Polytetrafluoroethylene Toxicosis in Chicks
Polytetrafluoroethylene Toxicosis in Chicks
Polytetrafluoroethylene Toxicosis in Chicks
Case Report
Katherine A Shuster,1,* Kristie L Brock,3 Robert C Dysko,1 Victor J DiRita,1,2 and Ingrid L Bergin1
Two groups of chickens (Gallus domesticus; White Leghorn; age, 4 d and 2 wk) housed in a university research vivarium were
found dead or moribund without prior signs of illness. The overall mortality rates were 92.3% (60 of 65 birds) for the 4-d-old birds
and 80% (8 of 10) for the 2-wk-old birds. All chicks were housed in brooders with heat lamps in a temperature- and humidity-
controlled room. Primary gross findings were mild to moderate dehydration and hepatic lipidosis. The most consistent histologic
findings were pulmonary hemorrhage and edema in all 7 of the 4-d-old birds evaluated and in all 4 of the 2-wk-old birds assessed.
In addition, 1 of the 4-d-old birds had multifocal centrilobular hepatic necrosis. These findings suggested an inhaled toxicant and
hypoxia, respectively. Inspection of the animal room revealed that approximately 50% of the heat lamp bulbs in the brooder cage
were coated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Two published case reports detail similar experiences in birds exposed to PTFE-
coated heat-lamp bulbs. Birds are highly sensitive to inhaled toxicants owing to the high efficiency of their respiratory systems, and
PTFE toxicosis is known to cause pulmonary edema and hemorrhage in pet birds after exposure to overheated nonstick cookware.
In the present case, the bulbs were replaced, and no similar problems subsequently have been noted. This case illustrates the sen-
sitivity of avian species to respiratory toxicants and serves as a reminder that toxicosis can be encountered even in the controlled
environment of a laboratory vivarium.
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a synthetic polymer that is to ventilate the lungs, which are the site of gas exchange. 4 Due
useful for its thermal stability and lubricant (antistick) proper- to this structural arrangement, airflow within the avian respira-
ties.11 It is used in various products, including nonstick cookware, tory system is unidirectional. Gas exchange occurs in the lungs
ironing board covers, and heat lamp bulbs. PTFE is most com- as a cross-current system.4 Specifically, this situation means that
monly marketed under the trade name Teflon. air passing through the parabronchi and blood moving through
Pet birds are susceptible to developing PTFE toxicosis.1,6,9 Most the capillaries travel at right angles to each other.4 This arrange-
of these cases have been due to overheated frying pans within the ment allows for very efficient gas exchange as carbon dioxide
household. At temperatures above 280 °C, PTFE-coated surfaces and oxygen pressure gradients are preserved along the length of
begin to emit degradation products in the form of particulates the connection between the parabronchus and capillary sytem.4
and gas.5,9 Subsequent inhalation of these by-products by birds However, other gases (for example, PTFE degradation products,
can result in various clinical signs, including open-beak breathing, carbon monoxide) that are contained in the inhaled air will also
chirping, incoordination, lateral recumbency, convulsions, and be present at increased levels with oxygen. If the gas is toxic, this
death.11 The most common pathologic lesion is severe, extensive, increased concentration will lead to significant respiratory com-
necrotizing and hemorrhagic pneumonitis and edema.10 The pri- promise, resulting in hypoxia and associated hepatic damage.
mary mechanism of injury is direct injury of type I pneumocytes
and capillary endothelial cells by PTFE degradation products, al-
Case Report
lowing fluid and blood to leak into the airways.10 Although PTFE
Two groups of chickens (Gallus domesticus; White Leghorn; ages,
toxicosis has been reported infrequently in humans as ‘polymer
4 d and 2 wk) were reported because of acute moribundity and
fume fever,’ birds are much more sensitive to inhaled toxicants.
death to the veterinary staff at an AAALAC-accredited academic
This unique sensitivity of birds is due to the anatomy of their
institution. Moribund birds were lethargic and in respiratory dis-
respiratory system. Most birds have 9 air sacs (with some species-
tress with open-beak breathing. The birds had last been observed
dependent variations) surrounding the lungs.4 The lungs are very
8 h previously and appeared normal. The overall mortality rates,
rigid and do not expand; instead, the air sacs act as a bellows
including birds found dead and those euthanized due to respi-
ratory distress, were 92.3% (60 of 65 birds) for the 4-d-old birds
Received: 15 Aug 2011. Revision requested: 20 Sep 2011. Accepted: 09 Oct 2011. and 80% (8 of 10) for the 2-wk-old birds. A similar clinical picture
1
Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine and 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 3Office of Laboratory Animal Resources,
had been observed with the previous 2 groups of chicks housed
West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. within the room (2 wk and 1.5 mo previously), with sudden-onset
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
49
50
Figure 2. Histopathology images. (A) Lung. The majority of airways contained large amounts of hemorrhage. A primary bronchus was almost com-
pletely filled with blood (arrow). Hematoxylin and eosin stain; bar, 1 mm. (B) Lung. Some areas also showed moderate perivascular edema (arrow).
Hematoxylin and eosin stain; bar, 200 µm. (C) Lung. Multifocal fibrin, platelets, and hemorrhage within an airway (arrow), indicating that the hemor-
rhage observed in the lungs occurred before death. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; bar, 50 µm. (D) Liver. Multifocal centrilobular or paracentral necrosis
with congestion and hemorrhage (arrows), indicating hypoxia. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; bar, 1 mm.
rate decreased significantly (to 11%) when the ventilation rate mer fume fever and usually consists of flu-like symptoms and
was increased. Heat lamp bulbs in the facility had recently been noncardiogenic pulmonary edema.6 Most cases occur during the
replaced with PTFE-coated bulbs. The authors2 speculated that manufacture of PTFE, but one report involved a kitchen accident.1
the lack of pulmonary hemorrhage in that instance, compared However, the subject in that case report1 may already have had
with that in nonstick cookware cases, might have been due to compromised lung function due to a history of smoking. Even
fewer pyrolysis products with heat-lamp bulbs. Pyrolysis in non- though clinical signs in humans are rare, PTFE degradation prod-
stick cookware is reported to occur at a temperature of 280 °C,5 ucts can be toxic and should be considered a hazard.8
whereas the surface of the coated bulbs was found to reach ap- The current case illustrates 2 important points. First, differ-
proximately 202 °C.2 In our current case, the PTFE-coated bulbs ent species can vary markedly in their susceptibility to various
were introduced into the room slowly and reached a maximum toxicants. In the present report, that variation is due to anatomic
of 3 of 6 bulbs. Distance from the bulbs, duration of exposure, differences. Second, in cases of acute death in a large number of
ventilation, and number of bulbs in the room may contribute to animals within the same room, the environment should be exam-
the variations in mortality in cases of heat lamp-associated PTFE- ined thoroughly, and personnel should be questioned carefully.
toxicosis. These evaluations were pivotal in the resolution of the current
PTFE toxicosis can occur in humans, although it is not seen as case, which provides a reminder that toxicosis can occur even in
frequently as in exposed birds because of the anatomic differences the controlled environment of a laboratory vivarium.
mentioned earlier.1,6,8,9 The condition in humans is known as poly-
51
Acknowledgments 5. Griffith FD, Stephens SS, Tayfun FO. 1973. Exposure of Japanese
We thank Michael Martin, DVM, MPVM, DACPV, and John Barnes, quail and parakeets to the pyrolysis products of fry pans coated with
DVM, PhD, DACVP, DACPV (North Carolina State University) as well Teflon and common cooking oils. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 34:176–178.
as Richard Fulton, DVM, PhD, DACPV, and Darrin Karcher, PhD 6. Lightfoot TL, Yeager JM. 2008. Pet bird toxicity and related environ-
(Michigan State University) for their assistance with this case. mental concerns. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 11:229–259.
7. Richardson M. 1991. Teflon toxicity from heat lamps. J Assoc Avian
Vet 5:192.
References 8. Waritz RS. 1975. An industrial approach to evaluation of pyrolysis
1. Blandford TB, Seamon PJ, Hughes R, Pattison M, Wilderspin and combustion hazards. Environ Health Perspect 11:197–202.
MP. 1975. A case of polytetrafluoroethylene poisoning in cocka- 9. Wells RE. 1983. Fatal toxicosis in pet birds caused by an overheated
tiels accompanied by polymer fume fever in the owner. Vet Rec cooking pan lined with polytetrafluoroethylene. J Am Vet Med Assoc
96:175–178. 182:1248–1250.
2. Boucher M, Ehmler TJ, Bermudez AJ. 2000. Polytetrafluoroethylene 10. Wells RE, Slocombe RF. 1982. Acute toxicosis of budgerigars (Melop-
gas intoxication in broiler chickens. Avian Dis 44:449–453. sittacus undulatus) caused by pyrolysis products from heated poly-
3. Charlton BR, Bermudez AJ; American Association of Avian tetrafluoroethylene: microscopic study. Am J Vet Res 43:1243–1248.
Pathologists. 2000. Avian disease manual. Kennett Square (PA): 11. Wells RE, Slocombe RF, Trapp AL. 1982. Acute toxicosis of bud-
American Association of Avian Pathologists. gerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) caused by pyrolysis products
4. Fedde MR. 1998. Relationship of structure and function of the avian from heated polytetrafluoroethylene: clinical study. Am J Vet Res
respiratory system to disease susceptibility. Poult Sci 77:1130–1138. 43:1238–1242.
52