LLB 3 Project
LLB 3 Project
Legal education
The Indian Bar Association is responsible for the promotion of legal education and sets
the standards of legal knowledge in consultation with the universities. The Bar
Association accepts legal education centers and also prescribes various types and
standards of courses of study, admission capacity, infrastructure demands, and course
structures.
The Bar Association also visits and audits these legal education centers as part of its
statutory functions. The Bar Association was also responsible for driving the next level
of evolution in legal knowledge in the country by establishing the first National
University of India Law School in Bangalore. The inception of this premier law school
has brought about a paradigm shift in law teaching and research.
Conclusion
The Advocate’s Act of 1961 ushered in a new era in the history of the legal profession
by conferring to a large extent on bar boards the power and jurisdiction previously
exercised by the courts. It has fulfilled the aspirations of those who had been
demanding an All-India Bar Association and effecting a unification of the Bar
Association in India by creating a single class of practitioners empowered to practice in
all courts. They are now subject to the rules established in the code of conduct
established by their own bodies to which members can turn for the protection of their
rights, interests, and privileges.
Therefore, the legal profession can play a fundamental role in the defence of individual
rights and in the effective dissemination of justice, while acting as an integrating force
in national life. It is now part of the modern legal system that provides both the
personnel and the techniques for efficient rational utility. The responsibility of this
profession towards Indian society is really great, as has been its history.
However, not all that glitters is gold. The responsibility that the Indian Bar Association
has to society and the challenge it faces today testify that the Indian Bar Association
has not risen to the level to fulfill its functions. The highest obligation is to provide free
legal aid to the “destitute and oppressed.” This obligation is subject to the limits of the
economic condition of the lawyer. But we know that even superstar attorneys whose
financial conditions are exceedingly prosperous even summarily refuse to see an
indigent person in dire need of legal assistance. Most high-profile attorneys steer clear
of state legal aid programs. Unless the bar leaders do some introspection and put the
profession back on the rails, all we are left with is an occupation and not a profession.
Professional ethics encompasses an ethical code governing the conduct of persons engaged in the
practice of law as well as persons engaged in the legal sector. All members of the legal profession
have a paramount duty to the court and towards the administration of justice. This duty prevail over
all other duties, especially in the circumstances where there may be a conflict of duties. It is
important that legal practitioners conduct themselves with integrity, provide proper assistance to the
court, and promote public confidence in the legal system. In carrying out their duties, they are
required and expected to deal with other members of the legal profession with courtesy and
integrity.[1] Advocates, apart from being professionals, are also officers of the court and play a vital
role in the administration of justice.
Accordingly, the set of rules that govern their professional conduct arise out of the duties that they
owe to the court, the client, their opponents and other advocates. Rules on the professional
standards that an advocate needs to maintain are mentioned in Chapter II, Part VI of the Bar Council
of India Rules. These Rules have been provided under section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Authority Concerned
State Bar Council and its Disciplinary Committee
Section 35 of the Advocates Act deals with the provisions regarding formulation and functioning of
Disciplinary Committee under the State Bar Council. Under this, if any legal practitioner is found guilty
of any professional misconduct, after providing an opportunity of being heard may make any of the
following orders:
Dismiss the complaint or where the proceedings were initiated at the instance of the State
Bar Council, direct that the proceedings be filed;
Reprimand the advocate;
Suspend the advocate for a period as it may deem fit;
Remove the name of the advocate from the State roll of advocates.
In the case of Nortanmal Chauaisia v. M.R. Murli[4], the Supreme Court held that the term
Misconduct had not been defined under the Advocates Act. But the term envisages a breach of
discipline, although it would not be possible to lay down what would lead to misconduct or
indiscipline, which is wide enough to include wrongful act or omission, whether done intentionally or
unintentionally. It also means improper behaviour, intentional wrongdoing or deliberate violation of
a rule of the standard of behaviour.
Conclusion
Professional ethics can also be stated as the duties that have to be followed by an advocate during his
profession. These are moral duties and the very basic courtesy which every person in this field should
know. An advocate who does not work with sincerity and does not follow the rules of conduct is said
to have violated the code of ethics of this profession. The fundamental aim of legal ethics is to
maintain honor and dignity of the legal profession to ensure the spirit of friendly co-operation,
honorable and fair dealing of the counsel with his clients as well as to secure the responsibilities of
the lawyers towards the society.
Topic 3 BAR COUNCIL
The Advocate Act, 1961, has made provisions for the establishment of Bar Councils.
The Bar Council will be two patterns - Bar Council of India and State Bar Council. Under
Section 3 of the Act State Bar Council will be established. However, Under Section 4, a
Bar Council of India will be established.
(a) for each of States of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Jammu and Kashmir,
Jharkhand Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Orissa, Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh
and Uttaranchal, to be known as the Bar Council of that State;
(b) for the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram,
Nagaland and Tripura to be known as the Bar Council of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya,
Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh.
(c) for the State of Kerala and the Union territory of Lakshadweep, to be known as
the Bar Council of Kerala;
(cc) for the State of Tamil Nadu and the Union territory of Pondicherry to be known
as the Bar Council of Madras;
(ccc) for the States of Maharashtra and Goa, and the Union territories of Dadra and
Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, to be known as the Bar Council of Maharashtra and
Goa;
(d) for the States of Punjab and Haryana, and the Union territory of Chandigarh, to
be known as the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana;
(dd) for the State of Himachal Pradesh, to be known as the Bar Council of
Himachal Pradesh;
(e) for the State of West Bengal and the Union territory of Andaman and Nicobar
Islands, to be known as the Bar Council of West Bengal; and
(f) for the Union territory of Delhi, to be known as the Bar Council of Delhi.
(2) A State Bar Council shall consist of the following members, namely:—
(a) in the case of the State Bar Council of Delhi, the Additional Solicitor General of
India ex officio in the case of the State Bar Council of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya,
Manipur and Tripura, the Advocate General of each of the State of Assam, Manipur,
Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura, ex officio; in the case of the State Bar Council of
Punjab and Haryana, the Advocate-General of each of the State of Punjab and
Haryana, ex officio; and in the case of any other State Bar Council, the Advocate-
General of the State, ex officio;
(b) in the case of a State Bar Council with an electorate not exceeding five
thousand, fifteen members, in the case of a State Bar Council with an electorate
exceeding five thousand but not exceeding ten thousand, twenty members, and in the
case of the State Bar Council with an electorate exceeding ten thousand, twenty-five
members, elected in accordance with the system of proportional representation by
means of the single transferable vote from amongst advocates on the electoral roll of
the State Bar Council: Provided that as nearly as possible one-half of such elected
members shall subject to any rules that may be made in this behalf by the Bar Council
of India, be persons who have for at least ten years been advocates on a State roll, and
in computing the said period of ten years in relation to any such person, there shall be
included any period during which the person has been an advocate enrolled under the
Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926).
Term of Office of the Members of State Bar Council : Section 8 Provides term of the
office of the Members of the State Bar Council -
The term of office of an elected member of a State Bar Council (other than an
elected member thereof referred to in section 54) shall be five years from the date of
publication of the result of his election:
Provided that where a State Bar Council fails to provide for the election of its
member before the expiry of the said term, the Bar Council of India may, by order for
reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the said term, the Bar Council of India may,
by order, extend the said term for a period not exceeding six months.
Section 6(1) of the Advocate Act 1961 makes provisions in respect of the functions of
the State Bar Council.
Functions of State Bar Councils
(1) to admit persons as advocates on its roll;
(2) to prepare and maintain such roll;
(3) to entertain and determine cases of misconduct against advocates on its roll;
(4) to safeguard the rights, privileges and interests of advocates on its roll;
(5) to promote the growth of Bar Associations for the purposes of effective
implementation of the welfare schemes referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (2) of
this section clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 7;
(6) to promote and support law reform;
(7) to conduct seminars and organise talks on legal topics by eminent jurists and
publish journals and paper of legal interest;
(8) to organise legal aid to the poor in the prescribed manner;
(9) to manage and invest the funds of the Bar Council;
(10) to provide for the election of its members;
(11) to visit and inspect Universities in accordance with the directions given under
clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 7;
(12) to perform all other functions conferred on it by or under this Act; (i) to do all
other things necessary for discharging the aforesaid functions.
A State Bar Council may constitute one or more funds in the prescribed manner for
the purpose of—
(a) giving financial assistance to organise welfare schemes for the indigent,
disabled or other advocates;
(b) giving legal aid or advice in accordance with the rules made in this behalf;
(c) establishing law libraries.
A State Bar Council may receive any grants, donations, gifts or benefactions for all or
any of the purposes specified in sub- section (2) which shall be credited to the
appropriate fund or funds constituted under that sub-section.
Section 22 of Advocate Act 1961 provides that, There shall be issued a certificate of
enrollment in the prescribed form by the State Bar Council to every person whose
name is entered in the roll of advocates maintained by it under this Act.
Every person whose name is so entered in the State roll shall notify any change in
the place of his permanent residence to the State Bar Council concerned within ninety
days of such change.
d) He fulfills such other conditions as may be specified in the rules made by the
State Bar Council.
e) He has paid, in respect of enrollment, stamp duty, and an enrollment fee payable
to State Bar Council.
An application for enrollment shall be made in the prescribed form to the State
Bar Council within whose jurisdiction the applicant proposes to practice. The
application is referred to enrollment Committee of State Bar Council. The application
may be allowed or rejected. Where the Enrollment Committee of Bar Council propose
to refuse any such application, it shall refer such application for the opinion of the Bar
Council of India.
It may be noted that Section 26A of Advocate Act empowers a State Bar Council
by amendment of 1973 to remove from the State Roll the name of any Advocate who
is dead or from whom a request has been received to that effect.
Section 27 of The Act Provides that where an application has been once refused, it
cannot be entertained by another Bar Council except in certain circumstances. It lays
down that where a State Bar Council has refused the application of any person for
admission as an advocate on its roll, no other State Bar Council shall entertain an
application for admission of such person as an advocate on its roll, except with the
previous consent in writing of the State Bar Council which refused the application and
of the Bar Council of India.
Section 19 of the Advocate Act, 1961, requires the State Bar Council to send copies of
rolls of advocates to the Bar Council of India. It provides that every State Bar Council
shall send to the Bar Council of India an authenticated copy of the roll of advocates
prepared by it for the first time under this Act and shall thereafter communicate to the
Bar Council of India all alterations in, the additions to, any such roll, as soon as the
same have been made.
The State Bar Council has Power to punish an advocate for professional
misconduct and other misconduct. The Disciplinary Committee of the State Bar Council
may make any of the following order -
(a)dismiss the complaint or, where the proceedings were initiated at the
instance of the State Bar Council, direct that the proceedings be filed;
(c) suspend the advocate from practice for such period as it may deem fit;
(d) remove the name of the advocate from the State roll of advocates.
A bar Council establishes several committees to its function under this Act
including the disciplinary committee, Executive Committee, Enrollment Committee,
etc. Every such committee is allotted a distinct function to carry.
d) To Maintain Accounts and Conduct Audit
Section 12. of Advocate Act 1961 provides that every Bar Council shall cause to be
maintained such books of accounts and other books in such form and in such manner
as may be prescribed. The accounts of a Bar Council shall be audited by auditors duly
qualified to act as auditors of companies under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), at
such times and in such manner as may be prescribed. A State Bar Council shall send a
copy of its accounts together with a copy of the report of the auditors thereon to the
Central Government and shall cause the same to be published in the Gazette of India
BCI was made to prescribe a standard of professional conduct, etiquette and exercise
disciplinary jurisdiction. BCI additionally sets standards for legal education and gives
recognition to Universities whose degree in law fills in as a qualification for students to
enrol themselves as advocates after graduation.
BCI comes under the domain of Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India and it
is a corporate body having an interminable succession and a common seal. The BCI has
constituted a few committees, for example, the Education Committee, the Disciplinary
Committee, the Executive Committee, the Legal Aid Committee, the Advocates Welfare
Fund Committee, the Rules Committee, and different Committees framed to look after
the explicit issues emerging every once in a while.
Formation of BCI
The need for All India Bar was felt just after the enforcement of the Constitution of
India. In the annual meeting of Inter-University Board held in Madras, a resolution was
passed for the need of an All Indian Bar and it was also emphasized that there should
be uniformity in law examination conducted by different universities of the country.
In May 1950, the Madras Provincial Lawyers Conference was held under the
administration of S. Varadachariar settled that the Government of India ought to
appoint an advisory group to develop a scheme for an All India Bar and changing the
Indian Bar Council Act to acquire its congruity with the new constitution. At its
gathering held on October 1, 1950, the Bar Council of Madras embraced a resolution.
In the meantime, the Law Commission of India was assigned the job of assembling a
report on judicial administration reforms. A comprehensive Advocated Bill was
presented in the Parliament which brought about the Advocates Act, 1961 to
implement the suggestion of the All India Bar Committee and the Law Commission’s
proposals related to the legal profession. The Bar Council of India was established
under section 4 of the Advocates Act, 1961. M.C. Setalvad and C.K. Daphtary were the
first chairman and vice-chairman respectively.
The primary objection of BCI is to control and administer the working of all immediate
subsidiary state-level bar councils other than setting out the measures of professional
conduct and etiquette.
The statutory functions of Bar Council of India are stated under Section 7 of the
Advocate Act, 1961. Following are the functions of BCI concerning the different bodies:
1. Advocates – BCI lays down standards of professional conduct and etiquette for
advocates and BCI also safeguards the rights, privileges, and interests of advocates.
2. State Bar Council– BCI lays down the procedure to be followed by its disciplinary
committee and the disciplinary committee of each State Bar Council. BCI deals with
and disposes of any matter arising under this Act, which may be referred to it by a
State Bar Council. BCI exercises general supervision and control over State Bar
Councils.
5. Legal Education– BCI promotes legal education and lays down standards of such
education in consultation with the Universities in India imparting such education. BCI
conducts seminars and organizes talks on legal topics by eminent jurists and publishes
journals and papers of legal interest. BCI also organizes legal aid to the poor in a
prescribed manner.
6. Funds– BCI manages and invests in the funds of the Bar Council. Through this fund
BCI gives financial assistance to organize welfare schemes for poor, disabled, or other
advocates. This fund is also used in giving legal aid and establishing law libraries.
BCI can receive grants, donations, and gifts for any of the above-mentioned purposes.
7. Elections– BCI conducts elections regularly to elect its members who shall run the
Bar Councils.
Powers
Bar Council of India under its formation has been given powers to regulate many
things. Few major powers that BCI hold are divided amongst the committees set up by
the Advocates Act. Section 9 of the act sets up the Legal Education Committee and
under Section 10 an Executive Committee is set up. Chapter III of the Bar Council of
India Rules permits the Council to form more committees in addition to those specified
in the Act. The Council also has the power to delegate the duties or functions to these
committees.
Executive Committee deals with all the questions related to the management of funds,
affairs of the staff, allotment of work, audit, accounts, library, and legal publications
delegation.
Advocate Welfare Committee is empowered by the Advocates Welfare Act, 2001. This
committee looks after the application procedure made by advocates for welfare funds.
It also verifies their application and provides the fund.
Legal Aid Committee has the power to offer services to the poor, who cannot afford
the services of a lawyer. This committee gives the payment of the court from the
charges of preparing a case, drafting to filing the case.
There are other committees which look after the infrastructure of the council’s office
across the country.
All these committees work under the BCI. BCI has the power to the discontinuance of
recognition of any University which is based on the recommendation by the Legal
Education Committee. BCI also hears every appeal which is proceeded by the
Disciplinary Committee.
BCI has the power to conduct the All India Bar Examination (since 2010) which tests an
advocate’s ability to practice law. An advocate must pass this examination to practice
law in any court.
BCI also conducts the National Moot Court Competition which promotes advocacy
skills amongst law students through Bar Council of India Trust (public charitable trust).
There is an Indian Bar Review which is a quarterly journal of BCI and is among the top
legal periodicals in the country.
Legal basis
Advocates Act, 1961 is the act that provides for the constitution of the Bar Councils
and an All-India Bar. Section 3 of the act talks about the State Bar Council whereas
Section 4 the act talks about the existence of Bar Council of India. Section 4 of the act
also talks about the members who will consist of structure BCI. The Attorney- General
of India and the Solicitor- General of India will be ex officio. It also talks about that
there will be one representative from each State Bar Council.
Section 5 of the act establishes that BCI will be a corporate body as there will be
perpetual succession and a common seal, and can it sue by the name which it is
known.
Section 7 of the act mentions all the functions to be performed by BCI. An amendment
was made by Act 60 of 1973 and more functions were inserted in Section 7. Section 7
also gives power to BCI to become a member of international legal bodies, for
example, the International Bar Association. The Act in Chapter II states all about the
council through different sections. Under Chapter II, the constitution of the different
committees, the criteria of disqualification of members, a staff of Bar Council, etc. are
mentioned.
Bar Council of India Rules also laid our rules, which were made by BCI in the exercise
of its rulemaking power under the Advocates Act, 1961. Bar Council of India Rules lays
down the procedure for the election or the termination of the members of the council.
It also specifies the powers of the chairman and vice-chairman of the council. Not only
this it also talks about the procedure of the meetings of the council or the meeting of
the committees and their reports. Chapter IV of the rules gives the qualification and
conditions of service of the secretary, accountant, and other members of the staff.
All these section and Advocates Act lays down the legal basis of BCI.
Critical analysis
In recent times the horizon of BCI is increasing. BCI has seen the rise in legal education,
about fifty years ago the concept of the law school was very different and more of the
convention but, through the efforts of BCI and other authorities the image of legal
education right now is more practical.
Legal education is also that field which has to fulfil the requirement of globalization.
BCI from time to time is ensuring that the standard of legal education is maintained so
that the graduates can fulfil the requirement of globalization. Hence, BCI ensures that
even paralegal education is also provided to students. Some more changes were
recommended by BCI in legal education after the 184th Report of the Law Commission
which urged the need for having subjects related to International Trade Practice,
Comparative Law, International Human Rights Law, Space Law, etc. to increase
intercontinental endeavour among students.
One of the important things to be noticed is that BCI can only recommend or suggest
things but the power of enforcement is exhaustive.
In the pandemic time also, BCI is working for the benefit of its members. The Bar
Council of India has told the Hon’ble Supreme Court that it will be providing some
amount for the assistance to the needy lawyers amid the lockdown.
There are certain provisions in the legal field in India today which the Bar Council must
investigate, so as to protect the law standard from degradation and to keep up the
same standard.
Conclusion
The Bar Council of India has plenty of capacities vested inside itself, whereby practicing
those capacities it can rebuild and reframe the entire legal field in the nation. Indeed, it
very well may be all the more overwhelmingly visualized, that in present-day times it
has scarcely contribute valuably in the improvement of law in India. Bar Council of
India is working effectively, although there have been talks related to an increase in
the power of BCI to ensure more effective command over the law as a profession.
Meetings are held regularly to ensure the smooth functioning of BCI.
State Bar Council issues a Certificate of Enrollment in the prescribed form. Then State
Bar Council shall notify any change in the place of his permanent residence within 90
days of such change to every person whose name is entered in the state roll.
Section 48 of the advocates act makes provision in respect of indemnity against the
legal proceedings.
2. Section 26-A of the Advocate Act empowers a State Bar Council to remove from the
state roll the name of any advocate who is dead or from whom a request has been
received or that effect.
3. Section 27 of the act State Bar Council refuses the application of any person on its
roll, No other State Bar Council shall entertain an application for admissions of such
person as an advocate on its rolls, except with the previsions consent in writing of the
State Bar Council which refused the application and of the Bar Council of India. And the
state bar council is required to issue a certificate of enrollment in the prescribed form
to every person whose name is entered in the roll of advocates maintained by it under
the act.
1. All persons who were entered as advocates on roll of any High Court under Indian
Bar Councils, 1926, immediately before the appointed day including persons being
citizens of India who before 15-8-1947, were enrolled as advocate under the said act in
any area which before the said date was comprised within India as defined in the
government of India act 1935, at any time express or entertain in the prescribed
manner to practice within the jurisdiction of the bar council.
2. All other persons who are admitted to be advocates on the roll of the State Bar
Council under this act on or after the appointed date, each such roll of advocates shall
consist of two parts, the first part containing the names of senior advocates and
second part, the names of other advocates.
RULE MAKING POWER
The State Bar Council has been empowered to make rules regarding the for the
welfare of the advocates, such rules may provide for:-
1. The time within which and form in which an advocate shall express his intention for
the entry of his name in the roll of a state bar council under section 20.
2. The form in which an application shall be made to the Bar Council for admissions as
an advocate on its roll and the manner in which such application shall be disposed of
by the enrollment committee of the bar council.
Introduction
The concept of Lok Adalats stands as a unique contribution of the Indian legal system to world legal
jurisprudence. It is an informal system of justice dispensation which has largely succeeded in
providing a supplementary forum to litigants for determination and settlement of disputes[1].
Originating from Gandhian principles by Mahatma Gandhi, it has become a major helping hand to
courts and is prescribed in Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as well[2].
The advent of Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 further gives a statutory status to these Lok Adalats,
promoting the constitutional mandate of Article 39-A of the Constitution of India, which directs the
state to organize Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on a
basis of equal opportunity[3]. These Lok Adalats provide three-fold benefits involving speedy
resolution of disputes coupled with reduced costs of litigation and avoiding further appeals, thereby
making them the perfect instrument to resolve the heightened burdened on judiciary for disposing
cases[4]. In 2018 alone, about 47 lakh cases were disposed of in National Lok Adalats, which included
about 21 lakh pending cases and 26 lakh pre-litigation cases[5]. Therefore, their efficacy has been a
linchpin in reducing excessive litigation[6].
Keeping in mind their contribution to Indian jurisprudence, the author shall discuss the concept of
Lok Adalats in the country, their functioning, advantages, places for improvement and their role as
functionaries towards access to justice for the poor and downtrodden.
Level of Organization
Lok Adalats are better known as the people’s courts, therefore they need to be available to people on
every level of governance[7]. The Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 (Hereafter “the Act”) prescribes
for several levels wherein Lok Adalats can be organized, ranging from the lowest courts to the apex
court which can take cognizance and organize Lok Adalats for effective and speedy justice[8]. The
persons residing over these Adalats include serving or retired judicial officials as well as other persons
as prescribed by the authority conducting the Lok Adalats in the given area[9].
Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction of these Lok Adalats is parallel to the courts organizing them, therefore it extends to
any case or matter which is being heard by that court under its original jurisdiction[10]. Matters with
respect to offences not compoundable under law are an exception to this jurisdiction. They cannot be
adjudicated in Lok Adalats[11]. These courts may also take cognizance of cases as per provisions of
the Act for disputes agreed by the parties to be resolved under them or if one of the parties makes an
application to the courts for referring the case to Lok Adalats for settlement and the court is prima
facie[12] satisfied that there are chances of settlement[13].
Eventually once the court is satisfied, it passes an award with respect to the dispute is final and
binding on the parties[17]. The award is enforceable as a decree of the civil court and no appeal lies
from this award[18]. Therefore, this provision ensures that the award is conclusive and the matter is
put to rest once and for all.
Advantages of Lok Adalats
The reason behind the efficiency of Lok Adalats is based on several advantages which it holds over
normal courts of law. These factors are responsible for its quick disposal of several disputes. They are:
Procedural Flexibility
There exist considerable procedural flexibility as major procedural laws such as the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 or the Indian Evidence Act, 1882 are not strictly enforced[19]. The parties can
interact directly through their counsels which is not possible in a regular court of law. This dynamic
nature of Lok Adalats allows them to conciliate both party interests and pass awards which are
acceptable to both parties[20].
No Court Fees
There is no court fee payable when a matter is filed in a Lok Adalat[21]. If a matter pending in the
court of law is referred to the Lok Adalat and is settled subsequently, the court fee originally paid in
the court on the complaints/petition is also refunded back to the parties[22].
Here, there lies an important point of difference between “access” to justice, and access to “justice”;
wherein the former refers to whether a chance of redressal was provided to the aggrieved party
whereas the latter refers to whether justice was served. Both these aspects have been analyzed in
this article.
1. The Bench, i.e. the place where the judges take their seat.
2. Bar, i.e. the place where the advocates stand.
The judges are known as the “Bench” and the Advocates are known as the “Bar”. The relation
between the judges and Advocates are referred to as the Bar and Bench relation. Speedy justice and
the faith the public has on the judiciary depend on the relation between the judges and the
Advocates and in the administration of justice the role of Advocates is equally important as that of
judges. Providing justice is the joint responsibility of both the judges and the Advocates.
Duties of Bar and Bench in administration of justice
In the administration of justice, Bar and Bench plays an important role. Following are the duties of
the Bench and the Bar which they should perform for the administration of justice.
Patient Hearing
While hearing cases the judge shall not be biased, and shall not form the opinion regarding the merit
of the case until he heard both the parties, he should act in the interest of justice. Sufficient
opportunity shall be given to the advocates by judges in order to present their case.
Impartiality
Judges shall act impartial, and shall not do anything in favor of his friend and relatives, he must do
everything for justice.
Avoidance of Interruptions
When advocates examine witnesses in a case or argue in case, the judge shall make sure that there
are no interruptions. Unwanted interruption or bad comments by the judges during the hearing of
the case disturbs the advocates and as a result, he may not be able to present his case properly. But
the judges can interfere in the following circumstances:
Interpretation of Statutes
In some cases, interpretations of acts, codes, regulations, orders, etc has to be done by the court,
during the process of administration of justice, in order to remove the ambiguity or inconsistency or
to know the actual meaning of the provisions. So in such cases, proper interpretation of statutes
should be done by the court to render justice to the parties.
Avoidance of unreasonable adjournments
Without reasonable and sufficient grounds cases shall not be adjourned. One of the reasons for
mounting arrears of cases is unreasonable adjournment which causes hardship to the parties.
Speedy disposal
Cases that come before the court shall be disposed of as soon as possible, as when justice is delayed
it means justice is denied.
Avoiding harsh comments
Harsh comments shall be avoided by the judge in the court about the advocate’s lack of knowledge in
law, similarly, without any sufficient reason, they can not ask the advocates to leave the court. Judges
should possess a calm temper.
Independence
The protection of the independence of the judiciary should be the prime duty of the judge.
Meeting of judges and advocates
At regular intervals, meetings shall be conducted between the judges and the Advocates, such that
they can put forward their difficulties in front of each other and it can be sorted out, this will help in
strengthening the Bar and Bench relation.
Integrity
The character and the conduct of a judge shall be praiseworthy, and he should have personal and
intellectual integrity.
Industriousness
A judge should regularly update his knowledge and should know all the recent developments and
changes made in the law.
1. A respectful attitude shall be maintained by advocates towards the courts, bringing in mind
that for the survival of the society the dignity of the judicial office is essential.
2. Efforts shall be made by advocates in order to prevent his/her client from adopting unfair
practices concerning the court.
3. By any illegal or improper means, an advocate shall not try to influence the judgment of
the court.
4. Dignity and self-respect shall be maintained by an advocate while presenting his/her case
in front of the judge.
5. An advocate shall help the court in the trial of the case by presenting clearly the laws
which are relevant to the particular case.
6. An advocate shall not present any fact in front of the court which he knows to be false.
7. An advocate shall not ask for an adjournment of the case without any sufficient reason.
8. An advocate shall always appear in court in a presentable manner and a prescribed dress.
In public places, he should not wear a gown or bands.
9. If an advocate knows a judge personally he should not practice before him.
10. An advocate shall not interrupt in between when an opposite council or judge is speaking.
11. If an advocate has a monetary interest in any case, he shall not plead in such a case.
12. An advocate shall not represent any organization or institution if he is a member of the
executive committee of such an organization or institution.
13. An advocate shall not apply any personal influence over the decision of the court, nor he
should give any kind of impression that he possesses personal influence with the judge
before whom he practices.
Conclusion
An independent and fearless Bar is not preferred over an independent Bench, similarly, an
independent Bench is also not preferred over an independent and fearless Bar, neither of them is
superior over the other, both are essential for a free society. The freedom given to the Bar requires
an independent judiciary, through which if necessary the freedom that is given to the Bar, be
vindicated. A well-behaved, responsible, cultured, and a leaned Bar is one of the potent means for
assuring judges their independence. Finally, the keystone for the smooth functioning of the courts in
the general interest of the society is the reciprocal adjustment of conduct by the Bar and the Bench.
Constitutional Law
In the Article 244(1) of the Constitution, expression Scheduled Areas means such areas as the President may by
order declare to be Scheduled Areas.
The President may at any time by order
direct that the whole or any specified part of a Scheduled Area shall cease to be a Scheduled Area or a
part of such an area;
increase the area of any Scheduled Area in a State after consultation with the Governor of that State;
alter, but only by way of rectification of boundaries, any Scheduled Area;
on any alteration of the boundaries of a State on the admission into the Union or the establishment of
a new State, declare any territory not previously included in any State to be, or to form part of, a
Scheduled Area;
rescind, in relation to any State of States, any order or orders made under these provisions and in
consultation with the Governor of the State concerned, make fresh orders redefining the areas which
are to be Scheduled Areas.
These criteria are not spelt out in the Constitution of India but have become well established. They embody
principles followed in declaring 'Excluded' and 'Partially-Excluded' Areas under the Government of India Act
1935, Schedule B of recommendations of the Excluded and Partially Excluded Areas Sub Committee of
Constituent Assembly and the Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes Commission 1961.
Special Provisions for Fifth Schedule Areas
The Governor of each State having Scheduled Areas (SA) shall annually, or whenever so required by
the President, make a report to the President regarding the administration of Scheduled Areas in that
State.
The Union Government shall have executive powers to give directions to the States as to the
administration of the Scheduled Areas.
Para 4 of the Fifth Schedule provides for establishment of a Tribes Advisory Council (TAC) in any State
having Scheduled Areas. If the President so directs, there will be established a TAC in a State having
Scheduled tribes but not Scheduled Areas therein, consisting of not more than twenty members of
whom, three-fourths shall be the representatives of the Scheduled Tribes in the Legislative Assembly
of the State. If the number of representatives of the STs in the Legislative Assembly of the State is less
than the number of seats in the TAC to be filled by such representatives, the remaining seats shall be
filled by other members of those Tribes.
The TAC shall advise on such matters pertaining to the welfare and the advancement of the STs in the
State as may be referred to them by the Governor.
The Governor may make rules prescribing or regulating
o the number of members of the Council, the mode of their appointment and the appointment
of the Chairman of the Council and of the officers and servants thereof,
o the conduct of its meetings and its procedure in general; and
o all other incidental matters.
The Governor may, by public notification, direct that any particular Act of Parliament or of the
Legislature of the State shall or shall not apply to a SA or any part thereof in the State, subject to such
exceptions and modifications, as specified. The Governor may make regulations for the peace and
good government of any area in the State which is for the time being a SA. Such regulations may
o prohibit or restrict the transfer of land by or among members of the Scheduled tribes in such
area;
o regulate the allotment of land to members of the STs in such area;
o regulate the carrying on of business as money-lender by persons who lend money to members
of the STs in such area.
In making such regulations, the Governor may repeal or amend any Act of Parliament or of Legislature
of the State or any existing law after obtaining assent of the President.
No regulations shall be made unless the Governor, in case a TAC exists, consults such TAC.
1. States’ Territories.
2. Union Territories.
3. Areas that the Government of India may acquire at any moment.
Concept
Union Territories - Concept
Union Territories, also known as Centrally Administered Territories, are
federal territories administered by the Union Government of India.
Advisory Committees
Advisory Committees Of Union Territories
The Ministry of Home Affairs is the nodal ministry for all matters
concerning Union Territories, including legislation, finance and budget,
services, and the appointment of Lt. Governors and Administrators, as
defined by the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules
1961.
The Home Minister's Advisory Committee (HMAC)/Administrator's
Advisory Committee exists in all five Union Territories without a
legislature (Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Daman and
Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Lakshadweep, and Ladakh) (AAC).
The Union Home Minister chairs the HMAC, while the Administrator of
the concerned Union Territories chairs the AAC.
Members of Parliament and elected members of local governments,
for example, District Panchayats and Municipal Council of the
respective Union Territories are members of these committees among
others.
The Committee discusses the general issues relating to the social and
economic development of the Union Territories.
Recent Developments
Recent Developments In Case Of Union Territories
In 2019, legislation was passed to unite the Union Territories of
Daman and Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli, with effect from January
26, 2020, to become the new Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar
Haveli and Daman and Diu.
The former state of Jammu & Kashmir has been reorganized as the
new Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the new Union
Territory of Ladakh on 31st October 2019.
Structural Fragility
Structural Fragility Of Union Territories
Because of the Union Territories’ structural vulnerability in the
constitutional scheme of things, it is simpler for the central government to
intervene in their operations and destabilize them.
Articles Related
Articles Related To Union Territories
Conclusion
Conclusion
Due to the existence of Union Territories, many critics have resolved India
into a semi-federal nation, as the central and state governments each have
their legislatures. Union Territories of India have special rights and status
due to their constitutional formation and development. Thus, Union
Territories are also important segments in the administrative jurisdiction of
our Country.
Historical aspect
When India and Pakistan gained their independence on 15th and 14th August 1947, respectively; J&K chose to
remain independent. There was an agreement by J&K with Pakistan and India that none of them will attack
J&K. While India respected the agreement and exercised restraint, Pakistan attacked Kashmir in a bid to annex
it by force. On 6th October 1947, Kashmir was attacked by “Azad Kashmir Forces” supported by Pakistan. To
save J&K, Maharaja Hari Singh (the then ruler of J&K) chose to accede J&K to India.
In October 1947, the accession was made by the ruler in favour of India in consideration of certain
commitments made by Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru (the then Prime Minister of India). It was in the pursuance of
those commitments that Article 370 was incorporated in the Constitution.
Special Features
Separate Constitution
J&K is the only state in India which has a Constitution of its own. The Constitution of J&K was enacted by a
separate Constituent Assembly set up by the State and it came into force on 26th January 1957.
Jurisdiction of Parliament
Parliament or the Union Legislature has very limited jurisdiction in case of J&K as compared to other states. Till
1963, Parliament could legislate on subjects contained in the Union List, and had no jurisdiction in case of
Concurrent List under 7th Schedule of the Constitution. But now, the Parliament has power to legislate not just
on subjects contained in the Union List but also on some of the subjects of Concurrent List. Residuary powers,
unlike other states, rest with J&K. The Parliament has no power to legislate Preventive Detention laws for the
state; only the state legislature has the power to do so.
Emergency Provisions
The Union of India has no power to declare Financial Emergency under Article 360 in the state. The Union can
declare emergency in the state only in case of War or External Aggression. No proclamation of emergency
made on the grounds of internal disturbance or imminent danger thereof shall have effect in relation to the
state unless (a) it is made at the request or with the concurrence of the government of the state; or (b) where
it has not been so made, it is applied subsequently by the President to that state at the request or with the
concurrence of the government of that state. In December 1964, Articles 356 and 357 were extended to the
state.
Official Languages
Provisions of Part XVII of the Constitution apply to J&K only insofar as they relate to (i) the official language of
the Union; (ii) the official language for communication between one state and another; or between a state and
the Union; and (iii) language of the proceedings in the Supreme Court. Urdu is the official language of the state
but use of English is permitted for official purposes unless the state legislature provides otherwise.
Miscellaneous
Certain special rights have been granted to the permanent residents of J&K with regard to employment under
the state, acquisition of immovable property in the state, settlement in the state, and scholarship and other
forms of aid as the state government may provide.
The 5th Schedule pertaining to the administration and control of Schedule Areas and Scheduled Tribes and the
6th Schedule pertaining to administration of tribal areas are not applicable to the state of J&K.
The Provisions of the State Constitution (except those relating to the relationship of the state with the Union)
may be amended by an Act of the Legislative Assembly of the state passed by not less than two-thirds of its
membership. If such amendment seeks to affect Governor or Election Commission, it needs President's assent
to come into effect. No amendment of the Constitution of India shall extend to J&K unless so extended by an
order of the President under Article 370(1).
Under Article 370(3), consent of state legislature and the constituent assembly of the state are also required to
amend Article 370. Now the question arises, how can we amend Article 370 when the Constituent Assembly of
the state no longer exists? Or whether it can be amended at all? Some jurists say it can be amended by an
amendment Act under Article 368 of the Constitution and the amendment extended under Article 370(1). But
it is still a mooted question.
Those against its abrogation forward the following arguments. They contend that that Abrogation will have
serious consequences. It will encourage secessionists to demand plebiscite which will lead to
internationalisation of the issue of J&K. They further argue that the contention of Article giving rise to
secessionist activities is baseless as states like Assam and Punjab, which don't have any special status have
experienced such problems. It would not only constitute a violation of the solemn undertaking given by India
through the instrument of accession, but would also give unnecessary misgivings in the minds of the people of
J&K, making the issue more sensitive.
Conclusion
The demand for abrogation of the special status of J&K is completely justified. The author feels that it is indeed
root cause of all the problems of J&K and encourages secessionist activities within J&K. In the latest
controversy relating to “Land Transfer” to Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board, it was alleged by separatists that it
was a violation of Article 370 as the land was being transferred to India. Whereas, it was not so, as the land
was being “diverted” and not “transferred”, as alleged. It has, indeed, created “psychological barriers” in
minds of people of J&K and people of other parts of the country for each other. Some people in other states
believe that you need a Visa or something like that to enter the state of J&K.
The question of plebiscite doesn't arise till Pakistan doesn't withdraw its forces from POK (Pakistan Occupied
Kashmir). India has taken a stand that after lapse of so much time, the circumstances within state have
changed. Under the changed circumstances, the plebiscite can't be held and hence, the demand for it is
completely unjustified. The view is accepted by most of the nations of the world like USA, UK, France, etc. As
far as the argument pertaining to Punjab and Assam is concerned, every problem has its own reasons. You
can't equate one problem with another just because it appears to be similar. Like death sentence is not
awarded in all cases of murder because of appreciation of the facts of the individual cases; similarly before
giving a verdict on this issue, the “individuality of facts” needs to be appreciated.
Law and society regulate each other. Law changes if changes take place in society. The
laws can’t be stagnant. With the growing state of society, its norms and regulations
also need to be amended timely.
Once the bill gets passed by both the Houses of Parliament, then it is presented before
the President for his assent. And after receiving assent on the bill, the bill becomes
Constitutional Amendment Act.
In this method, the words in the law do not change. It remains the same. The change
takes place in its meaning and interpretation. For example, in Article 21, many
amendments take place. But it never changes the content of Article 21 but changes the
context, scope, and ambit. The right to life includes free air, education, medical aid,
dignity, speedy trial, fair trial, and many more.
In this form of Amendment, the text or words are changed in the law. The provision is
amended by way of addition, variation, or omission. For example, by the 42nd
amendment 1976, the words Secular, Socialist, and Integrity were added in
the Preamble. This amendment was done by way of adding in the Preamble. Likewise,
the amendments are done by omission or variation.
By special majority means more than 50 percent of the total members and two-third of
the present and voting. The total members in each House are 545 in Lok Sabha and
245 in Rajya Sabha. The provisions which get amended by the special majority
are Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State policy, and all other provisions
which are not covered under the other two categories.
All the provisions in the Constitution which are related to the federal structure of
polity can be amended (changed) by a special majority of the Indian Parliament and
ratification of half of the total states.
Provisions like Election of the President, Supreme Court and High Court, lists
mentioned in the seventh schedule, executive and legislative powers of the Union and
the State, Representation of State in Parliament, and Article 368 itself.
The court held that the word ‘law’ in Article 13 does not include the amendment of the
Constitution. Therefore Fundamental Rights can be amended under Article 368. The
same was approved in the case of Sajjan Singh vs. State of Rajasthan, 1965.
The Supreme Court, with the majority view, said that Fundamental Rights are out of
the reach of the Parliament. The court emphasized that Article 368 does not give
power to the Parliament but merely provides procedure as to how to amend. The
Parliament’s power to amend the constitutional provisions is not under Article 368 but
in Article 245. As we have read earlier that amending the Constitution is a legislative
process whereas Article 368 provides only the procedure to amend. The court said that
the amendment is a law within Article 13, and if in any case violates Fundamental
Rights, then it shall be void or unconstitutional.
This amendment was an answer to the decision made in Golak Nath’s case. It sought to
reverse the ruling of Golak Nath’s case. It inserted clause 4 in Article 13, which stated
that Article 13 would not apply to any amendment made under Article 368. This
amended the text of Article 368. Before this amendment, Article 368 provided only for
the procedure for amendment. Later it changed to “empower the Parliament to
amend and procedure therefor.”
Keshavanand Bharati Case
The Supreme Court said that the Parliament has powers to amend the Constitution but
not its basic structure. The basic features are those supporting pillars of the
Constitution without which the Constitution cannot stand. The Parliament can under
Article 368 amend any provision but not its basic features.
What is Basic structure can’t be listed, but the Supreme Court illustrated few features
like the supremacy of the Constitution, separation of power, federal character,
sovereignty, democratic character, and so on.
Provided that the conduct of the President may be brought under review by any court,
tribunal or body appointed or designated by either House of Parliament for the
investigation of a charge under article 61:
Provided further that nothing in this clause shall be construed as restricting the right of
any person to bring appropriate proceedings against the Government of India or the
Government of a State.
(4) No civil proceedings in which relief is claimed against the President, or the
Governor of a State, shall be instituted during his term of office in any court in respect
of any act done or purporting to be done by him in his personal capacity, whether
before or after he entered upon his office as President, or as Governor of such State,
until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been delivered to
the President or the Governor, as the case may be, or left at his office stating the
nature of the proceedings, the cause of action therefor, the name, description and
place of residence of the party by whom such proceedings are to be instituted and the
relief which he claims.
(1) No person shall be liable to any proceedings, civil or criminal, in any court in respect
of the publication in a newspaper of a substantially true report of any proceedings of
either House of Parliament or the Legislative Assembly, or, as the case may be, either
House of the Legislature, of a State, unless the publication is proved to have been
made with malice:
Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply to the publication of any report of the
proceedings of a secret sitting of either House of Parliament or the Legislative
Assembly, or, as the case may be, either House of the Legislature, of a State.
A member of a House belonging to any political party who is disqualified for being a
member of the House under paragraph 2 of the Tenth Schedule shall also be
disqualified to hold any remunerative political post for duration of the period
commencing from the date of his disqualification till the date on which the term of his
office as such member would expire or till the date on which he contests an election to
a House and is declared elected, whichever is earlier.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this article,-
(a) the expression “House” has the meaning assigned to it in clause (a) of paragraph 1
of the Tenth Schedule;
Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution or in any law for the time being in force-
(a) the Prince, Chief or other person who, at any time before the commencement of
the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971, was recognised by the
President as the Ruler of an Indian State or any person who, at any time before such
commencement, was recognised by the President as the successor of such ruler shall,
on and from such commencement, cease to be recognised as such Ruler or the
successor of such Ruler;
(b) any existing law shall cease to have effect in any major port or aerodrome except as
respects things done or omitted to be done before the said date, or shall in its
application to such port or aerodrome have effect subject to such exceptions or
modifications as may be specified in the notification.
Where any State has failed to comply with, or to give effect to, any directions given in
the exercise of the executive power of the Union under any of the provisions of this
Constitution, it shall be lawful for the President to hold that a situation has arisen in
which the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the
provisions of this Constitution.
366. Definitions.
In this Constitution, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions
have the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them, that is to say-
(1) “agricultural income” means agricultural income as defined for the purposes of the
enactments relating to Indian income-tax;
(2) “an Anglo-Indian” means a person whose father or any of whose other male
progenitors in the male line is or was of European descent but who is domiciled within
the territory of India and is or was born within such territory of parents habitually
resident therein and not established there for temporary purposes only;
(4) “borrow” includes the raising of money by the grant of annuities, and “loan” shall
be construed accordingly;
(8) “debt” includes any liability in respect of any obligation to repay capital sums by
way of annuities and any liability under any guarantee, and “debt charges” shall be
construed accordingly;
(10) “existing law” means any law, Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule or regulation passed
or made before the commencement of this Constitution by any Legislature, authority
or person having power to make such a law, Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule or
regulation;
(11) “Federal Court” means the Federal Court constituted under the Government of
India Act, 1935;
(12A) “goods and services tax” means any tax on supply of goods, or services or both
except taxes on the supply of the alcoholic liquor for human consumption. *
(14) “High Court” means any Court which is deemed for the purposes of this
Constitution to be a High Court for any State and includes-
(a) any Court in the territory of India constituted or reconstituted under this
Constitution as a High Court, and
(b) any other Court in the territory of India which may be declared by Parliament by
law to be a High Court for all or any of the purposes of this Constitution;
(15) “Indian State” means any territory which the Government of the Dominion of
India recognised as such a State;
(21) omitted
(22) “Ruler” means the Prince, Chief or other person who, at any time before
the commencement of the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971, was
recognised by the President as the Ruler of an Indian State or any person who, at any
time before such commencement, was recognised by the President as the successor of
such Ruler;
(24) “Scheduled Castes” means such castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within
such castes, races or tribes as are deemed under article 341 to be Scheduled Castes for
the purposes of this Constitution;
*12A, 26A, and 26B added by 101st Amendment Act in 2016. Here is the full 101st
Amendment Act PDF. (97KB) Please see this once.
(28) “taxation” includes the imposition of any tax or impost, whether general or local
or special, and “tax” shall be construed accordingly;
and such transfer, delivery or supply of any goods shall be deemed to be a sale of
those goods by the person making the transfer, delivery or supply and a purchase of
those goods by the person to whom such transfer, delivery or supply is made;
367. Interpretation.
(1) Unless the context otherwise requires, the General Clauses Act, 1897, shall, subject
to any adaptations and modifications that may be made therein under article 372,
apply for the interpretation of this Constitution as it applies for the interpretation of an
Act of the Legislature of the Dominion of India.
(2) Any reference in this Constitution to Acts or laws of, or made by, Parliament, or to
Acts or laws of, or made by, the Legislature of a State, shall be construed as including a
reference to an Ordinance made by the President or, to an Ordinance made by a
Governor, as the case may be.
(3) For the purposes of this Constitution “foreign State” means any State other than
India:
Provided that, subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament, the President
may by order declare any State not to be a foreign State for such purposes as may be
specified in the order.