The document contains questions for cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff in an Estafa criminal case. The questions ask the witness to confirm their name and role in the case, how they met the accused and a witness for the accused, details about a meeting and payment, and whether any documents support the witness's testimony.
The document contains questions for cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff in an Estafa criminal case. The questions ask the witness to confirm their name and role in the case, how they met the accused and a witness for the accused, details about a meeting and payment, and whether any documents support the witness's testimony.
Original Title
Questions for the Cross Examination of Plaintiff-Resula
The document contains questions for cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff in an Estafa criminal case. The questions ask the witness to confirm their name and role in the case, how they met the accused and a witness for the accused, details about a meeting and payment, and whether any documents support the witness's testimony.
The document contains questions for cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff in an Estafa criminal case. The questions ask the witness to confirm their name and role in the case, how they met the accused and a witness for the accused, details about a meeting and payment, and whether any documents support the witness's testimony.
Q1: Please state your name for the record. Q2: Can you please confirm that you're the plaintiff in the Criminal Case No. 123456 for Estafa? Q3: You're working as an engineer at Buildfast Inc., is that correct? Q3: That is how you met the witness for the Accused, Genesis Yarte, is that correct? Q4: Are you aware that Genesis Yarte is the cousin of herein accused, Guillermo Katalbas? Q5: But you testified in your direct examination that the accused is a common friend of you and Genesis Yarte, is that correct? Q6: How did you meet with the accused on November 12, 2019? Q7: Is it true that on that day, you met at Starbucks with only the accused and Genesis Yarte? Q8: Based on your direct testimony, you mentioned about the receipt of your payment of P50, 000.00 to herein accused, by which you and the accused also signed. However, there are no document on record evidencing such transaction. Did you testify about such receipt which was allegedly signed by the accused? Q9: Is it true that the SEC issued a Certification confirming Bright Future Co.’s non- registration? Q10: Is it also true that in such Certification, no name of herein accused was written? Q11: Aside from your lone testimony, do you have other proofs that herein accused presented himself as a networking agent? Q12: Do you have other matters that you wish to address to this Court? NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, YOUR HONOR.
G.R. No. L-246 March 27, 1946 SILVERIO VALDEZ, Petitioner, ANTONIO G. LUCERO, Judge of First Instance of Ilocos Sur, and CELESTINO JIMENEZ, Provincial Warden of Ilocos Sur, Respondents