2013 MSME Survey Summary Report
2013 MSME Survey Summary Report
2013 MSME Survey Summary Report
OF STATISTICS COLLABORATIVE
SURVEY: SELECTED FINDINGS
(2013)
There is growing recognition of the important role Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises (MSMEs) play in economic development. They play a pivotal role
through several pathways that go beyond job creation. They are growth-
supporting sectors that not only contribute significantly to improve living
standards, but also bring substantial local capital formation and are responsible
for driving innovation and competition in developing economies. Governments at
all levels have undertaken initiatives to promote the growth and development of
MSMEs. The general perspective is that MSMEs are seen as accelerating the
attainment of broad socio-economic objectives, including poverty reduction,
employment generation, wealth creation, among others.
In view of the above, some of the findings of the survey are as follows:
The total number of MSMEsas at 2013 stood at 37,067,416 (Micro-
36,994,578, Small- 68,168, and Medium-4,670).
The initial start-up capital 68.35% of micro enterprises was predominantly
less than fifty thousand Naira, while small and medium enterprises were
predominantly less than ten million Naira.
Lagos state has the highest number of small and medium enterprises
(11,663), while Kwara state has the least (226).
Lagos state also has the highest number of micro enterprises (3,224,324),
followed by Oyo state (1,864,954), then Kano state (1,794,358). While the
FCT (482,365) and Nasarawa state (382,086)recorded the least.
The main challenges confronting the operations of MSMEs in Nigeria as
revealed by the survey are access to finance and poor infrastructure,
inconsistency in government policies, poor support (business development
services), access to market, multiple taxation and obsolete technology
The total number of persons employed by the MSME sector as at
December, 2013 stood at 59,741,211, representing 84.02% of the total
labour force.
Female entrepreneurs accounted for 43.32% in the ownership structure of
micro enterprises as against 22.75% in small and medium enterprises.
Most of the entrepreneurs interviewed are not aware of SMEDAN and
their services. The beneficiaries of SMEDAN Services are very minimal in
virtually all the states.
Over 70% of the entrepreneurs do not have patent right, hence their
intellectual property are not protected.
The ownership structure by age showed that the age bracket of 24-50
dominates. Hence youth entrepreneurs are dominant.
It is an established fact globally that the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises
sector is a key engine to economic growth and development. This sector is
responsible for most of the advances in new products and process, provides
most of the employment opportunities but is also a key indicator of the overall
performance of an economy. The dynamic nature of this sector also makes it
vulnerable to a high mortality rate occasioned by sudden shifts in economic
policy, global trends, global shocks in international markets and many
unforeseen situations. The lean nature and size of this sector, which underscores
its vulnerability, is also its key asset. It is flexible and can easily rise up to and
adapt to sudden change in situations locally and globally. These are some of the
underlying facts, which necessitated a change of focus in Nigeria’s economic
policy direction.
Nigeria’s population of over 160 million people with over 65% of that figure being
below the age of 35 makes a change of policy imperative. No country with the
abundant potentials and size in land and population can afford to maintain a
status as a rentier economy on a single commodity, oil. Therefore one of the few
alternatives open to policy makers was to look inward and seek to develop the
national economy through the MSME sector. Many efforts are going on
concurrently within the last Twelve years to boost this sector of the national
economy, starting from the creation of an Agency solely responsible for the
promotion and development of this sector (SMEDAN), implementation of the
NEDEP (National Enterprise Development Programme), creation of the MSME
national and state councils, YOUWIN, the revised National MSME Policy and
other funding access of the central bank of Nigeria and other development
banks. The MSME sector as an important catalyst for growth needs such
fundamental policy support. Government also believes that unlocking the key
potential of this sector also involves additional support in Agriculture and the
provision of regular and affordable power supply. Several efforts are underway in
With the overall objective of reducing poverty through wealth and job creation
and facilitating national economic development, the Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprise are perceived as engine of socio-economic transformation in both
developed and developing counties. SMEDAN is striving to fill the gap of the
death and paucity of credible and reliable database, which is one of the main
constraints in the development of this sub sector.
In light of the above, the need for consistent and reliable database for MSMEs in
Nigeria is imperative. Hence the importance of this survey, however, SMEDAN
will continue to update and provide credible MSME data through collaboration
with both private and public institutions. The Agency through a robust MSME
date base will continue to evolve a strategic plan and programme towards vibrant
and virile MSMEs that will stimulate and trigger economic development in
Nigeria.
The main objective of this survey is to establish a credible and reliable database
for the MSME sector in Nigeria that does not preclude the importance of the
survey in:
Definition
As in developed economies, Nigeria with the introduction of the National Policy
on MSMEs has addressed the issue of definition as to what constitutes micro,
small and medium enterprises. The definition adopts a classification based on
dual criteria, employment and assets (excluding land and buildings) as shown
below.
10 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Micro Enterprises are those enterprises whose total assets (excluding land
and buildings) are less than Five Million Naira with a workforce not
exceeding ten employees.
Small Enterprises are those enterprises whose total assets (excluding
land and building) are above Five Million Naira but not exceeding Fifty
Million Naira with a total workforce of above ten, but not exceeding forty-
nine employees.
Medium Enterprises are those enterprises with total assets excluding land
and building) are above Fifty Million Naira, but not exceeding Five
Hundred Million Naira with a total workforce of between 50 and 199
employees.
If there exists a conflict on classification between employment and assets criteria
(for example, if an enterprise has assets worth seven million naira (N7M) but
employs 7 persons), the employment-based classification will take precedence
and the enterprise would be regarded as micro.
Relevance of MSMEs
It is evidently clear that the micro, small and medium enterprises could play a
catalytic role in the economic transformation of Nigeria. The role includes
substantial contribution of the sector to the gross domestic product, employment
generation, export, increasing local value addition and technological
advancement. Other measures advanced by the advocates of micro, small and
medium enterprises development in the country include:
11 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
viii. Tendency among these enterprises to become feeders of large-scale
enterprises and service products made by the latter.
12 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
3 Methodology
Introduction
Following the successful production of a credible and reliable baseline data for
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in 2010, the need for re-
assessment of the impacts of government policies and programmes on the
Nigerian MSMEs becomes imperative. This survey is a follow of the baseline to
ascertain the successes or otherwise of the policies and programmes of Small
and Medium Enterprises Development Agencies of Nigeria (SMEDAN) and to
also determine the contribution of these MSMEs to the Gross Domestic Product,
export and employment generation.
In general practice, the employment size of enterprises is the major factor used
in its classification into sectors worldwide. Following this principle, the
criterion/classification adopted for the survey was determined by the employment
size of enterprises as shown in the table below:
Objectives
The main objective of this survey exercise is to:
Principally ensure the currency of available data and its conformity with baseline
data aimed at providing a reliable and credible data for local and international
references that will stimulate and trigger growth and development of the sub-
sector in accordance with SMEDAN’s mandate.
Other objectives include:
1. Determine the contribution of these Micro, Small and Medium enterprises
(MSMEs) sub-sector e.g. manufacturing, building and construction, etc. to GDP
in Nigeria.
2. Determine the number and spread of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
(MSMEs) in Nigeria on the basis of geo-political zones and states.
3. Identify the challenges and constraints facing the operation of Micro, Small and
Medium enterprises in Nigeria
4. Identify the number of people employed in the MSMEs sub-sector.
13 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
5. Identify the number of MSMEs owned by women and men towards gender
equity.
6. Determine gender ownership of these MSMEs within age brackets, their
categories and sizes, access to finances as well as contribution to export.
7. Determine number of jobs created, level of capacity building to their employees.
8. Determine the growth rate of MSMEs in Nigeria.
9. Identify the number of MSMEs that are not registered with the Corporate Affairs
Commission
10. Determine the number of MSMEs that does not have an insurance policy.
11. Identify the number of MSMEs that have patent right.
12. Determine the number of MSMEs that operate with/without a business plan, etc.
Coverage
The survey was conducted in all the 36 states of the Federation and the Federal
Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja and it cut across both urban and rural enumeration
areas (EAs) in the country. The EAs selected for the study are those with Micro
Enterprises using National Integrated Survey of Households (NISH) Module of
the National Bureau of Statistics Local Government Frame.
In the establishment component, both urban and rural areas where small and
medium enterprises are located were also canvassed through National
Integrated Survey of Establishment (NISE) Module.
Scope
The subject areas covered in the two (2) modules include:
i. Holding identification
ii. Business Status
iii. Free Entry and Competition
iv. Input, Output, Expenditure and Receipts
v. Technical Support Services/Enterprises growth
vi. Level of employment
vii. Educational Qualification of workers
viii. Total revenue/Turnover
ix. Capacity Utilization
x. Inventory
xi. Production
xii. Source of working capital, etc.
14 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Sample Design
The frame of Enumeration Areas demarcated by the National Population
Commission for 2006 Housing and Population Census was used to select micro
enterprises households for the Household component of the survey while the
frame of Small and Medium Enterprises with the Business Enterprises Division of
National Bureau of Statistics was used for the establishment component.
The selected Enumeration Areas cut across the frame of Enumeration Areas in
each state depending on the concentration of these Micro Enterprises. Forty (40)
EAs were selected per state including the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja which
was equally treated as a state in both components of the survey.
For the establishment component, 4000 Small and Medium Enterprises were
selected for study across the country in 13 sectors using the principles of
Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) to allocate number of establishments to
states according to the concentration of the establishments.
xiv. Manufacturing
xv. Wholesale and Retail trade; Repairs of Motor Vehicles and Motor Cycles
xvi. Accommodation and Food service Activities
xvii. Mining and Quarrying
xviii. Construction
xix. Water Supply; Sewerage, Waste Management and Remediation
xx. Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
xxi. Transport and Storage
xxii. Information and Communication
xxiii. Administrative and Support Services Activities
15 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
xxiv. Education
xxv. Art Entertainment and Recreation
xxvi. Other Services Activities
Survey Instruments
A generic questionnaire was adopted for both micro and the small and medium
enterprises. This was meant to allow easy administration of the questionnaires. A
very comprehensive manual of instruction was also adopted to explain in details
all that was required to fill the questionnaire properly and also serve as reference
material for the field staff.
16 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
4 Conclusion
The survey covered Micro, Small and Medium enterprises employing 1-199
persons. The Micro aspect of the survey covered enterprises employing 1-9
person(s) and it is classified as informal sector. The formal sector (Small and
Medium) covered enterprises engaging 10-199 persons.
The survey generated a lot of data and the result is no doubt revealing,
considering the key findings. Micro enterprises dominated with highest number of
enterprises, while Small and Medium enterprises result showed strong
correlation in the number of enterprises recorded in states like Lagos, Oyo and
Kano to mention but few.
The immense financial assistance received from the Small and Medium
Enterprise Development Agency of Nigeria (SMEDAN) on the survey did not only
enhanced the capability of the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in achieving
high response rate but also gave a lot of credence to the result of the survey. The
calibre of officers used for the exercise accounted for the high achievement.
Adequate publicity was another factor that contributed to the success of the
survey.
On the other hand, the attitude of some enterprises who delayed their
questionnaire or outright refusal is regrettable. The adverse consequences of
these actions are far reaching to the nation in government’s planning and
transformation programmes for the benefit of the people. The Government
economic programmes and policy formulation cannot be meaningfully achieved
without reliable data on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in
Nigeria.
This survey report which is the second in its series has presented a vivid
statistical report on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) activities in
Nigeria in the year 2013. It has revealed relevant statistics on MSMEs. activities.
17 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
The report also presents the contribution of MSMEs to the nation’s Gross
Domestic Product (GDP). It is expected that useful policy would emerge from the
major findings of this survey. The recommendations made in this report will assist
policy-makers in Nigeria in their ploy to move the economy forward.
Policy Recommendations
A proactive strategy is necessary to address the 6 key constraints faced
by thesector:
- Access to finance
- Weak infrastructure
- Inconsistency of Government Policies
- Access to market
- Multiple taxation
- Obsolete technology
Stable financial development, effective and secure financial systems and
targeted lending.
Good institutions at all levels of government supporting and promoting
MSMEs. This will ensure corruption and regulatory burdens are minimized
and rule of law, land and property rights, creditors’ rights etc. are
overcome accordingly.
Good infrastructure and facilities that encourage MSMEs to pool their
information and resources
High level of entrepreneurship and sufficient human capital development
Promotion of and access to innovation and technology and adequate
openness to foreign technology.
Good policies that encourage stable exchange rates, low inflation,
minimize entry regulations and promote attainment of higher levels of
productivity.
As the economy grows, appropriate rules and regulations that encourage
fair competition should be in place to guide the increasing number of
companies involved in the domestic and export markets.
Stable policies targeted at MSMEs that provide sustained support and
guidance and encourage investment in the sector
There is an urgent need for renewal and upgrading of MSMEs
infrastructure located in the existing Industrial Development Centres
through cluster development approach. The development process needs
to be implemented properly and should be strengthened with ample work
space and provision of cluster common infrastructure to enhance their
productivity.
18 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
MSMEs generally lack the understanding and ability to determine the
competencies that are required by an employee to fulfil his/her role. These
skill gaps exist in all the sectors. MSMEs will need to invest in training and
development that leads to skill development and job enhancement.
Government through SMEDAN should strive to provide a solution to the
skill gaps in the MSME sub-sector. This makes the issue of capacity
building an important area to focus upon. The building of new and
renovation of existing technical colleges is highly advised.
The competitiveness of any economy depends on how efficient all the
resources in the process of production are utilized and how efficient these
are marketed, hence the entire chain of production has to be efficient. This
means that the process of production has to be cost efficient and meets
quality needs of the consumers. The operational cost of MSMEs should be
addressed towards attaining cost efficiency through the use of latest
technology. The issue of power outages and other basic infrastructure
such as access roads and transportation should also be addressed.
Most of the MSMEs do not have patent right and their intellectual property
are not protected. The Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment,
SMEDAN and NOTAP should assist the MSMEs in this regard by setting
up an intellectual property facilitation cell, which will provide a range of
intellectual property related services, such as prior art search, patent
landscape and interface for technology transfer.
SMEDAN services to MSMEs should be restructured for positive impact.
The Agency should be able to provide a wide spectrum of technical
services to the MSMEs. These should include common facilities for
testing, tool room services, technology up-gradation, modernization,
quality improvement, training for entrepreneurship development, a number
of training for skill up-gradation, preparation of project and product
profiles, technical and managerial consultancy, assistance for exports and
advocacy to government on issues affecting MSMEs in Nigeria.
On access to finance by MSMEs, SMEDAN should critically address this
constraint by evolving a Credit Rating Scheme and Credit Guarantee
Scheme for the sub-sector. This will make financing the sub sector
attractive to banks and other investors.
Awareness/information dissemination of SMEDAN and SMEDAN activities
are very poor as revealed by the survey. The current knowledge
dissemination system is limited in its outreach. There is a need to develop
a better communication strategy and use of new age media tools.
Most of the MSMEs are not registered. Hence, creating a huge informal
economy with its adverse implication on Government policies and
19 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
programmes. SMEDAN should strive to mainstream these huge informal
enterprises to the formal economy.
Most of the sectors are operating below optimum capacity. SMEDAN
should endeavour to enhance their capacity.
The key to the economic emancipation of Nigeria lies in the generation of
sufficient financial revenue, foreign exchange, increased employment and the
opening of her borders to global competition. It is reasonable to say that this is
therefore firmly dependent upon the structured and orderly development of the
MSME sector.
20 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
5 Selected Tables for Micro-Enterprises
STATE NUMBER
ABIA 904,721
AKWA-IBOM 1,319,607
ANAMBRA 1,223,395
BAUCHI 944,503
BAYELSA 541,332
BENUE 1,479,145
CROSS RIVER 921,256
DELTA 1,536,158
EBONYI 577,216
EDO 898,084
EKITI 964,179
ENUGU 1,064,893
GOMBE 527,230
IMO 1,296,386
JIGAWA 820,001
KADUNA 1,635,453
KANO 1,794,358
KATSINA 1,216,604
KEBBI 692,104
KOGI 967,431
KWARA 717,909
LAGOS 3,224,324
NASARAWA 382,086
NIGER 977,240
OGUN 1,165,848
ONDO 1,026,770
OSUN 1,356,174
OYO 1,864,954
PLATEAU 786,504
RIVERS 1,749,911
SOKOTO 700,106
TARABA 513,973
ZAMFARA 722,360
FCT 482,365
Total 36,994,578
21 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 2 Micro-enterprises by Economic Sector
SECTOR 2013
NUMBER PERCENT
Agriculture 3,300,778 8.92
Mining and Quarrying 70,443 0.19
Manufacturing 4,887,395 13.21
Sewage, Waste Management and Remediation
Activities 7,875 0.02
Construction 731,303 1.98
Wholesale and Retail 20,224,627 54.67
Transportation and storage 1,760,932 4.76
Accommodation and Food Services 2,039,517 5.51
Information and communication 335,604 0.91
Administration and support services 213,724 0.58
Education 104,420 0.28
Arts, entertainment and Recreation 390,609 1.06
Other services 2,927,351 7.91
Transport, storage and communication 0 0.00
Hotel and Restaurant 0 0.00
Total 36,994,578 100.00
22 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 3: Micro-enterprise Business Registration by Economic Sector
STATE Sex
Male Female TOTAL
23 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
EBONYI 889,667 2.52 240,756 1.07 1,130,422
EDO 755,873 2.14 527,277 2.34 1,283,150
EKITI 716,777 2.03 723,993 3.21 1,440,771
ENUGU 855,020 2.42 601,920 2.67 1,456,940
GOMBE 1,659,926 4.71 172,505 0.76 1,832,431
IMO 858,003 2.43 602,331 2.67 1,460,335
JIGAWA 778,176 2.21 161,931 0.72 940,106
KADUNA 2,071,929 5.87 295,531 1.31 2,367,461
KANO 2,009,734 5.70 327,544 1.45 2,337,278
KATSINA 1,682,090 4.77 273,144 1.21 1,955,234
KEBBI 1,034,035 2.93 59,897 0.27 1,093,933
KOGI 2,897,835 8.21 1,312,771 5.82 4,210,605
KWARA 438,935 1.24 574,264 2.55 1,013,199
LAGOS 2,379,713 6.75 3,197,299 14.17 5,577,011
NASARAWA 348,701 0.99 164,964 0.73 513,665
NIGER 725,552 2.06 246,391 1.09 971,943
OGUN 1,004,908 2.85 747,949 3.32 1,752,856
ONDO 282,442 0.80 845,032 3.75 1,127,474
OSUN 547,016 1.55 1,049,513 4.65 1,596,530
OYO 1,664,976 4.72 1,837,567 8.15 3,502,542
PLATEAU 911,418 2.58 288,342 1.28 1,199,760
RIVERS 1,158,797 3.28 1,395,049 6.18 2,553,846
SOKOTO 1,048,176 2.97 31,105 0.14 1,079,281
TARABA 509,727 1.44 51,712 0.23 561,439
YOBE 0.00 0.00
ZAMFARA 721,057 2.04 239,717 1.06 960,774
FCT 295,696 0.84 304,993 1.35 600,689
Total 35,276,366 100.00 22,560,025 100.00 57,836,391
24 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 5: Employment Generation in Micro-enterprises by Economic Sector and Sex
Sector
Male Female Total
25 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 6: Distribution of Micro-enterprises by Legal Status
26 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 8: Micro-enterprises’ Business Insurance by Economic Sector
27 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 9: Distribution of Micro-enterprises by Initial Start-Up Capital Bands
28 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 11: Micro-Enterprises’ Business Capacity Turnover (Monthly Average Sales), 2012
Table 12: Micro-Enterprises’ Business Capacity Turnover (Monthly Average Sales), 2013
29 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 13: Micro-Enterprises’ Business Cost of Labour and Capital (Staff Emolument), 2012
Table 14: Micro-Enterprises’ Business Cost of Labour and Capital (including Staff
Emolument), 2013
30 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 15: Micro-Enterprises’ Total Administrative/Operating Costs, 2012
31 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 17: Micro-Enterprises’ Daily Usage of Alternative Source of Power by Sector
1-5 HOURS 6-10 HOURS 11-15 HOURS 16-20 HOURS ABOVE 20 HOURS
Sector Classification Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Agriculture 1,628,441 60.78 797,817 29.78 117,577 4.39 53,837 2.01 81,479 3.04 2,679,151
Mining and Quarrying 26,745 59.76 14,971 33.45 3,038 6.79 0 0.00 0 0.00 44,754
Manufacturing 2,491,346 61.80 1,132,167 28.08 304,126 7.54 54,644 1.36 49,040 1.22 4,031,324
Sewerage, Waste
Management and 2,295 32.16 4,840 67.84 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 7,136
Remediation Activities
Construction 326,406 59.68 149,204 27.28 45,257 8.28 10,062 1.84 15,970 2.92 546,899
Wholesale and Retail 9,262,230 59.64 4,719,945 30.36 1,033,745 6.58 142,528 0.91 388,130 2.51 15,546,577
Transportation and Storage 794,016 62.21 403,131 29.72 66,566 4.66 11,002 0.75 32,618 2.66 1,307,332
Accommodation and Food 838,265 52.12 559,232 36.19 132,407 8.68 13,895 0.93 31,296 2.09 1,575,094
Services
Information and 148,330 48.69 113,016 37.10 30,230 9.92 8,160 2.68 4,881 1.60 304,617
Communication
Administration and Support 83,990 49.56 83,499 46.10 3,170 2.04 0 0.00 3,559 2.29 174,219
Services
Education 43,396 46.87 47,585 51.40 709 0.77 0 0.00 891 0.96 92,581
Arts, entertainment and 202,993 60.00 106,697 32.10 33,221 5.52 1,903 1.57 3,489 0.80 348,304
Recreation
Other Services 1,389,279 56.46 800,150 32.56 168,792 7.00 42,442 1.83 53,799 2.15 2,454,461
Total 17,237,731 59.21 8,932,257 30.68 1,938,838 6.66 338,472 1.16 665,152 2.28 29,112,450
32 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 18: Micro-Enterprises’ Skills Gap by Economic Sector
Qualified Artisans
Qualified Artisans Not Readily
Sector Classification Total
Readily Available Available
Number Percent Number Percent
Agriculture 2,066,890 62.65 1,232,412 37.35 3,299,303
Mining and Quarrying 24,316 34.52 46,127 65.48 70,443
Manufacturing 2,798,249 57.44 2,073,256 42.56 4,871,504
Sewerage Waste
Management and
Remediation Activities 5,189 65.89 2,686 34.11 7,875
Construction 487,428 66.80 242,244 33.20 729,672
Wholesale and Retail 10,737,633 53.33 9,394,963 46.67 20,132,596
Transportation and Storage 973,152 55.13 784,490 44.87 1,757,642
Accommodations and Food
Services 978,659 48.01 1,055,046 51.99 2,033,704
Information and
Communication 185,804 56.63 142,309 43.37 328,113
Administration and Support
Services 10,154,464 74.04 59,259 25.96 213,723
Education 51,345 49.17 53,075 50.83 104,420
Arts, entertainment and
Recreation 260,392 68.24 130,216 31.76 390,609
Other Services 1,651,146 57.84 1,189,502 42.16 2,840,652
Total 20,400,877 55.40 16,421,489 44.60 36,822,365
NA/Missing 172,213
33 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 19: Major Government Policy that Affects Micro-Enterprises Most Favorably
POLICY FREQUENCY
ENVIRONMENT SANITARY 18,505,191
ROAD MAINTENANCE 19,701,440
INTRODUCTION OF RAW MATERIALS 9,752,374
JOB CREATION 11,754,288
TAXES 4,869,741
EXCHANGE RATE 4,120,167
INTERVENTION FUND 7,783,543
POWER SUPPLY 11,358,723
POLITICAL STABILITY 11,632,135
BANKING REFORM 6,340,532
FERTILIZER PRODUCTION 8,626,993
POLICY FREQUENCY
POWER SUPPLY 20,623,973
DEMOLITION 11,847,433
TAXES 15,519,701
TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,416,017
ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION 7,995,490
INFRASTRUCTURE/SOCIAL AMENITIES 13,606,614
IMPORTATION OF FUEL 11,752,140
TRADE PERMIT 9,903,041
WITHDRAWAL OF SUBSIDIES 13,736,072
INTRODUCTION OF SHARIA 5,109,919
POVERTY ALLEVIATION 7,208,231
CUSTOM DUTIES 8,549,901
BANNING OF IMPORTANT OF GOODS 9,533,950
INTEREST RATE 8,255,754
PENSION 3,500,236
EMBARGO ON LOAN FACILITIES 9,491,992
34 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 21: Micro-Enterprises’ Priority Areas of Required Assistance
35 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 22: Micro-Enterprises’ Awareness of SMEDAN by State
STATE AWARE
ABIA 69,128
AKWA-IBOM 181,164
ANAMBRA 47,980
BAUCHI 229,523
BAYELSA 89,517
BENUE 125,724
CROSS RIVER 150,770
DELTA 253,550
EBONYI 145,078
EDO 72,124
EKITI 52,687
ENUGU 16,587
GOMBE 200,329
IMO 4,660
JIGAWA 209,477
KADUNA 217,092
KANO 612,725
KATSINA 670,939
KEBBI 322,551
KOGI 41,690
KWARA 95,125
LAGOS 273,128
NASARAWA 28,961
NIGER 229,413
OGUN 99,482
ONDO 140,609
OSUN 134,268
OYO 129,160
PLATEAU 102,347
RIVERS 228,844
SOKOTO 267,199
TARABA 15,779
ZAMFARA 247,568
FCT 131,768
Total 5,836,947
36 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 23: Micro-Enterprises’ Benefitted from SMEDAN by State
STATE BENEFITTED
ABIA 7,198
AKWA-IBOM 2,451
ANAMBRA 0
BAUCHI 0
BAYELSA 0
BENUE 0
CROSS RIVER 2,752
DELTA 2,862
EBONYI 2,185
EDO 11,872
EKITI 1,718
ENUGU 0
GOMBE 8,337
IMO 0
JIGAWA 1,455
KADUNA 19,383
KANO 3,406
KATSINA 52,520
KEBBI 29,542
KOGI 1,380
KWARA 4,715
LAGOS 7,970
NASARAWA 748
NIGER 2,270
OGUN 0
ONDO 1,886
OSUN 0
OYO 5,888
PLATEAU 17,441
RIVERS 20,855
SOKOTO 7,074
TARABA 0
ZAMFARA 0
FCT 1,200
Total 217,108
37 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
6 Selected Tables for Small and Medium Enterprises
Table 24: Small and Medium Enterprises by State
STATE MEDIUM
SMALL
ABIA 1,769 40
AKWA-IBOM 898 195
ANAMBRA 1,620 117
BAUCHI 2,039 27
BAYELSA 354 72
BENUE 1,146 22
CROSS RIVER 1,126 168
DELTA 1,444 -
EBONYI 1,206 4
EDO 1,879 118
EKITI 903 126
ENUGU 812 99
GOMBE 1,043 65
IMO 1,259 135
JIGAWA 1,022 75
KADUNA 2,712 170
KANO 7,790 496
KATSINA 1,256 99
KEBBI 898 91
KOGI 827 17
KWARA 164 62
LAGOS 11,044 619
NASARAWA 1,098 22
NIGER 1,258 100
OGUN 1,690 104
ONDO 1,805 194
OSUN 2,247 25
OYO 7,468 519
PLATEAU 2,070 110
RIVERS 2,981 41
SOKOTO 631 210
TARABA 891 69
ZAMFARA 577 16
FCT 2,244 446
Total 68,168 4,670
38 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 25: Comparison of Total Employment by State, 2010 and 2013
2013 2010
STATE
Male Female Total % Male Female Total %
39 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 26: Total Employment by Sex and Economic Sector
40 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 28: Distribution of Ownership by Sex and Economic Sector
INFORMATION AND
COMMUNICATION 280 89.07 34 10.93 314
ADMINISTRATIVE AND
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 2,049 82.32 440 17.68 2,489
ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT
AND RECREATION 200 89.72 23 10.28 223
OTHERS SERVICES
ACTIVITIES 2,204 78.82 592 21.18 2,796
WATER SUPPLY,
SEWERAGE, WASTE
MANAGEMENT AND
REMEDIATION ACT 21 95.24 1 4.76 22
Table 29: Distribution of Small and Medium Enterprises by Ownership Status and Economic
Sector
PRIVATE FAITH
SOLE
BUSINESS PARTNER LIMITED COOPERA BASED
SECTOR
PROPRIETORS
SHIP LIABILITY TIVE ORGANI
OTHERS TOTAL
HIP
COMPANY SATION
41 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
WHOLESALE/RETA
IL TRADE 10,501 1,120 2,941 56 0 164 14,782
42 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 30: Distribution of Small and Medium Enterprises by Economic Sector
SMALL MEDIUM
ECONOMIC SECTOR
CONSTRUCTION 500 67
INFORMATION AND
COMMUNICATION 448 31
43 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 31: Distribution of Enterprises by Start-up Capital
Below 10 57,329
10 - 20 4,287
21 - 30 654
31 - 40 271
41 - 50 390
Above 50 1,577
Total 64,508
44 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 34: Business Insurance by Economic Sector
45 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 35: Distribution of Enterprises by Daily Usage of Alternative Source of Power and
Economic Sector
6 - 10 16 - 20 Above 20
ECONOMIC SECTOR
1 - 5 Hours Hours 11 - 15 Hours Hours Hours
INFORMATION AND
COMMUNICATION 157 143 72 36 38
ADMINISTRATIVE AND
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 1,437 938 321 93 186
ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND
RECREATION 121 77 29 7 27
OTHERS SERVICES
ACTIVITIES 1,486 1,148 274 243 211
46 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 36: Small and Medium Enterprises' Employees' Level of Education
12% NO EDUCATION
17% PRIMARY
JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL (JSS)
SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL (SSS)
2%
VOCATIONAL/COMMERCIAL
NCE/OND/NURSING
12% B.A/B.SC/B.ED/HND
M.SC/M.A/M.ADIN
DOCTORATE
51%
OTHERS
47 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 37: Small and Medium Enterprises' Skills Gap by Economic Sector
QUALIFIED ARTISANS
QUALIFIED ARTISANS
ECONOMIC SECTOR NOT READILY
READILY AVAILABLE
AVAILABLE
MANUFACTURING 8,386 2,389
MINNING & QUARRYING 198 48
ACCOMMODATION & FOOD SERVICES 5,495 1,864
AGRICULTURE 997 501
WHOLESALE/RETAIL TRADE 9,235 5,512
CONSTRUCTION 470 48
TRANSPORT & STORAGE 605 196
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION 362 86
EDUCATION 18,904 6,559
ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT 2,215 812
ACTIVITIES
ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND 178 85
RECREATION
OTHERS SERVICES ACTIVITIES 2,613 875
WATER SUPPLY, SEWERAGE, WASTE 10 15
MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION ACT
TOTAL 49,668 18,990
48 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y
Table 38 MSMEs Contribution to National GDP, 2013
49 | S M E D A N / N B S M S M E S U R V E Y