Acts 2
Acts 2
___________________
___________________
NBST 520-D02
By
Russell D. Ward
December, 2014
i
Table of Contents
Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1
The Pentecostal Event (Acts 2:1-4) ................................................................................................2
Feast of Pentecost .......................................................................................................................2
The Wind .....................................................................................................................................4
The House ....................................................................................................................................4
Tongues of Fire ...........................................................................................................................5
Baptism of the Holy Spirit ..........................................................................................................6
Languages ....................................................................................................................................7
The People of Pentecost (Acts 2:5-13) ...........................................................................................8
Jewish Diaspora............................................................................................................................9
Gentiles.......................................................................................................................................10
The Sermon at Pentecost (2:14-40)................................................................................................10
Significance ................................................................................................................................10
Structure .....................................................................................................................................12
The Promise and Power of Pentecost (2:41-47) ............................................................................14
Power to Witness ........................................................................................................................14
Christian Community .................................................................................................................14
Explosive Growth ......................................................................................................................15
Concluding Thoughts .....................................................................................................................16
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................18
ii
INTRODUCTION
Pentecost is perhaps the single most important event in the Christian church. The Pentecost event
created the foundational power and thrust that enabled the rapid growth of the Christian Church
in the first century. Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit as the comforter and to empower the
Church to fulfill the Great Commission (Matthew 28).Clark Pinnock explains the importance of
At Pentecost the church received the Spirit and became the historical continuation of
Jesus ‘anointing as the Christ. The One baptized in water and Spirit now baptizes the
disciples. He transferred Spirit to them so that his actions could continue through their
agency. The bearer of the Spirit now baptizes others with the Spirit, that there might be a
continuation of his testimony in word and deed and a continuation of his prophetic and
charismatic ministry.1
This pivotal event marked the inauguration of the church and the confluence of various
strands of the Gospel meta-narrative. This event is often referred to as the “birth of the Church”2
.From the very beginning, God predestined the arrival of the Messiah and the consummate
Kingdom of God. We see this foreshadowed in the Protoevangelium: And I will put enmity
between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the
head, and you shall bruise him on the heel." (Gen 3:15). Furthermore, the Missio Dei is
expressed in Numbers 14:21-22. God desires to fill the whole earth with his Glory and to spread
his name through the line of Judah (1 Chronicles 9) and the tents of Shem (Gen 9) The Pentecost
event was the fulcrum point from which God’s glory was projected or radiated outward and the
power of the Holy Spirit like a tidal wave began to move over the Fertile Crescent and was
1.Pinnock, Clark H., Flame of Love: A Theology of the Holy Spirit (Intervarsity Press – A, 1996), Locations
1928-1931, Kindle.
2.
Polhill, John B., Acts: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture: 26 New American
Commentary (B&H Publishing Group, 1992) Locations 2411-2412, Kindle.
1
poured out as the Minor Prophet Joel prophesied (Joel 2:28-32), and was promised in Luke 24:
49 and Acts 1: 4– 5.3 The Church was empowered to evangelize and it continued to grow
exponentially in size and in community. 4 The New Testament church was immediately thrust
into a powerful and yet tumultuous incubation period. The Holy Spirit delivered the power
(δύναμις) and comfort (παράκλητος or Paraclete) to endure the hardships and ensuing
persecution. (Acts 1:8) The purpose of this paper it to provide an overview of various aspects of
the Pentecost event. This paper will explore the background of Pentecost, the historical facts of
Pentecost, the resulting theological implications, and some outgrowths in the Christian Church.
Pentecost is a feast that occurs fifty days after Passover. Marvin Wilson explains the basic facts
about this important occasion: “The pilgrimage festival of Shabuot, “Weeks” (Pentecost), was
celebrated in Bible times amidst singing and dancing, as bikkurim, “first fruits,” were brought to
the Temple.” 5 But, how did this celebration effect the city of Jerusalem and the Pentecost event?
Many people were in Jerusalem for this celebration. So, this was an ideal time for the outpouring
of the Holy Spirit for all the present groups to witness. The later established Church in Rome was
believed to be started by some people that were converted during the Pentecost event. So, the
occasion of this important feast helped to aggregate the Jewish diaspora to witness the prophetic
event. F.F. Bruce unpacks the meaning of Pentecost in the Jewish tradition and how it relates to
Law of God given to Moses on Mt. Sinai: “The day of Pentecost was so called because it fell on
3.Bock, Darrell L. Acts Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. (Baker Publishing Group,
2007). Locations 2696-2697, Kindle.
.Bruce, F.F. The Book of Acts New International Commentary on the New Testament (Eerdmans Publishing
Co - A., 1988) 72, Kindle.
5 . Wilson, Marvin R., Our Father Abraham: Jewish Roots of the Christian Faith (Eerdmans Publishing Co
2
the fiftieth day after the presentation of the first sheaf to be reaped of the barley harvest, that is,
the fiftieth day from the first Sunday after Passover (pentēkostos being the Greek word for
“fiftieth”). Among Hebrew-and Aramaic-speaking Jews it was known as “the feast of weeks”4
(Ex. 34:22a; Deut. 16:10) and also as “the day of the first fruits” (Num. 28:26; cf. Ex. 23:16a)
because on that day “the first fruits of wheat harvest” (Ex. 34:22a) were presented to God. At a
later date it was reckoned to be the anniversary of the giving of the law on Sinai—a not
unreasonable deduction from Ex. 19:1, according to which the Israelites arrived in “the
wilderness of Sinai” on the third new moon after their departure from Egypt (i.e., at the
beginning of Siwan, about forty-four days after the first Passover).”6 So, it seems that Pentecost
Law. Could there be an allusion in the Acts 2 Pentecost event to the “first fruits” of the new
Church being the people who occupied the upper room? This is simple conjecture. This
traditional Jewish feast occurs according to a schedule and yet it seems that the Apostles and the
rest of this group were simply following Jesus’ directive to wait on the Holy Spirit. Of course
this occasion of Shabuot was also deeply ingrained in the Jewish tradition.7
The next verse (Acts 2:2) affirms what initially happened at this pivotal moment when these
believers were together in the waiting place: “And suddenly there came from heaven a noise like
a violent rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting.” There are two
areas that must be examined. First of all, what was this Wind? Secondly where was this house
6.Bruce, F.F. (1988-06-30). The Book of Acts New International Commentary on the New Testament
(Eerdmans Publishing Co – A, 1988) 49-50, Kindle
7. Neusner, Jacob. An Introduction to Judaism a Textbook and Reader. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminister
/ John Knox Press, 1991. 58
3
The “wind” in this passage is believed to be a noticeable demonstration of the Holy
Spirit’s presence and power. This association of wind with the Holy Spirit is based linguistically
in the fact that both the Hebrew word ruah (GK8120) and the Greek word pnueuma (GK4460)
mean either wind or spirit depending on the context.8 Darrell Brock explicates the wording that
Luke used to describe the situation here: “The first indication that something is taking place is
the sound (ἦχος, ēchos) like a rushing wind (πνοῆς βιαίας, pnoēs baits) suddenly (ἄφνω, aphnō;
only here and Acts 16: 26; 28: 6) filling the room where the disciples are seated”. 9 There is some
question why Luke emphasized the “sound” like a rushing wind.10 In other Biblical passages,
God used wind to symbolize his Spirit. For example, God used wind in Ezekiel 37 to revive the
dead at the future restoration of Israel. Some scholars believe that this foreshadowed the
Pentecost event.11
The second area we must examine is the question of location. Where was this “house”?
Verse 1 states that they were all together in one place. However, Luke does not specify with any
clarity exactly where they were located. There seems to be some indication that it was at or near
the Temple because they were able to attract a large crowd of observers. However, it seems
highly unlikely that it was at the temple because of the word that Luke used for “house”. Darrell
Bock explains this linguistic difference and the implications on this question of location: “It is
not at all likely to be the temple, as the term οἶκος (oikos, house) appears in verse 2. Luke always
refers to the temple (twenty-two times) as τὸ ἱερόν (to hieron; Haenchen 1987: 168n1). It is a
8.Kenneth L. Barker, John R. Kohlenberger III, ed. The Expositor's Bible Commentary Abridged Edition
New Testement. Vol. 5. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1994). 387
9.Bock, Darrell L. Acts Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New (Baker Publishing Group, 2007)
Locations 2696-2697, Kindle
10.Ibid. 387
11. Keener, Craig S. Bible Background Commentary. Downers Grove Ill: (Intervarsity Press, 1993). 327
4
public place, however, as a crowd quickly is drawn to the event. That houses could hold a group
of 120 or so (Acts 1: 15) has been shown by an unearthed mansion in the Jewish Quarter of
Jerusalem, with its meeting hall of 11 by 6.5 meters (Menzies 1991: 208– 9n5; Avigad 1984: 95–
103).”12 The overwhelming scholarly consensus is that they were gathered in the upper room
Verse 3 states the following: “And there appeared to them tongues as of fire distributing
themselves, and they rested on each one of them. (NASB)” A clear question is: what were these
tongues of fire and why were they significant? In the Old Testament, God used fire many times
to signify his presence, power or impending judgment. For example, the burning bush where
God spoke to Moses (Ex 3:2-5) or the fire that rested above the Tabernacle and guided Israel in
the desert by night. (Ex 13:21) Additionally, God answered Elijah by fire. (1 Kings 18:24) There
are several other examples where God used fire in this way. G. K. Beal posits that tongues of fire
12 .Bock, Darrell L., .Acts Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Baker Publishing Group,
2007). Locations 2737-2742, Kindle
13. Polhill, John B., Acts: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture: 26 New American
14G.K. Beale “THE DESCENT OF THE ESCHATOLOGICALTEMPLE IN THE FORM OF THE SPIRIT
AT PENTECOST” 56.1 2005 last access December 6, 2014
www.tyndalehouse.com/TynBul/Library/TynBull_2005_56_1_05_Beale_TempleDescentPentecost.pdf
5
So, it seems quite normal for God to use fire as a visible demonstration of his power and
his presence to indicate different messages in various contexts. There is some disagreement on
whether these tongues were connected with the “other tongues” of verse 4. 15 Some have
suggested a double meaning for tongues in this situation between verse 3 and 4. This double
meaning is further explained in the New American Commentary (NAC): “Much as in English,
the Greek word glossa can refer to the physical organ of the tongue. It also has the metaphorical
meaning of what is spoken by the tongue, spoken language. So here, the lapping flames that had
the visible likeness to tongues enabled the believers to speak in inspired language.” 16 So, the
NAC makes this connection between verse 3 and 4. Verse 4 continues by stating the following:
“And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the
Spirit was giving them utterance.” What does being “filled with the Holy Spirit” mean?
Furthermore, what were these “other tongues” and why are they significant? Some have
compared the Baptism of Jesus by John with the Baptism of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. The
Holy Spirit descended on Jesus in the form of a dove, whereas the Spirit descended on the church
as tongues of fire. The Father spoke at Jesus’ baptism, on the other hand, when the Church was
baptized they spoke with “other tongues”.17 There are some definite similarities between the two
events. The “other tongues” could either be an ecstatic utterance or they were known human
languages. The ecstatic utterances would coincide with the 1 Corinthian 12-14 texts. The verb
used “enabled” or gave utterance (GK 1443 & 710) is used with ecstatic usage in both the Old
15 .Kenneth L. Barker, John R. Kohlenberger III, ed. The Expositor's Bible Commentary Abridged Edition
New Testement. Vol. 5. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1994) 387
16. Polhill, John B., Acts: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture: 26 New American
17.
Hogue, Richard. Tongues: A Theological History of Christian Glossalalia. Mustang : ( Tate Enterprises,
2010) .38-39
6
Testament and other Greek literature. 18 However, the tongues in first Corinthians were
whereas the tongues heard at the Pentecost event were understood by the various onlookers as
ordinary human languages of various cultures and locations. This is significantly different. 19
The NAC explicates this difference: “There are strong reasons, however, for questioning whether
the Pentecost experience could have been the sort of ecstatic language Paul dealt with at Corinth.
From Paul's treatment the glossolalia there was clearly not rational discourse but an ecstatic
“praise language,” edifying to the individual tongue-speaker, but not to the church (1 Cor 14:1-
5). It was as meaningless to others as indistinct musical notes or a language totally foreign to
them (1 Cor 14:6-12). For the church Paul preferred to speak “five intelligible words” (“with my
mind,” RSV) than ten thousand “in tongues” (1 Cor 14:19). The Pentecost experience did seem
to involve intelligible communication to those in the Jewish crowd.” 20 There have also been
allusions to the supernatural confusion of languages of Babel (Gen 11:9) as compared to the
supernatural clarity of languages at the Pentecost event.21 This is an interesting idea. Is this a
chiastic parallel reference? Bock indirectly warns against pressing this idea too hard: “The
passive form συνεχύθη (synechythē) from the verb συγχέω (syncheō) refers to being amazed or
surprised; “bewildered” in RSV, ESV, NASB, NLT; “in confusion” in NET; “confounded” in
KJV). The verb shows up in Gen. 11: 7, 9 in the LXX. Barrett (1994: 119) correctly notes one
should not press the Babel analogy too much to argue for the reversal of that judgment, as the
18 .
Kenneth L. Barker, John R. Kohlenberger III, ed. The Expositor's Bible Commentary Abridged Edition
New Testement. Vol. 5. Grand Rapids, Michigan: (Zondervan, 1994) 388
7
terms are common and the confusion is not ended by the act alone.22 However, G.K Beal asserts
that there could indeed be a connection between these two events.23 Beal posits that the reason
for this connection is that the tower of Babel is a symbol in parallel contrast to the Tongues of
Pentecost as a Theophany of a Latter-Day Sinai Sanctuary.24 The interpreter must tread carefully
here because it is difficult to know for sure. Nevertheless, because of the crowd’s reaction to the
“other tongues”, it seems apparent that these languages were intelligible and prophetic. No
doubt, this miracle was a great proof or evidence of the veracity of the Gospel and provided the
standing for Peter’s subsequent sermon. The next major question that must be addressed is: who
were the people in the upper room and who were the witnesses that observed this monumental
There was a group of people that were in the upper room that was filled with the Holy
Spirit. There were many witnesses to this event. After Peter preached, around 3,000 people were
converted. First of all, the men that were waiting were in fact the witnesses to the Ascension. In
Acts 1 we observe that Jesus instructed the apostles to go to Jerusalem and wait for the Holy
Spirit. (Acts 1:4) Furthermore, we see a more explicit listing of the individuals that occupied the
upper room in Acts 1:13: “When they had entered the city, they went up to the upper room where they
were staying; that is, Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and
Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon the Zealot, and Judas the son of James.” So Clearly
these men were the apostles. Secondly, verse 5-11 says the following:
22.Bock, Darrell L. (2007-10-01). Acts (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament) (Kindle
Locations 2871-2872). Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
23.G.K. Beale “THE DESCENT OF THE ESCHATOLOGICALTEMPLE IN THE FORM OF THE SPIRIT
8
Now there were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation under heaven.
And when this sound occurred, the crowd came together, and were bewildered because
each one of them was hearing them speak in his own language. They were amazed and
astonished, saying, "Why, are not all these who are speaking Galileans?” And how is it
that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born? "Parthians and
Medes and Elamites, and residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and
Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the districts of Libya around Cyrene, and
visitors from Rome, Cretans and Arabs--we hear them in our own tongues speaking of
the mighty deeds of God.
The witnesses to this pivotal event were mostly Jewish diaspora. Many came to Jerusalem to
celebrate Shabuot. F.F. Bruce provides insight about this occasion and important group of
observers: “The Jews who were resident in Jerusalem on this occasion were to a large extent
pilgrims from various lands of the dispersion who had come to the holy city to celebrate the
festival of Pentecost. Even if the word “Jews” is an addition to the original text, it is Jews or
proselytes who are indicated by the phrase “devout men.” Only at the Jerusalem temple could
they attend the special sacrificial services prescribed for that “holy convocation” and take part in
them (Num. 28:26–31)25. The Jewish Temple was central to the Jewish faith and practice. So,
despite the distances and the financial hardships, these dispersed Jews traveled to Jerusalem to
partake in this important feast. According to Bruce, these witnesses were not Gentiles. He
explains: “The people who heard the sounds on this occasion, however, were not Gentiles but
Jews and proselytes; the evangelization of Gentiles was a revolutionary development, recorded
with a fanfare of trumpets, at a later stage in the narrative of Acts. Yet those “devout” visitors are
apparently considered by Luke to be representatives of the various lands from which they had
come, and of the local dialects of those lands. 26 The NAC further supports this idea by noting
that the word used here is eulabeis, which means pious and in Luke-Acts is always used of Jews,
25 . Bruce,
F.F., The Book of Acts New International Commentary on the New Testament (Eerdmans
Publishing Co - A.,1988) 53-54, Kindle
26.Ibid 55
9
never of Gentiles (cf. Luke 2:25; Acts 8:2; 22:12).27. It seems that these Jewish converts went
back to their various home locations and started new churches as in the case of the church at
Rome. The list of nationalities or locations in verses 9-11 have puzzled many scholars. This
strange list is laid out in an east to west and north to south orientation as shown in the Holman
Atlas.28 However, it strangely omits certain major locations such as Galatia and Macedonia and
yet included Judea. There have been many attempts to make sense of this listing. Some have
even attempted to enumerate and associate these to the Zodiac.29 Using Occam’s razor would
suggest that Luke was simply delineating the variety of Jewish diaspora that were present on that
significant day. The demonstration of God’s Spirit caused the crowd to be shocked and
bewildered. This powerful witness to the glory of God set the stage for Peter’s sermon.
Peter’s sermon at the Pentecost event was one of the most compelling sermons of all
time. He provided a powerful argument for Jesus Christ as the Messiah and the Son of God.
Peter used Old Testament prophecy and reminded the crowd how they witnessed the signs and
wonders. This sermon is vital because it is a crystal clear presentation of the Gospel which Christ
death, burial and resurrection are linked. This is a presentation of the Kerygma.30 Bock explains
This speech is one of the most important theological declarations in the NT. It highlights
who Jesus is and explains how one can know what God was doing through him. It nicely
complements the presentation of the gospel from Paul and the church tradition, with its
emphasis on how Jesus provides salvation as a sacrifice for sin (1 Cor. 15: 1– 3).Together
27 .Polhill, John B, Acts: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture: 26 New American
Commentary (B&H Publishing Group, 1992) Locations 2523-2524, Kindle
28 . Brisco, Thomas V., Holman Bible Atlas (Broadman & Holman Reference (B&H Publishing,1999)
10
the speech and the tradition reveal the gospel to be the good news that God’s promise has
come in Jesus, who died for sin and sits at God’s side, distributing the benefits of salvation
rooted in forgiveness and the provision of the Spirit.31
Men of Judea and all you who live in Jerusalem, let this be known to you and give heed
to my words. "For these men are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is only the third hour of
the day;
but this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel: 'AND IT SHALL BE IN THE
LAST DAYS,' God says, 'THAT I WILL POUR FORTH OF MY SPIRIT ON ALL
MANKIND; AND YOUR SONS AND YOUR DAUGHTERS SHALL PROPHESY,
AND YOUR YOUNG MEN SHALL SEE VISIONS, AND YOUR OLD MEN SHALL
DREAM DREAMS; EVEN ON MY BONDSLAVES, BOTH MEN AND WOMEN, I
WILL IN THOSE DAYS POUR FORTH OF MY SPIRIT And they shall prophesy.
AND I WILL GRANT WONDERS IN THE SKY ABOVE AND SIGNS ON THE
EARTH BELOW, BLOOD, AND FIRE, AND VAPOR OF SMOKE.
THE SUN WILL BE TURNED INTO DARKNESS AND THE MOON INTO BLOOD,
BEFORE THE GREAT AND GLORIOUS DAY OF THE LORD SHALL COME. AND
IT SHALL BE THAT EVERYONE WHO CALLS ON THE NAME OF THE LORD
WILL BE SAVED.
Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God
with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst,
just as you yourselves know-- his Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and
foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to
death. "But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was
impossible for Him to be held in its power. “For David says of Him, 'I SAW THE LORD
ALWAYS IN MY PRESENCE; FOR HE IS AT MY RIGHT HAND, SO THAT I WILL
NOT BE SHAKEN. 'THEREFORE MY HEART WAS GLAD AND MY TONGUE
EXULTED; MOREOVER MY FLESH ALSO WILL LIVE IN HOPE; BECAUSE YOU
WILL NOT ABANDON MY SOUL TO HADES, NOR ALLOW YOUR HOLY ONE
TO UNDERGO DECAY.
YOU HAVE MADE KNOWN TO ME THE WAYS OF LIFE; YOU WILL MAKE ME
FULL OF GLADNESS WITH YOUR PRESENCE. “Brethren, I may confidently say to
you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with
us to this day.
"And so, because he was a prophet and knew that GOD HAD SWORN TO HIM WITH
AN OATH TO SEAT one OF HIS DESCENDANTS ON HIS THRONE, he looked
ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that HE WAS NEITHER
ABANDONED TO HADES, NOR DID His flesh SUFFER DECAY. "This Jesus God
raised up again, to which we are all witnesses. "Therefore having been exalted to the right
hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has
poured forth this which you both see and hear. “For it was not David who ascended into
31Bock, Darrell L., Acts Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Baker Publishing Group,
2007). Locations 3064-3068, Kindle
11
heaven, but he himself says: 'THE LORD SAID TO MY LORD, "SIT AT MY RIGHT
HAND, UNTIL I MAKE YOUR ENEMIES A FOOTSTOOL FOR YOUR FEET.
Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord
and Christ--this Jesus whom you crucified.
Starting in verse 17 Peter quotes Joel’s prophecy found in Joel 2:28-32. This would have been
very familiar to the Jewish people. Peter connected this known prophecy with fulfillment in
Jesus. This is further evidenced by Peter’s choice of wording. Bruce explains this: “Luke,
matching the prediction to the fulfilment, uses the more precise phrase “in the last days. “For
Luke the sign of the age to come is the presence of the Spirit. The context of Joel’s prophecy
contains a call to repentance in hope of divine forgiveness (Joel 2:12–14)—a call which is
echoed by Peter later on (v. 38).”32 Bock explains that this sermon was the first of a number of
“missionary speeches which come from tradition and have 6 major themes: (1) the age of
fulfillment has come; (2) it has come through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus; (3) the
resurrection exalted Jesus; (4) the Holy Spirit is the sign of the church’s power; (5) the messianic
age’s consummation comes in Jesus’s return; and (6) God calls for repentance and offers
forgiveness, the Holy Spirit, and his promise.33 Another important aspect of Peter’s sermon is
Peter’s sermon is based on, and contains an extensive chiasm. This reverse literary
structure allows for the narrative to be understood poetically. There are examples throughout
scripture of parallelism and reverse parallelism. This passage contains one of the most important
32Bruce, F.F., The Book of Acts New International Commentary on the New Testament (Eerdmans
Publishing Co – A, 1988) 61, Kindle
33Bock, Darrell L., Acts Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. (Baker Publishing
Group,2007) Locations 3137-3140, Kindle
12
parallel structures of the New Testament.34 Kenneth Baily lays out the chiastic structure for the
B but God raised him up, having loosed the pangs of death (because it was not possible for him to be held by it).
C David says, "I saw the Lord always before me, for he is at my right hand...." MEN, BROTHERS, IT IS
D that the patriarch David died and was buried (and his tomb is with us to this day).
F' having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit
E' he has poured out this which you see and hear.
C' but he himself says, "The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand... ASSUREDLY THEREFORE LET ALL
34 Keener, Craig S. Bible Background Commentary. Downers Grove Ill: (Intervarsity Press, 1993). 327
13
A' this Jesus whom you crucified.35
Kenneth Baily goes on to conclude that this hymn or poem was not original in structure or in
some content. Regardless of sermon’s originality, it remains as one of the most skillfully crafted
and well delivered sermons of all time as evidenced by the tremendous response.
The results and implications of this pivotal event were immense and far-reaching. Verse 41
states the following: “So then, those who had received his word were baptized; and that day there
were added about three thousand souls.” The promised power was delivered. This was the power
to become witnesses. The Church of God was birthed out of this event fuel by the power of the
Holy Spirit. This power was realized in his new temple and made visible through the tongues of
fire which was a possible reference back to the Sinai theophany.36 Beale succinctly states it this
way: “God’s fiery theophanic presence as a new heavenly temple extending from heaven and
descending upon his people and making them a part of it”37 This is a powerful description of a
profoundly spiritual change and the empowerment of the Church. This was God drenching his
church with new oil for service. Verse 42 states: “They were continually devoting themselves to
the apostles' teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.” This new found
comforter and source of power enabled the church to become unified (Eph 4:3). The believers
devoted themselves to four important practices in the church. First, the apostles’ teaching. It was
critical that the teachings of Christ be carried on by the apostles in the form of the Christian
35 Kenneth E. Bailey. Poet and Peasant and Through Peasant Eyes: A Literary-Cultural Approach to the
Parables in Luke (Combined edition) Location 722 Kindle
36G.K. Beale “THE DESCENT OF THE ESCHATOLOGICALTEMPLE IN THE FORM OF THE SPIRIT
AT PENTECOST” 56.1 2005 last access December 6, 2014
www.tyndalehouse.com/TynBul/Library/TynBull_2005_56_1_05_Beale_TempleDescentPentecost.pdf
37 Ibid. 17
14
tradition. It was upon this firm foundation of Christian tradition along with the revelation given
to the Apostle Paul that the Church formed the Creeds of Christendom. Secondly, there was the
practice of fellowship The Greek word used here Koinōnia is one Paul often employed, but it
appears only here in all of Luke-Acts. 38 This word means close relationship, association or
communion. Polhill further explains this usage: “In secular Greek it could involve the sharing of
goods, and Paul seems to have used it this way in 2 Cor 9:13. It was also used of communion
with a god, especially in the context of a sacred meal; and Paul used it in that sense in 1 Cor
10:16.140”39 Thirdly, the breaking of bread was shared among the believers. This is the practice
of sharing a meal. This could also mean sharing in the Eucharist.40 The final practice was prayer
together. No doubt, there was community prayer and Bruce states that the believers likely carried
on the tradition of praying in the temples and according to Jewish models but now the prayer was
enriched by Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit.41 Verse 43 states: “Everyone kept feeling a
sense of awe; and many wonders and signs were taking place through the apostles.” God’s power
continued to be operating and produced miracles during this formative time. Polhill expounds on
the subsequent miracles that were happening during this early period: “An example of one such
miraculous sign is given in 3:1-10. Luke's summary statement would indicate that this healing
story is only one example of many miracles worked by the apostles in this early stage of their
ministry. The response of the people is a reverent fear (phobos, “awe,” NIV). “Everyone”
38Polhill, John B, Acts: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture: 26 New American
Commentary (B&H Publishing Group, 1992) Locations 2897-2898, Kindle
39 Ibid.
40 Bruce, F.F, The Book of Acts New International Commentary on the New Testament (Eerdmans
Publishing Co – A, 1988). 73, Kindle
41 Ibid.
15
probably refers to those outside the Christian community who were awed by apostolic miracles
(cf. 5:12-13).”42
And all those who had believed were together and had all things in common; and they
began selling their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone
might have need. Day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread
from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of
heart, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to
their number day by day those who were being saved.
There was incredible cohesion and growth that can only be attributed to a supernatural outpouring
of the Holy Spirit. The Church was truly an unstoppable force and continued to grow by leaps and
bounds. Brock explains the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit as spurring procreative growth
and furthering the Church as it began to confront the ensuing persecution: “Luke concludes the
summary with a note that as each day passes, the Lord adds to the number who are being saved.
The phrase καθʼ ἡμέραν (kath’ hēmeran) is yet another distributive use of κατά. [3] This is an
iterative: God is continuously adding to the43. So, this process was repeating as a good discipleship
program should. The church today should study and recapture the essence or truth of the early
church model.
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
The Holy Spirit comforts, empowers, and sustains the Church. Pentecost was breathtakingly
important. Jesus promised that he would send the comforter (Paraclete). The Holy Spirit brings
. Polhill, John B, Acts: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture: 26 New American
Commentary (B&H Publishing Group, 1992) Locations 2737-2739, Kindle
43Bock, Darrell L, Acts Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Baker Publishing Group,
1992). Locations 4200-4206, Kindle
16
wind and fire that moves the Church, and his still small voice nudges the believer toward the
truth and then subsequently reveals that truth with astounding clarity. It the power of the Holy
Spirit that enlightens the human mind and bring understanding to those who were once confused
by the caustic and fatal effects of sin. When man’s towering accomplishments fail to inspire
understanding, the Holy Spirit brings clarity. Where confusion once dominated, the Spirit offers
hope. The poet William Blake captures the essence of this truth in his Pentecost inspired poem:
17
Bibliography
Beale, G. K. "Tyndalehouse Bulletin." The Descent of the Escatological Temple in the Form of
Black, Thomas D. Lea and David Alan. The New Testament its background and Message.
Bock, Darrell L. Baker Exegetical Commentary of the New Testament: ACTS. Grand Rapids:
Bruce, F.F. The New International Commentary: The Book of Acts. Grand Rapids: Wm. B.
Eerdmans , 1988.
Dillard, Tremper Longman III and Raymond B. An Introduction to the Old Testament . Grand
Hagner, Donald A. The New Testament: A historical and theological introduction. Kindle
Enterprises, 2010.
18
Jr., J. Juilius Scott. Jewish Backgrounds of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic,
1995.
Keener, Craig S. Bible Background Commentary. Downers Grove Ill: Intervarsity Press, 1993.
—. the IVP Bible Background Commentary New Testament. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity
Kenneth L. Barker, John R. Kohlenberger III, ed. The Expositor's Bible Commentary Abridged
Land, Steven Jack. Pentecostal Spirituality: A Passion for the Kingdom. Cleveland, TN: CPT
Press, 1993.
Moo, D.A. Carson & Douglas J. An Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2005.
Walton, John H. Bible Background Commentary (Old Testament). Downers Grove, IL:
Wilson, Marvin R. Our Father Abraham: Jewish roots of the Christian Faith. Grand Rapids:
19