.G., 2003. The dynamics of chalcocite heap bioleaching. In: packed columns: gamma ray tomography and CFD simulation. Chem. Eng.
Proceedings of the TMS Fall Extraction and Processing Conference, pp. 351e364. Process 41, 473e483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00167-2.
Pietsch, W., 2008. Agglomeration Processes: Phenomena, Technologies, Equipment. Yin, S., Chen, W., Chen, X., Wang, L., 2019a. Bacterial-mediated recovery of copper
John wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527619801. from low-grade copper sulphide using acid-processed rice straw. Bioresour.
Pietsch, W., 2003. An interdisciplinary approach to size enlargement by agglom- Technol. 288, 121605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121605.
eration. Powder Technol. 130, 8e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(02) Yin, S., Wang, L., Chen, X., Wu, A., 2020. Response of agglomeration and leaching
00218-8. behavior of copper oxides to chemical binders. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.
Potter, G.M., 1981. Design factors for heap leaching operations. Min. Eng. 33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2081-5.
277e281. Yin, S., Wang, L., Chen, X., Wu, A., 2016. Effect of ore size and heap porosity on
Quaicoe, I., Nosrati, A., Skinner, W., Addai-Mensah, J., 2014. Single and mixed oxide capillary process inside leaching heap. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China 26,
and clay particle agglomeration: influence of feed mineralogy and percent 835e841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64174-2.
drum volume loading. Powder Technol. 253, 568e579. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Yin, S., Wang, L., Free, M.L., Wu, A., Kabwe, E., 2018a. Enhancement of copper re-
j.powtec.2013.12.019. covery by acid leaching of high-mud copper oxides: a case study at Yangla
Quaicoe, I., Nosrati, A., Skinner, W., Addai-Mensah, J., 2013. Agglomeration behav- Copper Mine, China. J. Clean. Prod. 202, 321e331. https://doi.org/10.1016/
iour and product structure of clay and oxide minerals. Chem. Eng. Sci. 98, j.jclepro.2018.08.122.
40e50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.03.034. Yin, S., Wang, L., Kabwe, E., Chen, X., Yan, R., An, K., Zhang, L., Wu, A., 2018b. Copper
Raj Kumar, S.M., Malayalamurthi, R., 2017. Agglomeration and sizing of rolling bioleaching in China: review and prospect. Minerals 8, 32. https://doi.org/
particles in the sago sizing mechanism. Powder Technol. 320, 428e444. https:// 10.3390/min8020032.
Yin, S., Wang, L., Wu, A., Chen, X., Yan, R., 2019b. Research progress in enhanced doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.05.001.
bioleaching of copper sulfides under the intervention of microbial commu- Zhang, W., Wu, J., Weng, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Wu, A., 2020. Understanding the
nities. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 26, 1337e1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/ role of cellulose fiber on the dewaterability of simulated pulp and paper mill
s12613-019-1826-5. sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 702, 134376. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Zhang, S., Liu, W., 2017. Application of aerial image analysis for assessing particle j.scitotenv.2019.134376.
size segregation in dump leaching. Hydrometallurgy 171, 99e105. https://

Journal of Cleaner Production: Leiming Wang, Shenghua Yin, Aixiang Wu

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Cleaner Production: Leiming Wang, Shenghua Yin, Aixiang Wu

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Cleaner Production: Leiming Wang, Shenghua Yin, Aixiang Wu

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Cleaner Production 279 (2021) 123705

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Cleaner Production

Ore agglomeration behavior and its key controlling factors in heap

3.4.1. Intra-/inter-particle porosity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

1. Introduction pollution (Jerez, 2017; Li et al., 2014). It resulted in serious envi-

ISL þ1000 No / / / Cu: >5 5e50

Fig. 2. Scheme of industrial ore heap with agglomeration process.

Fig. 5. Typical heaps of valuable metal using ore agglomeration method.

Parameter Ore types

Copper oxides Copper sulﬁdes Uranium Nickel ores

Ore grade/% 0.45e1.45 0.8e1.0 150e1000 ppm 0.3e2.5

Type Binder Description of basic features

Organic Lignin Negligible resistance to sulfuric acid solution.

Fig. 12. Mechanical tests in the wet/dry strength evaluation of agglomerations.

Fig. 13. Flow behavior and bonding behavior in non-agglomerated/agglomerated heaps.

3.4. Dual-pore structure 3.5. Flow behavior and percolation

3.4.1. Intra-/inter-particle porosity 3.5.1. Flow paths

3.5.2. Liquid retention and hysteresis behavior

You might also like