GOVERNANCE Chapter 7 8 9 COMPILED
GOVERNANCE Chapter 7 8 9 COMPILED
GOVERNANCE Chapter 7 8 9 COMPILED
In fact, CSR means different things to different people. However, certain ideas
are becoming commonly accepted. One is that CSR is not about philanthropy or
charitable work. It refers to something much more fundamental. It is about how
companies take responsibility for their actions in the world at large. Conventional
CSR watchdogs.include labor unions, consumer groups, environmentalists, NGOs
and all 'stakeholders' watching over their interest as opposed to 'stockholders' only.
The role of business worldwide and specifically in the developed economies has
evolved over the last few decades from classical profit maximizing approach to a
social responsibility approach, where businesses are not only responsible to its
stockholders but also to all of its stakeholders in a broader inclusive sense. One can
identify so many reasons for shifting the role of business from classical concept to a
responsible business concept, but negative impression of stakeholders on the
enterprise would get a higher priority among others. In one hand, enterprises create
wealth and job opportunities for the society and on the other, they pollute and
destroy environment and ecology with devastating impact on human health and
bio-diversity worldwide. To address the social problems or the problems of the
stakeholders, the business community evolved a new approach in their business
strategies named CSR. Through CSR, enterprises are intent to strike a balance
between economic and social goals, where resources are used in a rational manner
and social needs are be addressed responsibly.
One important aspect of CSR is that it is not a legal obligation but rather a
voluntary social and environmental positive initiative to establish an image of
environmentally and Socially Responsible Business (SRB) that also encompasses
MSMEs as well as giant corporations. The motivation and drive to pursue is chiefly a
result of pressure from well-organized consumer rights movement, specifically in
developed world that acts as a watchdog and hardly hesitates to impose consumer
boycott against a company that violated established CSR practices. An example is
the consumer boycott imposed on purchasing Bangladesh ready-made garments on
the ground that these are produced by under-aged child labor. Despite the fact that
in the not so distant past, CSR was more of a charity by affluent or socially
responsible business organizations without expecting any financial return, today, it
very much a planned investment in creating positive image to enhance profitability.
Under the CSR concept, companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better
society and a more sustainable environment. As evolved primarily in the western
world, most of the rising companies there practice CSR to enhance the image and
acceptability in the community (Green Paper, 2001). There are driving forces behind
CSR that include new concerns and expectations from citizens, consumers, public
authorities and investors in the context of globalization. Social criteria are
increasingly influencing the investment decisions of individuals and institutions both
as consumers and as investors. Increased concern about the damages caused to
the environment by economic activities; transparency of business activities brought
about by the media and modern information and communication technologies are all
contributing to the changing scenario regarding CSR. According to Green Paper
(2001), "Few trends I could so thoroughly undermine the very foundations of our free
society than the acceptance by corporate officials of a social responsibility other than
to make as much money for the stockholders as possible." (Friedman, 1962)
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT
The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) aims to examine the role
of business in society and to maximize the positive societal outcomes of business
activity.
In practice, much of the business activity that has so far been labeled CSR
has been driven by the concerns of investors, companies, campaign groups and
consumers based in the world's richest countries. National CSR agendas in middle
and low-income countries have been less visible internationally, and have often not
been labeled CSR. The result has been CSR practices that are largely framed in rich
countries, then internationalized and transferred to other businesses and social
settings through international trade, investment and development assistance. The
strategic challenge for governments at national and local levels is how best to shape
an agenda that has been largely market-driven and responsive to concerns of rich
country stakeholders.
Over the past years, governments, companies and NGOs in many middle-and
low-income countries have accelerated the process of adaptation of the developed
country-driven CSR agenda through greater direct engagement. CSR movements
and initiatives have emerged in countries such as China, India, South Africa,
Philippines and Brazil among others. Governments of some middle-income countries
facing major social challenges have explicitly sought to engage business in meeting
those challenges, as with Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa or
presidential encouragement of business efforts to tackle poverty in the Philippines.
There are two broad sets of justifications for public sector actors in middle and
low-income countries to engage with CSR: defensive and proactive. The two are not
mutually exclusive. A policy initiative that initially has a defensive justification may
quickly become part of a proactive strategy of engagement.
The defensive justification relates to minimizing the potential adverse effects
of CSR on local communities, environments and markets when it is imposed through
international supply chains and investment. Governments of some major economic
powerhouses such as China have undertaken a variety of initiatives to ensure that
CSR practices with impact in their countries are tailored to national economic and
social interests.
The proactive justification for public sector actors to engage with CSR is
provided by the opportunity to increase the domestic public benefits of CSR
practices in economic, social and environmental terms.
CSR practice has identified five distinctive roles for public sector engagement
with CSR: regulation, facilitation, partnership, endorsement and demonstration. In
practice, there are no bright lines between them, and many of the policy instruments
governments wanting to promote a CSR agenda can use could be considered as
expressions of more than one of these government roles.
In the broadest sense of CSR, the entire body or social and environmental
legislation in any country can be seen as an expression of public sector engagement
with CSR. Other areas of legislation including competition policy, basic investment
and enterprise frameworks, and rights of access to information and public
participation in decision- making are also important parts of the 'enabling
environment' for CSR (Source: UN Sustainable Development Innovation Brief,
February 2007).
CSR IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
The following are the different ranges of application for CSR in the
international perspective where the socially responsible conduct of a corporation can
assure the increase in acceptance by the stakeholders.
From the business standpoint, the state regulations cannot always guarantee
that the entrepreneurial conducts of these big enterprises are all compliant with such
development model. In addition, in some cases, there are outsourcing practices and
issues not only in business process but also in labor and materials which can
promote the adoption of standards lower than those prescribed in the home
countries. It is in this context that the corporations should go beyond the minimum.
Many studies have shown that in the medium-term, this model will bring turn out
about better consumer favor, product innovations, process innovations, and the most
basic of all the advantages, raw material savings.
Corporations, particularly the larger ones, have a significant influence not only
on the economy but also on the social and political life of the country in which they
operate. It is therefore expected from a socially responsible behavior standpoint that
corporations should be consistent with the principle of fairness and respect of basic
rights. In affirmation to this, the entrepreneurial strategy of these large enterprises
should be based on the following CSR demands:
● Be Compliant
The operational conduct of the enterprise should not be lower than the
standards of the host country; for example, with regard to compliance with
environmental laws, commercial laws, salaries, benefits, working conditions and
many other things directly or indirectly related to any stakeholder of the enterprise.
● Be Consistent
Have partners of the same kind. Human and labor rights are ought to be
respected anywhere and therefore, multinationals in the host countries should press
hard on their partners, both local and international, to adopt the same observance
and recognition of rights the enterprise is following when it does business. In this
way, businesses will move on the same path towards genuine CSR practice.
The real test on the MNCs' sincerity to develop the host economy or country is
to invest on fixed asset if allowed by the host. Seeing their buildings and other fixed
assets could only mean one thing, they will be here for long if not for good.
TRANSPARENCY
LEGALITY
The enterprises that prefer a CSR strategy declare to the public and to the
stakeholders that they do not participate to illegal engagements of financial market
manipulations and insider trading, as well as tax evasion through the practices of
transfer pricing, facilitated by their transnational structure.
CONSUMERS
Since the first environmental movements took stand in the 1960s, and in the
following decades, the consumers' movements have begun to assert themselves at
the international level, with the increasing support of the scientists who denounced
the harmfulness of some productions for the mankind and the environment.
Due to market globalization, supply chains have become very complex, often
outsourced in countries where human right protection is low or there are no
environmental regulations, or tolerance of hard labor is high due to absence of
choices (an ugly head of exploitative conduct). This situation represents a critical
point for enterprises that have chosen to adopt a socially-responsible conduct. The
lack of ethical control on the supply chain is becoming a not only a commercial risk
but also a financial one.
GLOBALIZATION OF CORRUPTION
Corruption takes many different forms, from the routine cases of bribery or
petty abuse of power that are said to "grease the wheels to the amassing of
spectacular personal wealth through embezzlement or other dishonest means.
For MNCs, bribery enables companies to gain contracts (particularly for public
works and military equipment) or concessions which they would not otherwise have
won. Every year, Western businesses pay huge amounts of money in bribes to win
friends, influence and contracts. These bribes are conservatively estimated to run to
US$80 billion a year; roughly the amount that the United Nations believes is needed
to eradicate global poverty. In 1999, the US Commerce Department reported that in
the preceding five years, bribery was believed to have been a factor in 294
commercial contracts worth US$145 billion. In 1996, the magazine World Business
reported that the bribes paid by German companies alone were over $3 billion. Not
just companies are involved. According to a French secret service report, the official
export credit agency of France paid around $2 billion in bribes to foreign purchasers
of "defense equipment" in 1994.
Such bribery may be pervasive, but it is difficult to detect. Many Western
companies do not dirty their own hands, but instead pay local agents, who get a 10%
or so "success fee" if a contract goes through and who have access to the necessary
"slush funds" to ensure that it does. Bribery is also increasingly subtle. It often takes
the form of semi-legal fees or "commissions", and inflated or marked-up prices. In
contracts guaranteed by export credit agencies, such "commissions" are included in
the costs and thus, in the total contract value covered by the guarantee. "It is
obvious," comments Transparency International, "that this practice constitutes an
indirect encouragement to bribe which, in future, brings it close to complicity with a
criminal offense." Until recently, bribery was seen as a normal business practice.
Many countries including France, Germany and the UK treated bribes as legitimate
business expenses which could be claimed for as tax deductions.
EXPORTING CORRUPTION
● Increasing Debt
Bribes increase the prices of projects. When these projects are paid for with
money borrowed internationally, bribery adds to a country's external debt. Ordinary
people end up paying this back through cuts in spending on health, education and
public services. Often they also have to pay by shouldering the long-term burdens of
projects that do not benefit them and which they never requested.
Bribing high-level officials ensures profits and helps off-load risks. In many
power projects in Asia, for example, there has been, according to the World Bank,
both "a high level of corruption" and a tendency to over-estimate demand for
electricity.
Although all the companies filed sworn statements denying corruption, six of
them subsequently confessed to offering bribes. So serious were the allegations that
the World Bank sent in a special team of investigators. Yet, far from receiving
support from Western governments for its anti-corruption efforts, Pakistan was
warned by the British, US, Japanese and Canadian governments that its clash with
the power companies would put off other investors. The IMF, meanwhile, went so far
as to make a new package of loans at the end of 1998 conditional on the
government's dropping the charges against the companies.
Bribery can be a useful way of getting around local opposition to a project and
of bypassing the usual democratic processes involved with awarding contracts. Take,
for example, the Norwegian mining company, MINDEX, that wants to carry out a
nickel and cobalt strip mining on the Philippine island of Mindoro. The local
population believes the mine will seriously damage the environment and ruin their
communities.
MINDEX has responded by attempting to buy off local leaders. It gave gold
watches to local politicians at a critical stage of the project's Environmental impact
Assessment, which had to prove that the mine was socially acceptable to local
people MINDEX has also paid for local district leaders to go on a "study tour to a
luxurious holiday island, built a new house for a local priest and paid local journalists
to write articles favorable to the company. MINDEX claimed the gifts are "signs of
friendship Local people, who oppose MINDEX, believed that such gifts are attempts
to manipulate the local tradition of "utang na loob" or "debt of gratitude towards those
who carry out small acts of generosity and could be against Filipino law.
"We refute the categorical statement of MINDEX that the local population of
Oriental Mindoro welcomes the mining project. Our people have consistently
manifested their strong opposition to mining operations in a series of protest
actions... We are one with our people in declaring our vehement opposition
against mining activity in our province."
Sometimes such bribes come in the form of illegal political donations. A 1999
audit by the Nicaraguan government revealed that a Canadian mining company,
Greenstone Resources, which controls 70% of the mining areas of Nicaragua,
donated $20,000 to President Arnoldo Aleman. The company was alleged to have
made further donations to other people in Aleman's Constitutional Liberal Party and
bribes to local officials in the area where Greenstone was mining. Nicaraguan law
states that donations can be given only by Nicaraguan citizens from within the
country.
In return for its money, Greenstone has consistently been allowed to get away
with flouting environmental laws and regulations. It carries out massive illegal logging
around the mining area, and pollutes water sources and the local environment at the
expense of local people's health. Says Magda Lanuza, a Nicaraguan activist
"You can smell the cyanide when you are near the mine. Children have
headaches, and there are other health problems. The technicians who visited
the area with us say the water is harmless but when we ask them to drink it,
they refuse."
Despite such evidence, Greenstone has received favorable environmental
impact assessments from Nicaraguan officials. The Ministry of Environment
personnel visit the firm's sites only when the company wants them and pays them, to
do so.
"The affair has been disaster for the sub-continent. With all the juicy
allegations of larceny and intrigue to savour, it is easy to forget that Bofors guns
added to the ever-growing armouries of India and Pakistan, which now face each
other in an unstable nuclear 'balance of power'... The consequences for Indian
democracy have been as dire... The Bofors scandal led to Rajiv Gandhi's defeat in
the 1989 general election and the emergence of the BJP as the dominant Indian
party."
● Private Banking
The private banking boom has its origins in the debt crisis and is a major
reason for the continued indebtedness of many poor countries. Because of the debt
crisis in the late 1980s onwards, Western banks had fewer opportunities to lend to
Third World countries and thus started to pursue wealthy individuals in the Third
World to encourage them to place their wealth in private bank accounts. The result
was a revolving door. International loans to developing countries were creamed off
by those in power and "transferred into banks... ironically often to 'private banking'
branches of the very same international banks that had issued the international
loan... in the first place." This has been at least as profitable for the banks as for the
individuals making the deposits. The average rate of return to banks for private
banking accounts is over 20%.
Although the private banking boom is a global phenomenon (in Latin America,
for example, the market is already estimated at $450 billion), the biggest
beneficiaries have been US banks. According to Raymond Baker, a financial
specialist at the Brookings Institute, the "US has, according to all credible estimates,
become the largest repository of ill-gotten gains in the world," not least because of
lax or inadequate oversight. A 1999 US Senate inquiry revealed that 350 of
Citibank's 40,000 clients were senior foreign government officials or their relatives,
including:
● President Omar Bongo of Gabon, who transferred $100 million through
personal accounts in Citibank's New York branches. Bongo had two private
accounts in the name of shell (or dummy) corporations as well as a special
account to receive payments from oil companies (which included alleged
bribes or "donations" from the French government's oil company Elf
Aquitaine). Citibank made more than $1 million a year net from Bongo's
accounts.
● Asif Ali Zardari, the husband of former Pakistan prime minister, Benazir
Bhutto, who transferred some $40 million through Citibank accounts, of which
$10 million is believed to be from kickbacks on a gold importing contract.
● The three sons of Nigeria's General Sani Abacha, who held some $110 million
in Citibank accounts, including some in the name of shell corporations set up
by Citibank. The bank lent the two sons $39 million to deposit in another bank
account in Switzerland after the new Nigerian government began
investigations into corruption in 1998.
● Raul Salinas, the brother of former Mexican President Carlos Salinas, who
transferred $80 to 100 million in alleged drug money out of Mexico between
1992 and 1994 through Citibank's accounts.
In Switzerland, too, private banks still hide the assets of Bongo's and
Abacha's families, as well as those of Mali's Moussa Traore and Zaire's Mobutu
Sese Seko. The private banking department at UBS, meanwhile, handles accounts
for the family of Kenyan President Daniel Arap Moi.
"There is no honest reason for being offshore. Bank secrecy and the offshore
money industry have no place in a globalized economy."- Jack Blum, Offshore
Expert & UN Consultant
Offshore banks and companies are another part of the system through which
money is siphoned out of poor countries and hidden well away from its citizens.
Offshore financial centers became prominent in the 1960s with bank deposits in tax
havens increasing from $11 billion in 1968 to $385 billion in 1978. By 1989, there
was an estimated $1.5 trillion offshore; by 1998, $5 trillion. In 1999, accounts in
some 61 offshore centers around the world held $8 trillion. In the Caribbean and
South Pacific Islands alone, the OECD found that deposits had increased five-fold
between 1985 and 1994, to $200 billion.
Since the 1980s, offshore finance centers or tax havens have been a magnet
for money from Third World countries, both clean and dirty. In the mid-1980s, a
Morgan Guaranty Trust study of "capital flight" from developing countries found that,
in one year alone, a total of $198 billion disappeared offshore from 18 developing
countries. Offshore centers impose little or no taxes, offer themselves to
non-residents to escape taxation in their own country, do not exchange information,
lack transparency, and attract shell companies-businesses "with no substantial
activities."
Because of the secrecy with which they operate, offshore centers have
become excellent places to launder the proceeds of crime and corruption. They have
been implicated in almost all money-laundering schemes. In 1996, the IMF estimated
that $500 billion-between 2 to 5% of global GDP-is laundered offshore every year.
Three years later, the IMF put the figure at anywhere between $590 and $1,500
billion. A 1997 UN report likewise calculated that laundered global revenues from
corruption, fraud, pornography and prostitution stood at between $500 billion and
$1,000 billion. Arms dealers also often use offshore bank accounts to hide their
tracks.
In some offshore havens, new companies can be set up for as little as £100.
Such companies, which can be set up in as little as 24 hours, are not required to file
annual returns or accounts, or to disclose ownership. In fact, in some offshore
centers, it is a crime to divulge any information about the ownership of banks,
depositors or shareholders of an offshore business. Not surprisingly, wealthy
criminals hold much of their money in such companies rather than as individuals.
Who these companies really represent becomes even more difficult to trace when
they are owned by yet other offshore companies in different jurisdictions.
International pressure has been mounting in recent years to return money which has
been stolen from public treasuries and stashed away in Western banks and offshore
tax havens. Several precedents exist for the return of such funds:
● In 1998, US$500 million of former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos'
money was returned from Swiss banks to the Philippine government. The
Presidential Commission on Good Government set up after Marcos was
deposed has recovered overall some $1 billion of the $5 billion that the
Marcos family squirreled away.
● In March 1999, the High Court in London ordered the freezing of all accounts
belonging to former Nigerian ruler Seni Abacha's family. In October 1999, the
Swiss government called on five banks to freeze several accounts held in the
name of Abacha's son, Mohammed, and thought to contain hundreds of
millions of dollars plundered from the Nigerian central bank and oil revenues.
In January 2000, Swiss banks froze £390 million in accounts belonging to
Abacha and his associates. Four months earlier, the Nigerian government had
announced that it had already managed to recover some $700 million of
Abacha's money. In all, Abacha is believed to have stashed $1.5 billion in
embezzled funds in Western banks.
● In November 1999, the Bank of England identified and froze the London bank
accounts of Angola's rebel leader, Jonas Savimbi, who was until recently
aided and abetted as an anti-communist "freedom fighter by several Western
governments, including those of the US and UK.
BLACKLISTING COMPANIES
NGOs are also calling for an international public index or ranking of corrupt
companies. At the moment, the international anti-corruption NGO, Transparency
International, publishes an annual bribery perceptions index. The index ranks
countries rather than companies. Since it is not countries that do the bribing, this
index remains fundamentally flawed.
GOVERNMENT ACTION
Several NGOs are doing just this by, for example, monitoring debt relief funds
to see if they are being spent on poverty reduction measures; mobilizing ordinary
people and raising awareness; and developing the monitoring capacity of local civil
society to keep local governments accountable in a context of decentralization.
DETERRENTS
The system includes massive devolution of funds to local meetings, which are
required to draw up plans for deploying them, and a concerted effort to maximize
public attendance at such meetings. Eight key democratic principles are central,
including: "maximum direct participation of the people; accountability (continuous
social auditing of performance) and transparency through the right to information."
The potential for corruption, a problem before the new system, is minimized
by a commitment to transparency and openness of all documents and decisions. As
The Hindu newspaper notes:
RESISTANCE
Enable ordinary people to use information. Only if they have the relevant
knowledge can citizens hold their governments accountable and ensure that
resources that belong to them are used in the right way.
TRUE or FALSE
TRUE 1. During the 1980s, very few organizations created and implemented ethics
codes,
TRUE 2. A businessperson can take some comfort when faced with an ethical
dilemma by talking openly about it with management because ethical decisions will
always withstand scrutiny.
TRUE 6. Customers can't find out which firms are acting responsibly and which are
not.
TRUE 7. Businesses record of social responsibility today is much better than in past
decades.
TRUE 8. When translated, caveat emptor means "let the buyer beware."
TRUE 9. The ability of the Bureau of Food and Drugs to force businesses making or
selling defective products to recall them is most closely related to consumers' right to
choose.
TRUE 10. Recently, consumers and the government have been losing an increasing
number of product liability lawsuits against sellers of defective products.
TRUE 11. One major reason for improving product safety is the consumer's demand
for safe products.
FALSE 13. With no focus on that issue and attention being paid to sustainability and
transparency in international business, many countries are now making greater
efforts to eradicate corruption, which will create proper conditions for a deeper
involvement of business groups in social responsibility actions.
TRUE 14. Developing countries represent the most rapidly expanding economies,
and hence the most lucrative growth markets for business.
TRUE 15. While individual and organized forms of philanthropy are not new, there
has been a particular explosion of models in the past 20 years in the field of
organized philanthropy.
FALSE 16. Corporate social responsibility has not undergone significant changes in
the past several decades.
TRUE 17. While Friedman's view has theoretical merit, and should not be dismissed
lightly, that position is no longer widely shared by the global business leaders of the
21st century.
TRUE 18. Employee matching gift programs are one such vehicle where the
employee makes the choice and the corporation matches or exceeds the employee
contribution.
TRUE 19. If CSR is to have potential as a way to address social and environmental
challenges, it must be supported by a public that holds companies accountable.
FALSE 20. There must not be enough motivation and momentum in the field to keep
the social responsibility of corporations a priority.
FALSE 21. Pursuing a mission of sustainable development can make our firms more
competitive, more resilient to shocks, nimbler in a fast-changing world and more
likely to attract and hold customers and the best employees.
FALSE 22. Consumers are also increasingly paying attention to corporate behavior.
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. Caveat emptor
3. You have been asked to complete this year's social responsibility report for
the insurance industry. Which of the following statements would you include
as a valid indication of socially responsible activities in this industry?
A. This year, we sold more insurance policies than in the previous two years,
B. This year marked a 200% increase in the number of new insurance products
and services available to customers.
C. To date, few women and minorities hold management positions in the
insurance industry.
D. This year, more than 300,000 volunteer hours were contributed by
companies through loaned executives and release-time arrangements.
E. Fewer than one-eighth of the companies' charitable contributions go to people
related activities.
A. Because corporations are creations of society, they are responsible for giving
back to the communities in which they operate.
B. These companies have realized it is in their best interest to increase
their social responsibility before they are once again subject to stricter
regulations.
C. These companies are using social responsibility as a means to increase their
profitability both short term and long term.
D. Long-distance providers have started taking pride in their industry and its
record for social responsibility.
E. They feel a responsibility to their stockholders, employees, the government,
investors, and society as a whole.
7. Supporters of increased social responsibility would most likely say mat the
goal of a firm is to
A. social issues are the responsibility of government officials elected for that
purpose.
B. companies should maximize profits and not solve society's problems with their
time, money and talent.
C. because social problems affect society in general, businesses should not be
expected to solve these problems.
D. social responsibility by firms can prevent increased government
intervention.
E. business managers are primarily responsible to stockholders and providing
them a good return.
9. Which one of the following is an argument for increased social
responsibilities?
10. MasterCard sends a customer a memo that discloses the true cost of
borrowing with each billing statement. It does this because it realizes that the
customer has the right to
A. choose.
B. obtain credit.
C. be heard.
D. be informed.
E. safety.
11. The motion picture industry uses a rating system to describe the content of
its movies. Movies are accompanied by ratings such as PG (parental guidance
suggested) or R13 (not suitable for those under 13). This rating system
satisfies consumers' right to
A. be heard.
B. safety.
C. be informed.
D. censorship.
E. watch what they want to watch.
A. be treated fairly
B. be informed
C. safety
D. be heard
E. service
13. If Casio were to buy out all other calculator manufacturers, what consumer
right would be at stake?
A. The right to choose
B. The right to be heard
C. The right to safety
D. The right to service
E. The right to be informed
A. wasteful.
B. recycling.
C. redesign.
D. disposal.
E. pollution
15. Over the past several decades, concern for the environment has
A. been relatively steady because people expect to live in a clean and safe
environment.
B. increased significantly because pollution became a threat to life and
health.
C. been carefully handled by businesses because they are the primary source of
pollutants.
D. become stronger in the US but not yet in the rest of the world.
E. decreased because today's industrialized processes are naturally more
environmentally friendly.
16. When sulfur emitted by smoke stacks combines with moisture in the
atmosphere to form acids that are spread by the wind, results.
A. air pollution
B. fire
C. acid rain
D. emissions
E. wet pollution
17. The company you Work for recently has committed itself to implementing a
program of social responsibility. After the company has gotten the
commitment of top executives, planned the program, and appointed a program
director, you suggest that a(n) be prepared periodically to evaluate the
success of the program.
A. research report
B. social audit
C. ethics evaluation
D. departmental memorandum
E. social actions report
18. What is the major source of human emissions of air pollution in the upper
atmosphere?
A. Aircraft
B. Automobiles
C. Acid rain
D. Volcanoes
E. Factories
19. Which of the following is not one of the steps in developing and
implementing a program of social responsibility?
A. planning
B. the social audit
C. commitment of employees
D. appointment of a director
E. commitment of top executives
20. What specific gas is internationally considered a top concern for air
pollution?
A. carbon monoxide
B. nitrogen dioxide
C. carbon dioxide
D. greenhouse gas
E. hydrogen monoxide
22. Which type of pollution has seen the least improvement since
environmental issues became important?
A. Land
B. Air
C. Ocean
D. Water
E. Factory
"Being a CEO still means sitting across the table from big institutional investors and
showing your leadership and having them believe in you." - Christie Hefner
INTRODUCTION
These investors are entitled to vote on their shareholdings. With the right,
institutional investors can play an active role in corporate governance. And, with their
significant holdings and war chest at their disposal, their power to make a "to buy" or
"to sell" order of the shares in the investee corporation will certainly exert influence
on the way the investee treats the institutional investor and how it conducts its
business.
Hedge Fund
● Investment Banking
● Investment Trust
Investment trust refers to Investors' money being pooled together from the
sale of a fixed number of shares a trust issues in its first offering. The board will
normally hand over responsibility to a professional fund manager to invest this
money in the stocks and shares of a wide range of companies. This is typical
investment endeavor where the entity's money is invested in several placements
more than most people could realistically invest in themselves. The investment trust
often has no employees, only a board of directors comprising only non-executive
directors. In recent years, this has started to change, especially with the emergence
of both private equity groups and commercial property trusts both of which every so
often use investment trusts as a holding company, this strategy is normally used to
increase the sources of funds, and consequently enlarge the pipeline of money for
wider investment coverage
● Mutual Fund
● Pension Fund
CROSS LISTING
Cross listing refers to listing of equity shares of a company in more than one
stock exchange in different countries. The term can also be used to refer to the
listing of a company on more than one stock exchange in the same country: for
example in the U.S., there are companies that are listed in both the NASDAQ and in
the New York Stock Exchange. Here in the Philippines, we only have one (fused
from the original Manila Stock Exchange and Makati Stock Exchange) stock
exchange which is the Philippine Stock Exchange Inc. (PSE). U.S. companies may
choose to cross-list their shares on different Asian or European stock exchanges as
a strategy to address U.S. dollar positioning against major and dominant global
currencies.
● To Improve Liquidity
By cross-listing company can improve the liquidity of its existing shares at the same
time, find and support a liquid secondary market for new equity issues in foreign
markets. Firms from countries with small illiquid capital markets often outgrow those
markets and are forced to raise new equity abroad. In order to maximize liquidity, the
firm ideally should cross-list and issue equity in more liquid markets in other
countries or regions. The idea still remain, the more source for investors' money, the
better for the company.
● To Increase Its Share Price
Create a secondary market for shares that can be used to compensate local
management and employees in foreign subsidiaries. For example, if a company has
foreign subsidiaries and wishes to use stock options and share purchase
compensation plans for local management and employees, cross listing should
reduce transaction and foreign exchange costs for the local beneficiaries.
MONITORING
GOOD ACTIVIST
DETERRENT TO OPPORTUNISM
There are a lot of challenges to consider when one engages in activities for
purposes of deterring opportunism. One needs something to counter self-interested
behavior of the agents. One of the best antidote to opportunism is to have a voice in
the board. In corporate world, the level of audibility of the investor's voice may be
directly proportionate to the level of investment he is representing. Institutional
investor's representative to the board will serve as watchdog. Opportunistic attitudes
of the other members of the board will therefore be in-check.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ORGANIZATIONS
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession. It works with
its 159 members and associates in 124 countries and jurisdictions to protect the
public interest by encouraging high quality practices by the world's accountants.
IFAC members and associates, which are primarily national professional
accountancy bodies, represent 2.5 million accountants employed in public practice,
industry and commerce, government and academe.
The organization works to fulfill this mandate by carrying out three key functions:
1. It functions as a forum for inter-governmental deliberations, supported by
discussions with experts and exchanges of experience, aimed at consensus
building.
2. It undertakes research policy analysis and data collection for the debates of
government representatives and experts.
3. It provides technical assistance tailored to the specific requirements of
developing countries, with special attention to the needs of the least
developed countries and of economies in transition. When appropriate,
UNCTAD cooperates with other organizations and donor countries in the
delivery of technical assistance.
The rapid growth in the number of IPAS reflects the growing importance that
governments ascribe to investment promotion. Centralizing foreign investment
promotion and facilitation activities, such as information dissemination and policy
advocacy, within a single agency can be more cost effective and provides an
opportunity to present a coherent impression of a country's attractiveness to
investors. The growth in the number of IPAs also means that a rich body of
experience has been developed with respect to different approaches to investment
promotion agencies and across countries at different levels of development.
Countries that have recently established IPAS, or are contemplating doing so,
can use this experience to inform the design of the IPA following international good
practices. This approach helps to ensure the full effectiveness of the IPA and to
avoid repeating past mistakes.
Is the IPA adequately funded and is its performance in terms of attracting investment
regularly reviewed? What indicators have been established for monitoring the
performance of the agency?
Experience suggests that unless there is a full commitment to investment
promotion agencies by the government, they are less likely to succeed in attracting
new investors. They need to be adequately funded in order to attract and retain
qualified and motivated staff, ideally with private sector experience. Experience also
suggests that agencies with links to the center of government and with private sector
representation on the board have higher visibility and credibility and hence a better
record in attracting foreign investment. They are also more dynamic and adaptable
to changing economic circumstances, a critical issue for countries undergoing major
economic transformation.
Long delays and costly procedures to establish a new business entity is one
of the obstacles to new investment and entrepreneurial activity. Many governments
have introduced reforms to quicken and simplify the process of starting a new
business. One common approach to this challenge has been the establishment of a
'one-stop shop'. These allow investors to access information on the necessary steps
to start or expand a business and provide services to speed up the granting of
necessary permits and licenses. 'One-stop shops' also provide easy access to other
information that helps to facilitate investment, both domestic and foreign, for
instance, on legal and regulatory matters, on financing options, location choice, or
recruitment and training. 'One-stop shops' make it easier for the government to
centralize the quality provision of these services. This can deliver substantial savings
in time and cost to potential and existing investors, thereby facilitating new
investment.
To what extent does the IPA promote and maintain dialogue mechanisms with
investors? Does the government consult with the IPA on matters having an impact
on investment?
What mechanisms has the government established for the evaluation of the costs
and benefits of investment incentives, their appropriate duration, their transparency,
and their impact on the economic interests of other countries?
The use of financial and other incentives to attract foreign investors is not a
substitute for pursuing policy measures that create a sound investment environment,
for domestic and foreign investors alike. In the absence of a solid investment
environment, competition among countries for FDI may lead to no overall increase in
investment and divert public resources away from more productive uses. In some
circumstances, however, incentives may complement an already attractive enabling
environment for investment or serve as a partial rectification for market imperfections
that cannot be addressed by direct policy reforms. Nonetheless, authorities engaging
in incentive-based strategies to attract investment must periodically valuate their
relevance, appropriateness and economic benefits against their budgetary and other
costs, including long-term impacts on resource allocation. In doing so, authorities
also need to consider their commitments under international agreements, since
investment incentives can have effects beyond the countries that offer them,
including bidding contests leading to a waste of resources. Many governments,
including all OECD member countries, consider that it is inappropriate to encourage
investment by lowering health, safety or environmental standards or relaxing core
labor standards.
What steps has the government taken to promote investment linkages between
businesses, especially between foreign affiliates and local enterprises? What
measures has the government put in place to address the specific investment
obstacles faced by SMEs?
Has the government made use of international and regional initiatives aimed at
building investment promotion expertise, such as those offered by the World Bank
and other intergovernmental organizations? Has the IPA joined regional and
international networks?
Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides for checks and balances that were not available
in the past. Whistleblowers will now have greater protection of the law as well as the
opportunity to report fraud in their companies. Similarly, the auditors of companies
have to report to the independent audit committees.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The SEC is also rapidly moving towards real time disclosures so that each
investor has prompt access to information, under Section 409 that will have a
material impact on the company. The filing deadlines for quarterly and annual reports
have been accelerated by a third. The SEC has also identified items that need to be
disclosed in real time.
FRAUD
GOVERNANCE POLICIES
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION COMMITTEES
AUDIT COMMITTEES
SARBANES-OXLEY: IS IT PERFORMING?
According to widely quoted figures from Foley and Lardner, the SOX
compliance cost for companies with sales turnover of less than one billion dollars,
the SOX compliance cost was about $2.86 billion in financial year 2003 up from
$2.12 billion in financial year 2002 and the corresponding figures for companies with
revenues in excess of $1 billion is $7.4 billion. The major components of costs were
directors and officers insurance, lost productivity and accounting.
Figures have been presented in a variety of ways depending on how they are
collected. Other sources such as Parson Consulting indicate that 50% or more of
overall corporate governance cost revolves around process improvement, controls
documentation, testing, SOX compliance software procurement and adapting
controls to changing needs.
The conceptual breakthrough that under girds the new approach to risk
management is the realization that business risks, financial risk and operational risk
feed on each other and compound the impact of any one type of shock to a
company. Operational risk, such as fraud in the company, can create a liquidity crisis
for the company. Similarly, business risk, such as loss of intellectual property from
outsourcing of business processes overseas, could lead to bankruptcy of a company.
The vulnerability of companies has increased with the growing reliance on
sophisticated financial instruments, an extended enterprise and information
technologies. Increasingly, companies realize that they need to create a culture in
which employees at all levels. respond to unnoticed sources of risk in any corner of
the enterprise and communicate it to the rest of the organization. This is facilitated by
enterprise risk dashboards which help to communicate potential threats to the
company and galvanize organizations to react rapidly before a crisis goes out of
control.
processes that affect its balance sheet and income statement. That evaluation is
helping the company uncover latent risk across all its five divisions. TriQuint's
combined Sarbanes Oxley and ERM efforts have helped it to gain insight into risks in
the businesses it acquires. Typically, mergers fail when the cultures of two different
companies clash. TriQuint has made several acquisitions in recent years, and some
of those businesses have operations outside the United States. The company has
been able to identify and discuss the risks new acquisitions face, including
exposures related to specific cultural and regulatory environments.
With the goal of optimizing returns for targeted levels of risk, as well as for
prudential regulation, institutional investors diversify investments into large portfolios,
many of them having investments in thousands of companies. Some managers
pursue active investment strategies, but increasingly, they passively manage against
a benchmark, resorting to indexing. At the same time, the investment chain has
lengthened by outsourcing of management, further distancing investee companies
from the beneficial owners. As a result, incentives do not always stimulate
institutional investors to engage in monitoring the corporate governance practices of
investee companies.
Unlike in the case of private equity and hedge funds, most institutional
investors are not remunerated on the basis of the performance of portfolio
companies, but on the basis of the volume of assets under management. Moreover,
fund performance against a benchmark is reviewed often by investors on the basis of
mandates not exceeding three years. Taken together, these factors favor a focus on
increasing the size of assets under management and on investing them in indices,
rather than on improving the performance of portfolio companies. Incentives for
churning of assets and strong conflicts of interest add to those factors and create a
challenging context for the notion of institutional shareholder engagement and their
promotion of better governance practices. The costs of monitoring a large number of
companies are significant, while the benefits are shared with all shareholders,
creating a free rider problem. This often leads to sub-optimal monitoring and analyst
coverage of companies unless collective action is achieved.
A key problem identified is that domestic investors do not vote their foreign
equity. Another relevant aspect deals with whether institutional investors are
becoming increasingly short-term investors or at least promoting short-term thinking
by investee companies. Pension funds, especially defined-benefit schemes should
be able to make long term investment to match liabilities to their beneficiaries that
stretch over many years. But a number of large institutional investors are not acting
in this way.
The nature of institutional investors has evidently evolved over the years into
a complex system of financial institutions and fund management companies with
their own corporate governance issues and incentive structures. A great deal can be
done both by private agents and policy makers to improve the corporate governance
outcomes of institutional investors' behavior. In the private sector, enhancing
collaboration among institutional investors, as by establishing industry associations
to share the costs of monitoring and voting have shown positive results. On the
public policy side, prudential regulations sometimes excessively limit holdings by
institutional investors in individual companies and restrictions on incentive schemes
may also change their behavior in an unintended manner. Given the right set of
conditions, institutional investors can play an important role both in jurisdictions
characterized by dispersed or concentrated ownership, their role facilitated by private
and/or public policy action.
However, the forces driving the actions of institutional investors are different
from many other shareholders being determined by a unique set of costs, benefits
and objectives. In addition, the funds management industry that does not invest in its
own name is also highly significant. An explicit policy goal is to further the
development of institutional investors via, for instance, pension funds so as to foster
domestic capital markets. However, in other areas the institutions are seen as a
weak link in the company landscape related to short terms and to the pursuit of
political ends. Thus, some see them as already too powerful and their effects
possibly pernicious. Others by contrast, see them as not being robust enough in
promoting good corporate governance and corporate accountability. Not all the
arguments relate to good corporate governance per se but to their potential for
underpinning growth and development, and addressing other issues such as
environmental and social goals. However, there is a close relationship between good
corporate governance that promotes company performance and accountability, and
addressing these broader issues.
With the goal of optimizing returns for targeted levels of risk, institutional
investors pursue a range of portfolio diversification strategies, which in some cases
have led to highly diversified portfolios, many of them having investments in several
thousand companies. Though many managers pursue active investment strategies
and use benchmarks for the purpose of assessing performance, some investors
seek portfolios that are passively managed against a benchmark, in which case
managers typically must purchase all the equities in the share index (e.g. S&P 500).
The level of diversification can therefore be extreme. With the emergence of a broad
universe of professional investment managers and increasing access to information,
active strategies, on average, do not significantly outperform the market on a
net-of-fees basis. At the same time, and investors have increasingly channeled funds
into lower cost, passive diversification funds. This trend towards passive
diversification may not be conducive to the promotion of good corporate governance.
Institutional investors acting as agents for ultimate beneficiaries are very often
not directly remunerated on the basis of the performance of portfolio companies
whether based on company performance or better corporate governance practices.
The exception is certain private equity and hedge funds where performance
incentives are powerful, often 20% of fund performance. Rather, they are
remunerated often on the basis of management fees based on the volume of assets
under management. In the US, performance-based fees are generally not allowed
for mutual funds unless the fee also penalizes the manager for poor performance
(i.e. a fulcrum fee). Moreover, fund performance (either absolute or relative) is
reviewed often by investors and mandates usually last only around three years.
Taken together, the incentive structure often favor a focus on increasing the size of
assets under management, not necessarily bad but also not necessarily an incentive
to improve performance of portfolio companies, The incentive structure might also
contribute to churning of assets (i.e. buying and selling often) where it is possible to
increase the commissions from transactions. Indeed, a number of institutional
investors often exceed their own announced turnover targets. Average holding
periods have declined around the world to under one year on average although a
great deal of the decline might be due to the rising importance of high frequency
traders, another asset class. In addition, the incentive structures influencing many
institutional investors and fund managers are influenced by conflicts of interest
including their own ownership by banks and insurance companies, their relationship
to company sponsors of pension plans and the fact that they may control many funds
that can trade between themselves. Such incentives might work to the disfavor of
investors.
The principles that cover institutional investors are focused on "bread and
butter" corporate governance issues such as voting at company meetings, the
nomination and election of board members and to making their views known on
remuneration policy. They support acting in cooperation which might take matters
much further by underpinning more engagement, while leaving open the concept of
long and short-term.
In sum, the nature of institutional investors has evolved over the years into a
complex system of financial institutions and fund management companies with their
own corporate governance issues and incentive structures. Investment chains have
lengthened, increasing the number of institutions between the final beneficiary and
an investment in an enterprise. At each point, the incentive system might not lead to
good corporate governance outcomes. Investment strategies have also evolved with
passive investing through indices and exchange traded funds becoming more
important so as to lower costs and increase returns to beneficiaries. Against this
background, the old question of investor oversight of company boards needs to be
examined. With respect to the exercise by institutions of their voting rights, turnout at
company meetings has increased in recent years and there are dedicated corporate
governance investors. However, cross-border voting remains costly and uncertain.
Whether all these developments are sufficient to improve corporate governance
outcomes or whether they are just going in the right direction is an open question,
but a great deal depends on expectations. If the expectation is that institutional
investors act as stewards of companies, then progress might have been limited.
CHAPTER 8 ACTIVITIES
True or False
TRUE 2. Hedge funds are open only to a narrow range of professional or wealthy
investors who meet certain criteria set by watchdogs and regulators.
FALSE 3. External stakeholders are the board of directors, executives, and other
employees.
TRUE 4. The statutory granting of corporate existence may arise from general
purpose legislation or from a statute to create a specific corporation, which was the
only method prior to the 19th century.
FALSE 5. The growth in the number of IPAs also means that a rich body of
experience has not been developed with respect to different approaches to
investment promotion agencies and across countries at different levels of
development.
TRUE 8. The nature of institutional investors has evidently evolved over the years
into a complex system of financial institutions and fund management companies with
their own corporate governance issues and incentive structures.
TRUE 10. The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 seeks to lay ground for a culture of
proactive management of risks going beyond the reactive approach that has been
common to all industries.
Multiple Choice
a. business ethics
b. agency costs
C. corporate governance
d. constitution
a. diversification
b. cross listing
c. short selling
d. investment banking
a. SMEs
b. general professional partnerships
c. corporations
d. MNCs
a. dividends
b. hedge funds
c. ready-for-sale securities
d. money market placements
a. government
b. institutional investors
c. managers
d. securities traders
7. These are investor's money being pooled together from the sale of a fixed
number of shares a trust issues in its first offering.
a. investment trust
b. mutual fund
C. pension fund
d. IPO
8. A collection of assets forming part of a separate legal entity that came into
being from the contributions to a pension plan for the exclusive purpose of
financing pension plan benefits.
a. mutual fund
b. investment trust
C.pension fund
d. hedge fund
a. mutual fund
b. investment trust
C. pension fund
d. hedge fund
10. They are the representatives who can bring the voice of the members of
their respective institutions.
a. principal agent
b. Opportunists
c. good activists
d. institutional investors
11. The listing of equity shares of a company in one more than one stock
exchange in different countries
a. diversification
b. cross listing
c. short selling
d. investment banking
15. These are the board of directors, executives and other employees
a. External stakeholders
b. Internal stakeholders
c. Institutional investors
d. Other interested parties
CHAPTER 9
"Anything that makes your attempt to buy an asset more risky can have a material
effect on the amount of Investment we get. These days, we'd be lucky if we get lots
of foreign direct investment. We should not restrict it. We should make it easier.
-Nouriel Roubini
INTRODUCTION
Economic theory suggests that foreign direct investment (FDI) can generate
positive spillovers to domestic firms in the host country. Since multinational
corporations MNCs) are an important source of international capital and technology,
their entry can ( facilitate the transfer of technical and business know-how resulting
in productivity gains and competitiveness among local firms. These spillover effects
develop through best practices demonstration and diffusion, or through the creation
of linkages with foreign and domestic firms becoming either suppliers or customers,
or through the movement of experienced workers from foreign to local firms. The
entry of MNCS may also increase competition and force domestic firms to imitate
and innovate
Domestic firms also benefit from spillovers and externalities associated with
FDI through exports and/or international integration (Costa and de Queiroz 2002).
MNCS have established global or regional production bases where domestic firms,
particularly small and medium enterprises, can participate by serving as potential
suppliers of outsourced parts or services. Participation in these networks can also
provide domestic firms access to export markets. Global/regional production
networks have increasingly grown in sectors such as automotive, machineries,
electronics and garments.
To attract FDI inflows and generate the positive spillover effects from the
essence of foreign firms, the Philippines liberalized its FDI policy and offered various
foreign investment incentive measures To date, however, there are only few studies
that examine the productivity spillovers to domestic firms. Most studies focus on the
impact of FDI on economic growth and on the determinants of FDI to the Philippines.
There are hardly any empirical studies that explicitly apply quantitative analysis in
evaluating whether FDI generates technology spillover from foreign to domestic
firms. Due to the paucity of FDI firm-level panel data, it is difficult to measure or
disentangle the contribution and different effects of FDI
Foreign direct investment (FDI) has grown steadily in volume and is a major
source of development finance. Recognizing that FDI can contribute to economic
development, all governments want to attract it. However, the experience has been
mixed.
Since the Bretton Woods Institutions and the United Nations system were
established, official development assistance (ODA) has grown steadily and played a
lead role as a source of external capital for economic growth and development of
less developed countries around the world (Amerasinghe & Espejo 2006). However,
since the early 1980s, private capital flows, particularly foreign direct investment
(FDI), have grown at a phenomenal rate. FDI has become an important source of
private external finance for developing countries. It is different from other major types
of external private flows in that it is motivated largely by investors' long-term
prospects of making profits from production activities that they control. Foreign bank
lending and portfolio investment, in contrast, are invested in activities which are often
motivated by short-term profit considerations. These investments can be influenced
by a variety of factors (e.g. interest rates) and they are prone to herd behavior.
Increasing foreign investment can be one of the indicators that the host
country's than merely moving capital across borders; it has certain advantages to
both the host country and the investor Dunning (1980, 1988) argues that a firm's
foreign investment decisions are mainly influenced by firm and location specific
advantages. Open door economic policy (Singh A Jun 1975, Walder 1996), market
size (Lardy 1995; Milner & Pentecost 1996 Fittock & Edwards 1998), political stability
(Tesal 1994) and host countries macroeconomic policy, tax regime and regulatory
practices are considered as major determinants that attract FDI to developing
countries. FDI inflows generate jobs through new establishments and expanded
business and other economic activities, and indirectly increase competition within
domestic markets and facilitate the transfer of improved technology and
management techniques
For the investor, the potential benefits lie in penetrating a market, gaining
access to low-cost raw materials, diversifying business activity, reduction of cost in
production processes and defeating some of the disadvantages of exporting, such as
trade barriers and transport costs. FDI also enables companies to learn about the
host market and how to compete in it. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) own and
control operations abroad to benefit from diverse production location and
globalization of market
Internal factors in host countries are also important determinants. There are
elements of a host country that are considered location-related factors; First, there
are Ricardian type endowments, which mainly comprise natural resources, most
kinds of labor and proximity to markets. Second, there are environmental variables
that act as a function of political, economic, legal and infrastructural factors of a host
country
These factors play a crucial role in a firm's decision to enter a host country. There
are four types of FDI:
● Resource seeking (motivated by access to local, natural or human resources).
● Import substituting (substituting for exports to the local market).
● Export platform (a basis for exporting to a regional market).
● Rationalized or vertically disintegrated (locating each stage of production
according to local costs). A particular investment may be motivated by several
of the above factors simultaneously
In the last two decades, the Philippines has considerably liberalized its FDI
policies. Through the legislation of Republic Act 7042 or the Foreign Investment Act
(FIA) in June 1991, the country allowed foreign equity participation up to 100% in all
areas not specified in the Foreign Investment Negative List At the same time, the
Philippines pursued changes in its investment incentive schemes in order to
encourage FDI inflows
FDI PERFORMANCE
The 1980s witnessed fluctuating FDI inflows but with the liberalization efforts
in the early 1990s, steady increases in FDI inflows were registered from 1991 to
1994 Although substantial declines were observed in 2001 and 2003, some recovery
was felt as FDI increased from 2004 to 2007. In terms of FDI sectoral distribution, a
structural shift seems to be taking place as inflows to the manufacturing sector
slowed down while inflows to the services sector particularly finance and
telecommunications continued to rise
Within manufacturing, FDI inflows have been dominated by the food and
beverage sector with a share of 12.7% from 2000 to 2007. The share of chemicals
and chemical products fell to 4.2 % in the 2000s from 12.2% in the 1980s Coke,
refined petroleum and other fuel products also dropped to only 3.3% in the 2000s
from 9% in the 1990s. Similarly, FDI inflows in machinery, apparatus and supplies fell
to 2% from a share of 9% in the 1990s. There is also a decline in the share of
transport equipment from 3.7% in the 1980s to 2.6% in the 2000s. Only paper and
paper products witnessed an increase from 0.31% in the 1990s to 1.25 % in the
2000s
In terms of FDI sources, the US was the country's largest source of FDI
inflows up to the 1980s. However, its share dropped from 56% in the 1980s to only
13% in the 1990 and 2000 US dominance has been substantially diluted by the
increasing presence of Japan, Netherlands, UK and Singapore, Japan's share
increased from 13% in the 1980s to 24% in the 1990s, although this fell to 18% in
the 2000s.
While the investment policy reforms and opening up of more sectors to foreign
on investors in the past decade resulted in improvements in FDI inflows to the
country, the overall, FDI inflows to the Philippines have been limited and the
country's FDI performance has lagged behind its neighbors in East and Southeast
Asia Compared with FDI inflows to the ASEAN countries, the Philippines received
the lowest level of FDI inflows particularly in the 1990s and the 2000s. In terms of
cumulative FDI inflows, for instance, Vietnam's total soared to US$40 billion while
the Philippines barely increased at US$18.96 billion in 2007
The following are some of the major factors that influence firms to decisi
locate their investment in any particular developing country:
GOVERNANCE
INFRASTRUCTURE
The better the infrastructure of the host economy, the more attractive it is to
foreign investors. For example, the quality of transport and communications system
can be estimated from expenditure on road transport (Hill and Munday, 1991), Ernst
and Young identified the following infrastructure factors as important in attracting
FDI. These include.
● Good base of related and supporting industries like suppliers, sub contractors,
university research center, business services and raw materials,
● Good transport facilities, roads as well as port system for both sea and air.
● Low cost and availability of utilities such telecommunications, energy and
water.
● Environmental regulations and procedures. Availability of sites and premises.
MACROECONOMIC FACTORS
POLITICAL STABILITY
Business and political risks are credible determinants of FDI location variables
such as regulatory environment, inflation, incidence of violent or peaceful power
transitions and host country relationships with other countries are among the factors
identified
TECHNOLOGY FACTOR
PRIVATIZATION
PRO-PRIVATIZATION
Proponents of privatization believed that private entities can more efficiently deliver
goods and/or service than government due to free market rivalry. This is based on
the premise that government should be more on the regulatory aspect, that being, it
has no "business in business. Besides, government is not generally known as a
good provider of goods and services most especially in less-developed and
developing countries. In general, it is argued that over time privatization will lead to
lower prices, better quality, more options, lesser corruption, lesser red tape and
faster delivery of both goods and services
From the business economic standpoint, the argument for privatization is that,
the government has few incentives to make certain that they can run well the
enterprises they own. In a state-run business, for instance, there is difficulty in
determining how well it is being run considering that the absence of basis for
comparisons since most deals in state monopolies Another is that the government
administration do not have the fullest of technical competence in evaluating the
effectiveness and efficiency of diverse industries that government are engaging into
● Accountability
● Funds
● Dispersion of Resources
There are more tendencies that the resources, profits and incentives will be
dispersed and diversified in a highly privatized environment, this would give more
opportunities to more entities. Availability of investment to a good number of entities
will ignite the capital market, promotes activities, and adds more spin to the economy
in the process
● Corruption
● Tainted Purpose
● No More Subsidies
Efficiency can bring in profits. With profits, none or minimized subsidies will be
needed so taxpayers' money will be saved.
● Natural Monopolies
The existence of natural monopolies does not mean that these sectors must
be state-owned. Governments can enact anti-trust legislation and bodies to deal with
anti-competitive behaviors.
● Political Influence
● Profits
● Security
Governments have had the tendency to "bailout poorly run businesses, often
due to the sensitivity of job losses, when economically, it may be better to let the
business fold
ANTI-PRIVATIZATION
Those who oppose privatization argue the claims that governments are
ultimately accountable to the people so they have to make certain that the
enterprises they own are well managed. Nationalized enterprises run poorly will
cause government to lose public support and votes. Thus, democratic governments
do have an incentive to maximize efficiency in nationalized companies, due to the
pressure of future elections
Opponents of certain privatization believe certain parts of the social terrain
should remain closed to market forces in order to protect them from the
unpredictability and ruthlessness of the market (such as private prisons, basic health
care and basic education). Another view is that some of the utilities which
government provides benefit society at large and are indirect and difficult to measure
or unable to produce a profit, such as defense. Still another is that natural
monopolies are by definition not subject to competition and better administrated by
the state
Some would also point out that privatizing certain functions of government
might hamper coordination, and charge firms with specialized and limited capabilities
to perform functions which they are not suited for. In rebuilding a war torn nation's
infrastructure, for example, a private firm would, in order to provide security, either
have to hire security, which would be both necessarily limited and complicate their
functions, or coordinate with government, which, due to a lack of command structure
shared between firm and government, might be difficult. A government agency, on
the other hand, would have the entire military of a nation to draw upon for security,
whose chain of command is clearly defined.
● Accountability
The public does not have any control or oversight of private companies.
● Capital
● Concentration of Wealth
● Downsizing
● Goals
● Job Loss
● Natural Monopolies
● Political Influence
It is acknowledged by many studies that there are winners and losers with
privatization. Lack of transparency leading to state-owned assets being appropriated
at minuscule amounts by those with political connections, absence of regulatory
institutions, improper design and inadequate control of the privatization process
leading to asset stripping, are some of the major concerns.
● Profit
Private companies do not have any goal other than to maximize profits. A
private company will serve the needs of those who are most willing (and able) to pay,
as opposed to the needs of the majority, and are thus anti-democratic
INSOLVENCY REGIMES
INSOLVENCY
A business can be cash flow illiquid (or temporarily "insolvent") but "balance
sheet solvent if it holds fixed illiquid assets, particularly against short term debt that it
cannot be straight away realize when needed. Conversely, a business can have
negative net assets showing on its balance sheet but its cash flow is healthy by
reason of steady revenue streams that is able to serve debt obligations as they fall
due
Insolvency is commonly confused with bankruptcy. The two however, are not
entirely similar. The only similarity this two have is this two deals deal with troubled
debt. Insolvency is a state of being and bankruptcy is a matter of law. There has to
be bankruptcy proceedings in court and it the court that will be declared that and
entity is bankrupt. Companies can be insolvent but not legally bankrupt. Insolvency
can lead to bankruptcy, but the condition may also be a temporary insolvency and
fixable without legal protection from creditors.
CONSEQUENCE OF INSOLVENCY
The Philippine insolvency law which was enacted in 1909 has three (3)
principal subjects:
1. Suspension of payments
2. Voluntary insolvency
3. Involuntary insolvency
● Rehabilitative
● Distributive
On the other hand, it also considered distributive since the purpose of the
insolvency provision of the law is to effect an equitable distribution of properties
among the creditors and to benefit the debtor by discharging him of his obligation for
him to have a new start
REHABILITATION LAW (THE PROCESS)
● Stay Order
● Adequate Protection
The stay concept is not an absolute rule. During the effectivity of the stay
order, creditors may seek relief from its effects. In this regard, the rehabilitation rules
will adopt the concept of adequate protection. A secured creditor, for example, may
ask relief from the stay order if he lacks adequate protection. A creditor is considered
as lacking adequate protection if it can be shown that
1. the debtor is not honoring a pre-existing agreement to keep the property
insured,
2. the debtor is failing to take commercially reasonable steps to maintain the
property, or
3. the depreciation of the property is increasing to the extent that the creditor
becomes under-secured.
Upon showing of lack of adequate protection, the court shall take steps to
protect the creditor's interest such as ordering the rehabilitation receiver to make
payments or give a replacement security. The court, may, however, refuse to give the
creditor this relief if it would prevent the continuation of the debtor as a going
concern or otherwise prevent the approval and implementation of the rehabilitation
plan.
● Rehabilitation Receiver
The rehabilitation rule adopt the "equality is equity principle prescribed by the
Supreme Court for rehabilitation cases. This principle basically states that once a
company goes under rehabilitation, all creditors, whether secured or unsecured,
should be placed on equal footing. Consequently, unlike SEC Rules on Corporate
Recovery, The rehabilitation rules do not classify creditors into secured and
unsecured creditors. Neither do they give creditors the right to vote against the
rehabilitation of the debtor. What the rehabilitation rules grant or give the creditors is
the right to oppose or comment on the petition and rehabilitation plan. The court,
may, however, approve the rehabilitation plan even over the objection of the majority
of the creditors if, in its judgment, the rehabilitation of the debtor is feasible and the
opposition of the creditor is manifestly unreasonable.
● Cram Down
There are several proposed laws now pending with the Philippines Congress
to date the antiquated insolvency law regime. The proposed Corporate Recovery
Act. which has been renamed the Corporate Recovery and Insolvency Act ("CRIA"),
contains the usual provisions of a modern bankruptcy statute. It generally follows the
world's best insolvency practices. There are provisions on voluntary and involuntary
initiation of proceedings, effect of commencement of proceedings, duration of stay
order and adequate protection. The proposed legislation also deals with
administrative expenses, sament of post commencement interest, rescission of
pre-commencement mansactions, new money and cram down. The CRIA also takes
into consideration existing local context such as the effect of a stay order on
government financial institutions which enjoy special protection under Philippine law
Unlike the rehabilitation rules, the CRIA provides for a classification of creditors and
grants them separate voting rights. It even addresses the interplay between good
corporate governance and insolvency. In response to bankruptcies with international
repercussions, the CRIA contains provisions on cross border insolvency
Unlike the Insolvency Act and the Rehabilitation Law, the proposed Corporate
Recovery Act expressly categories different forms of debt relief available to a
corporate debtor in financial distress. They are as follows:
● Suspension of Payments
This is the default relief under the proposed legislation. A debtor is limited to
this remedy, unless (a) it has initiated a pre-negotiated rehabilitation proceeding: (b)
the debtor is a non-stock corporation or partnership; and (c) a majority of the
creditors have requested conversion of the proceeding to court-supervised
rehabilitation proceeding
This remedy involves the transfer of the assets of the debtor into a new
company which will be owned by creditors of the debtor in exchange for their credit.
The objective is to continue the old business under a new corporation with minimum
or no debts at all. This involves quite an intricate procedure. Involved in the process
is the setting up of a new company that will initially be fully-owned by the old debtor
in exchange for its assets, issuance of bonds, auctioning off of the shares of the new
company to the creditors of the debtor company in exchange for their credit and the
eventual ownership of the new company by the creditors of the debtor
This relief has encountered a lot of criticism as statutory relief. It will most
likely be deleted as a form of statutory relief, without prejudice to it being part of a
court supervised or pre-negotiated rehabilitation plan.
● Court-Supervised Rehabilitation
If support from all the voting creditor classes is not obtained, the court may
nevertheless approve the plan if evidence is shown that eighty percent of all the
voting creditors support it.
If the court approves the plan, it becomes binding on all creditors, even those
who voted against it. The proceeding is converted to liquidation is case of (a) late
submission of the plan, (b) the court's failure to approve the plan, or (c) the debtor's
breach of plan.
● Pre-Negotiated Rehabilitation
Experience in the Philippines has shown that the informal workout process or
out of court restructurings are quite common. This process, however, suffers from
the need of near unanimity among the creditors. Dissenting or "maverick" creditors
can frustrate the whole process. Accordingly, there is a need for accelerated court
approval of the restructuring agreement.
The pre-negotiated rehabilitation process allows for summary judicial
proceedings for debtors seeking ratification of a rehabilitation that was approved by a
majority of the creditors before the debtor sought relief from the court. It allows a
debtor to establish a comprehensive plan without needing to obtain unanimity, so
long as the minimal standards in the legislation are met, and a majority of the
creditors supports the plan. Once the court approves the plan, the pre-negotiated
plan is crammed down on non-participating or dissenting creditors. This relief,
therefore, combines the benefit of an accelerated court process and cram down
concept in insolvency law.
This is the final resort under the legislation. The proposed law calls for the
appointment of a liquidator and formulation of a liquidation plan. The provisions are
envisioned to ensure that the debtor's assets are sold quickly. It also seeks to amend
gosting legal provisions on preference of credits. For example, under the proposed
law, the proceeds from the sale of mortgaged properties are distributed to the
secured creditors. Proceeds remaining from such sales, and from sales of
non-mortgaged properties, are distributed as follows:
1. first, to meet unpaid administrative expenses,
2. second, to workers for back wages;
3. third, to the government for back taxes,
4. fourth, to all creditors not specifically mentioned; and
5. fifth, to creditors whose claims are subordinated by law or agreement.
It is hoped that the insolvency law of the Philippines will come to par with the
world's best insolvency law practices in the not-so-distant future (Adapted from the
Article: Recent Developments on Insolvency Laws and Business Rehabilitation in the
Philippines, by Francis Lim)
OPENNESS TO AND RESTRICTIONS UPON FOREIGN INVESTMENT
Philippine law generally treats foreign investors the same as their domestic
counterparts, with important exceptions outlined in the Foreign Investment Act
(detailed below). Corporations or partnerships must register with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) (http://www.sec.gov.ph) and sole proprietorships must
be registered with the Bureau of Trade Regulation and Consumer Protection
(BTRCP) in the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (http://www.dti.gov.ph).
Investors generally report that the Philippine bureaucracy is non-discriminatory but
slow to process these requirements. To streamline business registration process, the
GPH is implementing the Philippine Business Registry (PBR), a single, web-based
business registration system that integrates business registration processes now
handled by five government agencies.
The 1991 Foreign Investment Act (FIA) requires the GPH to publish the
Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL), which outlines sectors in which foreign
investment is restricted or limited The GPH is required by the FIA to update the FINL
every two years. The 9th FINL was published in October 2012 The broad scope of
the FINL contributes to the poor Philippine record in attracting foreign investment
particularly compared to its ASEAN counterparts. The FINL is comprised of two parts
Part A details sectors in which foreign equity participation is restricted by the
Constitution or laws. Part B lists areas in which foreign ownership is limited
(generally to 40 %) for reasons of national security, defense, public health, morals
and the protection of small and medium enterprises (SMES). There is no procedural
mechanism to request a waiver from the negative lists.
The 1987 Constitution prohibits foreign nationals from owning land in the
Philippines. The Investors' Lease Act of 1994 (ILA) allows foreign investors to lease
a contiguous parcel up to 1,000 hectares for 50 years, renewable once for 25
additional years. The 2003 Dual-Citizenship Act, which allows natural-born Filipinos
who became naturalized citizens of a foreign country to re-acquire Philippine
citizenship, gave Philippine dual citizens full rights to possess land. Ownership
deeds continue to be difficult to establish and are poorly reported and regulated. The
court system is slow to resolve land disputes.
In addition to the restrictions detailed in the FINL, firms with more than 40%
foreign equity that qualify for BOI incentives must divest to the 40% level within 30
years from registration date or within a longer period as determined by the BOI.
Foreign controlled companies that export 100% of production are exempt from this
requirement. Certain non-fuxury retail establishments must offer at least 30% of their
equity to the public within eight years from the start of operation.
In July 2012, President Benigno Aquino III issued an executive order closing
78 areas to new mining. The order imposes a moratorium on the new mining
agreements until the Philippine Congress defines a revenue-sharing scheme It
additionally confines small-scale mining to designated areas, requires the
government to review and renegotiate existing contracts, requires reserves to be
rewarded through a public bidding process, provides state ownership of mine wastes
upon the expiration of a contract, creates the Mining Industry Coordinating Council to
implement reforms, and bans the use of mercury in small-scale mining.
The BOT Law provides the legal framework for private sector participation in
large infrastructure projects: Franchises in public utilities-railways, urban rail mass
transit systems, electricity and water distribution, and telephone systems-may only
be awarded to enterprises with at least 60 % Philippine ownership While US firms
have won contracts under the law, mostly in the power generation sector, more
active foreign participation under BOT is often frustrated by legal and administrative
problems, including weaknesses in planning, tendering, and executing private sector
infrastructure projects: regulatory and legal challenges to collecting and/or increasing
tolls and fees; and lingering ambiguities about guarantees and other support
provided by the government.
The empirical analysis done by Prof. Rafaelita Aldaba and Prof. Fernando
Aldaba from the Philippine Institute for Developmental Studies (Nov. 2010) shows
that based on the full sample, productivity spillovers take place horizontally from
multinational corporations to domestic firms within the same industry at the five-digit
level. There is no evidence that productivity or employment spillovers take place
between foreign and domestic firms either through backward linkages (where
domestic firms supply intermediate inputs to foreign firms) or through forward
linkages (where foreign firms supply intermediate inputs to domestic firms). Though
these results may be attributed partly to the data aggregation and other limitations of
the dataset, these are consistent with the present condition of the manufacturing
industry characterized by the weakness of forward and backward linkages between
firms. Given these limited linkages between domestic firms and MNCS, it would be
difficult for productivity spillovers from foreign affiliates to take place through forward
or backward linkages channels
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
The experience of the Philippines shows that FDI spillover effects are not
automatically generated opening up the economy to FDI has contributed to the
country's exports of high technology products and overall economic growth However,
the spillover effects of FDI to domestic firms has remained limited due to the
domestic firms' weak competitiveness and inability to absorb the technology or
knowledge being transferred This implies that for spillovers to take place, the
absorptive capacity of domestic firms must be strengthened
To deepen the firm linkages within the economy, the development of domestic
parts and suppliers would be crucial. With the increasing regional economic
integration in East and Southeast Asia, potential opportunities could arise from the
growth of regional production networks where domestic parts and supplier firms
could act as subcontractors of outsourced parts and components. To improve the
competitiveness of domestic parts and suppliers and strengthen their linkages with
foreign affiliates, the government needs to adopt a more comprehensive approach
that would combine industrial policy to improve and develop domestic parts and
supplier firms with measures to create an environment conducive to the creation and
expansion of FDI-related spillovers as well as increase participation in higher
segments of industry value chain. The following policies are suggested:
For the Philippines to move up the technology scale, design and development
als and technological capabilities must be improved. Industrial upgrading would
necessitate a strong base of domestic knowledge. This would require the
development of specialized skills and technological capabilities, particularly in
electronics and auto parts,
In the country, the lack of access to financing has severely constrained the
growth of SMEs. Private banks were able to overcome these challenges by providing
assistance in preparing accounting records, business advice, and simplifying loan
documentation and tailor fitting loans to match the borrower's cash flow
Good infrastructure and logistics that lower production cost and facilitate the
easy supply chain management from the procurement of inputs to the export of
outputs are important for the operations of production networks. The government
must continue to pursue policies to lower power and communication costs, provide
sufficient port systems, reduce travel time, and offer travel and shipment options. To
improve the country's investment climate, it is important that the government
immediately focus not only on inadequate infrastructure but also on the country's low
institutional quality, corruption and inefficient bureaucracy that continue to constrain
doing business in the country.
Strengthen the capacity of the staff and provide adequate resources for the
effective implementation of the programs to be designed to improve industry
competitiveness and linkages between domestic firms and MNCs
The Central Bank has worked since 2007 to relax and streamline the
Philippine foreign exchange (forex) regulatory framework. There are no restrictions
on the full and immediate transfer of funds associated with foreign investments,
foreign debt servicing. or payment of royalties, lease payments and similar fees.
Philippine law allows for expropriation of private property for public use or in
the interest of national welfare or defense. In such cases, the Philippine government
offers compensation for the affected property. In the event of expropriation, foreign
investors have the right under Philippine law to remit sums received as
compensation in the currency in which the investment was originally made and at the
exchange rate at the time of remittance. However, agreeing on a
mutually-acceptable price can be a protracted process.
● Dispute Settlement
Many foreign investors describe the inefficiency and uncertainty of the judicial
system as a significant disincentive for investment. Investment disputes can take
years to resolve. While the judiciary is constitutionally independent of the executive
and legislative branches, it faces many problems including understaffing and
corruption. In addition, a number of Philippine government actions in recent years
have raised questions over the sanctity of contracts in the Philippines. High-profile
cases include the government-initiated review and renegotiation of contracts with
independent power producers, court decisions voiding disadvantageous and
allegedly tainted BOT agreements, and challenges to foreign participation in
large-scale natural resource exploration activities. The GPH has received foreign
donor support for judicial reform projects through the Asian Development Bank, the
World Bank and USAID,
● Performance Requirements
Performance requirements are established by the BOI for investors who are
granted incentives and are usually based on the approved project proposal. BOI
registered companies provide a projected yearly production schedule and export
performance targets Registered projects must maintain at least 25% of total project
cost in the form of equity and comply with the 25% local value-added sourcing
requirement. As of March 2010, foreign retailers are no longer subject to local
sourcing requirements.
The Government Procurement Reform Act does not cover projects under the
BOT Law, which allows investors in qualifying projects to engage the services of
Philippine and/or foreign firms for the construction of infrastructure projects.
Procurement by government agencies and government-owned or controlled
corporations is subject to a countertrade requirement entailing the payment of at
least US$1 million in foreign currency Implementing regulations set the level of
countertrade obligations at a minimum of 50% of the import price and set penalties
for nonperformance of countertrade obligations
● Incentives
According to the Senate Tax Study and Research Office, there are about 180
fiscal incentives laws and issuances in the Philippines as of December 2012.
President Aquino has stated his support for fiscal incentives rationalization publicly
and listed fiscal incentives reform as a priority legislative measure. A number of bills
have been filed in the Philippine Congress but the scope and detail of reform remain
contentious.
Every year, the Investment Priorities Plan (IPP) outlines the list of investment
areas entitled to incentives
Export-oriented firms with at least 50% of their revenues derived from exports
may register for additional incentives under the Export Development Act of 1994.
Registered exporters may be eligible for both these and BOI incentives, provided the
exporters are registered according to BOI rules and regulations and the exporter
does not take advantage of the same or similar incentives twice. Specific export
incentives include a tax credit ranging from 2.5 % to 10 % of annual incremental
export revenue.
Philippine law recognizes the private right to acquire and dispose of property
or business interests, subject to foreign nationality caps specified in the Philippine
Constitution and other laws. The 1987 Constitution grants the government authority
to regulate competition and prohibit monopoly, but there is no implementing law. The
Aquino administration has prioritized the enactment of an anti-trust law. Congress is
considering several anti-trust bills In June 2011, President Aquino issued an
executive order designating the Department of Justice (DOJ) as the government's
competition authority until anti-trust legislation is passed.
The Intellectual Property (IP) code provides the legal framework for
intellectual property rights protection in the Philippines, especially in the key areas of
patents, trademarks, and copyright. The Electronic Commerce Act extends the legal
framework established by the IP Code to the Internet. Investor concern include
deficiencies in the IP Code and other IP Laws that have unclear provisions relating to
the rights of copyright owners over broadcast, rebroadcast, cable retransmission or
satellite retransmission of their works, and burdensome restrictions affecting
contracts to license software and other technology.
The Philippines has generally strong patent and trademark laws. Its first-to-file
patent system grants patents valid for 20 years from the date of filing. The holder of
a patent is guaranteed an additional right of exclusive importation of his invention.
The United States announced its Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) partnership
with the Philippines starting in January 2013. The PPH is a global program that
streamlines the examination process for patent applications filed in participating
countries. However, the Cheaper Medicines Act limits patent protection for
pharmaceuticals and significantly liberalizes the grounds for the compulsory
licensing of pharmaceuticals. The Philippine Intellectual Property Office. (IPOPHL)
(http://www.ipophil.gov.ph) reported it has not received any application for licensing
since the law passed in 2008.
Trademark law protects well-known marks, which do not need to be in actual
use or registered to be protected under the law, and prior use of a trademark in the
Philippines is not required to file a trademark application. In July 2012, the
Philippines acceded to the Madrid Protocol, an agreement that facilitates the
protection of trademarks in a large number of countries by obtaining an international
registration.
In the area of copyright law, legislation that would fully implement the World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright and Performances and
Phonograms treaties has been ratified by the Philippine Congress after being
pending for more than a decade. Once enacted, a copyright bureau will be created
under the IPOPHL to handle copyright matters. Philippine law also protects computer
software as literary work, and exclusive rental rights may be offered in several
categories of works and sound recordings. Terms of protection for sound recordings,
audiovisual works, newspapers, and periodicals are compatible with the Agreement
on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Further, the
enactment of the Anti-Camcording Act in 2010 provided stringent penalties for illegal
camcording of motion pictures in theaters. The Act has reportedly helped to
significantly reduce unlawful camcording incidents in the Philippines.
The IP Code also recognizes industrial designs, performers' rights, and trade
secrets. The registration of a qualifying industrial design is for a period of five years
and may be renewed for two consecutive five-year periods. While Philippine law
recognizes performers' rights for 50 years after death, the exercise of exclusive
rights for copyright owners over broadcast and retransmission is ambiguous. While
there are no codified rules on the protection of trade secrets, Philippine officials
assert that existing civil and criminal statutes protec secrets and confidential
information. Other important laws defining intellectual property rights are the Plant
Variety Protection Act, which provides plant breeders intellectual property rights
consistent with the 1991 Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
Convention, and the Integrated Circuit Act, providing WTO-consistent protection for
the layout designs of integrated circuits.
There are less than 260 listed firms and the ten most actively-traded
companies account for nearly 40% of trading value and about 35% of domestic
market capitalization. To encourage publicly-listed companies to widen their investor
base, the PSE introduced reforms in 2006 to include trading activity and free float
criteria in the selection of companies comprising the stock exchange index. The 30
companies included in the benchmark index are subject to review every six months.
In November 2010, the PSE reinstated a policy for listed companies to maintain at
least 10% public ownership of their issued and outstanding shares to promote
greater market liquidity and fairer and more transparent stock pricing. Listed firms
were given up to the end of 2012 to comply with the minimum public float rule or face
de-listing/suspension and higher taxes.
Hostile takeovers are not common because most companies' shares are not
publicly listed and controlling interest tends to remain with a small group of parties.
Cross ownership and interlocking directorates among listed companies also lessen
the likelihood of hostile takeovers.
● Banking
The General Banking Law of 2000 paved the way for the Philippine banking
system to phase in internationally accepted, risk-based capital adequacy standards.
Since 2011, the Central Bank has broadly revised its risk-based capital framework in
step with adjustments in the Basel capital adequacy rules. In July 2007, the
Philippines adopted the Basel 2 capital adequacy framework for commercial banks
and their bank/quasi-bank subsidiaries, expanding coverage from credit and market
risks to include operational risks and enhancing the risk-weighting framework and
disclosure of capital adequacy and risk management systems. The Central Bank
began the staggered adoption of Basel 3 capital adequacy rules for commercial
banks in January 2011. Full implementation is scheduled for January 2014-four
years ahead of the timeline provided by the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision.
Thrift, rural, and cooperative banks that are not subsidiaries of commercial
banks are covered by a modified, risk-based capital framework consisting of Basel 1
with some elements of Basel 2, such as new capital adequacy requirements for
operational risks and enhanced disclosure.
Credit is generally granted on market terms and foreign firms are able to
obtain credit from the domestic market. However, some laws require financial
institutions to set aside loans for certain preferred sectors, which may translate into
increased costs and/or credit risks. Banks must set aside 25% of loanable funds for
agricultural credit, with at least 10% earmarked for agrarian reform programs and
beneficiaries. In early 2010, a new law tightened alternative modes of
compliance-which used to include low-cost housing, educational, and medical
developmental loans-to those directly targeting the agricultural sectors. Recent
investor experience with "agri-agra" eligible bonds raise questions about implied
guarantees by the Philippine government and investors are cautioned to exercise
due diligence.
Banks are also required to set aside 10% of their loans for micro-, small- and
medium-sized (MSME) borrowers, 80% of which should be earmarked for micro and
small enterprises. While most domestic banks are able to comply with these
mandatory lending requirements, operating and branching restrictions make it more
difficult for foreign bank branches to comply. To help incentivize lending to MSMEs
with limited or non-existing collateral to guarantee their lending, the Philippine
government seeks to enhance MSME access to finance through the Central Credit
Information Corporation (CCIC). It would operationalize a system that collects and
disseminates fair and accurate information about the track record of borrowers, as
well as the credit activities of all entities participating in the financial system. The
legal and regulatory framework for a centralized credit information system is in place
but not yet operational. The Credit Information System Act was adopted in October
2008 (Republic Act No. 9510). The implementing rules and regulations were adopted
in May 2009.
Following the signing into law of the Exchange of Information Tax Matters Act
in March 2010, and the issuance of implementing rules and regulations in September
2010, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
upgraded the Philippines from its tax standards "blacklist" to the list of jurisdictions
that "have substantially implemented the internationally agreed tax standard" for the
exchange of information.
● Accounting Standards
A number of local accountancy firms are affiliated with the "Big Four"
international accounting firms, namely KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst &
Young, and Deloitte.
● Outward Investments
The government has also intervened to directly cap or control pricing in some
additional private markets. During heavy typhoons and flooding, the Philippine
government may impose temporary price controls on gasoline and a basket of basic
goods and services. Under Philippine law, the President may freeze prices on basic
goods and services for a period of 90 days under a state of emergency.
The Philippine government's privatization program is managed by the
Privatization Management Office under the DOF. Apart from restrictions under the
FINL, there are no regulations that discriminate against foreign buyers. The bidding
process appears to be transparent, though the Supreme Court has twice overturned
high-profile privatization transactions to foreign buyers. The Power Sector Assets
and Liabilities Management Corporation is required to sell 70% of the
government-owned National Power Corporation's (NPC) generating assets and to
transfer 70% of NPC-Independent Power Producer contracts to private companies.
The Philippine government has opened access and retail competition through
several measures, including unbundling rates, removing cross-subsidies,
establishing the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market and privatizing 92% of the NPC's
generation assets as of 2012.
● Political Violence
Terrorist groups and criminal gangs operate in some regions of the country.
The Department of State publishes a consular information sheet at
http://travel.state.gov and advises all Americans living in or visiting the Philippines to
review this information periodically. The Department strongly encourages visiting and
resident Americans in the Philippines to register with the Consular Section of the US
Embassy in Manila through http://travelregistration.state.gov, the State Department's
travel registration website.
The New People's Army (NPA), the military arm of the Communist Party of the
Philippines, is responsible for general civil disturbance through assassinations of
public officials, bombings, and other tactics. It frequently demands "revolutionary
taxes" from local and, at times, foreign businesses, and business people. To enforce
its demands, the NPA sometimes attacks infrastructure such as power facilities,
telecommunications towers, and bridges, mostly in Mindanao. The National
Democratic Front (NDF), an umbrella organization that includes the Communist
Party and its allies, has engaged in intermittent peace talks with the Philippine
government. The NDF has not targeted foreigners in recent years but could threaten
US citizens engaged in business or property management activities.
Terrorist groups, including the Abu Sayyaf Group and Jema'ah Islamiyah,
periodically attack civilian targets in Mindanao, kidnap civilians for ransom and
engage in armed skirmishes with the security forces.
● Corruption
The Philippines does not have a bilateral investment agreement with the
United States.
● Taxes/Bilateral Tax Treaty
The Philippines has a tax treaty with the United States for the purposes of
avoiding double taxation, providing procedures for resolving interpretative disputes,
and enforcing taxes of both countries. The treaty also encourages bilateral trade and
investments by allowing the exchange of capital, goods and services under clearly
defined tax rules and, in some cases, preferential tax rates or tax exemptions.
Pursuant to the most favored nation clause of the Philippine-United States tax
treaty, US recipients of royalty income qualify for the preferential rate provided in the
Philippine-United Arab Emirates tax treaty. Accordingly, a 10% tax rate applies with
respect to most royalties. A 15% tax applies on the remittance of profits by Philippine
branches of US companies to their head offices and dividends remitted by Philippine
subsidiaries of US companies to their parent companies.
There are issues about the application of the preferential tax treaty rates on
dividends, interests, and royalties paid or payable to US residents. An entity must
obtain a tax treaty relief ruling from the BIR to qualify for preferential tax treaty rates
and treatment. However, according to several tax lawyers, the requirements for tax
treaty relief applications are burdensome. Even stricter regulations issued in 2010
disqualifying late filings from availing of the preferential tax rates. The volume of tax
treaty relief applications also has resulted in processing delays, with most
applications reportedly pending for over a year. Some publicly-listed companies
reportedly have opted to withhold a final 30% withholding tax on dividend payments
to foreign investors rather than go through the tedious process of securing tax treaty
relief rulings for preferential tax rates.
The BIR appears to be altering its position on tax gains through liquidation.
Previously, it had consistently applied Philippine United States Tax Treaty provisions
exempting foreign companies from capital gains and corporate income tax on profit
from the redemption and sale of shares by Philippine affiliates/subsidiaries being
liquidated. However, a 2009 ruling involving a foreign company held that such gains
were subject to corporate income tax but not to capital gains tax. In another case,
the BIR ruled that the Bains were subject to tax on dividends. A number of
transactions involving partial liquidations through shares redemption reportedly are
on hold because of this unresolved issue. Tax lawyers maintain that any gains from
partial or full liquidation should be exempt under the Philippines-Unites States Tax
Treaty.
A recent BIR ruling also states that a liquidating company and its
shareholders are taxable upon distribution of residual assets, but the ruling does not
clarify which taxes apply to the liquidation company.
The BIR has issued rulings involving non-US investors asserting that the
stock transfer tax is an ad valorem transactional tax-different from the capital gains
tax-and therefore, applies on the sale of publicly-listed shares in the stock exchange.
These rulings contradicted previous exemptions from the stock transfer tax by virtue
of bilateral tax treaty provisions exempting foreign nationals from tax on capital
gains. This interpretation could complicate the processing and resolution of
applications by US and other foreign investors. milar tax treaty relief
● Labor
During the reporting period, the non-agricultural daily minimum wage in the
National Capital Region is P446 (approximately US$10.37), although some private
sector workers receive less. Cost of living allowances are given across the board.
Most other regions set their minimum wage significantly lower than Manila. The
lowest minimum wage rates were in the Southern Tagalog Region, where daily
agricultural wages were P199 (US$4.59). Regional Boards may grant various
exceptions to the minimum wage, depending on the type of industry and number of
employees at a given firm.
Literacy in both English and Filipino is relatively high, although there have
been concerns in the business and education communities that English proficiency
was on the decline. The Department of Education, under its National English
Proficiency Program, continues its efforts to strengthen English language training,
including school-based mentoring programs for public elementary and secondary
school teachers aimed at improving their English language skills.
The Philippine Constitution enshrines the right of workers to form and join
trade unions. The mainstream trade union movement recognizes that its members'
welfare is tied to the productivity of the economy and competitiveness of firms;
frequent plant closures have made many unions even more willing to accept
productivity-based employment packages. The trend among firms of using temporary
contract labor continues to grow. During the reporting period, DOLE reported one
strike involving 20 workers. The DOLE Secretary has the authority to end strikes and
mandate a settlement between the parties in cases involving the national interest,
which can include cases where companies face strong economic or competitive
pressures in their industries. In 2012, there were 135 registered labor federations
and 16,647 private sector unions. The 1.38 million union members represented
approximately 3.4% of the total workforce of 40.4 million. Mainstream union
federations typically enjoy good working relationships with employers.
Special economic zones or cozones often offer on-site labor centers to assist
investors with recruitment. These centers coordinate with DOLE and Social Security
Agency, and can offer services such as mediating labor disputes. Although labor
laws apply equally to ecozones, unions have noted some difficulty organizing inside
them.
There have been some reports of forced labor in connection with human
trafficking in the commercial sex, domestic service, agriculture, and fishing
industries.
The figures in Table 1 below refer to foreign direct investment (FDI) stock
reported by the Central Bank. Disaggregation of net FDI flows by country and by
industry is presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Table 4 provides a list of top
foreign investors in the Philippines, using the latest available published information
from the SEC. Some figures indicated in earlier Investment Climate Statement were
revised to reflect updated Central Bank data.
CHAPTER 9 ACTIVITIES
True or False
TRUE 1. The entry of MNC increases competition and force domestic firms to imitate
and/or innovate.
TRUE 2. Foreign direct investment has grown steadily in volume and is a major
source of development finance.
FALSE 3. Various investment incentive measures were granted through the different
investment regimes administered by the Board of Investments (BOI), Philippine
Economic Zone Authority (PEZA), Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA), Clark
Development Corporation (CDC) and other bodies not mandated by various laws to
establish, maintain, and manage special economic or free port zones.
TRUE 4. Compared with FDI inflows to the ASEAN countries, the Philippines
received the lowest level of FDI inflows particularly in the 1990s and the 2000s.
TRUE 6. The Philippines limits foreign ownership for reasons of national security,
defense, and public health.
FALSE 8. The 1987 Constitution allows foreign nationals from owning land in the
Philippines.
TRUE 9. Foreign ownership in the banking sector is restricted by the 1994 Foreign
Bank Liberalization Act.
Multiple Choice
1. Refers to the effect the presence of MNCs has on domestic firms in the
same sector.
a. institutional investing
b. SMES
c. FDIs
d. MNCs
4. Clark and Subic enterprises enjoy the same incentives available to PEZA
enterprises except for
a. direct importation.
b. repatriation of profit.
c. tax holiday.
d. tax free export.
6. Philippine law generally treats foreign investors in the same manner as their
domestic counterparts with important exceptions outlined in the
a. three years from the date of registration, extendable by BOI upon request.
b. four years from the date of registration, extendable by BOI upon request.
c. five years from the date of registration, extendable by BOI upon
request.
d. six years from the date of registration, extendable by BOI upon request.
8. The 1991 Foreign Investment Act (FIA) requires the GPH to publish the
Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL) which outlines sectors in which
foreign investment is
a. restricted or limited.
b. open to Filipino investors.
c. open to foreign corporations.
d. limited to Filipinos.
a. manufacturing.
b. oil exploration.
c. retail trade industry.
d. mining.
10. Vertical spillovers from FDI occur as a result of the interaction between
domestic and foreign firms that are not in the same industry.
Instructions
You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to 01:00PM to
answer the quiz provided. The access code will be sent at 11:29AM through a Canvas announcement.
The 60-minute time limit will begin to run as as soon as you input the access code after clicking
"Take the Quiz". This means that the time will continue to run even if you leave the quiz for whatever
reason.
1. This is an independent quiz; do not work with others. Taking photos/screenshots of the contents of
the quiz, disclosing information to other students regarding the contents of the quiz, or answering the
quiz on behalf of another person are considered cheating. Students who commit such acts will be
sanctioned in accordance with the HAU Student Handbook.
2. All answers will be submitted through the Canvas questions.
3. Choose the best answer from among the choices, and click "next" to proceed to the next item. Make
sure that you have chosen your final answer because once done with each item, you cannot go
back to the previous anymore. (No multiple attempts). Be mindful not to click "submit" unless you
are finished taking the quiz.
4. You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to
01:00PM . You were already informed by your instructor on the schedule of this departmental quiz,
so you should have a backup plan in case you will experience problems, such as power interruption
in your area or internet-related problems. Please be reminded that the time limit will begin to run
as as soon as you input the access code after clicking "Take the Quiz" even if you leave the
quiz page for whatever reason. If you experience any problems in taking the quiz, inform your
instructor IMMEDIATELY. Your instructor will have the discretion on what to do in case you will
encounter any problems in taking the quiz
5. Once answers have been submitted, changing of answers will NOT be allowed.
6. If you are unsure of some items or some instructions, you may ask your instructor for clarifications.
Attempt History
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 1/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 1 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 2 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 3 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 2/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Correct! True
False
Question 4 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 5 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 6 0 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 3/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
ou Answered False
Question 7 1 / 1 pts
There are a few challenges to consider when one engages in activities for
purposes of deterring opportunism.
True
Correct! False
Question 8 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 9 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 4/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 10 1 / 1 pts
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act seeks to lay the ground for a culture of reactive
management of risks going beyond the proactive approach that has been
common so far.
True
Correct! False
Question 11 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 12 1 / 1 pts
The corporations’ president, CEO, and CFO are not required to assume
management responsibility and accountability for financials statements.
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 5/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 13 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 14 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 15 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 6/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 16 1 / 1 pts
Question 17 1 / 1 pts
short selling
investment banking
cross listing
Correct! diversification
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 7/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 18 1 / 1 pts
IFAC
UNCTD
ADB
Correct! OECD
Question 19 1 / 1 pts
One of the reasons to not transfer state-owned assets into private hands
because the public does not have any control or oversight of private
companies
Correct! Accountability
Concentration of Wealth
Downsizing
Question 20 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 8/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
ICC
Correct! ICGN
ADB
OECD
Question 21 1 / 1 pts
One of the justifications for CSR which relates to minimizing the potential
adverse effect of CSR on local communities, environments, and markets
when it is imposed through international supply chains and investments.
Proactive
Directive
Correct! Defensive
Question 22 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 9/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Export Platform
Import substituting
Question 23 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
Certain parts of the social terrain should remain closed to the market
forces in order to protect them from the unpredictability and ruthlessness of
the market.
Privatization will lead to lower prices, better quality, more options, lesser
corruption, lesser red tape, and faster delivery of both goods and services.
Question 24 1 / 1 pts
One motive of cross listing where the company will have fresh source of
funds but also have an enhancement in the marketability of its shares
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 10/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Improve liquidity
Question 25 1 / 1 pts
Refers to the effect the presence of MNCs has on domestic firms in the
same sector
Cross listings
Institutional investing
Vertical spillover
Question 26 1 / 1 pts
Investment Trust
Investment Banking
Mutual Fund
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 11/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 27 1 / 1 pts
obtain credit
be heard
choose
Correct! be informed
Question 28 1 / 1 pts
Pension Fund
Hedge Fund
Investment Trust
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 12/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 29 1 / 1 pts
Question 30 1 / 1 pts
Western Banks
Question 31 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 13/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Which of the following is not one of the five distinctive roles for public
sector engagement with CSR?
Demonstration
Correct! Regularization
Facilitation
Question 32 1 / 1 pts
SMEs
MNCs
Correct! FDIs
Institutional Investing
Question 33 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 14/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Good Activist
Principal-Agent Role
Deterrent to Opportunism
Question 34 1 / 1 pts
Technology Factors
Political Stability
Infrastructure
Question 35 1 / 1 pts
Political Influence
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 15/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Dispersion of Resources
Corruption
Question 36 1 / 1 pts
Question 37 0 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 16/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 38 1 / 1 pts
Question 39 1 / 1 pts
Paper
Petroleum
Chemical
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 17/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 40 1 / 1 pts
One of the ways on how civil society groups ca effectively fight corruption
where they need to be prepared to take on governments in innovative and
sometimes confrontational ways
Question 41 1 / 1 pts
One of the ways on how corrupt practices of MNCS affect other countries
include the following, except
Increasing Debt
Question 42 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 18/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Supply Chains
Correct! Legality
Question 43 1 / 1 pts
Deterrent to Opportunism
Principal-Agent Role
Monitoring
Question 44 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 19/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
AFSLAI
SSS
GSIS
Question 45 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 20/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Instructions
You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to 01:00PM to
answer the quiz provided. The access code will be sent at 11:29AM through a Canvas announcement.
The 60-minute time limit will begin to run as as soon as you input the access code after clicking
"Take the Quiz". This means that the time will continue to run even if you leave the quiz for whatever
reason.
1. This is an independent quiz; do not work with others. Taking photos/screenshots of the contents of
the quiz, disclosing information to other students regarding the contents of the quiz, or answering the
quiz on behalf of another person are considered cheating. Students who commit such acts will be
sanctioned in accordance with the HAU Student Handbook.
2. All answers will be submitted through the Canvas questions.
3. Choose the best answer from among the choices, and click "next" to proceed to the next item. Make
sure that you have chosen your final answer because once done with each item, you cannot go
back to the previous anymore. (No multiple attempts). Be mindful not to click "submit" unless you
are finished taking the quiz.
4. You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to
01:00PM . You were already informed by your instructor on the schedule of this departmental quiz,
so you should have a backup plan in case you will experience problems, such as power interruption
in your area or internet-related problems. Please be reminded that the time limit will begin to run
as as soon as you input the access code after clicking "Take the Quiz" even if you leave the
quiz page for whatever reason. If you experience any problems in taking the quiz, inform your
instructor IMMEDIATELY. Your instructor will have the discretion on what to do in case you will
encounter any problems in taking the quiz
5. Once answers have been submitted, changing of answers will NOT be allowed.
6. If you are unsure of some items or some instructions, you may ask your instructor for clarifications.
Attempt History
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 1/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 1 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 2 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 3 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 2/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Correct! True
False
Question 4 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 5 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 6 0 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 3/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
ou Answered False
Question 7 1 / 1 pts
There are a few challenges to consider when one engages in activities for
purposes of deterring opportunism.
True
Correct! False
Question 8 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 9 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 4/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 10 1 / 1 pts
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act seeks to lay the ground for a culture of reactive
management of risks going beyond the proactive approach that has been
common so far.
True
Correct! False
Question 11 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 12 1 / 1 pts
The corporations’ president, CEO, and CFO are not required to assume
management responsibility and accountability for financials statements.
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 5/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 13 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 14 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 15 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 6/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 16 1 / 1 pts
Question 17 1 / 1 pts
short selling
investment banking
cross listing
Correct! diversification
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 7/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 18 1 / 1 pts
IFAC
UNCTD
ADB
Correct! OECD
Question 19 1 / 1 pts
One of the reasons to not transfer state-owned assets into private hands
because the public does not have any control or oversight of private
companies
Correct! Accountability
Concentration of Wealth
Downsizing
Question 20 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 8/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
ICC
Correct! ICGN
ADB
OECD
Question 21 1 / 1 pts
One of the justifications for CSR which relates to minimizing the potential
adverse effect of CSR on local communities, environments, and markets
when it is imposed through international supply chains and investments.
Proactive
Directive
Correct! Defensive
Question 22 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 9/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Export Platform
Import substituting
Question 23 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
Certain parts of the social terrain should remain closed to the market
forces in order to protect them from the unpredictability and ruthlessness of
the market.
Privatization will lead to lower prices, better quality, more options, lesser
corruption, lesser red tape, and faster delivery of both goods and services.
Question 24 1 / 1 pts
One motive of cross listing where the company will have fresh source of
funds but also have an enhancement in the marketability of its shares
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 10/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Improve liquidity
Question 25 1 / 1 pts
Refers to the effect the presence of MNCs has on domestic firms in the
same sector
Cross listings
Institutional investing
Vertical spillover
Question 26 1 / 1 pts
Investment Trust
Investment Banking
Mutual Fund
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 11/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 27 1 / 1 pts
obtain credit
be heard
choose
Correct! be informed
Question 28 1 / 1 pts
Pension Fund
Hedge Fund
Investment Trust
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 12/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 29 1 / 1 pts
Question 30 1 / 1 pts
Western Banks
Question 31 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 13/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Which of the following is not one of the five distinctive roles for public
sector engagement with CSR?
Demonstration
Correct! Regularization
Facilitation
Question 32 1 / 1 pts
SMEs
MNCs
Correct! FDIs
Institutional Investing
Question 33 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 14/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Good Activist
Principal-Agent Role
Deterrent to Opportunism
Question 34 1 / 1 pts
Technology Factors
Political Stability
Infrastructure
Question 35 1 / 1 pts
Political Influence
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 15/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Dispersion of Resources
Corruption
Question 36 1 / 1 pts
Question 37 0 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 16/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 38 1 / 1 pts
Question 39 1 / 1 pts
Paper
Petroleum
Chemical
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 17/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 40 1 / 1 pts
One of the ways on how civil society groups ca effectively fight corruption
where they need to be prepared to take on governments in innovative and
sometimes confrontational ways
Question 41 1 / 1 pts
One of the ways on how corrupt practices of MNCS affect other countries
include the following, except
Increasing Debt
Question 42 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 18/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Supply Chains
Correct! Legality
Question 43 1 / 1 pts
Deterrent to Opportunism
Principal-Agent Role
Monitoring
Question 44 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 19/20
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
AFSLAI
SSS
GSIS
Question 45 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/assignments/137550/submissions/6299 20/20
Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9)
Due May 6 at 1pm Points 45 Questions 45
Available May 6 at 10:30am - May 6 at 1pm about 3 hours Time Limit 60 Minutes
Instructions
You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to 01:00PM to
answer the quiz provided. The access code will be sent at 11:29AM through a Canvas announcement.
The 60-minute time limit will begin to run as as soon as you input the access code after clicking
"Take the Quiz". This means that the time will continue to run even if you leave the quiz for whatever
reason.
1. This is an independent quiz; do not work with others. Taking photos/screenshots of the contents of
the quiz, disclosing information to other students regarding the contents of the quiz, or answering the
quiz on behalf of another person are considered cheating. Students who commit such acts will be
sanctioned in accordance with the HAU Student Handbook.
2. All answers will be submitted through the Canvas questions.
3. Choose the best answer from among the choices, and click "next" to proceed to the next item. Make
sure that you have chosen your final answer because once done with each item, you cannot go
back to the previous anymore. (No multiple attempts). Be mindful not to click "submit" unless you
are finished taking the quiz.
4. You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to
01:00PM . You were already informed by your instructor on the schedule of this departmental quiz,
so you should have a backup plan in case you will experience problems, such as power interruption
in your area or internet-related problems. Please be reminded that the time limit will begin to run
as as soon as you input the access code after clicking "Take the Quiz" even if you leave the
quiz page for whatever reason. If you experience any problems in taking the quiz, inform your
instructor IMMEDIATELY. Your instructor will have the discretion on what to do in case you will
encounter any problems in taking the quiz
5. Once answers have been submitted, changing of answers will NOT be allowed.
6. If you are unsure of some items or some instructions, you may ask your instructor for clarifications.
Attempt History
Attempt Time Score
LATEST Attempt 1 54 minutes 42 out of 45
Question 1 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 2 0 / 1 pts
There immediate and complete closure all offshore centers in all countries
is vital to stopping the laundering of corrupt money and the draining of
resources from the Third World.
ou Answered True
Question 3 1 / 1 pts
Corruption takes many different forms, from the routine cases of bribery
of petty abuse of power to amassing of spectacular personal wealth
through embezzlement or other means.
Correct! True
False
Question 4 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 5 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 6 1 / 1 pts
Correct! False
Question 7 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 8 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 9 1 / 1 pts
Investment promotion agencies cannot play an important role facilitating
effective communication between investors and the government.
True
Correct! False
Question 10 1 / 1 pts
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act seeks to lay the ground for a culture of reactive
management of risks going beyond the proactive approach that has been
common so far.
True
Correct! False
Question 11 1 / 1 pts
The corporations’ president, CEO, and CFO are not required to assume
management responsibility and accountability for financials statements.
True
Correct! False
Question 12 1 / 1 pts
Foreign direct investment has grown steadily in volume but is minor
source of development finance
True
Correct! False
Question 13 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 14 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 15 1 / 1 pts
Privatization is the act of transferring in whole or in part the ownership of a
private sector to the public sector.
True
Correct! False
Question 16 1 / 1 pts
One of the justifications for CSR which relates to minimizing the potential
adverse effect of CSR on local communities, environments, and markets
when it is imposed through international supply chains and investments.
Directive
Proactive
Correct! Defensive
Question 17 1 / 1 pts
Western Banks
Question 18 1 / 1 pts
Question 19 1 / 1 pts
Question 21 1 / 1 pts
AFSLAI
GSIS
SSS
Question 22 1 / 1 pts
One of the roles of institutional investors where institutional investors,
especially those whose investment is significant enough to earn a board
seat can be the fearless fiscalizers on corporate policies.
Deterrent to Opportunism
Monitoring
Principal-Agent Role
Question 23 1 / 1 pts
Investment Trust
Pension Fund
Hedge Fund
Question 24 1 / 1 pts
Import substituting
Question 25 1 / 1 pts
Supply Chains
Correct! Legality
Question 26 1 / 1 pts
Correct! ICGN
OECD
ICC
ADB
Question 27 0 / 1 pts
Which of the following is not one of the five distinctive roles for public
sector engagement with CSR?
Demonstration
Facilitation
Question 28 1 / 1 pts
SMEs
Correct! FDIs
MNCs
Institutional Investing
Question 29 1 / 1 pts
Political Stability
Technology Factors
Infrastructure
Question 30 0 / 1 pts
Question 32 1 / 1 pts
One of the ways on how corrupt practices of MNCS affect other countries
include the following, except
Increasing Debt
Question 33 1 / 1 pts
Refers to the effect the presence of MNCs has on domestic firms in the
same sector
Vertical spillover
Institutional investing
Cross listings
Question 34 1 / 1 pts
Question 35 1 / 1 pts
ADB
UNCTD
IFAC
Correct! OECD
Question 36 1 / 1 pts
Investment Trust
Investment Banking
Mutual Fund
Question 37 1 / 1 pts
Good Activist
Deterrent to Opportunism
Principal-Agent Role
Question 38 1 / 1 pts
Correct! be informed
be heard
obtain credit
choose
Question 39 1 / 1 pts
Dispersion of Resources
Corruption
Political Influence
Question 40 1 / 1 pts
Paper
Chemical
Petroleum
Question 41 1 / 1 pts
cross listing
Correct! diversification
investment banking
short selling
Question 42 1 / 1 pts
One motive of cross listing where the company will have fresh source of
funds but also have an enhancement in the marketability of its shares
Increase firm’s visibility and acceptance
Improve liquidity
Question 43 1 / 1 pts
One of the ways on how civil society groups ca effectively fight corruption
where they need to be prepared to take on governments in innovative and
sometimes confrontational ways
Question 44 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
Certain parts of the social terrain should remain closed to the market
forces in order to protect them from the unpredictability and ruthlessness of
the market.
Taxpayers’ money will not be used to cover loses.
Privatization will lead to lower prices, better quality, more options, lesser
corruption, lesser red tape, and faster delivery of both goods and services.
Question 45 1 / 1 pts
One of the reasons to not transfer state-owned assets into private hands
because the public does not have any control or oversight of private
companies
Concentration of Wealth
Downsizing
Correct! Accountability
Instructions
You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to 01:00PM
to answer the quiz provided. The access code will be sent at 11:29AM through a Canvas
announcement. The 60-minute time limit will begin to run as as soon as you input the access
code after clicking "Take the Quiz". This means that the time will continue to run even if you leave
the quiz for whatever reason.
1. This is an independent quiz; do not work with others. Taking photos/screenshots of the contents
of the quiz, disclosing information to other students regarding the contents of the quiz, or
answering the quiz on behalf of another person are considered cheating. Students who commit
such acts will be sanctioned in accordance with the HAU Student Handbook.
2. All answers will be submitted through the Canvas questions.
3. Choose the best answer from among the choices, and click "next" to proceed to the next item.
Make sure that you have chosen your final answer because once done with each item, you
cannot go back to the previous anymore. (No multiple attempts). Be mindful not to click
"submit" unless you are finished taking the quiz.
4. You are given a MAXIMUM OF 60 MINUTES on May 06, 2021, Thursday, from 11:30AM to
01:00PM . You were already informed by your instructor on the schedule of this departmental
quiz, so you should have a backup plan in case you will experience problems, such as power
interruption in your area or internet-related problems. Please be reminded that the time limit will
begin to run as as soon as you input the access code after clicking "Take the Quiz" even if
you leave the quiz page for whatever reason. If you experience any problems in taking the quiz,
inform your instructor IMMEDIATELY. Your instructor will have the discretion on what to do in
case you will encounter any problems in taking the quiz
5. Once answers have been submitted, changing of answers will NOT be allowed.
6. If you are unsure of some items or some instructions, you may ask your instructor for
clarifications.
Attempt History
Attempt Time Score
LATEST Attempt 1 46 minutes 42 out of 45
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 1/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 1 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 2 0 / 1 pts
ou Answered True
Question 3 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 2/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 4 1 / 1 pts
The goals of public sector engagement in CSR are likely different from
country to country.
Correct! True
False
Question 5 1 / 1 pts
Correct! True
False
Question 6 0 / 1 pts
ou Answered False
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 3/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 7 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 8 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 9 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 4/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 10 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct!
False
Question 11 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct!
False
Question 12 1 / 1 pts
Increasing foreign investment can be one of the indicators that the host
country’s economy is growing and opening to globalization.
Correct!
True
False
Question 13 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 5/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
True
Correct! False
Question 14 1 / 1 pts
True
Correct! False
Question 15 1 / 1 pts
The 1987 Constitution allows foreign nationals from owning land in the
Philippines.
True
Correct! False
Question 16 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 6/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Western Banks
Question 17 1 / 1 pts
Principal-Agent Role
Deterrent to Opportunism
Monitoring
Question 18 1 / 1 pts
Downsizing
Concentration of Wealth
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 7/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Correct! Accountability
Question 19 1 / 1 pts
Directive
Proactive
Correct! Defensive
Question 20 1 / 1 pts
Question 21 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 8/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Institutional Investing
Correct! FDIs
SMEs
MNCs
Question 22 1 / 1 pts
Which of the following is not one of the five distinctive roles for public
sector engagement with CSR?
Demonstration
Correct! Regularization
Facilitation
Question 23 1 / 1 pts
Pension Fund
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 9/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Hedge Fund
Investment Trust
Question 24 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
Certain parts of the social terrain should remain closed to the market
forces in order to protect them from the unpredictability and
ruthlessness of the market.
Privatization will lead to lower prices, better quality, more options, lesser
corruption, lesser red tape, and faster delivery of both goods and
services.
Question 25 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 10/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 26 1 / 1 pts
Investment Trust
Mutual Fund
Investment Banking
Question 27 1 / 1 pts
investment banking
Correct! diversification
short selling
cross listing
Question 28 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 11/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
One motive of cross listing where the company will have fresh source
of funds but also have an enhancement in the marketability of its
shares
Improve liquidity
Correct!
Increase firm’s share price
Question 29 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
Legality
Supply Chains
Question 30 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
OECD
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 12/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
IFAC
ADB
UNCTD
Question 31 0 / 1 pts
Question 32 1 / 1 pts
SSS
GSIS
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 13/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
AFSLAI
Question 33 1 / 1 pts
Export Platform
Import substituting
Question 34 1 / 1 pts
Refers to the effect the presence of MNCs has on domestic firms in the
same sector
Cross listings
Vertical spillover
Institutional investing
Question 35 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 14/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Good Activist
Deterrent to Opportunism
Correct!
Driver of Agent’s Performance
Principal-Agent Role
Question 36 1 / 1 pts
Paper
Correct!
Food and beverage
Petroleum
Chemical
Question 37 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 15/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 38 1 / 1 pts
Increasing Debt
Question 39 1 / 1 pts
Technology Factors
Political Stability
Infrastructure
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 16/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 40 1 / 1 pts
ICC
ADB
OECD
Correct! ICGN
Question 41 1 / 1 pts
Question 42 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 17/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Political Influence
Correct!
Tainted Purpose
Dispersion of Resources
Corruption
Question 43 1 / 1 pts
choose
be heard
obtain credit
Correct!
be informed
Question 44 1 / 1 pts
Correct!
Mobilize Ordinary People
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 18/19
5/17/2021 Finals Quiz (Chap 7 to 9): Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management and Internal Control
Question 45 1 / 1 pts
https://hau.instructure.com/courses/5163/quizzes/43412?module_item_id=419682 19/19