Development of Legal Profession in India
Development of Legal Profession in India
Development of Legal Profession in India
What is Profession?
In society, people occupy different occupations for their livelihood or for
their satisfaction. The occupations may be broadly divided as productive occupation
and service occupations. The occupations which require advanced education and
special training are called professions. LAW, teaching, architecture, medicine, etc are
related to professions. They are intended to serve mankind.
An advocate also serves the public by giving legal advice by explaining the
complicated and confusing provisions of different Acts and Rules to citizens who
seek his service.
An advocate assists the parties in drafting the economic transactions like contracts,
agreements, deeds, wills etc.
An advocate should provide free Legal Aid to the poor and deserving people on
compassionate grounds.
An advocate is the foreigner of the society. He has to fight for law reforms and social
change and at the same time extend his services to maintain law and order.
In India during the earlier period, people live in small groups. The
heads of these groups or tribes delivered justice under open sky before all the
members. Open arguments were made. There were no specialist like a lawyer
during those days. When Kingships was established in the society, Kings delivered
justice. In King's Court, the king was advised by his councilors. The law of those
days was a rooted in Hindu religion and custom. Dharma was protected by the king.
Though there was no Institution of a lawyer, some intellectual people served justice.
From the stories of Maryada Ramayana and Vikramaditya, we are well aware of the
wise man who solved the critical cases of those days. During those days the legal
profession was administered by the administrators. For sometime religious heads
dominated the society in administering the justice. During those days, the sufferer
presented complaint before the king in his court and thereafter the court summoned
the defendant to submit his reply. The Court then investigated the matter on the
evidence. The King took the advice of the religious heads and wise courtier and then
delivered the judgment. The same procedure was followed in all cases.
During the Mughal period, there was no Institution of the legal profession. But
both the parties of the litigation appoints their Vakils. This body decides the case and
they were paid a percentage of the amount in the suit. The Court has the power to
decide who should be allowed to appear as Vakils. They act as agent for principals
but not as lawyers.
The same system was continued in North India even under the rule of East
India Company.
During the British period, the model legal system was developed
in India. Before 1726, the courts derived their power not from the British crown but
from the East India Company. The charter of 1661 has already described the English
law.
i) Charter of 1726 :
In 1726 the crown issued the charter of 1726, and the Mayor's Court were
established in the presiding towns of Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras. They where the
royal Courts. They followed the procedure based on English law. But there were no
facilities to get the legal training. Many persons who have no knowledge of law were
used to practice before the said Courts. The Mayor's Court has no jurisdiction in
criminal cases. The criminal jurisdiction was conferred on the Governor.
In 1753, another charter was issued to modify the charter of 1726. This
charger also ignored significant provision for legal training and education relating to
legal practitioner. Even after the charter of 1753, the legal profession was not
organized.
Clause II of the Charter of 1774 empowered the said Supreme Court of Judicature
Calcutta to approve and enroll advocates and Attorneys- in-law. They were to
be Attorneys of record. They were authorized to appear and act in the supreme
court. The supreme court had the power to remove any advocate for Attorney on
reasonable cause. Indian legal practitioners were not allowed to enter the supreme
court. At that time 'Advocate' means the British and Irish Barristers and member of
the faculty of advocates in Scotland. The term 'Attorney' applied to the British
attorneys or solicitor.
The Bengal Regulation Act VII Of 1973 permitted qualified Hindu and
Muslim persons only to enroll as pleaders and the Bengal Regulation XII of 1833
allowed all the qualified persons of any nationality or religion to enroll as a pleader of
the Sardar Diwani Adalat.
The legal practitioners Act 1846 allowed at the people of any
nationality or religion to act as leaders. It also allowed attorneys and barristers
enrolled in any of Her Majesty's courts in India to plead in the company's Sardar
Adalat.
The Legal Practitioners Act, 1853 - This Act authorized the barristers
and Attorneys of the Supreme Court to plead in any of the companies courts
subordinate to Sardar court subject to rules in force in the said subordinate courts as
regards language or otherwise.
Section 5 of the Act says that every person entered as an attorney on the role of any
High Court would be entitled to practice in all the courts subordinate To Such High
Courts and in all revenue offices.
Section 6 of the Act Empowered the High Court to make rules consistent with the
Act as to Suspension and dismissal of pleaders and Mukhtars.
Section 8 empowered the pleader to practice in courts and revenue offices after
enrollment.
According to Section 12, the High Court can Suspend or dismiss any pleader or
Mukhtar if he was convicted of any criminal offense and according to Section 13, the
high court can suspend or dismiss pleader or Mukhtar guilty of professional
misconduct.
Section 14 of the Act made provisions in respect of the procedure when the charge
of professional misconduct was brought in subordinate Court or revenue office.
Section 17 of the Act deals with the power of chief controlling revenue authority to
make rules consistent with this act as to qualification, suspension, dismissal etc. of
the revenue agent.
Even after the enactment of the Bar Council Act 1926, the High Court has the
power of enrollment of advocates and the functions of the bar council was the
adversary in nature and the rules made by the bar council were to be effective only
on the approval of the high court. Section 10 of the Indian Bar Council Act 1926
empowered the high court to reprimand, suspend or remove from practice any
advocate of the high court if he was found guilty of professional misconduct or other
misconduct.
In 1951, the All India Bar committee was constituted under the
chairmanship of justice S.R.Das. The committee in its report recommended the
establishment of an All India Bar Councils and State Bar Councils. It recommended
the powers of enrollment, suspension or the removal of advocates to the Bar
Council. It recommended the common role of advocates should be maintained and
they should be authorized to practice in all courts in the country. It further
recommended that there should be no further recruitment of non-graduated pleaders
or mukhtars. The similar recommendations Were made by the fifth Law Commission
of India in its fourteenth report.
As a result of the report of the "All India Bar Committee Act, 1961 " .the
central government enacted the Advocate Act 1961.This Act has been in Force In
entire India. It brought Revolutionary changes in the legal profession in India. It was
set out to achieve the utility and dignity of the profession of law on an all India basis.
The Preamble of The says that the Act amends as well as consolidates the law
relating to legal practitioners.
The Advocate Act,1961 contains 60 Sections set out in 7 chapters.
Chapter I - deals with primary issues such as short title, extent and commencement
and definitions.
The Advocate Act 1961 repeals the Indian Bar Council Act,1926 and all other laws
on the subject.
The Advocate Act,1961 provides for an autonomous bar council in each state and All
India Bar Council consisting mainly of the representatives of the state bar councils.
Under the act, a state bar council is to enroll the qualified person as advocates and a
prepare a roll of advocates practicing in the state and thereafter a comment roll of
advocates for the whole of India is to be prepared by the bar council of India.
The Advocates whose Names are entered in the common roll would be entitled as of
right to practice in all courts in India including the Supreme Court.
Advocate Act 1961 amended many times to bring changes with the changing times
and to solve the practical problems.