Basundhara Upadhayaya Structural Analysis Report
Basundhara Upadhayaya Structural Analysis Report
Basundhara Upadhayaya Structural Analysis Report
SUBMITTED TO:
Chandragiri Municipality
Building Permit Section
MaGH 2077
1
1.0 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................3
2.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................4
3.0 ASSUMPTION AND DATA:....................................................................................................4
3.1 LOADS:.....................................................................................................................................................4
3.1.1 Dead Load:.................................................................................................................................4
3.1.2 Live load:....................................................................................................................................5
3.1.3 Seismic Load:.....................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Load Cases and Load combinations used:................................................................................................5
3.2.1 Static and Lateral Load cases:.....................................................................................................5
3.2.2 Design Load Combinations:........................................................................................................6
4.0 DESIGN:..........................................................................................................................................9
4.1 Bearing Capacity of SOIL:...................................................................................................................9
4.2 Slab Design:........................................................................................................................................9
4.3 Columns:..........................................................................................................................................10
4.4 Beams:..............................................................................................................................................10
4.5 Staircases:..............................................................................................................................................10
5.0 Conclusions:.............................................................................................................................10
Appendix 1: References.......................................................................................................................11
Appendix 2: Salient Features of Project..............................................................................................12
Salient Features:..........................................................................................................................................13
Sub soil PARAMETERS:.................................................................................................................................13
BUILDING PARAMETERS:..............................................................................................................................13
Loading and Design Parameters:..................................................................................................................13
BASIC DESIGN COMPONENTS:.....................................................................................................................15
Appendix 3: Model and Load calculation sheet and Load Input.........................................................16
Appendix 4: Output Data.....................................................................................................................21
Appendix 5: Sample design data.........................................................................................................30
2
1.0 BACKGROUND
Earthquakes are defined as earth’s surface vibrations caused by waves originating from a source of
disturbance in the earth mass. Earthquake is caused by volcanic eruption, slipping of faults i.e.
tectonic activities, big reservoirs, explosions etc.
In case of Nepal, slipping of faults i.e. tectonic activities cause earthquake because there are number
of active faults and thrusts in Nepal. Nepal’s geology is very young and hazardous. Also it lies in the
boundary of two seismically very active tectonic plates of the world i.e. Indian plate and Tibetan
plate. It is also said that the Indian plate is moving towards the Tibetan plate, which cause the
slippage of the faults causing the big earthquake. Thus Nepal is very vulnerable with respect to
seismic activities.
Though the time of shaking of earth mass is very small in fraction of seconds, it causes very severe
damages of properties as well as the lives. Nepal has so many experiences about such destructive
earthquakes. Out of them 1990 B.S. and 2045 B.S. are the recently known ones. Recently, 12th
baishak 2072, the massive earthquake which strike Nepal with epicenter at Barpak , Gorkha has
killed many lifes and destroyed the structures. The aftershocks created terror to the people as well.
Thus the seismic design of structure i.e. Earthquake resistant design of structure is found to be very
essential for countries like Nepal. The structures need to be designed and detailed so as to
counteract, the internal forces induce due to the earth mass shaking in base of these structures. The
design should ensure the structure against stability, strength and serviceability with acceptable levels
of seismic safety.
However, it would not be economically feasible to design the building so as to ensure that they
remain elastic and damage-free because the occurrence of maximum earthquakes is low, say one in
75 yrs. Thus it is reliable to design the ductile structure and not to design damage free structure but
non-collapsible structure for minimum destruction in lives and properties.
Thus the building is analyzed and Designed for earthquake safety and the brief report has been
prepared.
3
2.0 INTRODUCTION
The Structural design of residential building has been carried out using Etabs 18.1.1 by Limit State
Method of design.
The Literature review consists of standard literatures like national building code of India (IS code)
and Nepal national building code (NBC), other standard books of RCC structures. The dead load and
live loads are taken as per the recommendations of NBC and IS code. The seismic load i.e. base
shear is calculated by static seismic coefficient method using the procedures and guidelines provided
by NBC. Load bearing capacity and the soil data are assumed as per site condition.
The 3-D modeling of the building is built and the analysis is carried out using Etabs software.
Design load combinations are given as per the IS code.
Design of the structural elements are done by limit state method with the application of Etabs 18.1.1
software following IS code.
The cross beams i.e. secondary beams are provided to reduce the effective span of the panels in
order to reduce the depth of slab. The reduction of depth of slab is very much effective in reducing
the weight of the building, as it is notable that the contribution of slab is 60% out of total load of
building.
The Floor slab and beam combination has made the building stiffer which help in resisting the
distributed seismic load. The weak girder and strong column system has been adopted to facilitate
more stability against the lateral load.
The frames are designed for the total vertical load coming to individual column with ignoring the
stiffness of the infill wall but the considering its load.
4
Slab with Floor finishes and other finishing
Stairs
Partition Wall
Main Wall and all components
4) Partition Load:
In case the partition is not defined during design the Partition Wall load of 1 KN/m 2
is applied on the floor for future partition wall to be made.
The live load for the building is extracted from the IS code 875 part II -1987 for different
occupancies.
Seismic Coefficient Method is applied to calculate the seismic load on the components.
Seismic load on the building is calculated automatically and distributed to each floor diaphragm
from the software Etabs 18.1.1.
The static load cases including lateral load assigned to the software are as follows
5
S.no. Load Type Load Cases in Remarks
Etabs 17.0.1
Design Load combinations define the various factored combinations of thee load cases for which the
structure is to be designed. The design loading combinations are obtained by multiplying the
characteristic loads by appropriate partial factor of safety.
6
Partition Wall
DCon2 Load 1.5
Staircase Dead
DCon2 1.5
DCon2 Staircase Live 1.5
Linear
DCon3 Add Yes Dead 1.2
DCon3 Live 1.2
DCon3 Floor Finish 1.2
DCon3 Wall/Parapet Load 1.2
Partition Wall
DCon3 Load 1.2
DCon3 Staircase Dead 1.2
DCon3 Staircase Live 1.2
DCon3 EQx 1.2
Linear
DCon4 Add Yes Dead 1.2
DCon4 Live 1.2
DCon4 Floor Finish 1.2
DCon4 Wall/Parapet Load 1.2
Partition Wall
DCon4 Load 1.2
DCon4 Staircase Dead 1.2
DCon4 Staircase Live 1.2
DCon4 EQx -1.2
Linear
DCon5 Add Yes Dead 1.2
DCon5 Live 1.2
DCon5 Floor Finish 1.2
DCon5 Wall/Parapet Load 1.2
Partition Wall
DCon5 Load 1.2
DCon5 Staircase Dead 1.2
DCon5 Staircase Live 1.2
DCon5 EQy 1.2
Linear
DCon6 Add Yes Dead 1.2
DCon6 Live 1.2
DCon6 Floor Finish 1.2
DCon6 Wall/Parapet Load 1.2
Partition Wall
DCon6 Load 1.2
DCon6 Staircase Dead 1.2
DCon6 Staircase Live 1.2
7
DCon6 EQy -1.2
Linear
DCon7 Add Yes Dead 1.5
DCon7 Floor Finish 1.5
DCon7 Wall/Parapet Load 1.5
Partition Wall
DCon7 Load 1.5
DCon7 Staircase Dead 1.5
DCon7 EQx 1.5
Linear
DCon8 Add Yes Dead 1.5
DCon8 Floor Finish 1.5
DCon8 Wall/Parapet Load 1.5
Partition Wall
DCon8 Load 1.5
DCon8 Staircase Dead 1.5
DCon8 EQx -1.5
Linear
DCon9 Add Yes Dead 1.5
DCon9 Floor Finish 1.5
DCon9 Wall/Parapet Load 1.5
Partition Wall
DCon9 Load 1.5
DCon9 Staircase Dead 1.5
DCon9 EQy 1.5
Linear
DCon10 Add Yes Dead 1.5
DCon10 Floor Finish 1.5
DCon10 Wall/Parapet Load 1.5
Partition Wall
DCon10 Load 1.5
DCon10 Staircase Dead 1.5
DCon10 EQy -1.5
Linear
DCon11 Add Yes Dead 0.9
DCon11 Floor Finish 0.9
DCon11 Wall/Parapet Load 0.9
Partition Wall
DCon11 Load 0.9
DCon11 Staircase Dead 0.9
DCon11 EQx 1.5
Linear
DCon12 Add Yes Dead 0.9
DCon12 Floor Finish 0.9
DCon12 Wall/Parapet Load 0.9
8
Partition Wall
DCon12 Load 0.9
DCon12 Staircase Dead 0.9
DCon12 EQx -1.5
Linear
DCon13 Add Yes Dead 0.9
DCon13 Floor Finish 0.9
DCon13 Wall/Parapet Load 0.9
Partition Wall
DCon13 Load 0.9
DCon13 Staircase Dead 0.9
DCon13 EQy 1.5
Linear
DCon14 Add Yes Dead 0.9
DCon14 Floor Finish 0.9
DCon14 Wall/Parapet Load 0.9
Partition Wall
DCon14 Load 0.9
DCon14 Staircase Dead 0.9
DCon14 EQy -1.5
4.0 DESIGN:
The design for structural components beam, column, secondary beam is carried out with the help of Etabs
18.1.1 and the design of slab, staircase and footing was done manually and the design calculation sheet is
attached herewith the report.
9
4.3 Columns:
Columns are designed with the help of Etabs 18.1.1. Each Column was designed for the total
vertical load coming on to the individual column. The percentage of steel is checked as per Limit
governed by IS 456.The stirrup Area is checked for the spacing provided.
The spacing of stirrups is as per the requirement of seismic criteria given in seismic code and
seismic detailing code. Also the lapping and any other detailing requirement of IS 13920 is followed.
4.4 Beams:
Beams are designed with the software Etabs 18.1.1 considering the reversible effect due to
the seismic force. The most critical value of seismic force of all possible direction has been
considered.
The Shear Stirrups are designed as per the requirements and instruction of code and area of
the stirrups are checked for provided spacing. The spacing of the stirrups is governed by the seismic
detailing requirements.
4.5 Staircases:
Stair case is designed for the live load 3 KN/m2 as per the code and standard RCC books.
5.0 Conclusions:
The Seismic design of the Residential Building is done as per the relevant IS codes. The
Dead and Live Load of the building is taken as per the IS code 875. The Seismic load is as per the IS
code 1893-2002 by seismic coefficient method assigned to the Analysis and Design software Etabs
18.1.1 .
The Analysis of the 3-D model after assigning all the Dead, live and seismic load is done in
Etabs. And also the Design of each and every member of column and beam is done from the Etabs
using IS code Isolated footing is designed manually.
The other detailing Rules for column, beam, foundation and the beam column junction etc
concerning the stirrups size, spacing, lap length, confining of joints are done as per the IS code
13920 for ductile design.
Check for deflection limit and storey drift was done which was found satisfactory.
After design of all members the structural drawing is drawn as per design and other detailing
rules for earthquake resistant building.
Hence Safe, stable and the economical seismic design of the building is done.
10
11
Appendix 1: References
REFERENCES:
1.0 IS code 456-2000: Plain and Reinforced Concrete code of Practice
2.0 IS code 1893 (part I)-2002: Criteria for earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
3.0 IS code 875-1987: Code of Practice for Design Loads
Part 1 Dead Loads
Part 2 Imposed Loads
Part 5 Special loads and Load combination
4.0 IS code 13920-1993: Ductile Detailing of RCC structures subjected to seismic Force-Code
of practice
5.0 RCC structures by A.K. Jain
6.0 RCC structures by S.N. Sinha
7.0 Limit State Design by Vargees
8.0 Structural Design of Multistoried building by U.H. Varyani
9.0 IS code SP 16 Design guidelines for RCC Structures
10.0 IS code SP 34 for detailing of RCC structures
12
Appendix 2: Salient Features of Project
13
Salient Features:
BUILDING PARAMETERS:
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM: RCC Framed structure
NO. OF STOREY: 3 storey and staircase cover
PROVISION FOR FUTURE EXTENSION: CONSIDERED
STOREY HEIGHT: 2.84m
Grade of Concrete: M20 for all structural components including footing i.e. Beams, slabs,
foundation and staircases etc.
14
LOADING PARAMETERS:
1) DEAD LOAD: Comprises of all the self weight of all the components of
the building each floor wise.
5) PARTITION LOAD: As per code for partition wall not conformed during the
design taken as 1 KN/m2
15
BASIC DESIGN COMPONENTS:
Staircase: Open well Type Stair, Riser = 175mm, Tread = 250 Waist Slab = 150mm
Wall: 110 and 230 mm thick brick masonry in 1:4 and 1:6 cement sand mortar
Door/Window: Sal wood door and Aluminum windows frame and shutter
16
Appendix 3: Model and Load calculation sheet and Load Input
17
3D Model
18
a) STATIC LOAD ON BUILDING:
i) DEAD LOAD:
Unit wt. of Materials:
As per IS 875 Part I:
Reinforced Cement Concrete= 25 KN/m³
Brick Masonry= 18.85 KN/m³
Finishing Works:
Cement Plaster= 20.40 KN/m³
Screeding= 20.40 KN/m³
Marble Floor Finishing= 26.70 KN/m³
19
iii) STAIRCASE LOAD:
Staircase Between Ground Floor and First Floor
20
Live Load
21
Floor Finish
22
Staircase Dead Load
23
Staircase Live Load
24
Partition Wall Load
25
Wall Load
26
Appendix 4: Output Data
27
Deformed Shape
28
Bending Moment Diagram
29
Shear Force Diagram
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Appendix 5: Sample design data
52
Design of Two way slab
Critical Slab (First Floor Bed room)
Dimension of Slab
c-c length along longer span, ly 4572 mm
c-c length along shorter span, lx 3200 mm
support width 230 mm
clear span ly 4342 mm
clear span lx 2970 mm
ly+.5d 4397
lx+.5d 3025
effective span
along longer span, ly 4397 mm IS 456 Cl. 22.2.b.2
along shorter span, lx 3025 mm IS 456 Cl. 22.2.b.2
thickness of slab 110 mm
clear cover 15 mm
total thickness 125 mm
Reinforced used, Fy 500 N/mm2
fck 20 N/mm2
self wt. of concrete (γ) 25 KN/m3
Load Calculation
Self Weight 3.125 KN/m2
live load 2 KN/m2
floor finish 1.5 KN/m2
Partition Wall load 1.84 KN/m2
FOS 8.465
total load 1.5 12.6975 KN/m2
53
Check for deflection control criteria
lx 3025
d 110
lx/d 27.500
(l/d)basic 26
γ 1 from fig 6 of IS456
β 1 from fig 5 of IS456
Fs 129.759 N/mm2
% of tensional reinforcement 0.268
α 2 from fig 4 of IS456
now, (l/d)basic*αβγ 52 OK Safe
Check Shear
Vumax 15.690 KN
Nominal Shear Stress 0.143 N/mm2
From table 20 of IS 456
fck 20
τcmax 2.8 OK Safe
overall depth,D 125
Results
Overall depth of slab = 125 mm
Main bar along short span at support 8mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
Main bar along short span at mid 8mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
Main bar along long span at support 8mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
Main bar along long span at mid 8mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
54
55
Design of Isolated Foundation (F4)
56
Check for two way shear
At distance d/2 from face of column,
Length at critical section 700.00 mm
Perimeter at this section 2800.00 mm
Depth at critical section 400.00 mm
Area of concrete resisting two way shear 1120000.00 mm2
Two way shear (Punching shear) at critical section 550116.71 N
Nominal Shear stress, Tv 0.49 N/mm2
Permitted two way shear stress 1.118 N/mm2
Since, Nominal shear stress < Permitted two way shear stress Safe in two way shear
Calculation of Reinforcement
From the expression
Mu = 0.87fy*Ast*d(1-(Astfy/bdfck))
Then,
Ast required 517.50 mm2
Let us provide rein. Of φ 12 mm
Spacing required 432.72 mm
Provide spacing 150 mm Ok
57
Design of Dog Legged Staircase First Flight
Ra = 28.82 KN
Maximum Moment occurs at Distance 2.00 m
Maximum Moment = 31.06 KN-m
58
Check for deflection control criteria
Span 4000
d 129
lx/d 31.008
(l/d)basic 20
γ 1 from fig 6 of IS456
β 1 from fig 5 of IS456
Fs 185.559 N/mm2
% of tensional reinforcement 0.503
α 1.6 from fig 4 of IS456
now, (l/d)basic*αβγ 32 OK Safe
Check Shear
Vu 1.09 KN
τv 0.073 N/mm2
From table 20 of IS 456
fck 25 N/mm2
100As/bd 0.003 N/mm2
τc 0.42084 interpolate
For Slab with D=175 τc 0.483966 N/mm2
τv < τc
Results
Overall depth of slab = 150 mm
Main bar 12mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
Distribution Bars 10mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
59
Appendix 6: Column and Beam Reinforcement Detail
60
Column Reinforcement :
Concrete Grade=M20
Steel Grade=Fe 500
Ast
Width Depth Total Total
Col. Reqd from No of No of
Story Lvl. Column Grid b D A st Prov Ast Prov
ID Etabs 20Ø 16Ø 2
(mm ) %
(mm) (mm) (mm2) Remarks
Second Floor 300 300 2,376.00 8 2513.27 2.79
First Floor C1 F3 & G3 300 300 2,407.00 8 2513.27 2.79
Ground Floor 300 300 2,024.00 8 2513.27 2.79
Second Floor E1, G1, F4, 300 300 1,990.00 4 4 2060.88 2.29
First Floor C3 G4, E6, F6 & 300 300 1,890.00 4 4 2060.88 2.29
Ground Floor G6 300 300 1,614.00 4 4 2060.88 2.29
61
Beam Reinforcement:
Concrete Grade=M20
Steel Grade=Fe 500
62
Y-Y Direction Beam (Grid 1-1, 2-3, 5-4 & 6-6)
Stair Top 183.00 2 226.19
Support
Cover Bot 158.00 2 226.19
Top 158.00 2 226.19 As indicated
Mid 9" 14"
Bot 158.00 2 226.19 in drawing.
Top 208.00 2 226.19
Support
Bot 158.00 2 226.19
Third Top 289.00 3 339.29
Support
Floor Bot 223.00 3 339.29
Top 158.00 3 339.29 As indicated
Mid 9" 14"
Bot 158.00 3 339.29 in drawing.
Top 337.00 3 339.29
Support
Bot 168.00 3 339.29
63