The Study of Effective Components in Façade Engineering Towards Developing A Conceptual Framework
The Study of Effective Components in Façade Engineering Towards Developing A Conceptual Framework
The Study of Effective Components in Façade Engineering Towards Developing A Conceptual Framework
net/publication/321347798
CITATION READS
1 2,109
4 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Dorna Eshrati on 29 November 2017.
ABSTRACT
Building as a live organism, which can range from simplicity to complexity in itself, creates a controllable micro-
ecosystem in an ecosystem that is beyond human being control and provides the required conditions for residence.
This metabolism consists of different parts; each plays a role to satisfy housing needs. One of them is the façade.
Although façade design was born with creation of the first architectural property by men; “Façade Engineering” is
considered to be a new discipline in science. It has found a special position among other building construction
disciplines following the growing concern about buildings sustainability especially considering the fact of climate
change and the necessity for integrated building design. Façade engineering can be reviewed from different aspects.
This paper used qualitative approach and content analysis strategy to categorize and recognize the effective
components of façade engineering in eight main groups of: Structure, Sociability, Material, Security, Physics,
Management, Integrity, and Aesthetics. So, by elaborating these effective components, it paves the way for
developing a conceptual framework.
KEYWORDS: Façade engineering, Effective Components, Conceptual Framework, Building Envelope, Design.
1. INTRODUCTION
“The façade separates the useable interior space from the outside world”[1]. This general definition for façade
refers to its basic function; however, as Klein notes: “the functions of building envelope are extending in current
façade concepts [2].The new concepts regarding façade have led to the formation of a new interdisciplinary
scientific discipline called “façade engineering”, consisting of various fields and wide horizons to encompass.
Perino and Serra [3] suggested that “the building envelope more than a construction component, will have to be seen
as a place, a spatial location”. Lowings believed that “the future is unpredictable. We think that the envelope will
evolve in a number of different ways” [4]. It seems that the variety of these ways will find more complex aspects
with new developments in the field of building technology. These technologies have assisted the modern buildings
not to be a ‘static and neutral’ entity toward environmental changes, but a ‘dynamic and active’ kind, able to react to
environmental changes and provided a broader aspects of environmental comfort. However, the science of façade
engineering does not suffice and seeks to plan, design and implement buildings which are like a live organism and
able to breath, be fed, molt based on seasons, and react toward activities and behaviors occurring in environment.
Therefore, the building can be more in tune with ‘the demands and needs of users’ and can shift from its static state
to a responsive and changeable one in order to meet the user‘s various demands. The importance of addressing
façade engineering concept can be considered from different perspectives such as: the importance of energy saving
due to the shortage of fossil fuel resources, the importance of considering façade design in the process of
architectural education, training and design, the importance of reducing visual pollution in urban landscape, the
importance of sustainability in particular its environmental aspect, the economic importance to reduce the costs of
construction, operation and maintenance of the building, and also the importance of facilitating the implementation
process and reducing the time of implementation. Despite all these necessities, the theoretical and practical studies
show the lack of an integrated approach toward façade that can simultaneously consider its different aspects.
*Corresponding Author: Enghelab St., College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, Telephone: 00989177139781,
Email: [email protected]
61
Namazi et al., 2016
Therefore, the studies and experiences in façade engineering, despite their contribution in advancing this field, are
not capable of achieving all the goals of façade engineering and only realize some of its diverse aspects. Having
understood the necessity for an integrated approach toward façade engineering, this paper raises this question that
which components should be considered in façade engineering. So by answering this question the way for achieving
an integrated approach toward façade engineering would be paved. However, in order to realize such important
issue, there is still a long way ahead and lots of questions must be answered.
Based on research question, the qualitative research methodology is chosen and with applying logical
reasoning strategy as well as ‘content analysis’ and ‘logical inference’; this paper aims to analyze the content by
recognizing and categorizing international documents and theories. So, by determining the components of façade
engineering; the context for developing a conceptual framework for effective components in façade engineering is
provided. Moreover, reading and evidential observation based on books, papers and authentic documents are used as
research tools.
Buildings are like organisms, sucking in resources and emitting wastes [6]. The direction of this organism
forward moving, despite all ups and downs, has been toward being more self-sufficient and sustainable. The
significance of this self-sufficiency and sustainability is more perceived particularly in large-scale buildings due to
their greater demands for energy to provide the users comforts. Restricted comfort zone of the 21st century people
due to being used to mechanical lives, has led to increasing demand for energy on one side as well as energy crisis
and environmental change on the other side. This imbalance in energy demand and the Earth's capacity has raised
the alarms. To balance the scale, considering the façade design which simultaneously separates and links the inside
and outside, can be helpful. To achieve this goal, it is required to have a holistic view toward façade. The ‘Façade
Engineering’, as a new branch of architectural related studies, has emerged to achieve these goals. In this field of
study, building f façade is not considered as a separate element; but it is seen as a multi-dimensional element [1].
Kragh [7]introduced façade engineering as “a relatively new discipline, which is gaining importance in a time where
recession and climate change are factors leading to increasing focus on the need for an integrated approach to the
design and procurement of buildings. Technological developments and the way buildings are procured means that
success often depends on specialist input across abroad spectrum, which some twenty years ago led to the creation
of the first façade engineering practices” [7].Façade Engineering offers a set of design solutions to create building
envelops that can contribute to energy saving as well as optimizing material, construction and maintenance time, and
costs during construction, usage and maintenance.
The move to the use of engineered walls has created a need for specialists, façade engineers, designers and
analysts, who can understand the new technical complexities of envelope design and performance. Although façade
design used to be a part of architect responsibility; façade engineering with its multi-dimensional view toward
façade, as a smart envelope of an organism, has necessitated the use of different specifications in order to achieve its
ideal goal. However, among all inter-disciplinary specialists required for engineered façade design, the architect
plays her/his role like an administrator [8]. Some factors leading to development of complex building envelopes and
consequently the need for specialists in the design and construction process are: “today’s modern and demanding
architecture, complex geometry of façades, new material and techniques, increased statutory requirements and
standards regarding energy efficiency (CO2 emission), different demands and requirements in various regions and
62
J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 6(7)61-68, 2016
counties, various climatic conditions (maritime, snow, ice, high winds, earthquake, high humidity and
temperatures)” [9]. It is important to note that, besides detailed knowledge and high experience of the façade
engineers group, some other requirements need to be fulfilled, including special software (3D, simulations) to meet
the architect’s requirements, continues development in façade technology, design and systems, research on new
material and manufacturing/installation process, and knowledge of local statutory requirements [9]. From scrutiny of
façade engineering concept, it is concluded that façade engineering as an interdisciplinary knowledge can be
reviewed from different perspectives and considering its new development, the necessity for research on this topic
becomes more obvious. This paper, by focusing on effective components in façade engineering, recognizes these
components to achieve the research goal.
In relation to what components should be considered in façade design, which is the main topic of the third
section of this paper, it should be noted that there is a growing number of components for a well-designed façade,
driven by issues like comfort and sustainability. Keiller et al. [8]categorized the performance required of the façade
as follows: structure, integrity, physics and materials (Table 1). Knaack et al. [1]also introduced the different
functions that building façade should serve. He indicated that architectural appearance of the building, provides
views to the inside and outside. Building façade allows sunlight to penetrate into the building while usually
providing protection from the sun at the same time. It also creates an insulating layer against cold, heat and noise
that can be used during energy generation process (Table 1). Therefore, the role of façade in the energy generation
process and utility systems can be mentioned. Auer [10] is among those who considered merging the façade together
with mechanical tools highly beneficial. Auer considered them as interface between inside and outside that in this
case can have one integrated control system for both systems (Table 1). Perino and Serra [3]also believed that the
active technologies, mentioned in Table 1, are better to be functionally/structurally integrated rather than being
incorporated as an ‘addition’ to the façade. Timmeren, besides all components (Table 1), quoted from
Kennedy4(1997) on the importance of aesthetics component in façade engineering as follows: “this aspect as part of
spatial quality appears to be hard to define objectively. Nevertheless, it may be considered one of the criteria for
lasting success of sustainability of a designed building and as far as visible for the systems” [6]. The US Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 [11] defined high-performance building5 and façade. This act introduces
seven conditions for highly efficient façades that can be seen in Table 1 [12]. Wildlife can be mentioned as another
effective component in façade design. “Mother Nature tries to reclaim its turf by various means. Pioneering plants,
acrobatic rodents, ubiquitous insects, and nuisance birds feel welcome on modern façades lacking traditional means
of protection. Their presence is undesirable because they present health hazards, cause a build-up of unappetizing
deposits, make people feel uncomfortable, and physically deteriorate the building materials. This threat can be
assessed by proper design analysis, and eliminated by minor modifications to the architectural design” [13].
Besides all the components that have been mentioned based on experts’ opinion, there is additional component
that can be said to be the most important one. This component refers to the sociability that a building envelope
should contain. Tillmann [6]believed that “the building envelope is not a mere machine, an instrument to solely
solve the issues of energy and comfort. It also serves a societal purpose. Architectural quality is a cultural value, and
a climate oriented building skin must comply with the highest standards” [6]. Being accepted by society can
guarantee an engineered façade to remain popular and effective in modern life. Respectively, besides mentioning
some other components, Anshuma [14] discussed the importance of sociability component in façade engineering,
due to the fact that the social environment around the building is less considered from the beginning of the
construction of new buildings. At the end of this section, the most important international theories and documents in
relation to effective components in façade engineering are presented in Table 1.
63
Namazi et al., 2016
Table1- Introduction of effective components in façade engineering based on experts’ opinions (Authors)
No. Name of Expert Year Main Proposed Components for Engineered Façade
Wind Loading, Dead Loads, Movement, Construction, Water Tightness, Air tightness, Safety, Heat transfer, Acoustics,
1 Keiller et al. 2003
Solar gain, Daylight, Compatibility, Durability, Forming, Connection.
Sociability, Client, Facility Management, Energy Management, Building Automation Management & life Safety
2 Anshuman 2005
Management.
Natural Light, Waterproofing, Protection against UV radiation, Energy generation, Push and Pull force from wind
3 Knaack et al. 2007 loads, Ventilation, Vapour diffusion, Noise, View in/out, Interior loads, Heat/cold isolation, Self-weight, Appearance
in urban context.
The US Energy Energy Conservation, Environment, Safety, Security, Durability, Accessibility, Cost-benefit, Productivity,
Independence and Sustainability, Functionality, Operational Considerations.
4 2007
Security Act of 2007
(EISA sec. 401-12, 13)
Air tightness, Daylight transmission and distribution, Operable window for Natural Ventilation, Energy generation.
5 Auer 2008 Beneficailly merging the façade together with mechanical tools for the following reason:
Glare and solar control, Natural Ventilation, Comfortable heating and cooling.
Providing Useable interior space, Rain and water Proofing, Thermal Separation, Sun protection, Security, Relationship
to the overall structure, Interface with neighboring buildings, Specialized components integration, Sealing components,
2008
Energy savings, Active contribution to heating, cooling, ventilation, and Adaptability to changing user requirements,
6 Tillman
Upgradeability.
Adaptation, Conditioning exterior air, Minimizing the negative impact on environment, Maximum operating comfort
2009
for the user, Sociability.
Act as a shelter against rain/wind/cold, Harvesting water, Electricity, Clean air and treating or emitting waste
sustainably, Solar control, Acoustic damping, Thermal Insulation, Avoiding PM10 emissions to enter the building,
Bounding and/or emission of harmful CO2 and ozone produced in the building, Natural Light Admittance, Structural
soundness, Structural soundless, Social Safety, Physical Safety, Security of utilities & supply and consistency,
Minimum or an optimum of added raw materials and low as possible use of chemicals for materials, A minimum of
7 Timmeren 2009
pollution of soil/Air/Ground area/Surface water, Using closing cycles as much as possible, A minimum of energy use
or a maximum of renewable energy, Future value (flexibility, uniformity), Thermal and acoustical comfort,
Ventilation, Lighting, Minimizing or Optimizing use of material, Adaptability and extendib
ility, Screening off against incorrect use/sabotage/vandalism, Compactness and optimizing use of surface area,
Accessibility of parties involved, Aesthetic quality, and Independence of specialized institutions (self-control by users).
Energy performance, Environmental impacts, Safety and security, Durability, Economic Efficiency, Human
comfort/health/productivity, Operational considerations, Daylight Optimization, View optimization, Minimize glare,
8 Patterson and Matusova 2013
Control solar heat gain, Minimizing heat loss, Natural Ventilation, Performance optimization, and Minimizing
environmental impact.
generation/conversion systems(as for example the technologies for the on-site exploitation of the solar radiation),
9 Perino and Serra 2015 ventilation (being used as air heat exchangers, air pre-heaters, ventilation outlets/inlets, ducts etc.), HVAC and
artificial lighting systems.
Based on Table 1, each expert in façade engineering has considered some effective components related to this issue;
introducing a comprehensive viewpoint including all these effective components is the main goal of this paper
which is investigated in the result section.
In Section 3, the effective components in façade engineering form various experts’ viewpoints were discussed.
So as it is indicated, there are many factors involved in this matter that have been referred by many experts.
Although it is obvious that some of the components are considered more important in design process; there is the
possibility that some of the components are neglected in practical field due to their plurality and dispersion. So, in
order to organize the suggested components, the following eight components are recognized as main ones:
‘Structure’, ‘Sociability’, ‘Material’, ‘Security’, ‘Physics, Management’, ‘Integrity’, and ‘Aesthetics’. It seems that
the other components can be categorized as a subset of the principal components and thereby reducing the number
of them. As the main concepts of some of the components and their subsets were previously referred by different
titles, it becomes necessary to use the best title that can include all the aspect of each component from the various
viewpoints of experts. Thus, in this paper, the eight principal components and their subsets are put into a coherent
category as follows:
Component 1- Structure: Wind Load, Earthquake Load, Extendibility, Constructability, Self-weight, Movement,
and Joint;
Component 2-Sociability: Media, Urban Context, Outdoor interaction, Automation System, Ease of Operation for
User, Accessibility, and Indoor Interaction;
Component 3- Material: Compatibility, Optimization of Surface Area, Durability, Forming, Compactness, and
Connection;
Component 4- Security: Wildlife Protection, Noise Protection, Resist Impact and Blast, Social Safety, Installation
Safety, Physical Safety, Fire Safety, and Acoustical Privacy;
64
J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 6(7)61-68, 2016
Component 5- Physics: Bounding CO2/Ozone Emission, Natural Ventilation, UV Protection, Sunlight Protection,
Sunlight Penetration, Sound Protection, Energy Efficiency, Energy Operation, Night Lighting, Ease of
Implementation, Luminous Comfort, Acoustical Comfort, Thermal Comfort, and Minimize Light Pollution;
Component 6- Management: Client, Facility Management, Energy Management, Economy Recourse
Management, Maintainability, Optimize Construction Time, Life Safety Management, and Building Automation
Management;
Component 7- Integrity: Harvesting Water, Water Tightness, Air Tightness, and Vapour Diffuser; and
Component 8- Aesthetics: Exterior Aspects, Aesthetic Aspects in Urban Context, Optimize Contract with
Neighbors Buildings, and Interior Aesthetic Aspects.
In order to approach the conceptual framework, it is required to examine the eight components and their
subcomponents in detail. The first component to be reviewed is “Structure”. Considering the structure in designing
building envelopes especially tall buildings, for which the wind and earthquake loads are significant factors, has great
importance. The building envelope structure specifies how to transfer those loads to the main structure of the building
or the independent structure of the envelope. The building envelope should be designed in a way that their deviation
and deformation, caused by the forces of wind and earthquake, are not exceeded over their acceptable limit. These
features should also be taken into account in designing building envelope joints and details; so they can show suitable
reactions against displacements causing by those forces. Another feature that a building façade can have is the ability to
extend that provides the possibility for adding extra parts in future or replace the defective parts. In addition to the
mentioned items and regardless of the type of structure designed for the building envelope, the building envelope and
its intended structure must be able to withstand their own weight. Moreover, the constructability of building façades
should be considered in design process according to material, economic and time resources.
The second component is “Sociability” meaning the ability to communicate with users and pedestrians; this
component is the product of a new approach towards social life in contemporary cities. With application of control
systems, the building facades can be changed according to the users’ needs. In this case, convenient access and
being user-friendly must be taken into consideration. In addition to considering the urban context of design, building
façades can be equipped to be capable of playing audios and videos; so broader and more effective interaction with
users inside or outside the building are provided. In all these cases, providing integrated automation system to
establish communication between the building façade and other members of the building such as building
mechanical systems, lighting system and also user interface with facade should be of interest to designers.
The third effective component in developing the conceptual framework of façade engineering is “Material”.
Materials used in the construction of the building façade must have the capacity to be compatible and integrated with
other elements of the façade, the environmental conditions and the users. Also these materials and their connections
need to have the capacity of being flexible, in order to offer the possibility of being applied in various construction
forms. Obviously, the choice of materials and the design of components and connections must be in such a way that the
use of materials in proportion to the shape and the surface of building is optimized. Besides all these items, durability
and sustainability during construction and operation are considered as effective factors in the choices of materials.
“Security” is the fourth effective component in building façade design; Security encompasses many different
aspects. One of the most important one is the sufficient strength of building envelope against unexpected events
such as explosions and being severely crashed by objects from outside or inside the building. In addition, the façade
must be equipped against fire; for example by having ducts to lead the smoke outside the building to increase safety
and consequently social security. Security in the building façades also includes resistance against insects and
creatures like birds. Resistance against internal and external sound pollutions that provides psychological security
and acoustical privacy for the users should also be considered in façade design.
The fifth effective component in developing the conceptual framework of façade engineering is “Physics”;
including a wide range of topics. For instance, the entire system of façade must be energy-efficient. There are
several ways to achieve an energy-efficient façade; such as considerations for using natural air flow through
ventilation system and also considerations for providing optimized thermal and acoustic comfort. In addition, the
building envelope should have the lowest emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and ozone during
its construction and operation. Another case in the field of physics that must be taken into account is providing the
possibility of protection against UV and daylight nuisance while allowing the required sunlight to enter the building.
The systems for contorting the amount of light reaching into the building should be user-friendly. Moreover, the
internal and external lightings are better to be designed in a way that create the least possible light pollution.
“Management” is a critical component in the design of the building façade that besides considering the
employer’s viewpoints and demands, provides an integrated automation system to control and manage facilities,
energy, safety and maintenance as well as financial resources during the design, construction and operation of the
65
Namazi et al., 2016
building envelope. Through an integrated management system the optimal time of construction can be achieved.
“Integrity” is the seventh effective component in the development of conceptual of façade engineering. The building
façade must have a rainwater collection system to gather rain to re-use in the building. Also, the building envelope
should show a strong resistance against unpredicted weather condition. Considerations for disposal of vapor on the
surface of façade should be given during design and construction processes. Last but not the least is the “Aesthetic”
component. Considering the different aspects of aesthetic of the both outside and inside the building is particularly
important. In this regard, how the envelop is related to its context should be given priority.
Based on the eight principal components and their subcomponents, the conceptual framework of façade
engineering components is presented in this section. The proposed framework, despite its comprehensiveness,
simply considers all the components in an effective correlation and as an integrated totality (Figure 1).
The aim of this model is to present effective components in façade engineering in order to help design and
management groups and building users in the processes of ‘design’, ‘construction’, and ‘operation’ to achieve the
66
J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 6(7)61-68, 2016
main goal of façade engineering of the project. The eight principal components and their explanatory subsets are
introduced until the time this research conducted. Obviously, due to future advances in science and engineering; the
number of them is likely to increase and therefor the components would be required to review in future.
4. CONCLUSION
In today’s architecture, buildings have living and dynamic nature. One of the most outstanding features of
contemporary buildings are their compatibility to diverse environmental and climatic changes. Façade, as one of the
key elements of building, plays an undeniable role in this field. The science of façade engineering, as a new branch
in construction industry, seeks to achieve sustainable development goals and to harmonize the building and the
needs of users in different climates through integrated design. Given the urgency and importance of reviewing the
related theories, having been raised by various experts, the effective components in façade engineering are presented
in eight categories; the other components are recognized as subsets of the principal components. Conducted reviews
have led to a comprehensive and holistic model with the aim of introducing effective factors in the field of façade
engineering. Using this model can assist design and project management groups as well as users in the processes of
design, implementation and operation. In future research, it is recommended to revisit the proposed model due to
current progress in the new field of façade engineering and the possibility of new components addition. Future
researches could take the advantage of using the proposed conceptual framework of this paper for analyzing the
components of designed façades, by using quantitative research methodology such as Factor Analysis, in case
studies of the diverse climatic contexts and different historical periods in order to evaluate and rank the components
that mostly contribute to the efficiency of the façades of that place or time.
REFERENCES
1- Kanaack, U., Klein, T., K., Bilow, M., Auer, T., 2007. Façade, Principles of constructions. Birkhäuser Verlag
AG.p: 36.
2- Klein, T., 2008.Evolution or Revolution of Systems in Façade Technology, Is Function Integration the Strategy
for the Future?. In: Research in Architectural Engineering Series, Volume 8, The Future Envelope 1,
Architecture- Climate- Skin (U.Knaack, T.Klein). IOS Press, pp: 85-95.
3- Perino, M., Serra, V., 2015. Switching from static to adaptable and dynamic building envelopes: A paradigm
shift for the energy efficiency in buildings. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering 3, pp.143-163.
4- Lowings, L., 2008.Overlapping Boundaries. In: Research in Architectural Engineering Series, Volume 9, The
Future Envelope 1, A Multidisciplinary Approach (U.Knaack, T.Klein), IOS Press, pp: 47-64.
5- Brinda, T.N.P., 2015. Design and Performance Evaluation of Structural Double Glazing Façade Technology:
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 3, March
2015, pp: 1370-1378.
6- Timmeren, A., 2009. Climate Integrated Design (Climate ID) of Building Skins. In: Research in Architectural
Engineering Series, Volume 9, The Future Envelope 2, Architecture- Climate- Skin (U.Knaack, T.Klein). IOS
Press, pp: 33-61.
7- Kragh, M., 2010.Façade engineering and building physics, High performance-low impact. Engineering in Glass,
Ropemaker Place, London, UK, pp: 53-59
8- Keiller, A., Ledbetter, S. & Wilkinson, M., 2003. Creating tomorrow's façade engineers, Façade design and
procurement. Bath, pp: 57-64.
9- Pfenninger, K., 2009. Development in the Technology of Façades. In: Research in Architectural Engineering
Series, Volume 9, The Future Envelope 2, Architecture- Climate- Skin (U.Knaack, T.Klein). IOS Press, pp:107-
115.
10- Auer, T., 2008. Performance as a goal integration as the approach?. In: Research in Architectural Engineering
Series, Volume 8, The Future Envelope 1, Architecture- Climate- Skin (U. Knaack and T. Klein) pp. 67-72. IOS
Press.
11- EISA, 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Public Law 110-140. 110th Cong. Accessed 8
August 2015: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ140/html/PLAW-110publ140.htm
12- Patterson, M., Matusova, J., 2013.High Performance Façades. , Façade Plus Conference, New York, San
Francisco and Chicago, pp:8-9
13- Kazmierczak, K., 2010. Façade Engineering - How To Design a Functional Building Enclosure, AIA National
Convention, USA.
67
Namazi et al., 2016
14- Anshuman, Sachin, 2005. Responsiveness and Social Expression; Seeking Human Embodiment in Intelligent
Façades. In the proceeding of the 2005 Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in
Architecture / ISBN 0-9772832-0-8 Savannah (Georgia) 13-16 October 2005, pp.12-23
1
. The word wall is defined as “one of the sides of a room or building”/ Longman, dictionary of contemporary
English, available at http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/, Accessed Aguste 2nd 2015.
2
. The word skin refers to “a layer that is part of a vehicle, building, object etc., especially on the outside”/ Longman,
dictionary of contemporary English, available at http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/, Accessed Aguste 2nd
2015.
3
.“The front of a building, especially a large and important one”/ Longman, dictionary of contemporary English,
available at http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/, Accessed Aguste 2nd 2015.
4
. Kennedy, M. & Kennedy, D. (1997) Designing ecological settlements, European Academy of Urban Environment,
Dietrich Reimer Verlag, Berlin.
5
.“integrates and optimizes on a life cycle basis all major high-performance attributes, including energy
conservation, environment, safety, security, durability, accessibility, cost-benefit, productivity, sustainability,
functionality, and operational considerations” (EISA 2007, sec. 401-12, 13).
68
View publication stats