0% found this document useful (1 vote)
19 views

Barrage Design1

1. This document provides design details for a barrage including calculations for the minimum stable wetted perimeter, Lacey's silt factor, fixation of the crest level, and design of undersluices. 2. Key parameters calculated include a crest level of 590.16 feet, discharge over the crest of 151.11 cusecs/ft, and Lacey's looseness coefficient of 1.88. 3. The design includes 2 undersluices with 5 bays each and a crest level 3 feet below the main weir, to pass 120% of the flow through the main weir.

Uploaded by

Noman Ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
19 views

Barrage Design1

1. This document provides design details for a barrage including calculations for the minimum stable wetted perimeter, Lacey's silt factor, fixation of the crest level, and design of undersluices. 2. Key parameters calculated include a crest level of 590.16 feet, discharge over the crest of 151.11 cusecs/ft, and Lacey's looseness coefficient of 1.88. 3. The design includes 2 undersluices with 5 bays each and a crest level 3 feet below the main weir, to pass 120% of the flow through the main weir.

Uploaded by

Noman Ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Design of Barrage

Regd no.= 136


Input Design Data
Maximum Discharge, Q max =Regd no.*10000/3 453333.333 cusecs
Minimum Discharge, Qmin 12000 cusecs
River Bed Level, RBL 582 ft
High Flood Level, HFL 600 ft
Lowest water level, LWL 587 ft
Numbers of canals on left bank 1
Numbers of canals on right bank 2
Maximum Discharge of one Canal 3500 cusecs
Slope of river 1 ft/mile 0.000189
0.00018939
Lacey's looseness coefficient(LLC) 1.8

1- Minimum Stable Wetted Perimeter


Wetted perimeter, Pw = 2.67√ Qmax 1798 ft
Width between abutment, Wa = LLC x Pw 3236 ft
Number of bays 50
Bay width 60 ft
Number of fish ladder 1
Width of one fish ladder 26 ft
Number of divide walls 2
Width of one divide wall 15 ft
Width of one pier 7 ft
Total number of piers 47
Total width of piers 329 ft
Total width of bays, Wclear 3000 ft
Total width of divide walls 30 ft
Total Width between abutment, Wa 3385 ft
Discharge be tw een a butme nts, qabt 133.92 cusecs/ft
Discharge over crest, qcrest 151.11 cusecs/ft

2- Calculation of Lacey's Silt Factor


S = (1/1844) x f^5/3 / Q^1/6
Lacey's silt factor, f 1.96

3- Fixation of Crest Level


Afflux 3 ft
Height of crest above river bed, P 6 ft
Scour depth, R = 0.9(qabt^2 / f)^1/3 18.84 ft
Depth of water above crest, Ho = R- P 12.84 ft
Approach velocity, Vo = qabt / R 7.11 ft/s
Energy head, ho = Vo^2 / 2g 0.79 ft
Eo = Ho + ho 13.62 ft
Do = HFL - RBL 18.00 ft
E1 = Do + ho + Afflux 21.79 ft
Level of E1 = RBL + E1 603.79 ft
Crest level = Level of E1 - Eo 590.16 ft
Maximum d/s water le vel (from c urve for barrage stage di scharge, normal st ate) 600 ft
Submergency of weir,h = d/s WL - Crest Level 9.84 ft
h / Eo 0.72
Using Gibson Curve
C' / C 0.85
Coefficient of discharge,C= 3.8
C' = (C'/C) x C 3.23

Q = C' x W clear x Eo^3/2 487093 cusecs


O.K
Lacey's Looseness Coefficient, LLC=Total Wa/Pw 1.88

4- Design of Undersluices

Difference of crest level between undersluices & main weir 3 ft


Number of undersluices (N1) 2
Number of bays for each undersluices (N2) 5
Flow through undesluices as % of main weir,qus= 120 %
Crest level of undersluices 587.16 ft
Wclear = N1 xN2 xBay width 600 ft
qus = % flow x q w eir 181.333333 cusecs/ft
Scour depth, R = 0.9(qus^2 / f)^1/3 23.05 ft
Do, (may be Do = R) 23.05 ft
Approac h velocity, Vo = q us / R 7.87 ft/sec
Energy head, ho = Vo^2 / 2g 0.96 ft
Maximum U/S E.L = HFL + Afflux + ho 603.96 ft
Eo = U/S E.L - Crest Level 16.80 ft
h = (U/S E.L - Afflux) - Crest level 13.80 ft
h / Eo 0.82
Using Gibson Curve
C' / C 0.79
C' = (C'/C) x C 3.00

Q1 & Q3, ( Q = C' x W clear x Eo^3/2) 123988 cusecs


Q ma in we ir = C' x (W cl ear(bays) - W cle ar( us) )x Eo^3/2 389674 cusecs
Total Discha rge = Q1 + Q3 + Q main weir O.K 513662 cusecs
%water passing through undersluices=(Q1+Q3)/Qmain weir*100 31.8 % 1
Hence
Crest Level of Undersluices 587.16 ft
Number of Bays on Each Side 5

5- Determination of Water Levels and Energy Levels

5.1 Check for main weir


% Q DSWL Afflux USWL Do f qabt R vo ho Ho Eo h Eo3/2 qweir Q Afflux limits
%age
DSWL+afflux USWL-RBL Q/Wa 0.9(q ab t2 /f )1/3 q ab t /R /2g
Vo 2 USWL-CL Ho+h o DSWL-CL h/E o C'/C C' C'*E o3/2
ft 3/sec/ft q weir*Wbays Difference
ft3/sec ft ft ft ft ft 3/sec/ft ft/sec ft/sec ft ft ft ft ft3/sec Check
FOR NORMAL STATE 3-5'
120% 544000.00 600 4 604 22 1.99 160.71 21.14 7.60 0.90 13.84 14.73 10 0.67 0.89 3.382 56.5492 191.2493 573747.895 5.2 O.K
100% 453333.33 599.5 3 602.5 20.5 1.96 133.92 18.84 7.11 0.79 12.34 13.12 9 0.71 0.87 3.306 47.5252 157.11823 471354.681 3.8 O.K
50% 226666.67 596.5 3 599.5 17.5 1.83 66.96 12.14 5.51 0.47 9.34 9.81 6 0.65 0.88 3.344 30.7147 102.71011 308130.325 26.4 O.K
25% 113333.33 590.5 4.1 594.6 12.6 1.70 33.48 7.83 4.28 0.28 4.44 4.72 0 0.07 0.99 3.762 10.2528 38.570882 115712.646 2.1 O.K
FOR RETROGRESSED STATE 5-7'
120% 544000.00 596 7 603 21 1.99 160.71 21.14 7.60 0.90 12.84 13.73 6 0.42 0.97 3.686 50.8905 187.58243 562747.291 3.3 O.K
100% 453333.33 595.5 7 602.5 20.5 1.96 133.92 18.84 7.11 0.79 12.34 13.12 5 0.41 0.98 3.724 47.5252 176.98375 530951.25 14.6 O.K
50% 226666.67 591 7 598 16 1.83 66.96 12.14 5.51 0.47 7.84 8.31 1 0.10 1 3.8 23.9451 90.991384 272974.151 17.0 O.K
FOR ACCRETED STATE 1-3'
120% 544000.00 603 2 605 23 1.99 160.71 21.14 7.60 0.90 14.84 15.73 13 0.82 0.77 2.926 62.4033 182.59201 547776.03 0.7 O.K
100% 453333.33 602 2 604 22 1.96 133.92 18.84 7.11 0.79 13.84 14.62 12 0.81 0.78 2.964 55.9038 165.69899 497096.98 8.8 O.K
50% 226666.67 600.5 1 601.5 19.5 1.83 66.96 12.14 5.51 0.47 11.34 11.81 10 0.88 0.79 3.002 40.5737 121.80229 365406.878 38.0 O.K

5.2 Check for undersluices

Increase in flow= 20 %
Concentration of flow, Q= 148785.58 cusecs
Total width of under sluices,Wu= 600 ft
Crest level of undersluices= 587.16 ft
Q DSWL Afflux USWL D Vo ho h Ho Eo h/Eo C'/C C' qclear Q
DSWL+afflux (USWL-RBL) Q/Wu*D (Vo^2/2g) (DSWL-CL) (USWL-CL) (USWL+ho-CL) (Gibson) (C'*Eo^(3/2))(qclear*Wu)
(cusecs) (ft) ft (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (cusecs/ft) (cusecs)
For normal state
148786 593.5 8 601.5 19.5 12.7 2.51 6.34 14.34 16.85 0.38 0.960 3.65 252.24 151346 O.K
For Retrogressed state
148786 584.5 6 590.5 8.5 29.2 13.22 -2.66 3.34 16.55 -0.16 N/A 3.80 255.88 153526 O.K
For accreted state
148786 597.5 5 602.5 20.5 12.1 2.27 10.34 15.34 17.61 0.59 0.900 3.42 252.68 151609 O.K

6- Fixation of d/s Floor Levels and Length of d/s Glacis and d/s Floor

6.1 Fixation of d/s floor levels for normal weir section using blench curves

%Q Q qclear USEL DSEL hL E2 DSFL


(USWL+ho) (DSWL +ho) (USEL-DSEL) (blench curve) (DSEL - E 2)

(cusecs) (cusecs/ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)


Normal state of river
120 544000.00 191.2 604.90 600.90 4.00 19.1 581.80
100 453333.33 157.1 603.29 600.29 3.00 16.7 583.59
50 226666.67 102.7 599.97 596.97 3.00 12.5 584.47
For Retrogressed state of river
120 544000.00 187.6 603.90 596.90 7.00 20.1 576.80
100 453333.33 177.0 603.29 596.29 7.00 19.8 576.49
50 226666.67 91.0 598.47 591.47 7.00 13.2 578.27
For accreted state of river
120 544000.00 182.6 605.90 603.90 2.00 17.4 586.50
100 453333.33 165.7 604.79 602.79 2.00 16.8 585.99
50 226666.67 121.8 601.97 600.97 1.00 12.8 588.17
Hence
d/s Floor level 576 ft

6.2 Fixation of d/s floor levels for undersluices using blench curves

Q qclear USEL DSEL hL E2 DSFL


(USWL+ho) (DSWL +ho) (USEL-DSEL) (blench curve) (DSEL - E2)

(cusecs) (cusecs/ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)


Normal state of river
151346 252.24 604.01 596.01 8.00 24.4 571.61
For Retrogressed state of river
153526 255.88 603.72 597.72 6.00 23.4 574.32
For accreted state of river
151609 252.68 604.77 599.77 5.00 23.1 576.67
Hence
d/s Floor level for undersluices 572 ft

7- Fixation of d/s floor level for normal barrage section using


Crump's method and determination of floor length
a) Q 453333.333 cusecs
Maximum DSWL 602.00 ft
USWL 604.00 ft
USEL 604.79 ft
DSFL 585.99 ft
RBL 582 ft
Crest level 590.16 ft
Dpool (Max. DSWL - DSFL) 16.01 ft
Vd/s (Q/(Dpool x Wa) 8.37 ft/sec
d/s velocity he ad (Vd/s^ 2/2g) 1.09 ft
DSEL (DSWL + velocity head) 603.09 ft
K (USEL - Crest Level ) 14.63 ft
L (USEL - DSEL ) 1.70 ft
q (Q / Total width of bays) 151.11 cusecs/ft
Critical Depth, C, (q 2 / g)1/ 3 8.92 ft
L/C 0.19
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve) 2
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K] 3.21
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F 586.95 ft
E2, ( DSEL - Level of interse ction of jump) 16.13 ft
Submergency of jump, (Level of int erse ction of jump - DSFL ) 0.96 ft
Slope of d/s glacis 1: 3
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency) 2.89 ft
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E 2) 72.59 ft
Length of d/s floor, (Length of st ill ing pool -Length of glac is d/ s of jump) 69.70 ft
Say 70 ft
b)
Q 453333.333 cusecs
Minimum DSWL 595.5 ft
USWL 602.5 ft
USEL 603.29 ft
DSFL 576.49 ft
RBL 582 ft
Crest level 590.16 ft
Dpool (Min. DSWL - DSFL) 19.01 ft
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa) 7.04 ft/sec
d/s velocity he ad (V2/2g) 0.77 ft
DSEL, (DSWL + velocity head) 596.27 ft
K (USEL - Crest Level ) 13.13 ft
L (USEL - DSEL ) 7.02 ft
q (Q / Total width of bays) 151.11 cusecs/ft
Critical Depth, C, (q 2 / g)1/ 3 8.92 ft
L/C 0.79
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve) 2.8
F, [(K+F)/C x C - K] 11.84 ft
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F 578.32 ft
E2, ( DSEL - Level of interse ction of jump) 17.95 ft
Submergency of jump, (Level of int erse ction of jump - DSFL ) 1.84 ft
Slope of d/s glacis 1: 3
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency) 5.51 ft
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E 2) 80.77 ft
Length of d/s floor, (Length of st ill ing pool -Length of glac is d/ s of jump) 75.26 ft
Say 76.00 ft
Hence, we shall provide d/s floor = 76.00 ft

8 - Fixation of d/s floor length for undersluices


a)
Q 148785.576 cusecs
Maximum DSWL 597.5 ft
USWL 602.5 ft
USEL 604.77 ft
DSFL 572.00 ft
RBL 582 ft
Crest level 587.16 ft
Dpool (Max. DSWL - DSFL) 25.5 ft
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa) 9.7 ft/sec
d/s velocity he ad (V2/2g) 1.47 ft
DSEL (DSWL + velocity head) 598.97 ft
K (USEL - Crest Level ) 17.61 ft
L (USEL - DSEL ) 5.80 ft
q (Q / Total width of bays) 248.0 cusecs/ft
Critical Depth, C, (q 2 / g)1/ 3 12.41 ft
L/C 0.47
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve) 2.4
F=[(K+F)/C x C - K] 12.17 ft
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F 574.99 ft
E2, ( DSEL - Level of interse ction of jump) 23.97 ft
Submergency of jump, (Level of int erse ction of jump - DSFL ) 2.99 ft
Slope of d/s glacis 1: 3
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency) 8.98 ft
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E 2) 108 ft
Length of d/s floor, (Length of st ill ing pool -Length of glac is d/ s of jump) 98.90 ft
Say 99.00 ft
b)
Q 148785.576 cusecs
Minimum DSWL 584.5 ft
USWL 590.5 ft
USEL 603.72 ft
DSFL 572.00 ft
RBL 582 ft
Crest level 587.16 ft
Dpool (Min. DSWL - DSFL) 12.5 ft
d/s Velocity (Q/(Dpool x Wa) 19.84 ft/sec
d/s velocity he ad (V2/2g) 6.11 ft
DSEL (DSWL + velocity head) 590.61 ft
K (USEL - Crest Level ) 16.56 ft
L (USEL - DSEL ) 13.11 ft
q (Q / Total width of bays) 248.0 cusecs/ft
Critical Depth, C, (q 2 / g)1/ 3 12.41 ft
L/C 1.06
(K+F)/C ,(from crumps curve) 3.2
F=[(K+F)/C x C - K] 23.15 ft
Level of intersection of jump with glacis
= Crest level - F 564.02 ft
E2, ( DSEL - Level of interse ction of jump) 26.59 ft
Submergency of jump, (Level of int erse ction of jump - DSFL ) -7.98 ft
Slope of d/s glacis 1: 3
Length of glacis d/s of jump, (slope x submergency) -23.94 ft
Length of stilling pool, (4.5 x E 2) 120 ft
Length of d/s floor, (Length of st ill ing pool -Length of glac is d/ s of jump) 143.61 ft
Say 144 ft

Hence we shall provide d/s floor length = 144 ft

L =H L
K

y
F x

Va riou s Pa rameters for usi ng Cru mp's Curve

9- Check for Adequacy for d/s floor levels using conjugate depth method.

9.1 For normal weir section

Ф 1.00
Floor level of stilling pool, DSFL 576.49 ft

Discharge in river, Q (cusecs) 453333.333333333 226666.666666667


Discharge through ma in weir, Q 1= 0.8Q (cusecs) 362666.666666667 181333.333333333
max. min. max. min.
USEL (ft) 604.79 603.29 601.97 598.47
DSWL (ft) 602.00 595.5 600.5 591
E = USEL - DSFL 28.30 26.80 25.49 21.99
Intensity of flow on d/s floor, q = Q1/width of ma in weir 151.11 151.11 75.56 75.56
Depth in stilling pool, Dpool = DSWL - D SFL 25.51 19.01 24.01 14.51
f(z) = q/E 3/2 1.0035 1.0889 0.5872 0.7328
z 1.1340 0.1470 0.0761 0.0960
Conjugate depth coefficients
z' 0.6181 0.6385 0.4936 0.5432
d1 = z x E 32.10 3.94 1.94 2.11
Conjugate depths
d 2 = z' x E 17.50 17.11 12.58 11.94
Jump submergency = Dp ool - d2 8.02 1.90 11.43 2.57
Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K
Hence, jump is submerged in all cases
9.2 For undersluices section

Ф 1.00
Floor level of stilling pool, DSFL 572.00 ft

Discharge in river, Q (cusecs) 453333.333333333


Discharge through U.S with 20% concentration, (1.2 x (Q1 + Q2)) 148786
Max. Min.
USEL (ft) 604.77 603.72
DSWL (ft) 597.50 584.50
E = USEL - DSFL (ft) 32.77 31.72
Intensity of flow on d/s floor, q = Q1/Total width of all U/S 124 124
Depth in stilling pool, Dpool = DSWL - D SFL 25.50 12.50
f(z) = q/E 3/2 0.66 0.69
z 0.0860 0.0901
Conjugate depth coefficients
z' 0.5194 0.5294
d1 = z x E 2.82 2.86
Conjugate depths
d 2 = z' x E 17.02 16.79
Jump submergency = Dp ool - d2 (ft) 8.48 -4.29
Remarks O.K O.K

10 - Scour Protection
For main weir
Assume flow concentration 20 %
q = Qmax /(total width of bays) x 1.2 181.33 cusecs/ft
R = 0.9 (q 2/f)1/3 23.05 ft

10.1 - d/s scour protection for main weir

Safety factor for d/s floor critical condition 1.75


Depth, R' = safety factor x R 40.34 ft
Minimum D SWL for Qmax 595.5 ft
d/s appron (floor) level, (DSFL) 576.49 ft
Depth of water on apron (Min DSWL - DSFL) 19.01 ft
Increase in depth due to concentration 0.50 ft
Depth of water with concentration, D' 19.51 ft
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D' 20.83 ft
Slope of protection 1: 3
Length of apron to cover surfac e of scour = Sqrt (12 +32)x(R'-D' ) 65.86 ft
Length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t) 48 ft

595.5
=MIN. W.L

52.07
D 10.41 576.49
= )'R'-D
Bed(2.5
Level =DSFL

40.34
='R 1:3

t
Deepest Possible Scour

62.48
=)'R'-D (3

Scou r P rot ect ion

10.2 U/s Scour Protection for main weir

Safety factor for u/s floor critical condition 1.25


R' = Safety factor x R 28.82 ft
Minimum U SWL for Qmax 602.50 ft
U/s apron level, (RBL) 582 ft
Depth of water on apron = USWL -RBL 20.50 ft
Increase in depth due to concentration 0.50 ft
Total depth with concentration, D' 21.00 ft
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D' 7.82 ft
Slope of protection 1: 3
Length of apron to cover surfac e of scour = Sqrt (12 +32)x(R'-D' ) 24.72 ft
Length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t) 18 ft

For undersluices

Assume flow concentration 20 %


q = (Q 1+Q3)/Tota l w idth of undersluice sx 1.2 248 cusecs/ft
R = 0.9 (q 2/f)1/3 28.40 ft

10.3 - d/s scour protection for undersluices

Safety factor for d/s floor critical condition 1.75


Depth, R' = safety factor x R 49.70 ft
Minimum D SWL for Q1 + Q3 584.5 ft
d/s appron (floor) level, (DSFL) 572.00 ft
Depth of water on apron (Min DSWL - DSFL) 12.50 ft
Increase in depth due to concentration 0.5 ft
Depth of water with concentration, D' 13.00 ft
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D' 36.70 ft
Slope of protection 1: 3
Length of apron to cover surfac e of scour = Sqrt (12 +32)x(R'-D' ) 116.06 ft
Length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t) 83 ft

10.4 U/s Scour Protection for undersluices

Safety factor for u/s floor critical condition 1.25


R' = Safety factor x R 35.50 ft
Minimum U SWL for Q1 + Q3 590.5 ft
U/s apron level, (RBL) 582 ft
Depth of water on apron = USWL -RBL 8.5 ft
Increase in depth due to concentration 0.5 ft
Total depth with concentration, D' 9 ft
Depth of scour below apron = R' - D' 26.50 ft
Slope of protection 1: 3
Length of apron to cover surfac e of scour = Sqrt (12 +32)x(R'-D' ) 83.81 ft
Length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position
= length of apron x (1.25t/1.75t) 60 ft

10.5 - Thickness of Aprons

The following table gives the required values of "t" for protection of various grades of sand and slope of rivers
of various grades of sand and slope of rivers.

Fall in inches/mile 3 9 12 18 24
Sand classification Thickness of stone pitching in inches
Very coarse 16 19 22 25 28
Coarse 22 25 28 31 34
Medium 28 31 34 37 40
Fine 34 37 40 43 46
Very fine 40 43 45 49 52

Type of soil Medium sand


Slope of river 12 in/mile
Thickness of stone pitching, t 34 in
Thickness of stone apron in horizontal position = 1.75xt/slope 5 ft
Size of concrete blocks over filter 4 ft cube
Summary
Total Length of d/s stone apron 48 ft
4 ft Thick bloke apron = 1/3 x total length 16 ft (block= 4'x4'x4')
5 ft Thick stone apron 32 ft

Total length of u/s apron 18 ft


4 ft Thick bloke apron = 1/3 x total length 6 ft (block= 4'x4'x4')
5 ft Thick stone apron 12 ft

11 - Inverted Filter Design

Size of Concrete blocks 4 ft cube


Thickness of shingle (3' - 6") 9 in
Thickness of coarse shingle (3/4" - 3") 9 in
Thickness of fine shingle (3/16" - 3/4") 6 in
Spacing b/w conc. Blocks filled with fine shingle 2 in

Spacing /Jhries (2") Concr ete Blo ck s


)'x4'x4 '4(

Grav el "9

Co arse sand "9

Sand "6

Inverted Filt er

12- Design of guide banks

i)Length of each guide bank measured in straight line along


the barrage u/s , L u/s = 1.5 x Wa 5078 ft
ii) Length of each guide bank d/s of barrage, L d/s = 0.2 x Wa 677 ft
iii)For the nose of the u/s guide bank and the full length of d/s
guide bank use Lacey's depth = 1.75 x R 40.34 ft
For remaining u/s guide bank lacey's depth = 1.25 x R 28.82 ft
iv)Possible slope of scour 1: 3
v)Free board u/s 7 ft above HFL
Free board d/s 6 ft above HFL
These free boards also include allowance for accretion.
vi)Top of guide bank 40 ft
vii)Side slope of guide bank 1: 2
viii)Minimum apron thickness 4 ft

Length of barrage, Wa 3385 ft


Length of u/s guide bank 5078 ft
Length of d/s guide bank 677 ft
Radius of u/s curved part 600 ft
Radius of d/s curved part 400 ft
Maximum u/s angle protected 140 o
Maximum d/s angle protected 57 o - 80 o

12.1 Determination of levels of guide banks


Merrimen's backwater formula

d1  d2  1 C 2   d 1   d 
L  D        2 
S 
L = length of back water curve
S g   D   D 

22.0 21.8 20
=d 1 =d 2 =D
S

4817
=L

Me rrim en' s Backwater Fo rmula


Chezy's Coefficient, C 71 ( max for earthen channels)
Bed slope of river, S 1/ 5000
RBL 582 ft
D/s HFL with accretion 602 ft
D = D/s HFL with accretion - RBL 20 ft
U/s HFL with accretion 604.0 ft
d1 = U/s HFL w ith accretion - RBL 22.0 ft
Assume d2 (in bet wee n d1 a nd D) 21.8 ft
d1/D 1.100
d2/D 1.090
Ф (d1/D ) (from Bresse ba ck water function t abl e) 0.6806
Ф (d2/D ) 0.72
Length of backwater curve, L 4817 ft
Length of u/s guide bank 5078
Length of backwater curve, L and length of u/s guide bank is almost equal, hence ok

Rise in RBL = Length of guide bank / slope 1.02 from barrage level
Water level along h/w axis at 5078 ft u/s of barrage
= RBL + Rise in RBL + d2 604.82 ft

i)Level at the nose of u/s guide bank = W/L + free board 611.82 ft
ii)Level at the barrage = HFL + free board 607 ft
iii)Water level d/s of barrage 602.0 ft
D/s free board 6 ft
Level of guide bank d/s = W/L + Free board 608.0 ft

13 - Design of Guide Bank Apron

W.L

19.54 D
R' -( 2 .5
=)'D
3.2
=T=1.07t
T
R
3: 1

Deepest Possible Scour


t

Working on same lines as in section 10,

Length of unlanched horizontal apron = 2.5(R' - D') 19.54 ft


Length of launched apron at 1:3 slope = 3.16(R' - D') 24.70 ft
Thickness of stone a pron, t (as cal cula te d pre vi ousl y) 34 inches
say 3 ft
Volume of stones in apron = t x length launched apron 74.09 ft3/unit width
Minimum thickness of unlaunched apron = 1.07t 3.2 ft
Mean thickness of unlaunched apron = volume/ 2.5(R' - D') 3.8 ft
Maximum thickne ss of unlaunc hed apron = 2tm ean - tm in 5.0 ft

14 - Design of Marginal Bunds

i)Top width with no dowel 20 ft


ii)Top level above estimated HFL after allowing 1.5ft accretion 5 ft
iii) Front slope of marginal bunds (not pitched) 1: 3
iv)Back slope to be such as to provide minimum cover of 2 ft,
over hydraulic gradient of 1:6
v)U/s water level at nose of guide bank 611.82 ft
Free board of marginal bund 5 ft
Hence level of marginal bund 616.82 ft

Calculation of length of backwater curve:

Merrimen's equation can be used to calculate backwater length

d1  d2  1 C 2   d1   d 
L  D         2  
S S g    D   D 

d2 D
d1

L
Bresse Backwater F unction

Maximum USWL at Qmax 604.0 ft


RBL 582 ft
Normal W.L without weir 600 ft
d1 = M aximum USWL - RBL 22.0 ft
D = Normal W.L - RBL 18 ft
Slope 1: 5000
Table for length of backwater curve
D d1 d2 2 (5)x(10) L
d1  d2 1 C d1 d2 d  d   2  1
 T1  T2  1  1  2  2  x(1) =(11)+(4)
1 2 3
S4 S 5g 6
D D
7  D8  9D  10 11 12
18 22.0 21.5 2500 4843.4 1.222 1.194 0.4553 0.4799 0.0246 2145 4645
18 21.5 21.0 2500 4843.4 1.194 1.167 0.4799 0.5345 0.0546 4760 7260
18 21.0 20.5 2500 4843.4 1.167 1.139 0.5345 0.6253 0.0908 7916 10416
18 20.5 20.0 2500 4843.4 1.139 1.111 0.6253 0.6453 0.02 1744 4244
18 20.0 19.5 2500 4843.4 1.111 1.083 0.6453 0.7956 0.1503 13103 15603
18 19.5 19.0 2500 4843.4 1.083 1.056 0.7956 0.8564 0.0608 5301 7801
18 19.0 18.5 2500 4843.4 1.056 1.028 0.8564 1.155 0.2986 26033 28533
18 18.5 18.1 2000 4843.4 1.028 1.006 1.155 1.5881 0.4331 37759 39759
to get d2=18,d2/D=1, we stop at d2=18.1' Total 118260 ft
Hence length of backwater cure = 22.4 miles 22.40 miles

Part II
Design of barrage profile for sub surface flow condition

15 - Fixing of Depth of Sheet Piles

Scour depth, R 18.84 ft


Depth of u/s sheet pile from HFL = 1.5 R 29 ft
Max. USWL for Qmax 604.0 ft
RL of bottom of u/s sheet pile = Max. USWL - 1.5R 575.0 ft
Depth of d/s sheet pile below HFL = 2R 38 ft
RL of bottom of intermediate sheet pile = Max. USWL - 2R 566.0 ft
Taking RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile 550 ft

604.0 ft

590.16 ft
582.0 1: 4
A K 1: 3
576.49
B L N P R
575.0 76.00
M
566.0 Q
b1=1.5H = 47.27 32.66 6 41.04 550.0

16 - Calculation of Exit Gradient


H 1
GE  x
d  

H
b

E C
b1 α = b/d
d

D Parmeters o f Khosla's Curve

Let the water be headed up to Max. accreted level u/s with no flow d/s. 604.0 ft
Assume Retogression 4 ft
DSFL 576.5 ft 550
Differential head causing seepeage, H = M ax. u/s WL - (DSFL - Ret rogression) 31.5 ft
Depth of d/s sheet pile, d = DSFL - RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile 26.5 ft
Total length of concrete floor = b 202.97 ft 47.2725
α = b/d 7.66
1 form α ~ 1 curve 0.15
   

GE 0.178 SAFE
IF(1/7<Ge<1/5,"SAFE","UNSAFE")

17 - Calculation of Uplift Pressure After Applying Correction

17.1 U/s pile line:

Length of concre te floor upto u/s sheet pile, b 1 47.27 ft


Total length of concrete floor, b 202.97 ft
Depth of u/s sheet pile,d=RBL-RL of bottom of u/s pile 7.0 ft
Assume tf=u/s floor thickness 2.5 ft
1/α = d/b 0.0345
α = b/d 29.00
b1/b 0.233
1 - b 1/b 0.767
B = D From khosla's curve 100 - 30 70 %
A = E From khosla's curve 100 - 31 69 %
K =c From khosla's curve 65 %

i)Correction for floor thickness


tf
Correction in  
K  B  K  1.786 %
d
tf
Correction in  
A  A   B -ve -0.35714286 %
d
ii)Correction for interface of sheet pile

Correction in K due to second pile = d  D  D


19 
 b  b'
Depth of u/s sheet pile,d 7.0 ft
D = RBL - RL of bottom of second pile 16.0 ft
Total length of concrete floor, b 202.97 ft
Distance between two piles, b' 79.70 ft
Correction in  K +ve 0.96 %

iii)Slope correction for K

Correction for bs
 K  F S
b1
For 1:4 slope, Fs (from slope correction curve) 3.3
Distance betw een tw o piles, b 1 79.70 ft
Horizonta l projection of u/s glacis, bs = (crest level - RBL) x 1/s lope 32.66 ft
Correction for K -1.35
Hence
Correted A 68.64 %
Corrected  70 %
B
Corrected  K 66.40 %

17.2 Intermediate sheet pile at toe of d/s glacis:

Assume floor thickness 10 ft


DSFL 575.00 ft
RL of intermediate sheet pile 563.50 ft
d = DSFL - RL of Intermediate sheet pile 11.50 ft
Total length of concrete floor, b 194.80 ft
Length of concrete floor up to she et pile, b1 123.80 ft
b1/b 0.636
1 - b 1/b 0.364
α = b/d 16.94
 L  E From khosla's curve 100 - 56 44 %
 M  D From khosla's curve 42.5 %
 N  C From khosla's curve 38.5 %

i)Correction due to floor thickness

tf
Correction in L   L
 M  -1.30434783 %
d
tf
Correction in N   M N 3.48 %
d
ii)Correction due to interference of pile

Correction in  L due to u/s sheet pile  d  D D


19  
 b  b'
Depth of Intermediate sheet pile,d 10.5 ft
D = RBL - RL of bottom of u/s sheet pile 16.00 ft
Total length of concrete floor, b 194.80 ft
Distance between two piles, b' 79.70 ft

Correction in  L = d  D D -1.16 %
19  
 b  b'
Correction in  Ndue to d/s sheet pile = d  D  D
19 
Depth of Intermediate sheet pile,d  b   b' 10.49 ft
D = DSFL - RL of bottom of d/s sheet pile 26.49 ft
Total length of concrete floor, b 194.80 ft
Distance between two piles, b' 76.00 ft

Correction in  N= d  D  D 2.13 %
19  
 b  b'
iii)Slope correction for L

for '1:3 slope, Fs 4.5


bs = (crest le vel - D SFL) x 1/slope 41.04 ft
Distance betw een tw o piles, b 1 79.70 ft

bs
Correction in  L  FS  2.32 %
b1
Hence
Corrected L 43.86 %
Corrected M 42.5 %
Corrected N 44.11 %

17.3 D/s sheet pile at the end of impervious floor

Assume floor thickness 7 ft


Depth of d/s sheet pile, d 26.49 ft
Total length of concrete floor, b 194.80 ft
1/α = d/b 0.136
 P  E From khosla's curve 100 - 68 32 %
Q   D From khosla's curve 100 - 78 22 %
 R  C From khosla's curve 0%

i)Correction due to floor thickness

Correction in P -2.64 %
Correction in R 5.81 %

ii)Correction due to interface of piles

Correction in P
Depth of d/s sheet pile,d 26.49 ft
D = DSFL - RL of bottom of intermediate sheet pile 10.49 ft
Total length of concrete floor, b 194.80 ft
Distance between two piles, b' 76.00 ft

Correction in  P = d  D D -1.34 %
19 
 b  b'
Hence
Corrected P 28.02 %
Corrected Q 22 %
Corrected R 5.81 %

Table: Uplift pressure at E, D, C and along the sheet piles

Symbol used in u/s Pile Intermediate d/s Pile


Khosla cueve line Line Line
E = A 68.64% = L 43.86% = P 28.02%
D =  70% = M 42.5% = Q 22%
B

C =  66.4% = N 44.11% =  5.81%


K R

18 - Calculation For Floor Thickness:


tf  H
100G  1
where
tf = Thickness of floor in ft
 = % U plift pressure
H = Maximum differential head causing seepage
G = Specific gravity of concrete 2.4

a)Thickness of floor at A

Assumend thickness 2.5 ft


H 27.51 ft
Thickness from uplift pressure 13.49 ft
say 14.00 ft
b)Thickness of floor at L
Assumend thickness 10 ft
Thickness from uplift pressure 8.62 ft
say 9.00 ft
c)Thickness of floor at N
Assumend thickness 10 ft
Thickness from uplift pressure 8.67 ft
say 9.00 ft
d)Thickness of floor at P
Assumend thickness 7 ft
Thickness from uplift pressure 5.51 ft
say 6.00 ft
e)Thickness of floor at crest

L
x

L
K

Pressure at crest

Uplift pressure at crest  K  L 55.46 %


L  ( x)
Hence y
Thickness of floor at crest d/s of gate 10.90 ft
say 11 ft

You might also like