Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 394 views

    Criteria For Validation of The Survey Questionnaire Edited

    Uploaded by

    Dinz Guanzon Tayactac
    The document provides criteria for validating a survey questionnaire and ratings from three validators on a questionnaire about peer influence and study habits. The validators rated the questionnaire on criteria such as length, interest, depth of responses, suggestiveness of questions, ability to elicit definite but not forced responses, and ability to answer the purpose of the questionnaire. Overall, the first validator rated the questionnaire as very good, while the second and third rated it as good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Criteria For Validation of The Survey Questionnaire Edited

    Uploaded by

    Dinz Guanzon Tayactac
    394 views2 pages
    The document provides criteria for validating a survey questionnaire and ratings from three validators on a questionnaire about peer influence and study habits. The validators rated the questionnaire on criteria such as length, interest, depth of responses, suggestiveness of questions, ability to elicit definite but not forced responses, and ability to answer the purpose of the questionnaire. Overall, the first validator rated the questionnaire as very good, while the second and third rated it as good.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Criteria for Validation of the Survey Questionnaire Edited

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides criteria for validating a survey questionnaire and ratings from three validators on a questionnaire about peer influence and study habits. The validators rated the questionnaire on criteria such as length, interest, depth of responses, suggestiveness of questions, ability to elicit definite but not forced responses, and ability to answer the purpose of the questionnaire. Overall, the first validator rated the questionnaire as very good, while the second and third rated it as good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    394 views2 pages

    Criteria For Validation of The Survey Questionnaire Edited

    Uploaded by

    Dinz Guanzon Tayactac
    The document provides criteria for validating a survey questionnaire and ratings from three validators on a questionnaire about peer influence and study habits. The validators rated the questionnaire on criteria such as length, interest, depth of responses, suggestiveness of questions, ability to elicit definite but not forced responses, and ability to answer the purpose of the questionnaire. Overall, the first validator rated the questionnaire as very good, while the second and third rated it as good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Criteria for Validation of the Survey Questionnaire

    Using the criteria developed by evaluating a questionnaire set forth by Carter


    Good and Douglas Scates, please check the appropriate box which corresponds to your
    evaluation of the questionnaires on Peer Influence and Study Habits.

    Ratings are follows:

    1 – Poor 2 – Fair 3 – Good 4 – Very Good 5 – Excellent

    Validator Validator Validator


    Criteria for Evaluation
    1 2 3

    1. This questionnaire is short enough and


    respondents respect it and would not 5 4 3
    drain much of their precious time.
    2. The questionnaire is interesting and has
    a face appeal such that respondents will 4 4 3
    induced to respond to it and accomplish
    it.
    3. The questionnaire can obtain some
    depth to respondents and avoid 4 4 4
    superficial answer.
    4. The items/questions and their
    alternative responses are not too 5 4 4
    suggestive and no too stimulating.
    5. The questionnaire can elicit responses
    which are definite but not mechanically 4 3 4
    forced.
    6. Questions/ items are stated in such a
    way that the responses will not be 5 4 4
    embarrassing to the persons/ persons
    concerned.
    7. Questions / items are formed in such a 4
    manner as to avoid suspicion on the art 4 4
    of the respondents.
    8. The questionnaire is not too narrow nor
    restrictive nor limited in its philosophy. 4 4 4

    9. The responses to the questionnaire


    when taken as a whole, could answer 5 4 4
    the basic purpose for which the
    questionnaire is designed considered
    valid.

    Total 4.44 3.89 3.78

    You might also like