Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 40 views

    Mid Year Review Form T I To T III 2021 2022

    Uploaded by

    Robelyn Pangilinan
    This mid-year review form evaluates the performance of teacher Anna Liza G. Galman from August 2021 to July 2022. It assesses her achievements across three key result areas - content knowledge and pedagogy, professional engagement and contribution, and personal growth and self-directed learning. For each area, she is rated on specific objectives based on classroom observations, lesson plans, and other measures of work performance. Overall, her rater Anita A. Bunag gives her ratings of 'Very Satisfactory' or full marks, indicating she is meeting expectations for her role at this mid-point in the review period.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mid Year Review Form T I To T III 2021 2022

    Uploaded by

    Robelyn Pangilinan
    40 views1 page
    This mid-year review form evaluates the performance of teacher Anna Liza G. Galman from August 2021 to July 2022. It assesses her achievements across three key result areas - content knowledge and pedagogy, professional engagement and contribution, and personal growth and self-directed learning. For each area, she is rated on specific objectives based on classroom observations, lesson plans, and other measures of work performance. Overall, her rater Anita A. Bunag gives her ratings of 'Very Satisfactory' or full marks, indicating she is meeting expectations for her role at this mid-point in the review period.

    Original Description:

    MRF FOR TI-TIII

    Original Title

    Mid Year Review Form T I to T III 2021 2022

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This mid-year review form evaluates the performance of teacher Anna Liza G. Galman from August 2021 to July 2022. It assesses her achievements across three key result areas - content knowledge and pedagogy, professional engagement and contribution, and personal growth and self-directed learning. For each area, she is rated on specific objectives based on classroom observations, lesson plans, and other measures of work performance. Overall, her rater Anita A. Bunag gives her ratings of 'Very Satisfactory' or full marks, indicating she is meeting expectations for her role at this mid-point in the review period.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    40 views1 page

    Mid Year Review Form T I To T III 2021 2022

    Uploaded by

    Robelyn Pangilinan
    This mid-year review form evaluates the performance of teacher Anna Liza G. Galman from August 2021 to July 2022. It assesses her achievements across three key result areas - content knowledge and pedagogy, professional engagement and contribution, and personal growth and self-directed learning. For each area, she is rated on specific objectives based on classroom observations, lesson plans, and other measures of work performance. Overall, her rater Anita A. Bunag gives her ratings of 'Very Satisfactory' or full marks, indicating she is meeting expectations for her role at this mid-point in the review period.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM ( IPCRF)

    MID – YEAR REVIEW FORM


    Name of Employee: ANNA LIZA G. GALMAN Name of Rater: ANITA A. BUNAG
    Position: Teacher III Position: Master Teacher II
    Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd/SDO NUEVA ECIJA/PENARANDA CENTRAL SCHOOL Date of Review: February 18, 2022
    Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022) Republic of the Philippines
    Weight
    per
    Department of Education Mid-Year Review Rating
    KRA’s Objectives Timeline MOV
    REGION III – CENTRAL LUZONPerformance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Mid-Year
    KRA
    SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF NUEVATarget
    ECIJA Teacher) Review Results
    PENARANDA CENTRAL SCHOOL Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
    1.Content 1. Applied August BURGOS
    22.5% ST, BRGY.Observation
    Classroom POBLACION II, PENARANDA,
    Very NUEVA ECIJA 3103
    Knowledg knowledge of 2021 to Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter- Satisfactory (4)
    e and content within and July observer agreement form from
    Pedagogy across curriculum 2022 1. an observation of synchronous Demonstrated
    teaching areas teaching (limited face-to face Level 6 in
    teaching, online teaching, or Objective 1 as
    two-way radio instruction) shown in COT
    2. RATING FOR
    if option OVERALL
    1 is ACCOMPLISHMENTS
    not possible, an rating sheets / VERY SATISFACTORY 4.45
    5 5 0.28
    observation of a recorded inter-observer
    video lesson or audio lesson agreement forms
    that is SLM-based or MELC-
    aligned
    3. if options 1 and 2 are not
    ANNA LIZA G. GALMAN possible, an ANITA
    observation of a
    A. BUNAG KATRINA G. ABERIN
    demonstration teaching* via LAC
    Ratee Rater Approving Authority
    Very
    Satisfactory (4)
    One (1) lesson plan
    2. Used research- with annotations identifying the Used research-
    based knowledge research-based knowledge and/or based knowledge
    and principles of principles of teaching and learning and/or principles 5 5 0.28
    teaching used as basis for planning / of teaching and
    and learning to designing the lesson learning in two
    enhance
    components of
    professional
    instruction in the
    practice
    lesson plan to
    improve student
    learning

    Classroom Observation Tool Very


    (COT) rating sheet or inter- Satisfactory (4)
    observer agreement form from
    1. an observation of synchronous Demonstrated
    3. Displayed teaching (limited face to-face Level 6 in
    proficient use of teaching, online teaching, or Objective 3 as

    You might also like