Evaluation of Service Failure of Three Phase Induction Motor Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Evaluation of Service Failure of Three Phase Induction Motor Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Evaluation of Service Failure of Three Phase Induction Motor Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Effects Analysis
Abstract
The need to remain competitive in a highly competitive market has necessitated the quest by
manufacturer to strive for customer satisfaction. To facilitate their pursuit of these expected
standard objectives, manufacturers adopt up-to-date techniques. One among many of such
cutting edge techniques is Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA. Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis (FMEA) is a systematized quality determinative technique used for reliability
evaluation. It seeks to ascertain likely failures and their consequences; and is effective in
enhancing reliability of a system or product. This study engaged the procedure for performing
the FMEA as outlined in MIL-STD 1629 to analyze the failure modes of three phase Induction
motor. The result showed that the three phase induction motor is rugged and reliable and
majorly affected by externalities like improper installation, lack of proper maintenance and
mismatched spare parts. Therefore if these areas of concern are given the right attention, major
failure modes of induction motors will be forestalled.
Key Words: Risk Priority number, Three phase Induction motor, Severity, Failure mode,
Detection
1
Introduction
To maintain competiveness in the market, manufactures are saddled with the task of satisfying
their customers’ expectations of cost effective, reliable and high quality products. To facilitate
their pursuit of these expected standard objectives, manufacturers adopt up-to-date techniques.
One among many of such cutting edge techniques is Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA).
This FMEA technique is employed to ascertain probable failure modes, identify their effects on
both the product and the personnel using them, as well as determine mitigating procedures
(Janarthanan and Kumar, 2013). This study seeks to evaluate the reliability of three phase
induction motor by using the technique of FMEA to ascertain its failure potential and identify
Three phase induction motor is one of the most broadly accepted and extensively used electric
motors. This stems from their ruggedness and virtually maintenance-free operation. It is an
asynchronous machine which operates on the principle of induction. Nevertheless, like other
machines, the three phase induction motors are susceptible to defects as well which could
possibly result in downright damage to the motor. To ensure optimum performance, a system,
subsystem, component of equipment, the component itself, or even a certain process its failure
mode is often determined. Failure mode describes the manner in which failures presents itself.
This is important when attempting to avoid, prevent, understand or resolve a failure (Chiejine,
2021). A series of failure modes could reveal greatly, about the practical effects of failure
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematized quality determinative technique
used for reliability evaluation. It seeks to ascertain likely failures and their consequences; and is
FMEAs are extensively used engineering analysis tool used during design stage. However, the
failure of existing equipment already in service are also analyzed with FMEAs; in which case it
is handy in evaluating and enhancing the preventive maintenance agenda. As note by Road to
Reliability (2021) and Arun et al, (2013) FMEA analyses the following:
i. The possible failure modes of product or machine that explains how it fails to carry out
ii. The cause(s) of possible failure (e.g. material defect, Design deficiencies, processing and
iii. What effect the failure has on either the equipment the item is part of or the person using
it;
In the late 1940s, a need arose in the American military to investigate problems with the failure
eliminate all likely causation. This structural procedure is FMEA (Datalyzer, 2015). Arising
from the effectiveness of this technique, the nuclear and aerospace industry adopted it. Similarly,
NASA implemented it and believed the success of the moon landing was by its use. Furthermore,
when food contamination on space mission became a concern to NASA, they developed an
identical methodical tool termed Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) which
3
was exclusively for the food industry. Again in the 1970s, there were reoccurrences of fatal fires
in Ford Pinto occasioned by slow speed shunt each time the petrol tank split. To put an end to
this, Ford Motor Company employed FMEA in the course of their design (McDermott et al,
2019). As time went by, other industries with quest for topmost degree of reliability, for instance,
oil and gas and semiconductor adopted and employed FMEA. Hence, this technique is today
being widely used reliability and quality assurance analysis for diverse products including white
goods and common electronic products as well as industrial electrical contrivances like the three
phase induction motor which is the object of the present study. Practically, the FMEA is a risk
analysis and defect decreasing tool which focuses on three vital elements namely Severity (S) of
the defect for both equipment and the users, the Occurrence (O) of the possible causation and
The three phase induction motor (also referred to as asynchronous motor) converts electrical
energy into mechanical energy and are the most prevalently used motors particularly in
industrial, commercial and domestic spheres on account of their ruggedness simplicity, low cost
and high performance (Wan and Hong, 2001). Furthermore, it needs no additional starting motor
and necessity not to be synchronized. They are termed asynchronous motors because they run at
Basically, the induction motors principally comprise two parts which are Stator and Rotor.
Stator
4
As the name implies, this is the stationary part of the motor, and produces a rotating magnetic
field to interact with the rotor. It consists of a number of stampings with slots meant to bear the
three-phase windings. The coils of insulated wires are implanted into the provided slots. Each set
of coils, as well as the core surroundings form an electromagnet (a pair of poles) when an AC
supply is applied. The inner connection of the stator windings determines the number of poles an
created. The speed requirement is what determines the number of poles. Thus, the more the
number of poles, the lower the speed. This is governed by the relation
1
Ns ∝ (1)
P
120 f
Ns= (2)
P
Where N s is the speed; P is the number of poles and f is the frequency of supply voltage
Rotor
This is the rotating part of the motor. Generally, there are two types of rotors in three phase
induction motor. They are:
A squirrel cage rotor consists of a laminated cylindrical core. The circular slots at the outer
periphery are semi-closed. The slots are not made parallel to each other but are bit skewed, as the
skewing prevents magnetic locking of stator and rotor teeth and makes the working of the motor
more smooth and quieter. The squirrel cage rotor consists of aluminum, brass or copper bars as
shown in Fig.1 (a) and Fig.1 (b). This aluminum, brass or copper bars are called rotor
5
conductors, and are placed in the slots on the periphery of the rotor. The rotor conductors are
permanently shorted by the copper, or aluminum rings called the end rings. To provide
mechanical strength, these rotor conductors are braced to the end ring and hence form a complete
closed circuit resembling a cage, and hence got its name as a squirrel cage induction motor. The
squirrel cage rotor winding is made symmetrical. As end rings permanently short the bars, the
rotor resistance is quite small, and it is not possible to add external resistance as the bars get
permanently shorted. The absence of slip ring and brushes make the construction of squirrel
cage. Three phase induction motor very simple and robust and hence widely used. These motors
The phase wound rotor is also known as slip ring rotor (or simply, wound rotor). It consists of a
cylindrical core which is laminated the outer periphery of the rotor has a semi-closed slot which
carries a 3 phase insulated windings. The rotor winding are connected in star. As its name
6
indicates, the slip rings are mounted on the shaft with brushes resting on them. The brushes are
connected to the variable resistor. Fig. 2 illustrates the electrical diagram of slip ring three phase
induction motor. The function of the slip rings and the brushes is to provide a means of
connecting external resistors in the rotor circuit. The resistor enables the variation of each rotor
(i) Increase the starting torque and decrease the starting current
The rotor of this type is also skewed. A mild steel shaft is passed through the center of the rotor
and is fixed to it. The purpose of the shaft is to transfer mechanical power.
Fig. 2 shows a typical electrical diagram of a slip ring three phase induction motor while Fig. 3
7
Fig. 3: Phase wound (Slip ring) Rotor
The three phase induction motors have diverse use in domestic, commercial and industrial
applications. These include in lifts, cranes, hoists, large capacity exhaust fans, Driving lathe
machines, crushers, oil extraction mills, textiles etc. (Princy, 2020)
Methodology
The procedure followed while performing the FMEA in this study is as outlined in MIL-STD
1629 9 (1980). These steps are outline below and further illustrated in the flow chart of Fig. 4 as
presented by Sheng-Hsien and Shin-Yann (1995).
8
Fig. 4 :The Flow Chart for FMEA steps (Sheng-Hsien and Shin- Yann, 1995)
The severity rating of the failure mode is graded on a scale from 1 to 10. It is an estimation of
how severe or otherwise, the effects would be if a given failure takes place. Sometimes, as a
result of antecedent experience, the severity is well defined. There are however, diverse
contributory factors towards the overall severity of the situation being analyzed (Robin et al
1996). A serious effect marks a high severity grading and ensuing critical risk (Arun et al, 2013).
For instance, a failure mode that wields a severity number of 10 connotes a serious
discontentment and perhaps annoyance of the customer which could result to bodily injury as a
9
result of failure. On the other hand, severity ratings in the range of 4-6 brings about slight
dissatisfaction of customers while the failure mode within the range of 1-3 are interpreted as not
so severe, and may well not be detected (Robin et al, 1996). Table 1 provides the severity rating
A high occurrence rating shows great failure occurrence potential. Under this phase, the
processes and the documented failure mode (Robin et al, 1996). The possibility of failure
occurrence is ranked on a scale from 1-10. An inexorable failure, which occurs often is rated
between 8-10. The failures with mild occurrences are ranked from 4-6, while those with low or
eliminated failures have 1-3 occurrence rankings. Table 2 shows the occurrence ratings and risk
factor evaluations.
10
Table 2: Occurrence (O) Ratings (Tai-wu et al, 2019); (Arun et al, 2013)
This provides a ranking which is based on an evaluation of the probability that the failure mode
selected. The capability of failure detection is graded on a scale from 1-10. This grading is
however in the converse direction. In other words, a high detection rating shows low detection
capability. For instance, a rating “1” denotes a very high probability that a failure would be
detected before getting to the customer, and a rating of “10” indicates a low to zero probability
that the failure will not be detected. Table 3 shows the detection ratings and risk factor
evaluations.
Table 3: Detection (D) Ratings (Tai-wu et al, 2019); (Arun et al, 2013)
In any FMEA procedure, one key element is the Risk Priority Number (RPN). This establishes
where efforts need to be focused as well as the failure modes that will be given primacy of
mollification. RPN is calculated by multiplying the three variables namely: Severity (S),
The RPN values range from 0-1000 which provides a measurable means of weighing up the risks
in the FMEA analysis. This, however does not by any means have RPN as an unbroken linear
scale from 0-1000 rather, there are only 120 probable outcomes that range from 0-1000. These
outcomes have been generally found to be vulnerable to little changes. Furthermore, smaller
value of RPN is better than its higher value (Rakesh et al, 2013). Correct calculation of RPN
makes it easy to ascertain areas of critical concern. Some failures might be less severe, but
12
contaminants
2. Ground Winding 6 3 2 Overheating ;lightening Rewinding or replacement 36
winding shorted either ;pressure of a tight coil fit, hot of motor
shorted to to the spots caused by lamination
frame laminated core damage,
or to the motor
frame; slot
insulation
breakdown
3. Phase-to-phase Voltage 6 4 2 Insulation breakdown at the Rewinding or replacement 48
short between phases coil ends or the slots of motor
can be very
high
4. Open winding Charred 6 3 2 Undersized lead lugs, faulty Rewinding or replacement 36
connections in internal coil-to-coil of motor
the motor connections, severe
connection overloads, and physically
terminal box; damaged coils, phase-to
motor runs phase shorts, ground-to-
more slowly frame-shorts
and overheated
5. Burned Power output is 7 4 1 Operating on single phase Rewinding or replacement 28
windings from cut of motor
operating on approximately
single phase in half if it
happens while
the motor is
running; it will
continue to run
but it can no
longer start by
itself (it has no
rotating
magnetic field
to get it
started)
6. Open rotor bars Loss of power; 6 4 3 Overload burn out, arcing in 1.They can be repaired, 72
or end rings slow starting the slot from a short recast, or rebarred (if it is
and lower than winding, loose bar vibration, economical)
rated RPN; thermal growth stress (from 2. otherwise the motor can
very low starting), Flaws in bar be replaced
ampere with no materials (casting flaws) and
load. poor connection with end
rings
7. Open end rings Muse uneven 5 5 4 Flawed casting, motor burn 100
torque and out from overload,
some power mechanical damage, thermal
loss; electrical growth stress.
vibration
8. Misaligned Draws high 6 5 3 Wrong bearing shim Correcting the 90
rotor/stator ampere and placement, wrong bearing misalignment using
iron will lose width, incorrect installation vibration tester or analyzer
power; charred of bearing on the shaft, stator to determine the right
stator winding core shifted on its shell, rotor balance.
shifted on its shaft.
9 Rotor dragging Motor runs 6 4 2 Wrong bearing shim Replace motor 48
on the stator hotter than placement, wrong bearing
normal; low width, incorrect installation
voltage; power of bearing on the shaft, stator
and efficiency core shifted on its shell, rotor
loss; degraded shifted on its shaft.
magnetic
circuit.
13
1 Rotor loose on Rumbling or 7 4 2 Excessive clearance between Repair could be effected 56
0. shaft vibrating rotating and stationary depending on the price of
sound; a red elements of the machine replacement motor and the
dust forms such as bearing importance of the motor in
between the the plant operation.
shaft and rotor Otherwise, rotor (and
iron (this is shaft) can be replaced; the
oxidized iron) rotor can be bored out and
caused by the a new one shaft fitted to it
rubbing action or; a thin metal wedge can
between the be driven between the shaft
shaft and the and rotor to secure it.
rotor iron.
Arising from Table 4, the FMEA table for three phase induction motor, it is made known that
induction motor faults may be classified into fault on stator and rotor. However, it is obvious that
the induction motor is on the average, reliable seeing that most of the RPN values are low. On
the other hand, the high value wielded by open end rings, misaligned rotor/stator iron and open
rotor bars or end rings bring to light that such malfunctioning are due to wrong or incorrect
installation, mismatched spare parts, wrong/poor operation procedures etc. All these are external
factors. Attention needs to be directed to attending to the above concerns with additional
attention given to appropriate and quality power supply to the motor to forestall adverse effect on
Conclusion
The study dealt with FMEA procedure of three phase induction motor. Thus, the three phase
induction motor used for industrial, commercial and domestic application has been analyzed with
the expected failure mode observed and recorded. The probable cause and effects of failure
modes were evaluated with their severity values. The risk priority number was calculated by
14
By this study, a well documented method for operating three phase induction motor to ensure
References
Arun, J; Pravin Kumar, S; Venkatesh, M and Giridharan, A.S. (2013). Reliability Study on Spark
15
Plugs using Process failure mode and effect analysis. International Journal of
Chen, Y; Ye, C; Liu, B and Kang, R. (2012). Status of FMEA Research and engineering
Chiejine, C.M. (2021). Introduction to Testing Methods and Reliability. Martinspress Publishers
Elmore, W.A. (2004). Protective Relaying Theory and Applications. New York, NY: Marcel
Dekker, Inc.
IEC 60812 (2006). Analysis Techniques for system reliability-Procedure for Failure Mode and
Janarthanan, V and Kumar, D.R.(2013). Root Cause Analysis and Process Failure mode and
McDermott, R.R; Mikulak, R.J and Beauregard, M. R (2019). The Basics of FMEA 2nd Edition,
2009.
MIL-STD 1629 (1980). Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode and effect analysis 1980
Princy, A.J (2020). Induction Motors, main types and Different applications. http://www.support
Rakesh, R.B; Cherian, J and George, M (2013). FMEA Analysis. An integrated approach for
Road to Reliability (2021). Why the FMEA is my equipment not Reliable? 2017-2021. R2
16
Robin, E; Raymond, J. M and Michael, R.B (1996). The Basics of FMEA-Productivity Press
(1996)
Sheng-Hsien, G.T and Shin-Yann, M.H (1995). Failure mode and effects analysis for reducing
Breakdowns of sub system in the life care product manufacturing industry. Vol. 2,
Tai-wu,C; Huai-Wei,L; Kai-Ying, C and James, J. H. L (2019). A Novel FMEA Model based on
Rough BWM and Rough TOPSIS-AL for Risk Assessment. Mathematics, 2019, 7,
874
Wan, T.W and Hong, H (2001). An on-line neuro-fuzzy approach for detecting faults in
M A, 678-883
17