CET324 Assignment 1 Brief - 2021-2022
CET324 Assignment 1 Brief - 2021-2022
CET324 Assignment 1 Brief - 2021-2022
Important Information
You are required to submit your work within the bounds of the University
Infringement of Assessment Regulations (see your Programme Guide). Plagiarism,
paraphrasing and downloading large amounts of information from external sources,
will not be tolerated and will be dealt with severely. Although you should make full
use of any source material, which would normally be an occasional sentence and/or
paragraph (referenced) followed by your own critical analysis/evaluation. You will
receive no marks for work that is not your own. Your work may be subject to checks
for originality which can include use of an electronic plagiarism detection service.
For this assessment you are asked to submit an individual piece of work, therefore the
work must be entirely your own. The safety of your assessments is your
responsibility. You must not permit another student access to your work.
Referencing for this assessment should be done using the Harvard referencing
system. (see your Programme Guide).
Please ensure that you retain a duplicate of your assignment. We are required to
send samples of student work to the external examiners for moderation purposes. It
will also safeguard in the unlikely event of your work going astray.
Submission instruction:
Submission Date and Time See assignment submission page for submission date
Submission Location Digital copy via Canvas
Document Format A single Microsoft word document titled
“studentID_CET324_assignment_1.docx”.
For this assignment you are required to produce a report a report consisting of the
following parts.
The objective of the cyber clinic is to provide advice for those concerned about cyber
security and for those who may have encountered a breach of cyber security. Your
task is to produce a report (approximately 750 words) outlining the followings:
1. Identify the types of activities that a cyber clinic might undertake to provide
services to its stakeholders,
2. the benefits of such activities. You should Support your claims with external
sources (e.g., literature resources).
3. Identify the concerns that might arise from establishing such a service, and
4. Issues concerning liability and any legal and / or professional concerns in
establishing a cyber clinic.
Criteria Fail ( Fail (up to Pass (up to Pass (up to Pass (up Pass (up Pass (up Pass (up
plagiari 39%) 50%) 60%) to 70%) to 80%) to 90%) to 100%)
sed
work)
Relevance, Irrelevan Mostly Many parts Many parts All parts All parts Very Excellent
range, and t irrelevance are relevant are relevant are are good and
depth of content, or very few to the to the relevant relevant discussio relevant
reading very parts of the assessment assessment to the to the n and discussio
materials to minor content requiremen requiremen requirem requireme relevant n to the
supporting attempt, presented ts with ts with ents of nts of the to the requirem
your or are relevant some good the assessme requirem ents of
discussion large to the reading reading assessme nt and ents of the
(15%) sections requiremen range range nt with good the assessme
have ts of the some clear assessme nt,
been assessment good evidence nt and Excellent
plagiaris s and very reading of wide excellent rationales
ed poor range reading reading and
reading demonstr range argument
range ated presented
supporte
d with
very
wide
range of
reading
materials
included.
Report Very Significant Good style Competentl Well Well Very Excellent
presentation, poor deficiencie but with y written, written, written, well . and well
structure, quality s in some with some with only with written, written,
style, font, of expression deficiencie lapses from minor standard with with
section presentat and s in standard standard spelling standard standard
heading etc. ion and presentatio expression grammar, spelling and spelling spelling
(10%) structure n; the or format with poor and grammar, and and
. writer may that may format in a grammar, in a grammar, grammar,
achieve no pose readable in a readable in a in a
clarity and obstacles readable style with readable readable
lots of for the style with acceptabl style with style with
repetitious reader, acceptabl e format, good excellent
style rarely e format structure format, format
repetitious and clear structure
style presentati and clear
on presentati
on
References Irrelevan No use of, Some up- Uses a Good Critical Very Excellent
and citation t or to-date variety of appraisal appraisal Critical appraisal
of literature sources, inadequate, and/or literature of up-to- of up-to- appraisal of up-to-
sources very literature. appropriate which date date of up-to- date
(15%) minor Over literature includes and/or and/or date and/or
attempt, reliance on used. Goes some appropria appropria and/or appropria
or material beyond the recent texts te te appropria te
large provided material and/or literature. literature. te literature.
sections by the tutor has appropriate Recogniti Recogniti literature. Recogniti
have tutor. provided. literature, on of on of Recogniti on of
been Limited though not different different on of different
plagiaris use of necessarily perspecti perspecti different perspecti
ed sources to including a ves. ves. Very perspecti ves.
support a substantive Good use good use ves. Excellent
point. amount of source of source Excellent use of
Consistent beyond material. material. good use diverse
formatting library Consiste Consisten of source source
of texts. nt t material. material.
resources Competent formattin formattin Consiste Consiste
but some use of g of g of nt nt
missing source resources resources formattin formattin
information material. and no and no g of g of
. Consistent missing missing resources resources
formatting informati informati and no and no
of on. on. missing missing
resources informati informati
but some on on
missing
information
.