FREE RECORDING REQUESTED PURSUANT

TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
FILE ON DEMAND
NAME: Shawn-Matthew: Washington

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

NAME: Shawn-Matthew: Washigton

ADDRESS: 1665 Aldridge Way

CITY / STATE / ZIP: San Jose, California Republic

(DOCUMENT WILL ONLY BE RETURNED TO NAME & ADDRESS IDENTIFIED ABOVE)

(SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE)

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH IN- LAW / STATUS

and CLAIM OF Rights
Show me where in the constitution it says that people are denied, anything.
Government has limitations - not people.
For the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any
material right essential to the enjoyment of life at the mere will of another seems to be intolerable in
any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” Yick Wov. Hopkins 118
U.S. 356.

To: Agents and Representatives, successors and assigns, of the UNITED STATES*
and all subdivisions of same; FEDERAL RESERVE Officers and Board of Directors*and
subdivisions;OF
AFFIDAVIT AllPUBLIC
local, State, Federal, and/or international governments,*
NOTICES
organizations,
Part I agencies, the International Monetary Fund; the Queen of England*
and all subordinates; successors and assigns, and not limited to:

Acceptance of Oath by United States U.S. Citizen as Surety

President Birth Certificate
Beneficiary Rights/ Rights to Accept Special Notice to the Federal Reserve
for Value -Instruments Issued for and by the US
Declarations, inclusive of: Endorsement Language for Instruments
Notice of WHFIT/NMWHFIT and Checks
Notice of Successorship International Bills of Exchange
Matters of Interest Conclusions
Jurat Notice of Understanding, Intent and Claim
of Right
Duty to Speak

1|Page
 PUBLIC NOTICE OF LAND CLAIM I, Shawn-Mathew: Washington "Heir To The Creator"
of these Sovereign Continental United States born Real flesh & blood Man, have been led by
the faith in my Creator and my birthright to claim 37°18'53.5"N 121°49'08.6"Was My
homestead and commonly known Dejure.

I reserve the right to enjoy Soul Ownership of all minerals, deposits and resources of this
fixed location. I shall create an "Allodial Title" and New Parcel for this location 37°18'53.5"N
121°49'08.6"W if No REAL flesh & blood Man/Woman with current Allodial title and sworn
Testimony to the FACT, comes forth to challenge/rebut this official Public/Lawful notice
with in Thirty(30) FULL DAYS upon posting this NOTICE.

Send all Lawful Challenges to this location via paper mail ONLY. Shawn-Mathew:
Washington "Heir To The Creator" 1665 Aldrich Way San Jose California State Republic
Without U.S..

Being an American National, a representative of the original Family of Nations consolidated to form the
Trust known

All federal and state governments are bound to uphold the American Constitution pursuant to Article VI
of said Constitution where it affirms the following:
.
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuant thereof, and all
treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law
of the land; and the judges, in every State, shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of
any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several States legislatures, and
all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound, by oath
or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any
office or public trust under the United States.”
.
The above affirms without doubt or contradiction that all public servants of every federal and states
government are bound to the American Constitution and therefore all agencies of said federal and state
government must have a “Delegation of Authority”.
.
All “Courts” must have a “Delegation of Authority” pursuant to Article III, Section I of the American
Constitution where it affirms the following:

“The judicial powers of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such
inferior courts, as Congress may, from time to time, ordain and establish.”

.
The above affirms there MUST be a “Delegation of Authority” from Congress for any “Court” to exist with
judicial powers outside of the “One Supreme Court”.

Public Servants upon receipt of this agreement, whether in its entirety or specific section are required to
provide a full accounting showing by what authority the People are being infringed upon.

Under The United States of America and Congress Assembled. The First Amendment gives me a right to
2|Page
 communicate as I see fit. Included within that right is the right to define the meaning and significance of
certain words and actions, which are “symbols” that communicate an intention, therefore, I am compelled
to define all words and phrases that may be used in order to avoid being injured by any presumptions
and/or assumptions.

The definitions of words, phrases and sentences used in the following are those of a common man. Words
and their meanings are as those meanings as accepted in the casual course of human interaction in a
civilized community similarly educated and experienced as to their use.

Terms of Art and Words of Art, as they are known in corporate Legal writings, are foreign to this
document unless used descriptively herein and may not be interjected or construed by any agent or
authority without signed contractual permission of Declarant/Affiant.

NOMENCLATURE
Notice to all interested parties, recipients, Principals and Agents. Within the context of this Notice and
Claim/Contractual Agreement, and future issues of instruments/claims contemplated and described
herein, the names, titles and designations listed below are synonymous in use and intent, and noted as
reference to the Declarant/Affiant.

Shawn-Matthew: Washington; Washington, Shawn M..; Washington, Shawn; his,

himself, Living Man.

All titles of designation referring to the Non-resident Non-person Declarant/

Affiant contained within the following document and Notice, i.e. Executor,
Declarant, Affiant, Non-resident Non-person, Grantor, Beneficiary, and Trustee are synonymous in use or
intent.

All titles of designation contained herein, used as or in reference to corporate government entities, Agents
or Officers, successors or subdivisions, included but not limited to, United States, United States, Inc.,
United States Government, United States of America, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INC., U.S. Government and U.S. are synonymous
in use and intent relative to, and within, the specific context used/referenced.

AFFIDAVIT of PUBLIC NOTICE

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

I, Shawn-Matthew: Washington, herein after “Affiant” and/or Declarant/Affiant affirm and declare, in the
presence of the Creator, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and under
the laws of the State of California that the foregoing facts and statements made b y me are true, correct, and
complete to the best of my knowledge and ability.

1. Affiant is of age of majority, of sound mind and competent to testify.

2. Affiant is a Non-resident Non-person in the nation/state California Republic, a member republic of
the Union established by the Articles of Confederation and later expressed by the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution for the united States of America.
3. All the facts stated herein are true, correct, and complete in accordance with Affiant’s full belief
and knowledge and overstanding, admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness, Affiant
will testify to their veracity.
4. I have, in Good Faith, determined the facts stated herein as being true, correct, complete, and not
meant to mislead. By signing this Affidavit of Public Notice before a Notary Public as an authentic

3|Page
 act, do hereby claim and declare:

Affiant as Claimant makes known to the entire world that;

I AM, eternal essence, completely factualized in body, inclusive of this particular inbodyment, also
perceived as Shawn Matthew: Washington, born to a human mother and father on February 5 th, 1973,
domiciled in the County of Santa Clara, within the geographic boundaries of the thirty-first State of the
Union, California, hereby declare my full and complete renunciation and withdraw of all possible forms
of consent to the unlawful creation of, operation of, and participation in, the current fraudulent, de
facto, federal and state “corporate bodies politic” misunderstood to be the State of California and the
United States government.

Being a Living Man with Standing upon the Land, I am One of We The People a rightful beneficiary
to the United States Trust, by birthright and in capita holder in due course by Birthright, born a
legitimate child, in the image of his Heavenly Father who is Creator of all that is, and by way of this
Affidavit of Truth, assures all that Affiant is a living man of substance and surety and able to give credit
where Affiant chooses, in any amount, without limits, but without limited liability. Affiant is NOT a
corporation, fiction, legal entity, legal fiction, debt, debtor (dead - deador), or any other juristic "person".

As all jurisdiction flows from Right of Soil, please take Notice of the following: POLLARD v. HAGAN,
44 U.S. 212 (1845), "We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never
held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory, of which Alabama or
any of the new States were formed... ...[B]ecause, the United States have no constitutional capacity to
exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent domain, within the limits of a State or
elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted... ...Alabama is therefore entitled to the
sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within his limits, subject to the common law..."

In Good Faith, I hereby and herein declare and proclaim the following with clean hands at arms length:

Equality is Paramount and Mandatory by Law, and

Affiant in not a Corporation, and
Affiant is not a Fiction or Artificial entity, and
Affiant is a real ‘Flesh and Blood Man, and

Constitutions have jurisdiction over the Governments they create; fictional

entities (Corporations) are inferior to the Governments who have jurisdiction over them, and

The agents of Government are the TRUSTEES for the Grantor/Beneficiary, and

The united states of america is a common law jurisdiction, and

A statue is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given only the force of law, and

A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine, and act
under a common goal, and

The only form of government recognized as lawful in the united States of America is a representative one,
and Representation requires mutual consent, and

In the absence of mutual consent, neither representation nor governance can exist, and

People in the united States of America have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus
governed, and if anyone does revoke or deny consent, they then may exist free of government control and

4|Page
 statutory restraints, and a “Non-resident Non-person” is one who has lawfully revoked consent and exists
free of statutory restrictions, obligations and limitations, and

A citizen numbered by or issued/assigned a Social Security Number (SSN) is in fact presumed to be an

“employee” of the federal government and thus bound the statues created by and within Federal/State
government jurisdiction(s),and

Upon proper Notice, Claim of right, and express intent, a Non-resident Non-person may disavow this
employee presumption in fact, with prejudice, and without waiver or forfeiture of privilege or benefit
accrued, and

The lawful filing of IRS Form SSA-521/ 1099-C or others, respectively, and if properly filed, abandons
the citizen’s Social Security Number (SSN), waives the SS retirement/disability benefit and forfeits the
associated indebtedness owed the citizen by the U.S. Government as may be reported on IRS
Form(s)SSA-7050 or others.

Acceptance of Oath of President of the United States

Know all men by these presents that I, Shawn-Matthew: Washington, a Living Man,
hereby accept the Article II, Section I, Clause 8, Oath of the President of the
United States in which he stated; “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States and will to
the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the
United States.” I accept the President’s Oath as an offer to me made in good
faith and I respectfully demand that he work for my benefit, I accept the
President’s position as executive Trustee and publicly declare him to be my
executive Trustee in regard to each trust mentioned herein, I accept my
position as Beneficiary of these several trusts.

I recognize that the Constitution creates a trust between the United States and
the People, as in “to acknowledge or take notice of in some definite way”, I
recognize the President of the United States as executive Trustee of the trust
created by the Constitution. I hereby publicly acknowledge and accept my
position as a Beneficiary of the trust created by the Constitution. I hereby
claim all equitable title and interest available to me as a Beneficiary of this
trust. As a Beneficiary of this trust, I recognize that the United States
citizen/Assumed Business Name represented herein is a priority stockholder in
the corporate United States and through that citizen I have first and foremost
position in equity in the United States, and a right to various distributions
from that trust.

I recognize that in 1933 President Franklin D. Roosevelt created another trust

between the United States and the People. I recognize the President of the
United States as Executive Trustee of the trust created by President Roosevelt
in 1933. I hereby publicly acknowledge and accept my position as a beneficiary
of the trust created by President Roosevelt in 1933. As a Beneficiary of this
trust, I recognize the United States citizen/Assumed Business Name represented
herein is a priority stockholder in the corporate United States, and therefore,
I have first and foremost position in equity and a right to various
distributions from that trust. Affiant recognizes the proprietary antecedent
claim(s) derived from or on the basis of these pre-existing contracts.

Beneficiary Rights / Rights to Accept for Value

5|Page
 As a Beneficiary of the several trusts created by the Constitution and by
President Roosevelt, I hereby claim my right to accept for value any
instrument(s) issued for value. See: Title 31 Subtitle IV Chapter 51 Subchapter
11 5118 Gold clause and consent to sue. Also that, Legal Tender, under the
Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), Section 1-201(24) (Official Comment) the
referenced Official Comment notes that the definition of money is not limited
to legal tender, under the U.C.C.. The test adopted is that of sanction of
government, whether by authorization before issue or adoption afterward, which
recognizes the circulating medium as a part of the official currency of that
government. The narrow view that money is limited to legal tender is rejected.

Declarations

Declaration 1. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Declarant/Affiant

may not issue Instruments privately with Original Issue Discount (OID)26 CFR
§1.1275-1(g) and §1.1275-3; and may not avail himself of the following:
1. The Documenting of The Evidence of Withholding of Federal Income Tax,
2. Federal Reserve Act of 1913 §16, 26 U.S.C. §3123,
3. The Reporting of Change in Filing Method 26 CFR §1.671-5, §1.1271-
§1.1275,
4. The Recognizing of The Arrangement of the Non Mortgage Widely Held Fixed
Investment Trust (NMWHFIT),Internal Revenue Bulletin 2208-40, Notice
2008-77,
5. The Presenting of Evidence of a Non-adverse party 26 U.S.C. §672, The
Declaring of Trust Interest Holder (TIH) Status and The Acting as a
middleman/nominee, General Instructions for Form 1099,1098,5498 and W-2G,
6. The Accruing of Interest and the Dividends in Certain Hypothecation
Scenarios Federal Reserve, 1961, Modern Money Mechanics; Instructions for
Form 1099-DIV, 1099-INT/OID,
7. The reporting Under Safe Harbor Rules 26 CFR §1.671-5,
8. The Producing of a Natural Fungible Agricultural Commodity Within a
NMWHFIT 7 CFR §1(a) and §6; Chapter 9, Subchapter 11, Part A, §191; USDA
Packers & Stockyards,
9. The certifying of Warehouse 7 U.S.C. Chapter 10, USDA P&SP,
10. The Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies 26 CFR §301.7430-1,
11. The Bonding of the Public Servant for the Forwarding of All Bonds to the
United States Treasury and to stay in honor as successor, 18 US Code
§2071, §2073, §2075 and §2076, and Declarant/Affiant believed no such
evidence exist.

Declaration 2. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Declarant/Affiant

may not issue a Bill of Exchange as described in January 1, 2010,Internal
Revenue Service Manual 3.8.45.4.10.1, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 3. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Declarant/Affiant

may not and should not employ the following:
1. The Reporting of Violations Through The Identification of Terrorist Acts
and Piracy in Commerce, The Patriot Act 2001 Subtitle A invoking 31
U.S.C. §5318, Evidencing the Special Maritime Jurisdiction Title 9 §1,
title 1 §3, Providing Remedy For Plunder of Distressed Vessel 18 U.S.C.
§1658,
2. The Qualifying under Special Title as Federal Agency 5 U.S.C. §105, 5
U.S.C. §551,
3. The Contracting as an Officer,
4. The Acceptability of Individual Surety, FAR 28.203, 28.201,
5. The Accepting of the Default Offer by The Public Servant’s Bonded
Confession through Tacit Agreement FAR Part 42, 7 U.S.C. §56, and

6|Page
 Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exist.

Declaration 4. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that he cannot conduct

his commercial activities, private and public, under the Uniform Commercial
Code (U.C.C.), and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 5. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Shawn-Matthew:

Washington, is not a 26 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter 1 Subchapter J, Part 1 Subpart
E, Section 672(b) non-adverse party, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 6. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that on Nativity date

February/05/1973 A.D., Declarant/Affiant’s mother, unknowingly acting as
agent/informant for Shawn-Matthew: Washington, did not grant the State, a
corporation known as STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a name and birth for
documentation, and form a corpus resulting in a certain WHFIT (Widely Held
Fixed Investment Trust) as defined in 26 CFR §301.7701-4c, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 7. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that SHAWN MATTHEW

WASHINGTON WHFIT EIN:55-3253566 did not become a United States person under 26
CFR §7701(a)(30)(e) and did not become a corpus in fact from the granting by
Declarant/Affiant’s mother, unknowingly acting as agent/informant at birth for
baby boy, the Grantor of the boy, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 8. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence of ever voluntarily

submitting to any condition of involuntary servitude and/or slavery, and
because involuntary servitude has been abolished, and being one of those
several rights public servants are sworn and obligated to protect, the
undersigned, pursuant to his right(s), is not compelled to be a part of a
corporation, church or political State and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 9. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that a Trust Interest

holder (TIH) is not a Grantor, co-Trustee or co-Beneficiary holding at least
one interest, including but not limited to that of middleman, in the Trust(s)
as it applies per General Instructions for IRS Forms 1098/1099/5498 and W-2G,
and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 10. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that any outside

approval is needed for the Grantor to appoint, by will or Notice, the income
of the Trust(s) as per 26 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter 1 Subchapter J, Part 1
Subpart E, Section 674(b)(3), and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence
exists.

Declaration 11. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant does not have an equitable Interest in the cestui que trust
established by the application for, and the resulting issuance of a Social
Security Number, and in addition an Interest in the foreign situs trust as
evidenced by the birth certificate being on file as a registered United
States security in the possession of the Depository Trust Company in New York
City, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exist.

Declaration 12. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant cannot express the trusts mentioned, and, as Grantor,
modify/change the terms of said trust to include a provision that payment may

7|Page
 be directed from the above-described WHFIT, and Declarant/Affiant believes no
such evidence exists.

Declaration 13. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant may not use the private identifying numbers from the back
side of the social security card of SHAWN MATTHEW WASHINGTON with the
proceeding “E” as evidence of the routing number for the new Richmond ,VA
Federal Reserve Bank. Furthermore, there is no evidence that adding two zeros
to proceed the number series on the back of the card to use as a valid
account number to process instruments and/or ACH deposits through the Federal
Reserve system to the U.S. Treasury is not a true and factual method of
execution, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 14. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant as Grantor/Beneficiary, cannot direct the Court(s) and/or
Internal Revenue Service agent(s) to settle, or assist in settling, any
account(s) and provide details/instructions as to the proper preparation and
submittal of the documentation and paperwork required for settlement/closure
and/or recoupment of “funds” to Declarant/Affiant’s benefit, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 15. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Declarant/

Affiant’s prior approval is not required to access the referenced WHFIT
account/funds, and that government/commercial agents acting without approval
are liable and can personally incur charges for Title 18 violations, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 16. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant is not a Non-resident Non-person expressing the cestui que
trust, and may not modify the indenture/rules naming Charles P. Rettig d/b/a/
The commissioner of Internal Revenue, and/or successors and assigns as co-
Trustee(s) to settle the Declarant/Affiant/Beneficiary’s debts, dollar for
dollar, within ten days of receiving notice of a debt; additionally to
monitor the three credit rating companies so as to cause the correction and
removal of negative items from reporting records, and settle all civil and
criminal court case debts in name of same with private funds or credit(s)
drawn from the referenced WHFIT, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 17. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant, and/or his siblings, are not to be protected from any
harm, loss of property and/or loss of liberty, by action or deed, by
“individuals” acting as agents or Representatives of “corporation(s)”, as
well as the municipalities, agencies, and offices commonly known as
“government”, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 18. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant may not name William Barr d/b/a United States Attorney
General, and/or successors and assigns, as co-Trustee to enter the herein
Beneficiary/corporate person into the National Criminal Information Search
database and the local state CIS database to be identified /reported as “do
not detain”, and that Declarant/Affiant, and/or his siblings are not free to
travel in their private, not-for-hire, non-commercial road machines, without
state and/or county “registration” and without hindrance or delay by
policy/statue enforcers, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence
exists.

8|Page
 Declaration 19. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that
Declarant/Affiant may not name Joseph “Jay” Clayton III d/b/a Chairman of the
Securities Exchange Commission, and/or successors and assigns, as co-Trustee
to retrieve all bonds issued on/for the Declarant/Affiant, or under the
Declarant/Affiant’s name or “employer identification number”, and make the
funds/credits received available for disbursement at Declarant/Affiant’s
discretion, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 20. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant may not name Mike Pompeo d/b/a United States Secretary of
State, and/or successors and assigns, as co-Trustee to provide to
Declarant/Affiant, and/or his siblings diplomatic immunity and an American
National Passport for identification, travel and locomotion purposes, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 21. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that banks and other
vendors that have used Declarant/Affiant’s private property, i.e. signature /
autograph for unjust enrichment, will not return every “payment” and/or
“dividend” plus interest accrued, for the past 24 years upon demand via
Original Issue Discount or by other proper filing of form(s) as instructed by
the IRS in Title 26, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 22. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant may not direct a disbursement/payment, by simple signature
of acceptance (Acceptance for Value), Banker’s Acceptance or Bill of Exchange
for the balance owed on any incurred, existing or newly established
obligation, presentment or debt, in accordance with Title 26 §674(b)(5)(b)
and Internal Revenue

Declaration 23. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the following

cites regarding Bills of Credit are not true, and Declarant/Affiant believes
no such evidence exists. It is provided by Constitution of the United States,
Art. I Sec. 10, that NO STATE shall “emit Bills of Credit, or make anything
but gold and silver coin a tender in payment or debts” Such Bills of Credit
are declared to mean Promissory Notes or Bills issued exclusively on the
credit of the STATE, and for the payment of which the faith of the STATE ONLY
is pledged, the prohibition, therefore, does not apply to the notes of a
state bank, drawn on the credit of a particular fund set apart for the
purpose. 2M’Cord’s R. 12; 2 Pet. R. 818, 11 Pet. R. 257 Bills of Credit may
be defined to be paper issued and intended to circulate through the community
for its ordinary purposes, as MONEY REDEEMABLE at a Future Day. 4 Pet. U. S.
R. 410; Kent, Com. 407 4 Dall. R. xxiii.; Story. Const. §§ 1362 to 1364 1
Scam. R. 87, 526.

This phrase is used in another sense among merchants, it is a letter sent by

an agent or other person to a merchant, desiring him to give credit to the
bearer for the goods or money, Com. Dig. Merchant, F 3; 5 Sm. & Marsh. 491;
R. M. Charlt. 151; 4 Pike, R. 44; 3 Burr. Rep. 1667. Bill of Credit: in
Constitutional Law, A Bill or Promissory Note issued by the government of a
state or nation, upon its faith and credit, designed to circulate in the
community as money, and Redeemable at a future day.

Declaration 24. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant may not, in any fashion or manner he may choose, use the
income and credit available in the designated Trust(s) to discharge or offset
debt for acquisitions of consumer goods, real property or other purchases by
the proper filing of IRS Form(s) 1099 series or others, or authentic

9|Page
 instruments as required or permitted, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 25. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the following

cites regarding Federal Reserve notes are not true, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists. That the “giving a (federal reserve) note
does not constitute payment.” See Eckhart v. Commr. I.R.S., 42 F.2d 158
(1930). “checks, drafts, money orders, and bank notes are not lawful money of
the United States”, State v. Nellon,43 Ore. 168 (1903).
That the use of a (federal reserve) “Note” is only a promise to pay. See
Fidelity Savings v. Grimes, 156 Kan. 55 (1942). That the use of a (federal
reserve) “Note” is only a promise to pay. See Fidelity Savings v. Grimes,
supra. That Legal Tender (federal reserve) Notes are not good and lawful
money of the United States. See Rains v. State, 143 Tenn. 168 (1920). That
(federal reserve) Notes do not operate as payment in the absence of an
agreement that they shall constitute payment, See Blackshear Mfg. Co. v.
Harrell, 191 Ga. 433 (1940). Also, Federal Reserve Notes are valueless, See
IRS Codes Section 1.1001.1-1(4657) C.C.H.

Declaration 26. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant does not have an Unrestricted Claim of Right per Title 26
§1341 of the 1939 code, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence
exists.

Declaration 27. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that denying or

impeding any acquisition mechanism properly executed by the Declarant/
Affiant or any right to draw upon his claim and Interest in the Gold reserves
at value, held the Treasury of the United States, and his deficiency payment
caused by the WAR AND EMERGENCY ACT (Executive Order(s) 2039 and 2040), under
public policy (private law) of the “New Deal” cheap Food policy (and
others),is not a direct violation of the Constitution for the united states
of America., seventeen-hundred and eighty-seven A.D., and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 28. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that a Title 26

defined form of acquisition, secured by accounts receivable on deposit with
the Treasury for non-payment by the United States Treasury, and for the
purpose of discharging payment in like kind, debt-for-debt, is not the only
means by which Declarant/Affiant has of discharging the debt placed on him by
the United States(and “its” subsidiaries), and Declarant/Affiant believes no
such evidence exists.

Declaration 29. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that this Notice and
the filing of Internal Revenue Service form(s) including but not limited to
1099-A, 1009-B, 1099-OID, 1099-DIV, and/or 1099-INT does not constitute a
discharge under the United States, INC. bankruptcy and insolvency, said
discharge being the only means Declarant/Affiant has of discharging the
public debt placed on Declarant/Affiant by the UNITED STATES, INC. through
Executive Order(s) 2019 and 2040 of March 6, 1933 and March 9, 1933, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 30. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the SHAWN

MATTHEW WASHINGTON WHFIT is precluded from issuing private debt instruments
with Original Issue Discount (OID) as described in Regulations §1.1271
through §1.275 of Title 26 CFR, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such
evidence exists.

Declaration 31. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the

10 | P a g e
 instructions on how to report a private issue debt instrument with OID did
not exist in Regulation §1.1271 through §1.1275 of Title 26 CFR, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 32. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant is not designated as the beneficial owner of the trust
bearing his birth name in all capital letters; as defined in Subpart E, part
I, subchapter J, chapter I of the Code, and Declarant/Affiant believes no
such evidence exists.

Declaration 33. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the SHAWN

MATTHEW WASHINGTON WHFIT is not an investment trust as defined in §301.7701-
4(c), and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 34. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the SHAWN

MATTHEW WASHINGTON WHFIT is not an investment trust, or that, Shawn-Matthew:
Washington, a Non-resident Non-person, is not a beneficial owner and Trust
Interest Holder (TIH), in the SHAWN MATTHEW WASHINGTON WHFIT as defined in
paragraph (b)(20)of part 3, Title 26 CFR §1.671-5, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 35. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Declarations 5,

6, and 7 of this Notice do not comprise a complete definition of what a
Widely Held Fixed Investment Trust is considered and accepted to be by the
Internal Revenue Service Regulation 1.671-5(b)(22), and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 36. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Regulation Part

1.671-5 does not make provisions for non-pro rata reporting in (D), sales of
trust interest on a secondary market in (G), Reporting Redemptions in (F),
and Reporting OID under safe harbor in (vii) of Title 26 CFR, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 37. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that a United States

person/Person who is a Widely Held Fixed Investment Trust is not required to
do all reporting on IRS form(s) 1099 or others as required per the
regulations per IRS Publication Catalog No. 27978B and 64171A, and No.
27980N,and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 38. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that both Shawn-

Matthew: Washington and his corporate/ trust identity SHAWN MATTHEW
WASHINGTON WHFIT, are not both entities considered Grantors, Trustees,
beneficial owner(s), co-Trustees, co-Beneficiaries, middlemen and/or nominees
in the various trust relationships, at different times, sustained in
commerce, with the United States, on a daily basis, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 39. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that IRS form(s)1099

or others as required do not bring all aspects of commercial transactions to
light, which is ordered for by The Patriot Act, Subtitle A, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 40. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that IRS form(s)

1099-INT and/or others as required may not be used interchangeably with IRS
form(s) 1099-OID and/or others as required in certain cases as per Internal
Revenue Service catalog No. 27980N, Instructions for Form 1099-INT and 1099-
OID, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.
11 | P a g e
 Declaration 41. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that an Original
Issue Discount (OID) and private debt instruments are not valid under
Regulations §1.1271-1, §1.1271-2, §1.1272-2, §1.1271-3, through §1.1275, and
Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 42. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that a private debt

instrument does not also include a private money order or Bill of Exchange,
and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 43. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that a Dividend from

the monetization of a signature or an instrument is not reportable as per
Internal Revenue Service catalog No. 27980B, Instructions for Form 1099-DIV,
and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 44. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that §662 of the US

Code Title 26 does not require the reporting of distributed corpus or income
accumulating in a Widely Held Fixed Investment Trust, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 45. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant is not part of a “national banking association”, i.e., an
association of nationwide private, unincorporated People engaged in the
business of banking to issue notes against obligations of the United States
due them; whose property and labor has been hypothecated as surety for the
public debt, the U.S. Government’s debt and currency, by legal definitions,
and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 46. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant is not able to tender private debt instruments for
settlement of “Obligations of THE UNITED STATES”, under Title 18 U.S.C. § 8,
representing as the definition provides a “certificate of indebtedness
..drawn upon and authorize officer of the Unites States”, one of those
officers being the Secretary of the Treasury, and “issued under an Act of
Congress” (in this instance: public law 73-10, HJR-192 of 1933, Title 31
U.S.C. § 3123 and Title 31 U.S.C. § 5103 and by treaties of the UNITED
NATIONS CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL BILLS OF EXCHANGE AND INTERNATIONAL
PROMISSORY NOTES (UNCITRAL) and the Universal Postal Union headquartered in
Bern, Switzerland, and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 47. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the

International Bills of Exchange or International Promissory Note, under
UNCITRAL, are not legal tender as national bank notes, or notes of a National
Banking Association, by legal and/or statutory definition (UCC 4-195, 12 CFR
§ 229.2(e), § 210.29(d) and 12 U.S.C. § 1813), issued under Authority of the
United States Code, 31 U.S.C. §392 and §5103, which officially defines this
as a statutory legal tender obligation of THE UNITED STATES, and is issued in
accordance with 31 U.S.C. §3123 and HJR-192 (1933), which establish and
provide for its issuance as “Public Policy” in remedy for discharge of equity
interest recovery on that portion of the public debt to its Principals and
Sureties, bearing the obligation of THE UNITED STATES, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 48. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the referenced

WHFIT is not an “Executive Agency” per 5 U.S.C. §105, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists.

12 | P a g e
 Declaration 49. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the referenced
WHFIT is not an “Agency” per 5 U.S.C. § 551, and Declarant/Affiant believes
no such evidence exists.

Declaration 50. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that

Declarant/Affiant is not a Title 48CFR §53.210-1, Subpart 1.6. Warranted
Contracting Officer and Declarant/Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Declaration 51. Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidences that

Declarant/Affiant should not immediately be issued a permanent and valid
debit card, without further request or action, or be provided access to
authoritative instructions or assistance to properly submit or file the
required form(s) or instrument(s) necessary to clear and process the issuance
of the debit card, or provide The Financial Management Service (FMS) US Debit
Card or its equivalent, as currently available, issued for the account of
Shawn-Matthew: Washington as Grantor/Beneficiary of the SHAWN MATTHEW
WASHINGTON WHFIT with a daily minimum available balance/value of
($100,000.00) One Hundred Thousand U.S. Dollars, and Declarant/Affiant
believes no such evidence exists. Said debit card, with any applicable P.I.N.
number shall be issued without delay in processing/delivery to: Shawn-
Matthew: Washington, Trustee, at: c/o 1665 Aldrich Way, San Jose, California
Republic [95121].

MATTERS OF INTEREST

Involuntary Use: I am forced involuntarily to use U.S. funds such as Federal

Reserve Bank/System notes, commercial liability instruments and electronic
liability transactions as part of a scheme to compel the principals to impart
artificial commodity value to the liability evidenced thereon, on the
authority of Macleod v. Hoover, No.26395, S. Ct. (La.), 105 So. 305 (1925).
That court citing U.S. Bank v. Bank of Georgia, 23 U.S. 333 (1825) and Public
Law 97-248 (1982).

Legal Tender No Longer Required. In light of the holding of Guaranty Trust Co.v.
Henwood, 307 U.S. 247 (1939), take notice of… “As of October 27, 1977, legal
tender for discharge of debt is no longer required. That is because legal
tender is not in circulation at par with promises to pay credit” Baltimore
and Ohio R.R. v. State 36 Md. 519 (1872). “There can be no requirement of
repayment in legal tender either, since legal tender was not loaned, nor in
circulation and repayment, or payment, and need only be made in equivalent
kind; a negotiable instrument.”

UCC 3-603 Clarification. “If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an

instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the
tender id refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the
tender…” and

OREGON UCC ORS 81.010. “Effect of unaccepted offer in writing to pay or

deliver. An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money or to deliver a
written instrument or specific personal property is, if not accepted,
equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money, instrument or
property.” (This statue operates in other states via the rule of Para
Material).

CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL CODE 3603(b). If tender of payment of an instrument is

made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is
refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of

13 | P a g e
 the obligation of an endorser or accommodation party having a right of
recourse with respect to the obligation to which the tender relates.

OHIO USS ORC 1303. Commercial paper

WHEREFORE: Affiant can only discharge such debt/liability due to the fact
that the STATE OF OHIO removed the constitutional money that was to circulate
within the State of Ohio whereby the undersigned could “pay debts by law” and
the undersigned herein has been stopped in law from paying debts “at law”.
Since the STATE OF OHIO is a “federal unit”, it would be a violation of
commercial ‘due process’ or ‘fraud’ to bar the undersigned from accessing the
remedy provided by Congress to discharge debts (liabilities) ‘dollar for
dollar’. Dyett v. Turner, Warden, Utah State, 20 Utah 2d 403(1968).

U.S. Citizen as Surety

I recognized that the U.S. citizen presented is a legal fiction. I also
recognize that it is surety for the United States. As one of the People, a
Beneficiary of the several trust(s) created by the Constitution, so declared
in the Declaration of Independence, another constitution, and by President
Franklin D Roosevelt in 1933, the U.S. citizen is a surety and I recognize
that I can use my prepaid trust account to “discharge” instruments received
when issued and transferred to me for value.

Birth Certificate
I recognize the following statements as true on the public side about the
birth certificate:

1. The birth certificate is a result of the President’s Oath;

2. As a result of the president’s Oath, my birth certificate is evidence
of the obligation the United States owed to me;
3. The birth certificate represents value and is evidence of a pledge by
the U.S. citizen/Assumed Business Name to be a surety for the United
States;
4. The birth certificate is security for the pledge of allegiance to the
United States and its statues, made by the U.S. citizen/Assumed
Business Name;
5. The birth certificate is a security interest in the labor of the U.S.
citizen the certificate represents, based on the U.S. citizen’s pledge
to the United States;
6. The United States has an antecedent claim against the U.S. citizen’s
labor through the pre-existing contract (pledge);
7. Provides use of exemptions, as in an Accepted for Value process, for
deposits/offsets of statements, offers, presentments, bills, tax bills,
or an IRS voucher through the private side.

I recognize the following statements as true on the private side about the
birth certificate:
1. The birth certificate is a receipt;
2. The birth certificate is evidence of a promise made by the President
to the People;
3. The birth certificate is security for the promise of distributions
from the trust to me as Beneficiary;
4. The birth certificate is a security interest in distribution from the
trusts established by the Declaration of Independence, the
Constitution and by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933;
5. The birth certificate is a remedy that represents an antecedent claim
I have against the United States;
6. The birth certificate is evidence of a pre-existing contract;
14 | P a g e
 7. The birth certificate represents the prepaid account I have available
for offsets.

Special Notice to the Federal Reserve- Instruments for and by the US I recognize that
when the United States issues/presents an instrument or claim “for value”
the actual objective is to “get value” or to “get consideration” to settle
or correct an account, controversy or claim.

Acceptance for Value Synopsis

I recognize that when I accept for ‘value’ any instrument presented to me, I
accept whatever consideration the United States has offered me as evidence of
an obligation it has to me as a Beneficiary, and I accept whatever
consideration is offered on the instrument transferred to me through the U.S.
citizen that I represent.

When I accept for value an instrument presented to me by the United States or

subsidiaries, in any capacity, I may use a distribution from the trust(s)
account(s) to discharge or offset, as appropriate, the instrument via my
prepaid account(s). I recognize when I accept an instrument for value
resulting offset is a distribution from the bonds/trusts as a “Bill of
Credit”.

By accepting such an instrument for value and returning it for value, I can
close the account on behalf of the U.S. citizen/Assumed Business Name
represented herein. In this way, I fulfill the U.S. citizen’s/Assumed
Business Name legal duty and obligation to discharge the bill and my moral
duty to close the account, if appropriate. When I accept an instrument for
value and return it for settlement and closure of the account with the
Secretary of the Treasury or the IRS, this provides the “payment” to balance
the books and close or settle the account or controversy.

And I recognize that I may process International Bills of Exchange, Bills of

Credit and Money Orders:

IRS Technical Support Division

c/o The Treasury UCC contract Trust Department of the IRS
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20220

To discharge/offset the debt account(s) of Shawn Matthew Washington through

the U.S. Treasury. OR

Federal Reserve Bank

Routing No. 051000033 Account No. 55325xxxx
For the Federal Reserve to process the same through
the U.S. Treasury and charge the same to:
SHAWN MATTHEW WASHINGTON for Account No. 55-325xxxx

Legal Tender / Lawful Money

Legal definitions related to ‘legal tender’ have been written by Congress and
maintained as such to be both exclusive, where necessary, and inclusive, where
appropriate, to provide in its statutory definitions of legal tender for the
inclusion of all those, who by definition of private, unincorporated persons
engaged in the business of banking to issue notes against the obligation of the
15 | P a g e
 United States for recovery on their risk, whose private assets and property are
being used to collateralize the obligations of the United States since 1933, as
collectively and nationally constituting a legal class of persons being a
“national bank” or “national banking association” with the right to issue such
notes against The Obligation of THE UNITED STATES for equity interest recovery
due and accrued to these Principles and Sureties of the United States backing
the obligations of US currency and credit; as a means for the legal tender
discharge of lawful debts in commerce as remedy due them in conjunction with US
obligations to the discharge of that portion of the public debt, which is
provided for in the present financial reorganization still in effect and
ongoing since 1933. [12 U.S.C. 411, 18 U.S.C. 8, 12 U.S.C.: ch. 6, 38 Stat.251
Sect 14(a), 31 U.S.C. 5118, 3123. with rights protected under the 14 th Amendment
of the United States Constitution, by the U.S. Supreme Court in United States
v. Russell (13 Wall, 623, 627), Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S.
132,136,137 (1962) , The United States v. Hooe, 3 Cranch (U.S.)73(1805), and in
conformity with the U.S. Supreme Court 79 U.S. 287 (1970), 172 U.S.48 (1898),
and as confirmed at 307 U.S. 247(1939).]

HJR-192 further declared ……. “every provision………which purports to give the

oblige a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or
currency….is declared to be against Public Policy; and no such provision shall
be ….. made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred.” Making way for
discharge and recovery on US Corporate public debt due the Principals and
Sureties of THE UNITED STATES providing as “public policy” for the discharge of
“every obligation”, “including every obligation OF and TO THE UNITED STATES”,
“dollar for dollar”, allowing those backing the US financial reorganization to
recover on it by discharging on obligation they owed TO THE UNITED STATES or
its sub-corporate entities, against that same amount of obligation OF THE
UNTIED STATES owed to them; thus providing the remedy for the discharge and
orderly recovery of equity interest on US Corporate public debt due the
Sureties, Principals, and Holders of THE UNITED STATES, discharging that
portion of the public debt without expansion of credit, debt or obligation on
THE UNITED STATES or these its prime-creditors it was intended to satisfy
equitable remedy to, but gaining for each bearer of such note, discharge of
obligation equivalent in value ‘dollar for dollar’ to any and all “unlawful
money of the United States”.

Those who constitute an association nationwide of private, unincorporated

persons engaged in business of banking to issue notes against these
obligations of the United States due them; whose private property is at risk
to collateralize the government’s debt and currency, by legal definitions, a
“national banking association”; such notes, issued against these obligations
of the United States to that part of the public debt due its Principals and
Sureties are required by law to be accepted as “legal tender” of payment for
all debts public and private, and, as we have seen, are defined in law as
“obligations of the United States”, on the same par and category with Federal
reserve notes and other currency and legal tender obligations.

Items tendered for Discharge of Debt

The term “obligation or other security of the United States” includes all
bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve
notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons, United States notes, Treasury
notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates
of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized
officers of the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of
whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress, and cancelled United
16 | P a g e
 States stamps.

Any of the above listed instruments when tendered to the bank they are to be
negotiated to the United States Treasury for settlement as an “Obligation of
THE UNITED STATES”, under Title 18 U.S.C. Sect. 8, representing a “certificate
of indebtedness…drawn upon an authorized officer of the United States,”
(Secretary of the Treasury) “issued under multiple Acts of Congress” (public
law 73-10, HJR-192 of 1933 and Title 31 U.S.C. 3123, and 31 U.S.C. 5103) and
by treaties (the UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL BILLS OF EXCHANGE
AND INTERNATIONAL PROMISSORY NOTES (UNCITRAL) and the Universal Postal Union
headquartered in Bern, Switzerland).

I also recognize that I may issue Bills of Exchange in accordance with the
Internal Revenue Service Manual Section 3.8.45.4.10.1 (01-01-2010), such
instruments issued are in a self-constructed manner format until such time as
the IRS designates a specific format.

And I recognize that I may cause deposits to be made through any ACH Bank or
Depository with a Federal Reserve Bank affiliation.

Routing No. 051000033 Account No. 553253566

To Direct deposit to the account of SHAWN MATTHEW WASHINGTON
And charge the same through the U.S. Treasury and charge the same to:
SHAWN M. WASHINGTON for Account No. 55-3253566

Endorsement Language for Instruments

I recognize that I can provide a qualified endorsement on a statement, offer,
presentment, bill, tax bill, or an IRS voucher as follows:

Bill of Credit Approved

Pay to the Order of
The United States Treasury
18 U.S.C. §8/ UCC 3-603
Washington, Shawn Matthew
Authorized Representative
Exemption No. 553253566

Endorsement Language for Checks Made Payable to the U.S. Citizen/Assumed

Business Name Represented Herein. I recognize when I endorse a check made
payable to the U.S. citizen/Assumed Business Name represented herein, the way
it is endorsed determines if the negotiation of the check will be a taxable
event to the endorser, or not. I recognize by endorsing a check with a
qualified endorsement indicating that the check is exchanged for credit on
account or is exchanged for Federal Reserve Notes with no redeemable value,
according to Title 12 U.S.C. Chapter 3 Subchapter XII §411, I can control
whether or not negotiation of the check will be a table event to the endorser.
Such an endorsement might be:

Deposited as credit on account for Federal Reserve Notes with no redeemable

value.

- Or –

Deposited as credit on account or exchanged for Federal Reserve Notes pursuant

17 | P a g e
 to 12 U.S.C. §411 as amended.

I understand that this important amendment is the one that removed the
“redeem-ability” from the statue.

I recognize that if I am working for an employer and the U.S. citizen/Assumed

Business Name represented herein is being paid as an employee, and if I
properly endorse every check made payable to the U.S. citizen/Assumed Business
Name represented herein so negotiation of the check is NOT a taxable event as
described herein, then all interested parties agree that the U.S.
citizen/Assumed Business Name represented herein would and should file a W-8
BEN and I-9 as a non-resident alien with “not subject” status.

International Bills of Exchange

Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that Declarant/Affiant cannot
directly issue International Bills of Exchange as long as they are properly
drafted within the published guidelines of the UNCITRAL Convention on
International Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes (1988), and Declarant/
Affiant believes no such evidence exists.

Conclusion
As indicated the thirty (30) day notice to rebut is in effect. All recipients
of this Affidavit of Public Notice are bonded by statues, executive orders,
acts and codes that invoke the civil remedy in the several states, the United
States, The United Kingdom, United Nations and Rome to perform their duties of
office or position, or face charges that will result in one or more of the
following: UCC 9 Agricultural Lien, Maritime Lien, Federal Tort Claim, Arrest
of Bond, Tile 18 Violation Investigation, Tax Fraud Investigation, and/ or
Patriot Act, Subtitle A, Money Laundering Investigation.

No commercial harm can come to a Trustee/recipient receiving this Notice and

Claim who acts in honor. By accepting the terms of this agreement, you risk no
harm to yourself, your corporation, your office or your agency, The Affiant
holds no malice and wishes you no harm or injustice. By performing as to the
statues and tenets listed herein, you avoid malfeasance and bring honor to all
parties, your position, yourself, this contract, and to all claims/accounts
that you treat in accordance with the statements herein.

Please be advised that the provisions of Title 26 U.S.C. § 2044, Payment in

Bond, will result in a 18 U.S.C.. § 371 Defrauding the United States charge
when the public servant/corporate officer acts contrary to this agreement,
which carries a five (5) year prison sentence under Title 18 US Codes.

I, Shawn-Matthew: Washington, Beneficiary, Living Man, Non-resident Non-person

on the private side, Authorized Representative/Interest Holder to SHAWN MATTHEW
WASHINGTON WHFIT the U.S citizen/Assumed Business Name on the public side.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
By: _______________________________________
Shawn-Matthew: Washington, Trustee
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT THE US
28 U.S.C. § 1746(1)
c/o SHAWN MATTHEW WASHINGTON WHFIT Ens legis

18 | P a g e
 Notice of Understanding, Intent and Claim of Right

I hereby present recipients with Notice of Understanding, Intent and Claim

of Right to avoid potential confusion or conflict, to maintain my honor, and
ensure clarity between all government agents/agencies and myself.

Peacefully, I desire to avoid conflict and to live with maximum freedom, I

continue to study the history of the united states of America and its legal
system. Common overstandings and observations lead to certain conclusions.
After reading various Acts and Statues, exploring the usage of language
therein, I now know that “lawful” and “legal” are two different words with
distinct definitions.

It also appears that Acts and Statues in the United States, Inc. are only
contracts based in/on commerce. Therefore, I now Notice the various
government officials, authorities and agents named herein and seek
confirmation, correction or denial by recipients.

Response is required, as described herein, within thirty (30) days of

receipt of this Notice in writing, in care of the Notary Public, noted
below, by registered mail. Provide proof of your claim under oath or
attestation, under your full commercial liability and under penalty of
perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746. A failure to respond will be assumed to
be full agreement with my understanding of matters contained within this
Notice, Any response shall be on a point-by-point basis and shall contain
proof of a mistake or error in my overstanding or else my overstanding shall
stand as true, correct and permanent to stand as law between the parties
unless revoked or modified.

Failure to dispute the claims herein as required above will result in

default, default creates acceptance and acceptance creates permanent,
irrevocable estoppel. Now specifically, in the United States, I overstand

19 | P a g e
 that both a common law and a statutory law tradition exist. I also overstand
that a statue is a legislated rule of a society, which has the force of law
upon the members of that society, that society is defined as a fictional
legal entity, such as a corporation, person or citizen of the United States,
Inc..

I also overstand that the United States Government/subsidiaries are NOT a

nation entity occupying a certain geographical location but merely a
corporation with de facto authority by action and practice. This corporation
can only make corporate/contract law, which has the force of law upon its
consenting members.

From my research, the “law of the land” is the peaceful common law, which is
not influenced by Acts and Statues. Under common law, the rights, freedoms
and duties of private individuals have long been established, and, unlike
statue law, common law has had a progression toward more freedom and
personal responsibility rather than less, Among the rights and freedoms
overstood by common law are such things as the right to life, liberty, the
pursuit of happiness, property and use thereof, privacy, peace, to travel
freely, contract and commit commerce and trade in public and private without
harassment, intimidation or restriction of/by “license”.

The obligations and duties of those living under common law are essentially
to ensure that one does not infringe or allow others to infringe upon those
inalienable and unalienable rights and freedoms. I have also learned that the
rights of a free spiritual being cannot be lawfully limited without consent,
as that would imply involuntary servitude.

Rights are not bestowed upon one by another, unless the first gives consent
or the first is the lawful property of the second. The very nature of the
consent is that it can only exist among equals with full disclosure and
without coercion or duress. I do not recall ever being sold or purchased as
a slave, nor do I recall giving my free consent to be governed or
represented by any governmental agent/agency or authority, although at times
I have been deceived and intimidated into submission.

These various rights and freedoms are self-evident and unalienable to just
“be”. For lawful representation to exist there must be mutual consent, which
may be revoked/rescinded for any reason, depending on the nature of a
specific contract between the two parties.

I hereby notify recipients and any other interested parties that I revoke
and rescind my consent to be governed by corporate entities in their
artificial capacity with which I have no conscionable contract. I declare
that I am not a corporation, an insurer, or the legal representative of a
decedent nor an infant or an incompetent.

I, Shawn-Matthew: Washington, a Non-resident Non-person, Native American

Living Man, Acting peacefully and civilized within community standards, I
strive and inspire to exist free from violent aggression or injury, reject
wrongful acts and prosecutions endured or imposed, and I seek quiet
enjoyment of all my right(s), Interest(s), and property, both tangible and
intangible, and declare, for and on the record:

Any activity for which one must apply and receive a license or permit must
be a fundamentally statutory or State-sanctioned activity contrary to a non-
resident non-person’s right(s) and Interest(s), and

As I am a Non-resident Non-person and not a child (minor); I operate with

20 | P a g e
 full responsibility. I do not see need, nor can I be required, to ask for
permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from
those entities who claim limited liability, and

A by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and

Corporations are legal fictions requiring valid contracts in order to claim

authority or control over their employees and other parties alleged, and

Legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert control over those who are thus
blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge, as only a fool would
allow soulless fiction to dictate one’s actions, and I have a right to my
property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and

A summons is merely an “invitation to attend”, and those issued by the

United States or any of its agencies/subsidiaries create no obligation or
dishonor if and when disregarded, or met by “special appearance”, and

Peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statues and law, and those
who attempt to enforce statues against a non-resident non-person are in fact
breaking the very law they are sworn to uphold, and

Permanent estoppels by default, lawfully bars any peace officer, government

agent or prosecutor from bringing charges against a non-resident non-person,
under any Act or Statue.

Therefore, Be it now known that I, Shawn-Matthew: Washington, a Non-resident

Non-person, do hereby state clearly, specifically, and unequivocally any
intent to peacefully and lawfully exist, free of all statutory obligations
and/ or restrictions, and do retain/maintain all my rights to contract, trade,
exchange, barter, communicate and travel.

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my community’s

standards, and that I will, in fact and deed, support the collective desire
for truth, peace, safety and rights to maximum freedom.

Additionally, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful, private

commercial activities, after having been served this Notice, and who fails to
properly dispute these claims or make lawful counterclaim as described herein,
is breaking the law and cannot claim as a defense good faith, or color of
right or Law. Any such transgression(s) will be subject to the fee schedule
included herein and resolved by the law venue of my choosing.

Additionally, I claim the courts in the United States are de facto, and are in
fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the
transactions of security interests. I further claim that they require the
consent of both parties prior to “providing” any such service(s).

Furthermore, I claim all transactions in the nature of security interests

require the consent of both parties. I hereby deny consent to any transaction
of a security interest, issuing under any Act, for a Non-resident Non-person
is not subject to any Act.

Furthermore, I claim my Fee Schedule for any transgressions by peace officers,

government principals or agents or Justice system participants is
($1000.00/min after warning) one thousand dollar per minute after warning, or
any portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained,

21 | P a g e
 harassed or other attempts of regulation, transported, incarcerated or subject
to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
All fees may be assessed retroactively from the “initial point of contact”, at
Declarant discretion.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a notary public to secure payment of

assessments uniform with this Fee Schedule against any transgressors who, by
their actions or omissions, trespass on my interests, me directly or by proxy
in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure or citizens’

grand jury to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers,
government principals or agents or justice system participants who, having
been served notice of this claim and fail to dispute or make lawful
counterclaim, interfere with my sovereign activities or, by act or omission,
my lawful exercise of properly Noticed/claimed and established rights and
freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the right to address, at a time and location of my choice,

any valid counterclaim(s) or dispute(s) publicly, in an open forum by
discussion and negotiation. And to capture on audio/video equipment said
discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose or use as I see fit.

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service
upon one is service upon both. (Maximum of Law)

Duty To Speak
Declarant/Affiant has no record or evidence that the recipients are not parties
claiming relationship and office, therefore having the duty to speak, and
therefore lawfully respond, and believes no such evidence exists.

Declarant/Affiant states that parties in receipt of this Notice who wish to

dispute or rebut claims of fact and overstanding herein, or make
counterclaims thereto, must provide rebuttal in written form, point by point,
verified by certified documentation and accompanied by copies of lawful
evidence. Responses must be signed under oath and or attestation written
under the signer’s fill commercial capacity and signed under penalty of
perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ?1746 stating the facts contained in your
rebuttal are true, correct and not misleading, mere declarations are
insufficient. Recipients have the lawful duty and obligation to respond as
described herein to the Notary Acceptor, at the address provided below, by
registered mail no later than thirty (30) days from the date of receipt as
attested by a notary certificate of service, PS Form 3811, or verification by
electronic signature.

Non-response/partial response to this Notice is a dishonor and disregard of

duty thus established acceptance and agreement as fact by default, thus
creating a valid and binding contract by tacit approval, silence and
acquiescence, establishing a full and complete acceptance of all claims herein,
and creates a permanent and irrevocable estoppels, forever barring future
counterclaim(s) contemplating any claim or declaration herein, under any Statue
or Act.

A Notary Public has been used for timely and proper Notice as a courtesy to
prevent injury to recipients. Such use and that of Names or Titles, Government
or Corporate Codes, Statutes, Acts, citations, case rulings or other private
corporate regulations is coincidental and does not and shall not be deemed an
election to submit to foreign jurisdiction, under real, imagined or implied
consent, or to waive any rights, ownership, Interest, title, claim or

22 | P a g e
 defense(s).

Declarant/Affiant affirm and declare, in the presence of the Creator, under

penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and under
the laws of the State of California that, all Notice(s), Claims, Averment(s)
and Overstanding(s) herein to be true, complete and correct to the best of his
current knowledge and overstanding of the material presented, with full
transparency, in Good Faith and without Malice, with the sole purpose and
inherent right to correct the record.

Date: January 30th 2020

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Place of claim of right:
c/o 1665 Aldrich Way, San Jose By: ____________________________________
California Republic [95121], Declarant/Affiant
non-domestic without the US ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT THE US
28 U.S.C. § 1746(1)

23 | P a g e