Shri Ram Mandir & The Struggle For Cultural Identity

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Shri Ram Mandir & the Struggle for

Cultural Identity
CULTURAL IDENTITY RECASTED AS CULTURAL
HINDUISM
A. INTRODUCTION

"Rama is the embodiment of righteousness, he is virtue incarnate, truthful, and of unfailing


prowess. He is the Ruler of the entire humanity.”– Ramayana by Maharishi Valmiki.1

Valmiki Ramayana is the greatest


Figure Location of one of the seventh sacred place of India, Sri Ram
civilizational heritage of the world that Mandir, Ayodhya

shows the heroic character of Ram who


is the incarnation of God. The almighty
king Ram and his kingdom depict the
ideal realm in the human world that
protects the human world and destroys
the demons by following the way of
truth, justice, and law. Day by day there
came so many vernacular translations
of Ramayana some enforce the social,
some religious, whereas some show the
political fabric of that treatise. India is
the former center of devotion and
heritage. So, here Rama is not just a
name and a mandir is not just a simple
structure both are emotion and psyche
of the minds of the people here. This is
SOURCE Kumar, S. and Singh, R.P., 2018.
not solely buzzworthy or dooms
worthy matter but it is the cultural identity of the people in a different religion. So, somehow
the ‘bhumi puja’ of Ram mandir, 5th Aug. 2020 in Ayodhya became the largest cultural
program of Secular India, contains the majority Hindu population2.

In this paper, the struggle for cultural identity will be discussed. And How does political
ideology involve in making the cultural Hinduism as the incarnation of cultural identity will
also be considered here?

1 Srinivasan P. (2020), “Wait Is Over, Rama Is Home In 'Unconquerable' Ayodhya”,


culture Swarajya
2 Srinivasan P. (2020), “Wait Is Over, Rama Is Home In 'Unconquerable' Ayodhya”,

culture Swarajya

[1]
B. CULTURAL IDENTITY OF AYODHYA

Based on ethnicity, nationality, language, religion, and gender when we define a group of
people or individuals; that is cultural identity. And this not come befree the people born, it
comes from the behavioural practice achieved from society and ancestors. People themselves
only create this identity and do fight to preserve it in the core of the society. From
Table- Chronology of struggle for cultural identity in Ayodhya

SOURCE- Kumar, S. and Singh, R.P., 2018

[2]
archaeological settings or historical evidence Ayodhya is profoundly an important pilgrimage
center for Hindu, as well as Muslim and other religions also with due respect of different time
periods. In the table, the struggle from So, the main controversy of Babri Mosque/Rama
Janmabhoomi was centric on the same pivotal land in the past century. This land dispute finally
solved after so many struggles in 2019 by a supreme court judgment, by deciding to establish
ram temple in the disputed land and allot another 5-acre land for masjid built up.

C. CULTURAL HINDUISM AND CULTURAL IDENTITY

People were waiting for this auspicious ceremony for so many years or people made to be
waited by someone it is impossible to give a clear idea. Though religion and politics are totally
two different matter nowadays both are becoming the two sides of the same coin. It has not
started just now with this bhumi puja. But in India, this Hindu Nationalism started in 1915 with
the emerge of All India Hindu Sabha, which only cared for social, political, the educational
interests of the Hindu people. In 1921 it changed its name to Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha.
In 1937 V.D. Savarkar became the new president of Hindu Mahasabha. The race of culture and
civilization; that he named as ‘Sanskriti’ was the foundation concept of ‘Cultural Hinduism’ or
‘Hindutva’3. But the Mahasabha failed to sign a mark in the post-colonial Indian political
history. Later under the presidency of M. S. Golwalkar (1940), the Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh (RSS, 1925) worked on over individualization based on Hindutva. After post-
independence RSS has been banned for thrice in the chapter of Indian political regime. The
third time due to the demolition of the Babri mosque. Under the superintendency of Dr. Shyama
Prasad Mookerjee Bhartiya Jan Sangh (1951) later Bhartiya Janata Party (1980) take over the
idea of Hindu nationalism by disregarding the idea of inclusive secular nationalism. Before the
1991 parliamentary electoral campaign, they were beating around the platform of constructing
a Ram temple in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. Next to next every election campaign, the main
theme of Hindutva manifesto was “We believe that Cultural Nationalism—for which
Indianness, Bharatiyata and Hindutva are synonyms—is the basis of our national identity.”4 In
addition, it reaffirmed its commitment to the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya. As
Maryada Purushottam, Ram is an inspiring cultural symbol of India. His birthplace in Ayodhya
is also associated with the religious sentiments of crores of Hindus”. At last in 2014 BJP (Hindu

3
Katju, Manjari. (2019) "The History of Hindu Nationalism." The Oxford History of
Hinduism: Modern Hinduism
4 Bharatiya Janata Party (2004). Vision Document

[3]
Nationalism) came in the saddle of the state power with a slogan of ‘collective effort, inclusive
growth’.5 Now Sri Ram mandir the cultural identity got the embodiments of cultural Hinduism
at the national level.

The epitome of my argument here is, cultural identity is the recognition of an individual or
group of common people or of a place in society. If we think for Ayodhya; it holds the culture
of so many religions, languages, ethnicity. But in Ayodhya, only Sri Ram Mandir got the
cultural identity. It’s not because it got the support of saffron idealism or cultural Hinduism.
It’s because of population majority; culture of majority population matters. This article is not
opposing the supreme court judgment, this is only portraying the facts based on literature. So,
Ayodhya’s cultural identity is mainly based on the religion specification; and after the long
struggle for cultural identity Sri Ram Mandir got the identity in its place.

5 Katju, Manjari. (2019) "The History of Hindu Nationalism." The Oxford History of
Hinduism: Modern Hinduism

[4]
D. REFERENCES

• Ahmad, A. (1993). Culture, Community, Nation: On the Ruins of Ayodhya. Social


Scientist, 21(7/8), 17-48. doi:10.2307/3520344
• Bharatiya Janata Party (2004). Vision Document, <http://www.bjp.org/en/documents/
vision-document?u=vision-document-2004> (accessed on 13th Aug 2020).
• Cultural Identity in A Dictionary of Media and Communication, Oxford reference.
Retrieved from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/ authority. 2011
0803095 652855 on 13th Aug., 2020
• Katju, Manjari. (2019) "The History of Hindu Nationalism." The Oxford History of
Hinduism: Modern Hinduism (2019): 203.
• Kumar, S. and Singh, R.P., (2018). Sacred-heritage city development and planning in
India: a study of Ayodhya. Urban and regional planning and development: 20th
century forms and 21st century transformations. Springer, Dordrecht, New York,
pp.301-320.
• Mehta, D., (2018). The Ayodhya dispute: Law’s imagination and the functions of the
status quo. Violence and the Quest for Justice in South Asia, p.291.
• Srinivasan P. (2020), “Wait Is Over, Rama Is Home In 'Unconquerable' Ayodhya”,
culture Swarajya, retrieved from https://swarajyamag.com/culture/wait-is-over-rama-
is-home-in-unconquerable-ayodhya on 10.08.20 at 19:54.

[5]
AUTHOR BIO: Co-Authorship
1. Goutami Sadhukhan 2. Ananya Sadhukhan
B.Sc. 3rd year Mathematics honours, Masters in Regional Planning
St. Xavier college, autonomist School of Planning and Architecture,
Kolkata, New Delhi, 110002
Contact: 7386384383 Contact: 8448625707
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

[6]

You might also like