1448 BCC (GREF)

Pin 931448
C/O 99 APO
No. 8050/ /E8 Jun 2021

761 BRTF (GREF)

Pin 930761
C/O 99 APO
FORWARDING OF TIME EXTENSION AND AIP
(CA NO. CE (P) BRAHMANK-06 OF 2014-15)

1. Reference contractor letter No. VECPL/BRAHMANK/SIYOM/92 dated 20 Mar 2021.

2. Time extension alongwith AIP in triplicate is forwarded herewith for further necessarry action
please.

( SK Singh)
EE (Civil)
Encl :- Sheets OC Contract

1448 BCC (GREF)

Pin 931448
C/O 99 APO
No. 8050/ /E8 Jun 2021

761 BRTF (GREF)

Pin 930761
C/O 99 APO
FORWARDING OF TIME EXTENSION AND AIP
(CA NO. CE (P) BRAHMANK-06 OF 2014-15)

1. Reference contractor letter No. VECPL/BRAHMANK/SIYOM/92 dated 20 Mar 2021.

2. Time extension alongwith AIP in triplicate is forwarded herewith for further necessarry action
please.

( SK Singh)
EE (Civil)
Encl :- Sheets OC Contract
 EXTENSION OF TIME

CA No & Amount CE(P)/BRAHMANK/03/2016-17 FOR Rs-8,75,75,000.00 Date of Commencement 19-May-16

Date of Completion as per WO 18-May-19
Date of Completion as per DO No. 2 18-May-19
Name of Contractor & Address M/s Vij Engineers & Consultant Pvt Ltd, Date of Completion as per DO No. 3 18-May-19
B-68, Soami Nagar (North), Date of completion as per DO No.04 31-Mar-21
Near Chirag Delhi Flyover, Extension recommended in this TEP 31-Mar-22
Outer Ring Road, Phase I (100%Qty) 365 Days
New Delhi - 110017

Name of work DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF 100 MTR SPAN MAJ PMT BRIDGE WITH STEEL SUPER STRUCTURE (DECK TYPE) ON OPEN FOUNDATION OVER SIYOM NALLAH AT KM 27.520 ON ROAD ALONG –
YINGKIONG UNDER PROJECT BRAHMANK IN ARUNACHAL PRADESH : CA No. CE(P)/BRAHMANK/03/2016-17

S/No Contractor letter No Period asked by the contractor Period Recommended Remarks of the Engr-in- Recommendation of the OC Recommendation of the Decision of Accepting Officer
charge (Parawise Contract Commander
From To Days From To Days comments w.r.t.
Contractors letter &
Recmmendation)

1 Reference Contractor Letter No. VECPL/BRAHMANK/SIYOM/92 dated 20 Mar 2021 & Phase I Resons given by contractor " I partially agreed with the
VECPL/BRAHMANK/SIYOM/94 dated 25 May 2021. are of usual nature and recommendation of Engineer-In-
prevails in this locality Charge and recommend time
(a) Delay on account of Approval of Super structure Design/Drawings 1-Apr-21 31-Mar-22 365 1-Apr-21 31-Mar-22 365
extension for Phase-I (100% Qty) for
(a) Agreed 365 days only i.e. upto & including
(b) Delay on account of approval of Sub -structure Design/Drawing
(b) Agreed 31 Mar 22.
(c) Partially agreed
(c) Delay due to incorrect data provided in tender drawing that of actual/ground profile at site
(d) Not Agreed
(e) Partially Agreed
(d) Delay on account of profile verification at site
(f) Partially Agreed
(g) Agreed
(e) Procedural delay for issuance of various approvals/amendments
(h) Not agreed (SKSIngh)
(j) Not agreed EE(Civ)
(f) Non-inclusion of Schedule-B (Blasting materials) in CA documents
(k) Agreed OC Contract
(l) Not agreed.
(g) Delay on account of drilling and blasting at site
(m) Agreed.
(n) Agreed.
(h) Delay due to change in deck and foundation level and approval of bearing capacity (SBC)
RECOMMENDATION
The reasons put forth by the
(j) Delay on account of fabricated 100 mtr steel components had to be unload at Shiku bridge (i.e. 80
contractor are reasonable
Km away from Siyom Bridge) due to less space at Siyom bridge
and time extension for
(k) Delay in shifting of the materials from Shiku bridge to Siyom bridge site since 100 mtr span Phase-I (100% Qty) 365
structure are very long and voluminous in size. Further, these materials had to be transported back to days only i.e. upto &
the site in small vehicle which involved additional cost to the projects including 31 Mar 22 is
recommended .
(l) Delay in payments

(m) Delay due to weather conditions/Socio political disturbance

(D M Bhagwan)
(n) Delay due to pandemic lockdown in India AEE (Civ)
Engineer- In- Charge
The view of Engr-in-Charge & OC Contract based on reasons put forth by the firm vide their above
cited letter and further as per revised progress chart submitted are given at next coulmn.
 Appendix 17.1

REPORT FOR GRANT OF EXTENSION OF TIME EXCEEDING 25 % OR THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT PERIOD OF
EXCEEDING 3/9 MONTHS WHICHEVER IS MORE

(a) CA No. and year and Amount of Contract : CE(P)/BRAHMANK/03/2016-17

(b) Name of Work : DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF 100 MTR SPAN MAJ
PMT BRIDGE WITH STEEL SUPER STRUCTURE (DECK
TYPE) ON OPEN FOUNDATION OVER SIYOM NALLAH
AT KM 27.520 ON ROAD ALONG – YINGKIONG UNDER
PROJECT BRAHMANK IN ARUNACHAL PRADESH : CA
No. CE(P)/BRAHMANK/03/2016-17

(c) Period for completion stipulated in the contract : 36 Month

(d) 25 % of original contract period : 9 Month

(e) Date of commencement of work as per W.O. No. 1 : 19-May-16

(f) Date of completion of work as per W.O. No. 1 : 18-May-19

(a) Amount of escalation that would have been and : -

paid to contractor if work were completed within
original contract period.

(g) Extended date of completion ( Period of extension : 31-Mar-21

already granted ). Detail of extension granted.

Ist extension upto and including : 31-Mar-21

2nd extension upto and including : Nil

(a) Amount of escalation

(i) Paid in RARs upto and including… (Original : Nil
date of completion) Rs…….

(ii) Paid/ Payable in extended period : Nil

3 extension upto and including

rd
: Nil

(a) Amount of escalation

(i) Paid in RARs upto and including… (Original : Nil
date of completion) Rs…….

(ii) Paid/ Payable in extended period : Nil

(h) Date upto which further extension of time is Considered 31/Mar/22

due/ requested / under consideration

(a) Anticipated amount of escalation that would Become :

payable after expiry of previously extended date of
completion and upto and including the date upto which
the further extension is considered due.

(j) Total period of extension considering (h) : 365 Days

(k) Reason/ cause for (h) : (a) Delay on account of Approval of Super structure
Design/Drawings
 : (b) Delay on account of approval of Sub -structure
Design/Drawing

(c) Delay due to incorrect data provided in tender drawing

that of actual/ground profile at site
(d) Delay on account of profile verification at site
(e) Procedural delay for issuance of various
approvals/amendments
(f) Non-inclusion of Schedule-B (Blasting materials) in CA
documents
(g) Delay on account of drilling and blasting at site

(h) Delay due to change in deck and foundation level and

approval of bearing
(j) Delay on accountcapacity (SBC)
of fabricated 100 mtr steel components
had to be in
(k) Delay unload at of
shifting Shiku bridge (i.e.from
the materials 80 Km away
Shiku fromto
bridge
Siyom
Siyom Bridge) duesince
bridge site to less space
100 at Siyom
mtr span bridge
structure are very long
and voluminous in size. Further, these materials had to be
transported back to the site in small vehicle which involved
additional cost to the projects

(l) Delay in payments

(m) Delay due to weather conditions/Socio political
disturbance
(n) Delay due to pandemic lockdown in India
(l) Give following information in respect of all causes
Listed in (k)

(i) Cause as per (k)

(ii) Affected activities with dates of commencement NA
and completion as per original CPM
(iii) Date on which cause arose and date on which cause : NA
was removed.

(iv) Individual (s) responsible for the cause : NA

(v) Why cause coul not be prevented : NA
(vi) Was the CPM network and date schedule reviewed : NA
and revised to reschedule affected activities ref (ii)
within the over all completion period.

(vii) If reply to (vi) is in affirmative, what were the : NA

Rescheduled date for commencement and Completion
of the affected activities (Ref (vi) here is before)

(viii) What action was taken to remove the cause : NA

Before the reschedule date mentioned in (vii)
(m) Confirmation that all reasons/ cause necessitating : Yes
extension of time are listed in (k) and there are no other
causes/ reasons for which extension of time is due.

(n) Confirmation that all pre- requisites for timely : Confirm

commencement and completion of balance work other
than those listed in (k) have been met with by the
department and there shall be no other reason / causes
requiring further extension.

(o) Considered reason recommendations for disciplinary

action on account of each cause listed in (k)

Note : Considered reasons leading to these recommendation

are enclosed in signed Appendix (Action taken /proposed to
be taken to prevent repetition of similar lapses also is stated
in a separate Para in the enclosed Appendix).
(SK Singh)
EE(Civ)
OC Contract
 CHECK LIST FOR TEP
DATA REQUIRED FOR PROCEEDING OF TEP

SR NO DESCRIPTION REMARKS

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF 100 MTR SPAN MAJ PMT BRIDGE WITH STEEL SUPER
STRUCTURE (DECK TYPE) ON OPEN FOUNDATION OVER SIYOM NALLAH AT KM 27.520
1
ON ROAD ALONG – YINGKIONG UNDER PROJECT BRAHMANK IN ARUNACHAL
PRADESH : CA No. CE(P)/BRAHMANK/03/2016-17

2 CA No CE(P)/BRAHMANK/03/2016-17
3 CA Amount Rs-8,70,00,000.00
DO No 2 Dated 10 Feb
4 Amended CA Amount 575000
2018
5 Date Of Acceptance 30-Apr-16
6 Date of Commencement (As per WO) 19-May-16

7 Date of Completeion (As per WO) 18-May-19 36 Month

8 Extended date of Completion - -
9 Extension granted upto last DO - -
10 TEP sought for upto 3/31/2022 365
11 Total days extension required 3/31/2022 365
12 Period of Suspension of CA NIL
13 Net Extension required 365
14 % above completion period 95.71%
15 Work done till date (%) 46.26%
16 Financial Effect Nil

Weather enclosed
Documents required
Yes/NO

17 Appendix 17.1 along with SoC YES

18 Application of Contractor before expiry of Completion date YES

19 Delay report NA
Revised Time & Progress Chart duly counter signed by OC Contract
20 YES
& Commander Contract

Undertaking of Contractor stating "No further time extension will be

21 YES
sought to complete the work"

Undertaking of OC Contract stating "No further time extension will be

22 YES
sought to complete the work"

Undertaking of Commander Contract stating "No further time

23 YES
extension will be sought to complete the work"

24 Validity of Performance Security Submitted by Contractor NA

(SK Singh)
EE (Civil)
OC Contract