CIT 2021 Paper 173
CIT 2021 Paper 173
CIT 2021 Paper 173
1 Introduction
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are the most widespread symbionts of plant roots
in terrestrial habitats [1]. These ancient, obligate root symbionts contribute to the
2
transport of nutrients and water to their host plants (Augé 2001, Smith & Read, 2008),
pathogen resistance (Azcon-Aguilar & Barea, 1996; Jung et al., 2012), and the for-
mation and stability of soil aggregates (Duchicela, 2013). As the need of sustainable
agricultural practices increases, AMF are key to improving crop productivity and eco-
system function as well as other non-nutritional benefits (Delavaux et al., 2017).
Studies have shown that AMF abundance, diversity and functioning are af-
fected by differences in management practices in agroecosystems. High nitrogen and
phosphorus inputs are related to a decrease in host plant resource allocation to AMF
and therefore have a negative impact on AMF biodiversity (Verbruggen et al., 2012).
In contrast, plant intercropping systems can have a positive impact on AMF; for exam-
ple, Bainard et al., (2011) found that these systems support a more abundant and diverse
AMF community. Therefore, it is relevant to understand how agricultural management
practices influence AMF, especially when associated with crops of global importance,
such as potato.
Considering the importance of this crop in the region, the aim of this study is
to gain an understanding of the impact of different agricultural management on envi-
ronmental conditions and ultimately, effects on AMF activity and sequence-based
abundance, diversity and community composition in the Andean region. First, we ex-
amine the impact of agricultural management and conditions on AMF activity in select
potato Ecuadorian Andean plots (Section 1: Mycorrhizal Activity in the Ecuadorian
Andes). Next, to broaden the scope of our research, we use published sequence data to
examine the relationship of AMF abundance, diversity and community composition
with edaphic factors and altitude across the Andean region, including Bolivia, Ecuador,
and Perú (Section 2: Mycorrhizal Diversity in the Andes). Collectively, our field and
molecular analysis results will facilitate the understanding of mycorrhizal ecology in
potato fields and inform better approaches for employing this symbiosis to increase the
sustainability of agroecosystems.
3
2 Methods
AM fungus activity and diversity. AM fungus activity was quantified for external my-
celium biomass, internal mycelium biomass, percent mycorrhizal colonization and
rootlets dry weight according to Herrera et al. (2004); in addition, number of spores and
number of morphological species were determined. AM fungal spores were extracted
using the sucrose gradient centrifugation method described in Gerdemann and Nicolson
(1963) as described by Herrera et al. (2004). Spores were then visually quantified as
number of spores and number of morphological species identified to genus based on
AMF spore phenotypes described by Schüßler & Walker (2010) and others (Morton &
Msiska, 2010; Redecker et al., 2013).
(Helmus et al., 2007). This metric incorporates phylogenetic distance using a phyloge-
netic tree. In our phylogenetic tree construction, we included the Kruger LSU (large
subunit) database (Krüger et 124 al., 2012), as well as two outgroups, including one
ascomycete and one basidiomycete (Exophiala spinifera, Rhodotorula hordea), in addi-
tion to the target sequences (Senés-Guerrero and Schüßler, 2016), to more robustly pre-
dict phylogenetic relationships. We then used the resulting tree to predict PSR. Here,
we base branch length, used to calculate PSR, on substitution per base after running up
to 1000 iterations using RAxML (Stamatakis, 2006) after MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004)
alignment in MEGA 7 (Kumar et al., 2016). All metrics were calculated using R version
3.4.0.
To investigate the impacts of soil nutrient enrichments and other environmental varia-
bles in our field data we constructed simple and multiple linear regression models. After
transforming and scaling of variables (see Table S.2), we performed variable selection
using PCA (principal 151 components analysis) (see Figure S.1) and correlation be-
tween independent variables to avoid multicollinearity between predictor variables
within the multivariate model. The response variables were those described in the
Methods section. We ran separate multiple linear regression models for each response
variable and the four uncorrelated independent nutrient variables. We then ran simple
linear regression models for each response variable and each environmental variable to
understand the individual impacts of variables.
and species, please see Senés-Guerrero (2016). After transforming and scaling of vari-
ables (see Table 162 S.3. in the Supplementary material), we performed variable selec-
tion to avoid multicollinearity between predictor variables within the multivariate
model. Because there was a significant correlation between all variables of interest (al-
titude, nitrogen, phosphorus, pH and mean temperature), no multivariate model could
be assessed. Therefore, we ran separate simple linear regressions for each predictor
with each response variable, using sequence number as a covariate in all models and
assuming Gaussian distribution of the response variables. The response variables were
Shannon and Simpson diversity and richness (OTU, genera, and species), OTU nucle-
otide diversity and OTU phylogenetic species richness (PSR). We included a random
effect to properly account for structured variation present in this study (1|county:prov-
ince:cultivar). All previously described statistical analysis were carried out in R version
3.4.0 (Team, 2017). In order to investigate the environmental variables that predict
community composition, we ran separate PERMANOVAs with the OTU table, the spe-
cies table, and the genera table. Before using the tables, we included only samples
where a minimum of 5 OTUs, species or genera were found; we also only included
samples where a minimum of 1000 sequences were recovered, using rrarify from the R
package vegan (Oksanen et al., 2013). We then constructed PERMANOVAs with 999
permutations using adonis2 in vegan. We included phosphorus, nitrogen, pH, and alti-
tude as environmental predictors. In addition, to account for the structured variation
present in this study, we included a blocking variable using the strata option
(1|county:province:cultivar:sample).
3 Results
Fig. 1. Regression plots for Mycorrhizal Functioning: A) Number of spores response to phos-
phorus concentration; B) Species Simpson diversity response to phosphorus concentration; C)
Genera Simpson diversity response to phosphorus concentration; D) Number of spores re-
sponse to Altitude; E) Mycorrhizal colonization response to Altitude & F) Rootlets dry weight
response to Altitude.
4 Discussion
This study addressed how soil factors and altitude influence AMF activity and
sequence- based abundance, diversity and composition in Solanum tuberosum within
Andean Region agroecosystems. Specifically, we choose potato plots that represent a
gradient of phosphorus fertilization in the region. This allowed us to detect the influence
7
of agriculture on soil mutualistic symbionts through changes in soil nutrient load. Over-
all, we found that phosphorus and altitude were important in determining AMF activity
in Ecuador field data and sequence- based abundance, diversity and composition in the
Andean region. An increase in phosphorus broadly led to lower AMF activity and di-
versity, while increasing altitude led to greater AMF abundance and sequence-based
abundance, diversity and composition.
Nonetheless, our results are supported by a study by Verbruggen et al. (2012). These
authors found in a corn potato intercropping system that management practices impact
AMF abundance and community composition through changes in phosphorus. Altitude
is also a good predictor of AMF activity. Increasing altitude leads to increased AMF
activity, including number of spores and percent mycorrhizal colonization. We also
found that rootlets dry weight is negatively correlated with altitude. This shows that
there is less investment in rootlets is decreasing with altitude, as plants may rely more
on AMF. This is congruent with our finding that at higher altitude, there is a greater
number of AMF spores and root colonization. Although altitude is an important predic-
tor here, it is important to acknowledge the drawbacks of altitude as a predictor. Alti-
tude encompasses many predictors (temperature, precipitation) and so does not mech-
anistically help us explain what is driving AMF abundance and diversity.
Although both phylogenetic species richness (PSR) and nucleotide diversity (Pi) have
recently been used to describe sequence-based richness, we find no significant relation-
ships between these metrics and edaphic or altitudinal factors. PSR is thought to be a
better measure of richness as opposed to simple OTU richness because it takes phylo-
genetic relationships in a community into account. Pi measures nucleotide diversity
(nucleotide variation). The lack of results we see using nucleotide diversity metrics may
be due to sample size. For nucleotide diversity, due to non-independence of samples,
we could only assess Pi at 12 levels of P and 12 levels of altitude. Our PERMANOVA
results that show a decreasing significance of variables with broader definition of tax-
onomic groups (from OTUs to species to genera) may also result from a decreasing n.
With broader classification, the n available to the model decrease, potentially decreas-
ing any impact variables may have on the community composition.
As farmers look to more sustainable, but also profitable ways to farm potatoes, arbus-
cular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) should be considered. It has been argued that part of
the solution to more sustainable agriculture can be found belowground in the rhizo-
sphere (Gewin, 2010; Rillig et al. 2019) by manipulating soil microbes which improve
8
the root function and support important soil properties. AMF help in nutrient acquisi-
tion, reducing the need for fertilization, but also provide additional benefits to the crop
plant as well as soil conservation, promotion sustainability in the long-term economic
benefits to the farmer.
5 Conclusion
Here, we have shown that changes in soil nutrients lead to important change in both
activity and diversity of AMF of potato fields in the Andes within Ecuador, Bolivia,
and Peru. Overall, we show that, across the Andean region, phosphorus is the main
driver of both arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal activity and diversity in potato fields. In
order to reap the benefits of this ubiquitous symbiosis, we encourage farmers to con-
sider the impacts of increasing phosphorus addition on their crops. Namely, this addi-
tional phosphorus is likely to lead to the reduction of AMF abundance and diversity in
their fields, along with the reduction of benefits particularly in the Andean region. Fi-
nally, we hope these results support more research into sustainable agriculture that aims
to promote naturally occurring microbes to the crop and farmers’ benefit.
6 Acknowledgements
We thank the KU Center for Research Computing for their ongoing bioinformatics sup-
port throughout this project. We are grateful to Carolina Senés-Guerrero for sharing her
data with us. Thanks to Camille Delavaux, Andrew Mehring for statistical support and
Francisco Flores for bioinformatic analysis assistance.
References
1. Augé, R. M., 2001. Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbio-
sis. Mycorrhiza 11:3-42.
2. Azcón-Aguilar, C., and J. M. Barea., 1996. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control
of soil-borne plant pathogens – an overview of the mechanisms involved. Mycorrhiza 6:457-
464.
3. Bainard, L. D., Klironomos, J. N., & Gordon, A. M. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in
tree- based intercropping systems: a review of their abundance and
diversity. Pedobiologia, 54(2), 57-61.
4. Delavaux, C. S., Camenzind, T., Homeier, J., Jiménez-Paz, R., Ashton, M., & Queenbor-
ough, S. A., 2017. Nutrient enrichment effects on mycorrhizal fungi in an Andean tropical
montane Forest. Mycorrhiza, 27(4), 311-319.
5. Delavaux, C. S., L. M. Smith-Ramesh, and S. E. Kuebbing., 2017. Beyond nutrients: A
meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils.
Ecology.
6. Duchicela, J. I., 2013. Soil symbionts as filters and their environmental consequences.
Indiana University.
9
7. Edgar, R. C., 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high
throughput. Nucleic acids research 32:1792-1797.
8. FAO Lutaladio, NeBambi, and Barbara Burlingame. "International Year of the Potato 2008."
FAO, 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Land Resources.
9. http://www.fao.org/nr/land/en/.
Gerdemann, J.W., Nicolson, T.H., 1963. Spores of mycorrhizal endogone species extracted
from
10. soil by wet-sieving and decanting. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 46, 235– 244
Helmus, M. R., Bland, T. J.,Williams, C. K. and Ives, A. R., 2007. Phylogenetic measures
of
11. biodiversity. The American Naturalist 169:E68-E83.
Herrera-Peraza, R. A., Furrazola, E., Ferrer, R. L., Fernández Valle, R., & Torres Arias, Y.
12. (2004). Functional strategies of root hairs and arbuscular mycorrhizae in an evergreen
13. tropical forest, Sierra del Rosario, Cuba. Revista CENIC. Ciencias Biológicas, 35(2). Jung,
S. C., A. Martinez-Medina, J. Lopez-Raez, and M. J. Pozo. 2012. Mycorrhiza-Induced
14. Resistance and Priming of Plant Defences. J. Chem Ecol. 38:651-664.
15. Krüger, M., C. Krüger, C. Walker, H. Stockinger, and A. Schüßler. 2012. Phylogenetic ref-
erence data for systematics and phylotaxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from phy-
lum to species level. New Phytologist 193:970-984.
16. Koide, R., and G. Elliott. 1989. Cost, Benefit and Efficiency of the Vesicular-Arbuscular
Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Functional Ecology 3:252-255.
17. Kumar, S., G. Stecher, and K. Tamura. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics
analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular biology and evolution 33:1870-1874.
18. Loit, K., Soonvald, L., Kukk, M., Astover, A., Runno-Paurson, E., Kaart, T., & Öpik, M.
2018. The indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonisation potential in potato roots is
affected by agricultural treatments. Agronomy Research, 16(2), 510-522.
19. Librado, Pablo, and Julio Rozas. "DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA
polymorphism data." Bioinformatics 25.11. 2009. 1451-1452.
20. Morton, J. B., & Msiska, Z. 2010. Phylogenies from genetic and morphological characters
do not support a revision of Gigasporaceae (Glomeromycota) into four families and five
genera. Mycorrhiza, 20(7), 483-496.
21. Nei, Masatoshi, and Wen-Hsiung Li. "Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in
terms of restriction endonucleases." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76.10
(1979): 5269-5273.
22. Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. O’hara, G. L. Simpson,
P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, and H. Wagner. 2013. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology
package, version 2.
23. Ortiz O., Mares V. 2017. The Historical, Social, and Economic Importance of the Potato
Crop. In: Kumar Chakrabarti S., Xie C., Kumar Tiwari J. (eds) The Potato Genome.
Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham
24. Pearse, W. D., M. W. Cadotte, J. Cavender-Bares, A. R. Ives, C. M. Tucker, S. C. Walker,
and M. R. Helmus. 2015. Pez: Phylogenetics for the environmental sciences. Bioinformatics
31:2888-2890.
25. Redecker, D., Schüßler, A., Stockinger, H., Stürmer, S. L., Morton, J. B., & Walker, C. 2013.
An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glom-
eromycota). Mycorrhiza, 23(7), 515-531.
26. Schüßler, A., & Walker, C. 2010. The Glomeromycota: a species list with new families and
new genera. The Royal Botanic Garden Kew, Botanische Staatssammlung Munich, and Or-
egon State University, 19.
10
27. Senés-Guerrero, C., and A. Schüßler. 2016. A conserved arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal
core- species community colonizes potato roots in the Andes. Fungal Diversity 77:317-333.
28. Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell system technical
journal 27:379-423.
29. Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature.
Smith, S. E., and D. J. Read. 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic press.
Spooner, D. M., Nunez, J., Rodriguez, F., Naik, P. S., & Ghislain, M. 2005. Nuclear and
30. chloroplast DNA reassessment of the origin of Indian potato varieties and its implications
for the origin of the early European potato. Theoretical and applied genetics, 110(6), 1020-
1026.
31. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses
with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
32. Team, R. C. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2016.
33. Verbruggen, E., Van Der Heijden, M. G., Weedon, J. T., Kowalchuk, G. A., & Röling, W.
F. 2012. Community assembly, species richness and nestedness of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi in agricultural soils. Molecular Ecology, 21(10), 2341-2353.
34. Wu, F., Wang, W., Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, X., An, L. & Feng, H. 2013. Prospect of beneficial
microorganisms applied in potato cultivation for sustainable agriculture. African Journal of
Microbiology Research 7, 2150 2158.
35. S.: Title of a proceedings paper. In: Editor, F., Editor, S. (eds.) CONFERENCE 2016,
LNCS, vol. 9999, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2016).
7 Supplementary Information
Fig. S.1. PCA for independent variables (Altitude, pH, Organic mater, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe,
Zn, Cu, Mn & B )from Mycorrhizal activity in the Ecuadorian Andes data, independent varia-
bles where standardized using scale function from the base package i
Table S.1. Agricultural plots studied at provinces of Cañar, Cotopaxi, and Carchi.
Code Province Alti- P (mg. External Internal my- Rootlets Percentage of Number Species num-
tude(masl kg-1) mycelium celium bio- dry weight mycorrhizal col- of spores ber
) biomass mass (RDW) onization (MC)
M1r1 Cañar – Sizho 3074 85 53.36 89.39 4.91 60.60 11668 15
M1r2 Cañar – Cooperativa San 3074 12 10
Rafael 19.12 169.27 10.45 63.54 13231
M1r3 Cañar – Cooperativa San 3320 14 12
Rafael 28.62 103.68 7.68 49.07 16666
M2r1 Cañar – Antenas de Bueran 3600 33 61.74 41.77 4.11 41.51 32606 18
M2r2 Cañar – Antenas de Bueran 3600 24 84.00 60.49 3.44 73.58 43089 17
M2r3 Cañar – Antenas de Bueran 3600 15 23.87 57.67 4.52 63.11 31134 15
M3r1 Cotopaxi – Pagtag 4570 71 64.02 15.96 1.07 82.82 18285 15
M3r2 Cotopaxi – Yacubamba 3470 63 42.71 33.37 2.82 75.42 22493 15
M3r3 Cotopaxi – Romerillos 3520 44 93.74 111.79 4.57 78.78 8598 14
M4r1 Carchi – San Luis 2750 84 34.52 47.66 6.56 50.00 7816 14
M4r2 Carchi – Loma del Centro 3270 30 13
9 67.62 60.85 8.90 47.09 6423
M4r3 Carchi – El Tambo 3010 66 106.70 57.48 11.68 44.52 16943 18
M5r1 Carchi – San Luis 2750 77 105.26 49.53 8.45 48.84 4790 9
M5r2 Carchi – Loma del Centro 3270 21 14
0 68.25 94.12 5.14 50.96 7191
M5r3 Carchi – San Pedro de 3000 22 8
Dacha 0 44.94 73.18 3.97 64.29 3218
Table S.2. Variable transformation - Mycorrhizal activity in the Ecuadorian Andes. all the pre-
dicted variables where standardized using scale function from the base package in R.
ber of spores)
Table S.3. Variable transformation -Mycorrhizal Diversity in the Andes. lambda value was cal-
culated using Tukey’s ladder of powers function (transformTukey) from the rcompanion pack-
age and all the predicted variables where standardized using scale function from the base pack-
age in R
Table S.4. Mycorrhizal Activity in the Ecuadorian Andes: significance (p-value) and estimate
results for multivariate regression models
mental Var- mycelium bi- celium biomass dry weight mycorrhizal colo- of spores number
mate 01 4.199e-01
mate 02 1.645e-01
mate 02 2.311e-01
mate 01 4.428e-01
Table S.5. Mycorrhizal Activity in the Ecuadorian Andes: Significance (p-value) and estimate
results for simple linear regression models.
Table S.6. Generalized linear models predicting OUT. genera and species Richness. Significant
predictors are in bold.
Table S.7. Generalized linear models predicting Shannon and Simpson diversity calculated for
OTUs. species and genera. Significant predictors are in bold.
Table S.8. Generalized linear models predicting Phylogenetic Species Richness each calcu-
lated for OTUs. species and genera. Significant predictors are in bold.
Table S.9. PERMANOVA results from Senés-Guerrero for (a) the operational taxonomic unit
OTU table. (b) the Species table and (c) Genus table. Each analysis included all variables on the
table. Significant predictors are in bold.
*Table S.5 to S.9 were located in an external file due to pages limitation for the
submission of only one pdf file.
15
Fig. S2. Linear regression models for Nucleotide diversity and a) Soil phosphorus concentra-
tion levels (p= 0.88); b) Altitude levels(p=0.940). No significant p-value