Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Ga, Vanessa May - Module 2 ANSWER

    Uploaded by

    Vanessa May Caseres Ga
    The case involves a dispute over payment for a property sold by the petitioners to the respondent. The respondent claims to have paid the full purchase price of PHP 2 million, while the petitioners claim an unpaid balance of PHP 487,384.15 remains. The main issue is whether the respondent's obligation has been extinguished by payment. The respondent defends that her accountant confirmed only PHP 200,000 remained unpaid, and she presented a receipt showing payment of this amount.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ga, Vanessa May - Module 2 ANSWER

    Uploaded by

    Vanessa May Caseres Ga
    16 views3 pages
    The case involves a dispute over payment for a property sold by the petitioners to the respondent. The respondent claims to have paid the full purchase price of PHP 2 million, while the petitioners claim an unpaid balance of PHP 487,384.15 remains. The main issue is whether the respondent's obligation has been extinguished by payment. The respondent defends that her accountant confirmed only PHP 200,000 remained unpaid, and she presented a receipt showing payment of this amount.

    Original Title

    Ga, Vanessa May- Module 2 ANSWER

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The case involves a dispute over payment for a property sold by the petitioners to the respondent. The respondent claims to have paid the full purchase price of PHP 2 million, while the petitioners claim an unpaid balance of PHP 487,384.15 remains. The main issue is whether the respondent's obligation has been extinguished by payment. The respondent defends that her accountant confirmed only PHP 200,000 remained unpaid, and she presented a receipt showing payment of this amount.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    16 views3 pages

    Ga, Vanessa May - Module 2 ANSWER

    Uploaded by

    Vanessa May Caseres Ga
    The case involves a dispute over payment for a property sold by the petitioners to the respondent. The respondent claims to have paid the full purchase price of PHP 2 million, while the petitioners claim an unpaid balance of PHP 487,384.15 remains. The main issue is whether the respondent's obligation has been extinguished by payment. The respondent defends that her accountant confirmed only PHP 200,000 remained unpaid, and she presented a receipt showing payment of this amount.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    PRACTICE COURT I

    MODULE 2: CASE ANALYSIS

    Group Members:

    GROUP 6

    Ga, Vanessa May C.

    Susuban, Fe Marie G

    Magallanes, Myrtel Light V.

    Jurolan, Cristelle R.

    Sacro, Maria Rica A.


    Case:

    SPOUSES MINIANO B. DELA CRUZ and LETA L. DELA CRUZ


    vs.
    ANA MARIE CONCEPCION

    G.R. No. 172825

    October 11, 2012

    Parties of the Case:

    1. Miniano B. Dela Cruz and Leta L. Dela Cruz- Petitioner


    2. Ana Marie Concepcion- Respondent

    Facts of the Case according to the respomdent:

    March 25, 1996, petitioners (as vendors) entered into a Contract to


    Sell with respondent (as vendee) involving a house and lot in Cypress St.,
    Phase I, Town and Country Executive Village, Antipolo City for a
    consideration of P2,000,000.00. Respondent made the following
    payments, to wit: (1) P500,000.00 by way of down payment; (2)
    P500,000.00 on May 30, 1996; (3) P500,000.00 paid on January 22,
    1997; and (4) P500,000.00 bounced check dated June 30, 1997 which was
    subsequently replaced by another check of the same amount, dated July
    7, 1997. Respondent was, therefore, able to pay a total of P2,000,000.00.
    Before respondent issued the P500,000.00 replacement check, she told
    petitioners that based on the computation of her accountant as of July 6,
    1997, her unpaid obligation which includes interests and penalties was
    only P200,000.00.

    Issues:

    WON respondent's obligation had already been extinguished by


    payment.
    Defenses of the respondent:

    In her Answer with Compulsory Counterclaim, respondent


    claimed that her unpaid obligation to petitioners is only P200,000.00 as
    earlier confirmed by petitioners and not P487,384.15 as later alleged in
    the complaint. Respondent thus prayed for the dismissal of the complaint.
    By way of counterclaim, respondent prayed for the payment of moral
    damages and attorney’s fees. During the presentation of the parties’
    evidence, in addition to documents showing the statement of her paid
    obligations, respondent presented a receipt purportedly indicating
    payment of the remaining balance of P200,000.00 to Adoracion Losloso
    (Losloso) who allegedly received the same on behalf of petitioners.

    You might also like