SL No: Particulars: Page No

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CONTENTS

SL NO: PARTICULARS: PAGE NO:

1). ABSTRACT 1

2). INTRODUCTION 1

3). OBJECTIVES 1

4). NEED OF THE STUDY 1

5). METHODOLOGY 1

6). TROJECTORIES OF TECHNOLOGY 2-5

7). CONCLUSION 6

8). REFERENCES 6
TRAJECTORIES OF TECHNOLOGY

ABSTRACT:
This paper explores the trajectories of three key technologies in Formula 1 racing at the
component, firm and system levels of analysis. The purpose is to gain an understanding of the
evolutionary forces that contribute to the emergence and survival of dominant designs. Based on
archival data and contemporaneous accounts of the period 1967-1982, we develop a series of
propositions specifying the evolutionary forces acting on technological trajectories within each
level of analysis.

INTRODUCTION:

OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of the study are to know about the following

 To know what are the different trajectories impact on the technology.


 To know how it help to innovation.

NEED OF THE STUDY:


The need of the study is to get clear information about how the trajectories help to
develop the different types of technologies.

METHODOLOGY:
This study is descriptive and exploratory but constructive in nature. The secondary data
has been used collecting from books, journal, magazines, electronic sources etc. the primary data
has been collected form academicians and practitioners by personal discussions.

TROJECTORIES OF TECHNOLOGY
With these thoughts in mind, I would like to examine 3 critical trajectories that are
strategically impacting the innovation process. These evolve from trends that are inventing, and
being invented by, each other. I use the word “trajectory” here because it conveys a useful idea
something moving along a path with some “oomph” behind it.

These trajectories are 3 types they are:

1. Border crossings.
2. Emergence of complex technologies.

3. Knowledge and distributed intelligence.

1. Border crossings (national and sartorial):

The first trajectory comes under the heading of “border crossing.” It refers to the growth
in both scale and importance of cooperative approaches to scientific and technological research.

The uninhibited flow of fundamental knowledge in science and engineering through


publication and peer review remains a defining characteristic of our global enterprise. These data
make clear that this tradition remains indispensable to the process of research in all scientific and
technological fields.

Another type of border crossing has recently begun to occur with regularity. Cooperative
activities that cross sectarian boundaries notably industry university partnerships are a relatively
new addition to the strategic intent of research investments in contemporary universities, but they
too show signs of proceeding at an accelerating pace.

The Times article ran under the headline “since Finds Public Science Is a pillar of
industry.” The study found that 73 percent of recent patents awarded in the U.S cite research
from public and nonprofit organizations. The academic sector was found to be the principal
source of key findings, as it proved to be the source of just over half of the articles cited.

These findings, coupled with today’s constrained U.S. Federal budget environment, make
this an especially crucial period for industry university linkages. Hover the last two decades, we
have seen partnerships between academe and industry grows into a bountiful landscape of
innovative endeavors.

2. Emergence of complex technologies.

This brings me to the second trajectory the changing nature of the products and processes
demanded by today’s global marketplace. In a study presented this February at the annual
meeting of the America association for advance of science, Donald Kash and Robert Rycroft
found that the most successful commercial technologies have changed in one basic way over past
quarter century: they have become more complex.

Kash and Rycroft analyzed the 30 most valuable exports in the global market in the years
1970 and 1994. They divided them into the categories. They divided them into the categories this
can shown in the below table.

Kash and rycroft write that “economic well being in the future will likely go to those who
are successful in innovating complex technologies”. Put simply the future belongs to those who
can make sense of complex, to those who integrate diverse knowledge located in much different
organization to produce previously nonexistent capability.

3. Knowledge and distributed intelligence.

The third trajectory examine today is the impact of advanced information technologies and
society what may be colleagues and I at NSF describe as knowledge and distributed intelligence
or simply “KDI”. When recently asked about the future of the internet Bob lucky vice president
at Bell core said there are two things I know about the future. First, after the turn of the century
there will be one billion people using the internet. The second thing I know is that I have not the
foggiest idea of what they are going to be using it for.

The internet is indeed a tremendous breakthrough in that cobbles together millions of


computers , services all kinds of software database, documents and make huge amounts of”
stuff” available to millions of people the next revaluation however will be making to internet
“intelligent” a “place" and machine collaborate.

CONCLUSION:

Finally we conclude that these trajectories are impact and also support to innovate the t
new technologies. These trajectories are for it well for economic and social progress and ability
to innovate.

REFERENCES:

Chang, ike 1994. the economic of dominant Technical architectures: the case of the personal
computer Industry.

Moore, James. 1996. the death of competition. Harper Business, New York.

You might also like