Malldevco Case
Malldevco Case
Malldevco Case
International Contracts
Felix Lazcano Mayrl 1717
Jorge Hanun Garza 1703
Daniel Romero
30 september 2021
1. Risks in transaction
The clearest risk that Malldevco faces from this transaction, is the possibility of the
planning permission not being granted after the transaction takes place. If it were the case,
Malldevco would be owning a piece of land which it will not be able to develop for the purpose of
the industry it operates in: shopping and entertainment complexes. This means that Malldevco
will not be able to perceive the expected profit, given that they wouldn’t be able to build a
shopping complex.
Another possible risk would be that FlipIt will “flip” on Malldevco, selling the property to
another buyer. Because of this probability, it is important for Malldevco to sign an exclusivity
agreement with FilpIt.
Also, we believe it is a significant risk for Malldevco that, even if the land ends up being
reclassified, that the land itself isn’t viable for construction because of environmental factors
such as the land’s soil characteristics and water percolation, among other considerations like
connections to city utilities, deed restrictions, etc. 1
Finally, Malldevco should also consider that FlipIt will realize the negotiating power that
they have over Malldevco and raise the selling price of the land, after the parcel’s
reclassification.
We believe one of the best ways to manage the risks inside the contract, is to draft a
series of conditions, whether they are precedent or subsequent. This would be an excellent
mechanism to protect Malldevco’s interests regarding this transaction.
The usage of a condition precedent, will protect Malldevco, ensuring that what makes
this transaction valuable actually happens. Furthermore, we believe that implementing a few
conditions subsequent in the contract could also manage important risk factors. This type of
condition will allow the transaction to happen, whilst granting protection to Malldevco. Under
these conditions, if something that is considered under the contract as a condition subsequent,
happens, Malldevco would still be protected.
On the other hand, another mechanism to manage risks is to celebrate a promissory
estoppel, it is recommended that Malldevco also drafts conditions in said promissory estoppel
for it to be binding. Moreover, remaining in the topic of the promissory estoppels, another good
way to manage risk, is to draft a clause that establishes that the negotiations between both
parties shall be in good faith.
A final mechanism to manage risks outside of a contract, more from a business point of
view than a legal standpoint; is to be wary of the other party, as FlipIt could very well be using
Malldevcojust as a tactic to advance their own interests. It is better to be careful, so drafting an
exclusivity clause could be highly useful to Malldevco, by mitigating risk significantly. Ultimately,
when negotiating with FlipIt, Malldevco shouldn’t leave any options out of the table.
Also, a ver well drafted boilerplate, could be quit useful in mitigating future problems in case of a
lawsuit, like stating the governing law, applicable jurisdiction, place of fulfillment of the
obligations, stating that the headings are inserted for reference only and shall not be deemed a
part hereof or used in its interpretation, etc.
4. In relation to the second bullet point in the case, please draft one contract clause
to manage the risk you consider to be the primary risk in the whole deal
I. Condition precedent: FlipIt must manage and obtain a planning permission from Pioneer
City Council to reclassify the land as commercial/retail.
II. Right: If FlipIt does not obtain said planning permission, Malldevco may terminate this
contract without any responsibility.
III. Exclusivity: FlipIt shall not negotiate nor perform any act that goes against the purpose
of this contract, including but not limited to leasing, selling, or donating to a third party.