The Three Stages of Life Unit 10
The Three Stages of Life Unit 10
The Three Stages of Life Unit 10
10.2 INTRODUCTION
Aesthetic stage is the most delicate and least stable of all forms
of existence. This stage is occupied by majority of people. The main
characteristics of this stage is pleasure which remains within the realm
of unreality and dream. In this stage, the person lives the character of
automation and behaves according to his impulses and emotions. The
aesthetic man leads a life of luxury or hedonism. According to
Kierkegaard, this stage does not provide the individual with any stable
sense of identity and it estranges humans from selfhood.
The desire to enjoy various varieties of pleasure is the main
motive of the aesthetic person. For him everything including duty is
submissive to pleasure. In the aesthetic stage, everything becomes play,
enjoyment or delusion. The aesthetic person detaches himself from
moral struggle and indulges only in the search of beauty.
The aesthetic stage is a dead- end road. It deprives life of all
meaning and leads only to boredom and disgust. The aesthetic man is
self-centered, selfish and despairing. He is only in the quest for more
pleasures to escape from despair. He tries to attain the illusory life of
uninterrupted pleasure.
At the end, the aesthetic stage of existence ultimately becomes
boring, meaningless and empty by the repetitive forms of sensual
gratification. The aesthetic stage thus detoriates to a life of meaningless
despair. This acknowledgement leads to the realization that his inner
spirit yearns for a more meaningful existence and his life will become
intolerable, if this spiritual need is being repressed. For such individual,
Kierkegaard suggested the ethical way of life. He also stated that, the
transition from the aesthetic stage to the ethical stage is to be achieved
by making a decision, by a commitment or by an act of will.
the ethical stage person and their actions have importance with regard
to their agreement with the rules of morality.
The ethical stage of existence however comes to an end by the
uncertainty of existence, as it fails to validate one’s personal existence
and experience also lacks personal meaning. The ethical task of
expressing himself in the universal, which is, in order to become
universal, stripping himself of his individuality, is the main predicament
which is faced by the ethical person. The reason behind this is that, by
maintaining his individuality, he becomes guilty of deviating from the
universal and thereby he sins; again by not maintaining his individuality
also he sins, for not revealing what he is. Therefore, he cannot escape
guilt, whether he maintains individuality or not, does not matter. Guilt, for
Kierkegaard, does not mean an unpleasant hangover that comes after
doing some wrong acts; rather it means that which itself insinuates itself
at a much deeper level of experience.
In the ethical approach to life, a man is faced with another
problem. The problem of performing his duties whatever may be the
circumstances because he himself by being the member of the social
milieu and by making commitments is bound to perform his tasks.
However while performing his duties; the ethical person is faced with the
conflicting situations like whether to follow his conscience or to get
tempted by the superficial compromises, whether to perform his duty
towards the society or towards his own individual self and so on. As a
result of all these, the ethical man then finally comes to realize that he
is not capable of performing his duties and to fulfill the moral laws. There
are things which are beyond his control and which he cannot escape.
The ethical man then violates the law; the great ethical universal
deliberately and consequently becomes aware of his guilt. The shadow
of guilt becomes darker and it keeps on spreading, making it impossible
for him to remove the dread of guilt or to surpass it. The ethical person
then starts to feel that only God can help him in this situation. According
to Kierkegaard, guilt then becomes the dialectic element and a new
‘either/or’ is placed before the ethical man. Now it becomes his choice,
Contemporary Western Philosophy (Block 2) 159
Unit 10 Kierkegaard: Three Stages of Life
whether to be at the present stage fulfilling his moral laws and duties or
to move to the next sphere of existence—the religious sphere, on
realizing his limitations and being aware of estrangement from God, to
whom he belongs. The ethical individual, then by an act of commitment,
by a ‘leap of faith’ arrives at the religious sphere of existence. This leap,
as it is without any convincing arguments and without any assurance for
objective knowledge, is for Kierkegaard, leap into the unknown without
knowing where one is ‘leaping’.