Ijma: Unanimous Decisions of The Jurists
Ijma: Unanimous Decisions of The Jurists
Ijma: Unanimous Decisions of The Jurists
FORMATION OF IJMA
Whenever law needed a new principle, the jurists used to give a
consensual opinion so as to enable a solution. To be a jurist or
Mujtahid, it was essential that a person was a Muslim with adequate
knowledge of law and was competent to form logical deducements.
Ijtihad refers to the process of creating law through consensus on the
basis of ‘exercise of one’s reasoning so as to create a new rule of
law’. The Ijma had to be justified with references to the principles
given in the Quran or the tradition as well as public policy, interest of
the community and equity. The Mujtahtids are the recognised
interpreters of law.
KINDS OF IJMA
i) Ijma of the Companions: the consensual opinion of the
Companions is believed to be most authoritative and accurate. It
cannot be overruled or modified by subsequent Ijmas.
ii) Ijma of the Jurists: the opinion of learned scholars was believed to
be the next best Ijma after the Ijma of the Companions.
iii) Ijma of the People: At times, the mass acceptance of a principle as
law was also accepted. Nevertheless, it is of little consequence with
respect to core issues and principles of the Islam.
As can be seen, the authority of Ijma depends upon the capabilities
of the people participating in its formation.
IMPORTANCE
A major chunk of the fiqh or actual Muslim law came through Ijma. It
explained the Quran and traditions in terms of actual applicability as
well as laid down new principles of law so as to help the society to
cope up with growth and progress. It was through Ijma that the real
opportunities for interpretation of the hereto rigid Quran and
Traditions came up. It is even referred to as the ‘living tradition’ at
times.
DEFECTS
The Ijma lead to various reading and versions or interpretation of the
Quran, Sunna, custom etc. As a result, different sub-sects were
formed. The choice of unanimous opinion or majority opinion is
another bone of contention. The Ijma of the jurists and the people
could be overruled at any time; thus, they were not able to
contribute substantially to certainty in law. With the spread of Islam
and lack of a well- established communication network, obtaining
consensus of all the jurists was a major problem. Again the stock of
learned and accepted scholars ran short of the requirement and by
10th century, the Ijma had to be abandoned.