Solution of Sturm-Liouville Problems: Dr. T. Phaneendra
Solution of Sturm-Liouville Problems: Dr. T. Phaneendra
Solution of Sturm-Liouville Problems: Dr. T. Phaneendra
Dr. T. Phaneendra
February 20, 2018
or
[p(x).y 0 ]0 + [q(x) + λω(x)]y = 0 for all a ≤ x ≤ b, (1.2)
where
where
(a) P , Q, A and R are specified functions, and
(b) P 0 (x) = Q(x),
is a Sturm-Lioulle’s equation with the weight function ω(x) = R(x).
In fact, Using Q(x) = P 0 (x), and grouping the first two terms in (1.3), we get
which is the Sturm Lioulle form (1.2) with the weight function ω(x) = R(x).
1
ADDE Dr. T. Phaneendra
Module 5 Professor of Mathematics
xy 00 + y 0 + ny = 0, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, n = 0, 1, 2, ....
Comparing the given equation with (1.3), we see that P (x) = x, Q(x) = 1 so that
P 0 (x) = Q(x) = 1. Grouping the first two terms, and using Example 1.1, we get the
Sturm-Liouville form
h i
[x.y 0 ]0 + λy = 0 or dx
d dy
x dx + λy = 0
Comparing the given equation with (1.3), we see that P (x) = sin x, Q(x) = cos x so
that P 0 (x) = Q(x). Grouping the first two terms, in view of Example 1.1, we get the
Sturm-Liouville form
h i
[sin x.y 0 ]0 + 3y = 0 or dx
d dy
sin x dx + [x2 + 3x]y = 0
tan−1 xy 00 + 1
1+x2 y
0
+ 7xy = 0 where tan−1 x 6= 0.
Multiplying the equation with µ and then grouping the first two terms, we get
−2x 00
y − 2e−2x y 0 + λe−2x y = 0
e
or h i
e−2x · d dy d
e−2x · dy
+ λe−2x y = 0.
dx dx + dx dx
Dividing with P = x2 , and then multiplying the equation with µ, , and finally group-
ing the first two terms, we get
2
[xy 00 + y 0 · 1] + x − νx2x y = 0.
with the weight function ω(x) = 1/x and the parameter λ = −ν2 .
Example 2.3. Consider the Chebyshev differential equation of order κ:
(1 − x2 )y 00 − xy 0 + κ2 y = 0, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, κ ∈ R.
y 00 − 2xy 0 + 2λy = 0, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1,
we have 2
µ = e−x .
Its Sturm-Liouville form is
h 2
i 2
d
dx e−x . dx
dy
+ λ 2e−x y = 0
2
with the weight function ω(x) = 2e−x .
xy 00 + (1 − x)y 0 + λy = 0, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1,
2
R R
we see that µ = e (Q/P )dx
= e− 2xdx = e−x . Hence its Sturm-Liouville form is
h i
d −x2 dy −x2
dx e . dx + λ 2e y=0
2
with the weight function ω(x) = 2e−x .
The integral on the left hand side of (3.2) defines the inner product of the eigenfunc-
tions φj and φk with respect to the weight function ω(x) on [a, b].
Example 3.2. Find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, and then verify the orthog-
onality of the eigenfunctions for the regular Sturm-Liouville problem:
r2 + λ = 0 (3.5)
Case (a): λ < 0, say λ = −µ. Then (3.5) becomes r2 − µ = 0, which has two distinct
√
roots m = ± µ and hence the general solution of (3.3) is
√ √
y(x) = c1 e µx
+ c2 e− µx
, (3.6)
where the arbitrary constants c1 and c2 are evaluated by employing the boundary
conditions (3.4).
In fact, writing x = 0 and x = L in (3.6), and then using (3.4), we respectively get
√ √
c1 + c2 = y(0) = 0 and c1 e µL
+ c2 e − µL
= 0.
Solving these, we get c1 = c2 = 0. Thus y ≡ 0 is the only (trivial) solution for the
Sturm-Liouville problem (3.3) plus (3.4).
Case (b): λ = 0. Then the general solution of (3.3) will be y(x) = c1 x + c2 , which
will satisfy the boundary conditions (3.4) only if c1 = c2 = 0. Thus y ≡ 0 is the only
solution for (3.3) plus (3.4).
Case
√ (c): λ > 0. Then the roots of the A. E. (3.5) are a pair of imaginary roots m =
±i λ and hence the general solution of (3.3) is
√ √
y(x) = c1 cos λx + c2 sin λx, (3.7)
c1 cos 0 = 0 or c1 = 0.
Note that if c2 is also zero (3.7) would lead to the trivial solution y ≡ 0. Therefore we
assume that c2 6= 0. Then using the second condition of (3.4) and c1 = 0 in (3.7), it
follows that
√ √ √ nπ
sin( λL) = 0 so that λL = nπ, or λ = , n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . . (3.8)
L
We discard n = 0 because it gives λ = 0. Thus the nonzero solutions of the Sturm-
Liouville problem are
nπx
y ≡ y(x) = c2 sin , n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ,
L
n2 π 2
λn = , n = 1, 2, . . .
L2
are the eigenvalues and
nπx
φn = sin , n = 1, 2, . . .
L
are the eigenfunctions of the Sturm-Liouville problem (3.3) plus (3.4).
Finally for j 6= k,
Z L Z L
jπx kπx
φi (x)φj (x)dx = sin sin dx
0 0 L L
1 L
j−k
Z
j+k
=− cos πx − cos πx dx
2 0 L L
sin j+k πx sin j−k πx L
1 L L
= − (j+k)π
− (j−k)π
2
L L
x=0
L sin [(j + k)π] sin [(j − k)π]
=− −
2π j+k j−k
= 0.
This shows that the the eigenfunctions φ0n s corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are
orthogonal with respect to the weight function ω(x) = 1 on [0, L].
Example 3.3. Find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions and verify the orthogonality
of the eigenfunctions for the regular Sturm-Liouville problem (3.3) on 0 < x < π
with boundary conditions y(0) = 0 = y(π).
Solution. Take L = π in the previous example. Then λn = n2 are the eigenvalues
and φn = sin(nx), n = 1, 2, . . . are the eigenfunctions of the Sturm-Liouville
problem, orthogonal w. r. t. the weight function ω(x) = 1 on [0, π].
Example 3.4. Find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions and verify the orthogonality
of the eigenfunctions for the regular Sturm-Liouville problem (3.3) with boundary
conditions
y(0) = 0, y 0 (L) = 0. (3.10)
Solution. The first two cases that λ ≥ 0 will lead to the trivial solution y ≡ 0 for tha
problem which satisfy the boundry conditions (3.10), as in Example 3.2. Therefore
assume that λ > 0. Again from (3.2), the general solution of (3.3) is
√ √
y(x) = c1 cos λx + c2 sin λx, (3.11)
wich satisfies the first boundary condition y(0) = 0 only if c1 = 0. Also Note that we
assume that c2 6= 0, since c2 = 0 would give give the trivial solution y ≡ 0. Thus
√
y(x) = c2 sin λx, c2 6= 0 (3.12)
Now √ √
y 0 (x) = c2 λ cos λx.
Then using the second condition y 0 (L) = 0 in this, we get
√ √ nπ √ nπ
cos( λL) = 0 so that λL = or λ = , n = ±1, ±3, ±5, . . . .
2 2L
Since c2 6= 0 is arbitrary, we may write c2 = bn for n = ±1, ±3, ±5, . . .. Thus the
nonzero solutions of the problem are
nπx
y ≡ y(x) = bn sin , n = ±1, ±3, ±5, . . . .
2L
Also we note that
−kπx kπx
sin = − sin , k = 1, 3, 5, 7, ...
2L 2L
so that y−k and yk are not constant multiples of each other and are not linearly in-
dependent for k = 1, 3, 5, 7, .... Hence we can discard n = −1, −3, −5, −7, . . . as
well.
Setting n = (2m − 1), for m = 1, 2, 3, ... in these we see that
(2m − 1)2 π 2
(2m − 1)πx
λm = and φ m = sin , m = 1, 3, 5, 7, ...
4L2 2L
This shows that the the eigenfunctions φ0n s corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are
orthogonal with respect to the weight function ω(x) = 1 on [0, L].
Example 3.5. Find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions and verify the orthogonality
of the eigenfunctions for the regular Sturm-Liouville problem (3.3) on 0 < x < π
with boundary conditions y(0) = 0, y 0 (π) = 0.
(2m − 1)2
Solution. Take L = π in the previous example. Then λm = are the
4
(2m − 1)x
eigenvalues and φm = sin , m = 1, 3, 5, 7, ... are the eigenfunctions of
2
the Sturm-Liouville problem, orthogonal with respect to the weight function r(x) =
1 on [0, π].
Example 3.6. Find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions and verify the orthogonality
of the eigenfunctions for the regular Sturm-Liouville problem (3.3) with boundary
conditions
y 0 (0) = 0, y 0 (L) = 0. (3.13)
Solution. Eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenfunctions of the Sturm-Liouville
n2 π 2 nπx
problem are λn = and φ n = cos , n = 1, 2, 3, ....
L2 L