Group7 - Decision Tree Analysis
Group7 - Decision Tree Analysis
Group7 - Decision Tree Analysis
MBAIBCC107
GROUP 7
Ankur Mittal
Nishant Bhandari
Richardson Debbarama
Shivanshu Srivastava
Sholack Stanly
Shubham Jain
Shubham Saini
DECISION TREE IN DECISION ANALYSIS
A decision tree can be used as a model for a sequential decision problem under uncertainty.
A decision tree describes graphically the decisions to be made, the events that may occur,
and the outcomes associated with combinations of decisions and events. Probabilities are
assigned to the events, and values are determined for each outcome. A major goal of the
analysis is to determine the best decisions.
DECISION TREE STRUCTURE
Decision tree models include such concepts as nodes, branches, terminal values, strategy,
payoff distribution, certain equivalent, and the rollback method.
Nodes and Branches Decision trees have three kinds of nodes and two kinds of branches. A
decision node is a point where a choice must be made; it is shown as a square. The branches
extending from a decision node are decision branches, each branch representing one of the
possible alternatives or courses of action available at that point. The set of alternatives must
be mutually exclusive (if one is chosen, the others cannot be chosen) and collectively
exhaustive (all possible alternatives must be included in the set). There are two major
decisions in the problem. First, the company must decide whether or not to prepare a
proposal. Second, if it prepares a proposal and is awarded the contract, it must decide which
of the three approaches to try to satisfy the contract. An event node is a point where
uncertainty is resolved (a point where the decision maker learns about the occurrence of an
event). An event node, sometimes called a "chance node," is shown as a circle. The event set
consists of the event branches extending from an event node, each branch representing one
of the possible events that may occur at that point. The set of events must be mutually
exclusive (if one occurs, the others cannot occur) and collectively exhaustive (all possible
events must be included in the set). Each event is assigned a subjective probability; the sum
of probabilities for the events in a set must equal one.
In general, decision nodes and branches represent the controllable factors in a decision
problem; event nodes and branches represent uncontrollable factors. Decision nodes and
event nodes are arranged in order of subjective chronology. For example, the position of an
event node corresponds to the time when the decision maker learns the outcome of the event
(not necessarily when the event occurs). The third kind of node is a terminal node,
representing the final result of a combination of decisions and events. Terminal nodes are the
endpoints of a decision tree, shown as the end of a branch on hand-drawn diagrams and as a
triangle or vertical bar on computer-generated diagrams.
For representing a sequential decision problem, the tree diagram is usually better than the
written description. In some decision problems, the choice may be obvious by looking at the
diagram. That is, the decision maker may know enough about the desirability of the outcomes
(endpoints in the tree) and how likely they are. But usually the next step in the analysis after
documenting the structure is to assign values to the endpoints.
Types of Decisions:
There are two main types of decision trees that are based on the target variable, i.e.,
categorical variable decision trees and continuous variable decision trees.
1. Categorical variable decision tree
A categorical variable decision tree includes categorical target variables that are divided into
categories. For example, the categories can be yes or no. The categories mean that every
stage of the decision process falls into one category, and there are no in-betweens.
2. Continuous variable decision tree
A continuous variable decision tree is a decision tree with a continuous target variable. For
example, the income of an individual whose income is unknown can be predicted based on
available information such as their occupation, age, and other continuous variables.
Decision trees can also be used in operations research in planning logistics and strategic
management. They can help in determining appropriate strategies that will help a company
achieve its intended goals. Other fields where decision trees can be applied include
engineering, education, law, business, healthcare, and finance.
The data can also generate important insights on the probabilities, costs, and alternatives to
various strategies formulated by the marketing department.
2. Easy to prepare
Compared to other decision techniques, decision trees take less effort for data preparation.
However, users need to have ready information to create new variables with the power to
predict the target variable. They can also create classifications of data without having to
compute complex calculations. For complex situations, users can combine decision trees with
other methods.
3. Less data cleaning required
Another advantage of decision tree is that there is less data cleaning required once the
variables have been created. Cases of missing values and outliers have less significance on the
decision tree’s data.
If the company invests in the development of its business unit, there can be two
possibilities, i.e.:
• 40% possibility that the market share will hike, increasing the overall profitability of
the company by ₹2500000;
• 60% possibility that the competitors would take over the market share and the
company may incur a loss of ₹800000.
To find out the viability of this option, let us compute its EMV (Expected Monetary Value)
If the organization go for new product development, there can be following two
possibilities:
• 50% chances are that the project would be successful and yield ₹1800000 as profit;
• 50% possibility of failure persists, leading to a loss of ₹800000.
Do Nothing:
If the company does not take any step, still there can be two outcomes, discussed below:
• 40% chances are there that yet, the organization can attract new customers,
generating a profit of ₹1000000.
• 60% chances of failure are there due to the new competitors, incurring a loss of
₹400000.
Interpretation:
From the above evaluation, we can easily make out that the option of a new product line
has the highest EMV. Therefore, we can say that the company can avail this opportunity to
make the highest gain by ensuring the best possible use of its resources.