Review On Design and Operation of Clarifiers in The South African Sugar Industry For The Period 1975 To 1995
Review On Design and Operation of Clarifiers in The South African Sugar Industry For The Period 1975 To 1995
Review On Design and Operation of Clarifiers in The South African Sugar Industry For The Period 1975 To 1995
Dorr/Graver/Bach 4 1 4
Introduction RapiDorr 4 2 2
Dorr 444/BMA 4 4 1
At the outset it is worth noting that there has been no major SRI 1 1 1
breakthrough in the industrial process used for clarifying
cane juice in the last twenty years. Clarification is still carried
out by liming and settling in sub siders at boiling point and the In the clarifiers with one mud boot per settling tray, the
operating technique is basically the same. It is remarkable SRI-type unit has received overwhelming preference over the
that this static situation was maintained despite of three major Dorr444. For example, the last 17 clarifiers installed locally
changes to the local conditions, namely, the advance of diffu- since the early 1980s, except one at Komati Mill, have all
sion, the decline in cane quality and the many drought years. been of the SRI type which now represents 60% of the total
Of the three, the drastic reduction in the amount of suspended number in use. It must be noted that, in the more recent instal-
solids in mixed juice due to the progressive replacement of lations, the conventional SRI model has been slightly modi-
milling trains by diffusers is certainly the most striking. On a fied by reducing the size of the underflow region and mud
quantitative basis the diffuser does more of the clarification boot (lpersonal communication) to accommodate the very
duty than the clarifier itself. For example, in the 1995 season, low mud volumes encountered locally and reduce the reten-
the average solids content of diffuser mixed juice was 0,2% tion time of the muds, which is otherwise excessive.
against 1,0% for the mills, equivalent to a 80% removal of
One of the latest additions to the local clarifier population
solids in the diffuser (Anon., 1996).
is at Komati and was installed in 1994. It is a new design in
It is arguably a poor reflection on the local technologists the sugar industry although its concept has been used for
that this particular set of conditions has not led to a clarifier many years in water and effluent treatment. It is trayless, with
of entire South African design. All the clarifiers presently in- a central feedwell and eight radial launders fitted with identi-
stalled are of foreign design, albeit with certain modifications cal diameter holes through which the clarified juice exits. It is
to suit the local conditions. felt that there are not enough performance data available, at
this stage, to express an opinion on its performance. As with
the SRI model the mud region of this clarifier is being re-
Clarifier design duced presently to accommodate the very low mud volume.
Trends in clarifier types and numbers The almost universal adoption of the SRI-type clarifier by
Over the many decades since juice clarification by settling the industry is based on many reasons, not the least of which
has been carried out on a continuous mode, the main evolu- are the markedly cheaper cost of equipment, installation and
tion in clarifier design has been in the direction of a decrease maintenance, and the simplicity of operation. In general its
in the number of compartments for settling, relative to mud clarification performance is considered equal to the multi-
thickening (Hugot, 1986) as shown in Table 1. This trend has tray units except that it is known to be sensitive to juice flow
culminated in the SRI design with only one settling compart- variations and it has been found almost essential to have auto-
ment and one mud boot. mated control of the juice flow into the clarifier for optimum
The trend in the types of clarifier installed in the industry operation. Although it has the reputation of using more floc-
over the years has followed the same pattern with very few cui ant this is not reflected in the industry figures for the 1995
Dorr, Graver, Bach and RapiDorr clarifiers still being in op- season, with 3,3 ppm on mixed juice for both the SRI-type
eration. Of these, most, if not all, have been modified to and multi-tray clarifiers (Anon., 1996).
multi-point juice off-takes for more uniform flow pattern and The change in the number and type of clarifiers operating
some have been baffled to reduce turbulence at the juice inlet in South Africa (Allan, 1973; Reid 1992) over the past 20
to each compartment. The modifications have generally led years is shown in Table 2.
to much reduced retention times as reported by Scott (1988)
and van Duyker and Tosio (1986). Scott (1988) also reports 1 Mr S North-Coombes, formerly of Smith tech Pty Ltd, Durban