Shri Ram Mandir & The Struggle For Cultural Identity
Shri Ram Mandir & The Struggle For Cultural Identity
Shri Ram Mandir & The Struggle For Cultural Identity
Cultural Identity
CULTURAL IDENTITY RECASTED AS CULTURAL
HINDUISM
A. INTRODUCTION
In this paper, the struggle for cultural identity will be discussed. And How does political
ideology involve in making the cultural Hinduism as the incarnation of cultural identity will
also be considered here?
culture Swarajya
[1]
B. CULTURAL IDENTITY OF AYODHYA
Based on ethnicity, nationality, language, religion, and gender when we define a group of
people or individuals; that is cultural identity. And this not come befree the people born, it
comes from the behavioural practice achieved from society and ancestors. People themselves
only create this identity and do fight to preserve it in the core of the society. From
Table- Chronology of struggle for cultural identity in Ayodhya
[2]
archaeological settings or historical evidence Ayodhya is profoundly an important pilgrimage
center for Hindu, as well as Muslim and other religions also with due respect of different time
periods. In the table, the struggle from So, the main controversy of Babri Mosque/Rama
Janmabhoomi was centric on the same pivotal land in the past century. This land dispute finally
solved after so many struggles in 2019 by a supreme court judgment, by deciding to establish
ram temple in the disputed land and allot another 5-acre land for masjid built up.
People were waiting for this auspicious ceremony for so many years or people made to be
waited by someone it is impossible to give a clear idea. Though religion and politics are totally
two different matter nowadays both are becoming the two sides of the same coin. It has not
started just now with this bhumi puja. But in India, this Hindu Nationalism started in 1915 with
the emerge of All India Hindu Sabha, which only cared for social, political, the educational
interests of the Hindu people. In 1921 it changed its name to Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha.
In 1937 V.D. Savarkar became the new president of Hindu Mahasabha. The race of culture and
civilization; that he named as ‘Sanskriti’ was the foundation concept of ‘Cultural Hinduism’ or
‘Hindutva’3. But the Mahasabha failed to sign a mark in the post-colonial Indian political
history. Later under the presidency of M. S. Golwalkar (1940), the Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh (RSS, 1925) worked on over individualization based on Hindutva. After post-
independence RSS has been banned for thrice in the chapter of Indian political regime. The
third time due to the demolition of the Babri mosque. Under the superintendency of Dr. Shyama
Prasad Mookerjee Bhartiya Jan Sangh (1951) later Bhartiya Janata Party (1980) take over the
idea of Hindu nationalism by disregarding the idea of inclusive secular nationalism. Before the
1991 parliamentary electoral campaign, they were beating around the platform of constructing
a Ram temple in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. Next to next every election campaign, the main
theme of Hindutva manifesto was “We believe that Cultural Nationalism—for which
Indianness, Bharatiyata and Hindutva are synonyms—is the basis of our national identity.”4 In
addition, it reaffirmed its commitment to the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya. As
Maryada Purushottam, Ram is an inspiring cultural symbol of India. His birthplace in Ayodhya
is also associated with the religious sentiments of crores of Hindus”. At last in 2014 BJP (Hindu
3
Katju, Manjari. (2019) "The History of Hindu Nationalism." The Oxford History of
Hinduism: Modern Hinduism
4 Bharatiya Janata Party (2004). Vision Document
[3]
Nationalism) came in the saddle of the state power with a slogan of ‘collective effort, inclusive
growth’.5 Now Sri Ram mandir the cultural identity got the embodiments of cultural Hinduism
at the national level.
The epitome of my argument here is, cultural identity is the recognition of an individual or
group of common people or of a place in society. If we think for Ayodhya; it holds the culture
of so many religions, languages, ethnicity. But in Ayodhya, only Sri Ram Mandir got the
cultural identity. It’s not because it got the support of saffron idealism or cultural Hinduism.
It’s because of population majority; culture of majority population matters. This article is not
opposing the supreme court judgment, this is only portraying the facts based on literature. So,
Ayodhya’s cultural identity is mainly based on the religion specification; and after the long
struggle for cultural identity Sri Ram Mandir got the identity in its place.
5 Katju, Manjari. (2019) "The History of Hindu Nationalism." The Oxford History of
Hinduism: Modern Hinduism
[4]
D. REFERENCES
[5]
AUTHOR BIO: Co-Authorship
1. Goutami Sadhukhan 2. Ananya Sadhukhan
B.Sc. 3rd year Mathematics honours, Masters in Regional Planning
St. Xavier college, autonomist School of Planning and Architecture,
Kolkata, New Delhi, 110002
Contact: 7386384383 Contact: 8448625707
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
[6]