Captain Missions Failed Utopia41468199
Captain Missions Failed Utopia41468199
Captain Missions Failed Utopia41468199
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41468199?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Pennsylvania Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The Eighteenth Century
Lincoln Faller
The "lives" of two pirates in the second volume of Capt. Charles Johnson's
General History of the Pirates , published in 1728, make up what is actually one
narrative. Together, "The Life of Captain Misson" and "The Life of Captain
Tew" tell the strange and fascinating story of an attempt to establish some-
thing very much like a utopia off the coast of Africa. Though Tew was a real
person, Misson is a fiction and so (of course) is the story. Until recently we
were fairly sure that this story - and the History of the Pirates generally - was
the work of Defoe. What John Robert Moore wrought, Furbank and Owen
have undone.5
"Bid[ding] defiance to the Power of Europe " involves Misson and his crew
in a wide variety of initiatives. They practice a primitive form of communism,
keeping a "common Treasury, Money being of no Use where every Thing was
All would seem hopeful for the future. Many years later, however, Crusoe
gets a much delayed letter from the island. Things "went on but poorly," it
says, and his colonists "were malcontent with their long stay there." Will
Atkins had died some time before and the rest of them want to be fetched
away, "that they might see their own country again before they died." This is
all we know of their fates. Crusoe takes the blame for this turn of events. Had
his "wandering spirit" let him stay with his colony, things "would have done
well enough." "I pleased myself with being the patron of those people I placed
there, and doing for them in a kind of haughty majestic way, like an old patri-
archal monarch; providing for them, as if I had been father of the whole family,
as well as of the plantation." But he was not as patriarchal as he ought to have
been. Lamenting that he did not attach his island to a specific "government or
nation," which might have provided some lasting, overruling authority, he
goes on to say, "nay, I never so much as gave the place a name, but left it as I
found it, belonging to no man, and the people under no discipline or govern-
ment but my own
For all Crusoe's greater authority and power, the comparison between him
and Atkins is not entirely to his advantage. Given its potentially subversive
effect, little wonder that Friday, and the island itself, are so abruptly dispensed
(179). Then the rest of the savages shoot him full of arr
Still another dangerous line of potential thought - t
another kind of epistemological crisis - may be getting
day's abrupt, quite curious, even "queer" disappeara
Instances of "hybridity" can be as challenging to sexu
and cultural categories of difference, can produce just
in any case sails on without Friday, to other problema
behind his still unnamed - perhaps unnamable - island
to it and its new inhabitants. Their story gets no furth
clusion, not even much in the way of closure. There is
him or his narrative to dwell on. All we have at the end
adventure is Crusoe's uneasy feeling that he ought, so
more in control of whatever it was that finally happene
NOTES
Lemuel Johnson , who read and critiqued an earlier version of this essay , died March
The dearest of friends and a most exquisite colleague , he possessed knowledge and acuity
passing any I might ever hope to achieve. I learned more from him than I can say, more even
could know. In gratitude I dedicate this essay, such as it is, to him.
1. Bernal Díaz del Castillo, The Conquest of New Spain, tr. J .M. Cohen (Baltimor
64, 60. The Spaniard who remained was Gonzalo Guerrero. For another accoun
same episode see Francisco López de Gomara, Cortés: The Life of the Conqueror by H
tary, tr. and ed. Lesley Byrd Simpson from the Istoria de la conquista de Mexico (B
1966), 30-2; the Istoria was first published in 1552.
2. Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture (London, 1994), 204, 206, 207, 1.
3. Diaz, 65.
4. It is now well documented that European attitudes towards Africans, Native
cans, and Asians displayed an increasing racism over the course of the eighteenth c
even though "race" had not yet come to acquire its full modern meaning. On t
point see Nicholas Hudson, "From 'Nation' to 'Race': The Origin of Racial Clas
in Eighteenth-Century Thought," Eighteenth-Century Studies, 29 (1996): 247-6
development of white attitudes of racial superiority, see particularly (among a
potential sources) Richard Popkin's "The Philosophical Basis of Eighteenth-C
Racism" in Racism in the Eighteenth Century, Studies in Eighteenth-Century Cultur
ed. Harold E. Pagliaro (Cleveland, 1973), 245-62, and, of more recent vintage, Iv
naford, Race: The History of an Idea in the West (Washington, D.C., 1996), especiall
"The First Stage in the Development of an Idea of Race, 1684-1815," 187-233.