Transmedial Growth and Adaptation 251

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Transmedial Growth and Adaptation 251

Interestingly, Tolkien even mediates the description through Pippin’s words,


which are of course Tolkien’s own as well. Saruman’s voice receives a similar
treatment, with a description of its effect rather than merely its sound:

Suddenly another voice spoke, low and melodious, its very sound an
enchantment. Those who listened unwarily to that voice could seldom
report the words that they heard; and if they did, they wondered, for little
power remained in them. Mostly they remembered only that it was a
delight to hear the voice speaking, all that it said seemed wise and reason-
able, and desire awoke in them by swift agreement to seem wise them-
selves. When others spoke they seemed harsh and uncouth by contrast; and
if they gainsaid the voice, anger was kindled in the hearts of those under
the spell. For some the spell lasted only while the voice spoke to them, and
when it spoke to another they smiled, as men do who see through a jug-
gler’s trick while others gape at it. For many the sound of the voice alone
was enough to hold them enthralled; but for those whom it conquered the
spell endured when they were far away, and ever they heard that soft voice
whispering and urging them. But none were unmoved; none rejected its
pleas and its commands without an effort of mind and will, so long as its
master had control of it.10

Both Treebeard’s eyes and Saruman’s voice would be hard to incarnate into
image and sound without losing the powers that Tolkien can attribute to them in
a written description. Words can also control the level of vagueness that an author
desires, and they can easily be manipulated to hide ellipses, helping them to
go unnoticed in a text. Finally, they allow anyone to produce as elaborate and
epically-scaled a world as one can imagine for no more than the cost of pencil and
paper, making them the most common elements used in world-building.
On the other hand, words are also the most provocative and connotative of
world-building elements, relying upon the audience’s experiences and world
gestalten to produce their effects. As Tolkien puts it:

The radical distinction between all art (including drama) that offers a visible
presentation and true literature is that it imposes one visible form. Literature
works from mind to mind and is thus more progenitive. It is at once more
universal and more poignantly particular. If it speaks of bread or wine or
stone or tree, it appeals to the whole of these things, to their ideas; yet each
hearer will give to them a peculiar personal embodiment in his imagina-
tion. Should the story say “he ate bread”, the dramatic producer or painter
can only show “a piece of bread” according to his taste or fancy, but the
hearer of the story will think of bread in general picture it in some form of
his own. If a story says “he climbed a hill and saw a river in the valley
below”, the illustrator may catch, or nearly catch, his own vision of such

You might also like