Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 94 views

    Humes Standard of Taste Summary

    Uploaded by

    Priya
    Hume addresses the apparent contradiction between the great variation seen in judgments of taste versus the widespread agreement about certain works of art. He proposes that while judgments of taste are subjective responses, there can still be objective standards that account for consistent judgments. Hume argues tastes can be reconciled by recognizing that some works possess qualities that tend to produce feelings in qualified judges. A qualified judge is one with refined sensibilities developed through practice and comparison. Variations in judgments can be explained by deficiencies or biases in the faculties of perception.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Humes Standard of Taste Summary

    Uploaded by

    Priya
    94 views2 pages
    Hume addresses the apparent contradiction between the great variation seen in judgments of taste versus the widespread agreement about certain works of art. He proposes that while judgments of taste are subjective responses, there can still be objective standards that account for consistent judgments. Hume argues tastes can be reconciled by recognizing that some works possess qualities that tend to produce feelings in qualified judges. A qualified judge is one with refined sensibilities developed through practice and comparison. Variations in judgments can be explained by deficiencies or biases in the faculties of perception.

    Original Title

    _humes-standard-of-taste-summary

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Hume addresses the apparent contradiction between the great variation seen in judgments of taste versus the widespread agreement about certain works of art. He proposes that while judgments of taste are subjective responses, there can still be objective standards that account for consistent judgments. Hume argues tastes can be reconciled by recognizing that some works possess qualities that tend to produce feelings in qualified judges. A qualified judge is one with refined sensibilities developed through practice and comparison. Variations in judgments can be explained by deficiencies or biases in the faculties of perception.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    94 views2 pages

    Humes Standard of Taste Summary

    Uploaded by

    Priya
    Hume addresses the apparent contradiction between the great variation seen in judgments of taste versus the widespread agreement about certain works of art. He proposes that while judgments of taste are subjective responses, there can still be objective standards that account for consistent judgments. Hume argues tastes can be reconciled by recognizing that some works possess qualities that tend to produce feelings in qualified judges. A qualified judge is one with refined sensibilities developed through practice and comparison. Variations in judgments can be explained by deficiencies or biases in the faculties of perception.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    7/27/2019 Hume's Standard of Taste [Summary]

    Summary: Hume, “Of the Standard of Taste” (1760)

    Introduction

    Hume, being a good empiricist, observes that there is great variation in judgments of taste.

    “The great variety of Taste, as well as of opinion, which prevails in the world, is too obvious not
    to have fallen under every one's observation.” [¶1]

    But we also find widespread agreement in judgments of taste about certain works of art and
    artists.

    “The same Homer, who pleased at Athens and Rome two thousand years ago, is still admired
    at Paris and at London. All the changes of climate, government, religion, and language, have
    not been able to obscure his glory.” [¶11]

    So we seem at the outset to have a contradiction on our hands. There seems to be a good deal
    of anecdotal evidence for cases where judgments of taste vary and where they agree.

    How do we sort this out?


    1. Can we reconcile disagreements of taste? If so, how?

    Note that Hume is looking for a way to reconcile the experience of aesthetic objects, not just the
    testimony about them.

    The goal is a standard for appropriate or true judgments of taste.

    “It is natural for us to seek a Standard of Taste; a rule, by which the various sentiments of men
    may be reconciled...” [¶6]

    2. What makes a JT true or false? Are there rules that determine, in any given instance, whether
    one’s JT is correct?

    I say Mozart’s Grand Partita is beautiful, you say it’s not. Where do we go from there?

    Hume’s view seems to be that there must be standards of taste to explain the cases of universal
    or near universal agreement about particular  things, but they must allow for impediments to
    correct application in order to account for variations and inconsistencies.

    Skeptical Views

    In ¶7, Hume presents skeptical views regarding standards.

    1. Judgments of taste are not judgments about the nature of the object, but simply reports on
    one’s response to the object in question.

    “All sentiment is right; because sentiment has a reference to nothing beyond itself, and is
    always real, wherever a man is conscious of it.” [¶7. Note that in Hume’s day, as Jonathan
    Bennett tells us in his revised version of the essay1, the concept of sentiment  included
    feelings, opinions, and attitudes.]

    So, assuming it’s impossible to be mistaken about one’s own mental states (cf. Descartes), it
    follows that every sincere assertion such as “I think it’s beautiful” must be true. But the same

    1 David Hume, Four Essays, Jonathan Bennett, ed. 7. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfbits/himmort.pdf


    (Last access 15 Oct 11.)

    http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/humes-standard-of-taste-summary 1/2
    7/27/2019 Hume's Standard of Taste [Summary]

    follows for someone making the opposite claim— “I think it’s ugly”). Both must be true, even
    though they are contradictory. So on this account we have relativity in judgment but no
    disagreement about an objective matter of fact and, therefore, nothing to argue about.

    2. There are no “real” aesthetic qualities of objects.

    “Beauty is no quality in things themselves…. To seek the real beauty, or real deformity is as
    fruitless an inquiry, as to pretend to ascertain the real sweet or real bitter.” [¶7]

    In 18th century English, “real” tended to signify that which has qualities or properties, as well
    perhaps as causes and effects, independent of our sentiments. Hume denies, without
    argument, that beauty is a “real” property of objects. Maybe he takes it to be self-evidently
    false, since beauty is not the sort of thing that affects other objects “on its own”, independent of
    what anyone thinks or feels.

    Reconciliation—Hume’s Non-Skeptical View

    The only other option which is not skeptical is the one Hume defends, which turns on the
    distinction between primary and secondary qualities.

    “Though it be certain, that beauty and deformity, more than sweet and bitter, are not [primary]
    qualities in objects, but [secondary qualities that] belong entirely to the sentiment, internal [to
    body or mind] or external [sense-impressions, sensations]; it must be allowed, that there are
    certain [primary] qualities in objects, which are fitted by nature to produce those particular
    feelings.” [¶16]

    So this suggests a third possibility:

    3. A judgment of taste is about the qualities of an object that constitute its disposition to


    produce certain feelings in suitably qualified and properly situated perceivers. [This is
    illustrated by the story of the wine cask and the key with the leather strap.]

    The qualified judge is characterized in the following way:

    “Strong sense, united to delicate sentiment, improved by practice, perfected by comparison,


    and cleared of all prejudice, can alone entitle critics to this valuable character; and the joint
    verdict of such, wherever they are to be found, is the true standard of taste and beauty.” [¶23]

     Acceptable and understandable variations and impediments to correct judgments of taste are
    accounted for in the following way:

    “The general principles of taste are uniform in human nature: Where men vary in their
     judgments, some defect or perversion in the faculties may commonly be remarked; proceeding
    either from prejudice, from want of practice, or want of delicacy: and there is just reason for
    approving one taste, and condemning another. But where there is such a diversity in the
    internal frame or external situation as is entirely blameless on both sides, and leaves no room
    to give one the preference above the other; in that case a certain degree of diversity in
     judgment is unavoidable, and we seek in vain for a standard, by which we can reconcile the
    contrary sentiments.” [¶28]

    Timothy Quigley, revised 1 Feb 12).

    http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/humes-standard-of-taste-summary 2/2

    You might also like