Busniess Law
Busniess Law
1:
Explain and discuss the contract Law and its importance in business transitions
Introduction:
Since the dawn of human society, there have been many laws and policies that people have practiced.
These rules and regulations are referred to as ‘Legislations’ which were created or established by an
appointed agency and which were regulated or implemented by a supervisory authority. During the barter
exchange era, when people began to exchange goods, among others, in order to meet their needs, they
came up with the concept of money and starting a company. Nowadays, fast economic growth in the
world accelerates corporate transactions and business results and this is facilitated with the help of a legal
instrument for building a foundation of a rock-solid deal, known as ‘Contract’.
Law of Contract:
The word ‘contract’ is interpreted as an arrangement between two or more parties, which is of a
contractual (binding) nature. As a matter fact, an agreement with legal enforceability is said to be a
contract. It specifies and describes the responsibilities and commitments of the parties concerned. In each
contract, the ‘offeror’ makes an offer to enter into a contract with the ‘offeree’. The offeror agrees to do
something in particular (or to refrain from doing something in particular) and, if the offeror accepts this
offer, a contract is made. The contract itself, must prove to have certain elements.
A contract is lawfully enforceable, which ensures that if one party fails to do what he or she has agreed to
do, the other party may proceed to the courts to enforce the arrangement or offer damages for injuries
suffered as a result of a violation of the contract because a commitment made under the contract has not
been fulfilled or an act has not been carried out. However, a contract can only be executed if it satisfies
the following conditions:
Agreement:
There must be at least two parties to constitute a contract, i.e. one who proposes and another accepts the
same The primary factor which establishes a contract between the parties is an agreement which is the
product of an offer and approval and which constitutes a consideration for the parties involved.
Free Consent:
Consensus of the parties is another essential feature of the contract, which ensures that the parties to the
contract must agree on the same issue in the same way. The consent of the parties is said to be free if it is
not compromised by coercion, unreasonable force, deceit, misappropriation and error. It must be in
writing.
Competence:
Competence applies to the ability of the parties to enter into a contract, i.e. he/she has attained the age of
adulthood, he/she must be of a sound mind, and he/she is not excluded from entering into a contract in
compliance with the law.
Consideration:
This means the price agreed to be paid for the transaction. It must be both sufficient and lawful.
Legal objective:
The objective on which the contract is rendered must be legitimate and lawful, or otherwise it must be
declared void.
Contract is not expressly declared null and void: The statute does not expressly declare the contract null
and void, such as a contract for the restriction of marriage, commerce or legal proceedings.
The contract is a written agreement agreed by all participants, the employer and the employee, and is the
basis for any profitable enterprise. Contracts provide greater accountability for the execution of the tasks
and the fulfilment of the goals as agreed in the agreement. It acts as a fantastic help for establishing a
positive relationship with the clients.
The primary aim of the contract is to document the specifics decided by both sides through mutual
consent. It offers a detailed awareness of the services rendered by a third party or the monetary
requirements to be fulfilled by a third party. This information will serve as legal facts and are very
relevant to the deal.
Offers protection:
A legal agreement plays an important role in providing security between the parties as it explicitly points
out the contract tenure and collection of obligations. Any departure is a violation of contract and each of
them has the absolute right to recognize it. If either of the parties bring an action against the other side at
the time of a contract violation, the contract could be legitimate proof.
The written contract shall be the relevant documentation of the mutual consent of the proceedings agreed
to in the arrangement. It can be used for potential comparison purposes and provides information on the
time-limit for completion of any job assigned as per contract. The length of the deal is also highlighted in
the document, which gives additional guidance on the terms of the termination. In the worst case, though,
the contract may be cancelled if the other side fails to comply with the rules set out in the contract or
bypasses the terms.
At one time, transacting business was easy. Two people agreed to make a trade, and both parties
honoured their word. But in the 21st century, professionals are all too aware of the long history of deal-
breaking and lawsuits that have taken place all around them. In business, contracts are important because
they outline expectations for both parties, protect both parties if those expectations are not met and lock in
the price that will be paid for services. Contract law is critical because it permeates our culture. Without
it, life as we knew it may not have happened. Consider this topic for a moment from the point of view of
the business, nearly any deal it makes includes a contract. For example, purchasing raw materials, renting
property, employing equipment, selling its goods or services, and using banking and similar processes to
make or collect payments. Likewise, most customer purchases require the procurement of products or
services facilitated by the deal. As for companies, it is impossible to think of many purchases made by
customers that are not of this type. Finally, from the point of view of government, since much of what
they do stems from the intervention of the relevant Parliament, gradually the services they offer are
privatized and provided in compliance with the contract.
Previous research in this area focuses on how the contract is used to replace the loss of confidence
between the parties. The confusion faced by one side also applies to potential situations and some of them
are specifically linked to the other party in the business partnership. The trouble with this is that it is
difficult, and often almost impossible, to protect against all potential future eventualities. This is
especially problematic as the participants aim to defend themselves in a potential relationship that
involves multifaceted and exceptional exchanges. Contract negotiations are evaluated on the basis of five
phases: bid, debate, adaptation, preparation and final process of negotiation. Each process is studied on
the basis of its duration, the topics under consideration and the interaction between the parties. The
contract negotiations are not expected to have any direct effect on the eventual use of the contract,
although it is believed that they will largely affect the contract and the closeness that will be formed
between the parties. This has been found that when one of the parties involved is dominant and the other
weak, the stronger bargaining party always sets both the agenda and the contract plan. This, in essence,
has an effect on the outcome of the talks. The outcome is likely to be a unilateral deal. There is also a
possible reciprocal connection between the length of the talks and the closeness of the parties. Long-term
talks, for example, are likely to result in greater closeness as the sides learn to know each other better. In
the other side, if the sides already have a close relationship, the talks can be short-lived.
Conclusion
The above factors made contracts inevitable for companies to keep their details safe and to shield them
from the crooked. In addition, it will shield workers where employers fail to abide by the terms of the
contract by making misleading promises to employees and misguiding them. In addition, we maintain that
the centre of the analysis is the negotiating process, the contract and its use. Consequently, the contract
itself has a significant effect on the use of the contract. A unilateral contract that may have been written
by the giving party in a right-of-use arrangement is used to regulate persons within the company of the
opposing party. This very contract is often used in a more differentiated manner than otherwise. It is
found that a typical contract leads to a non-differentiated use. A contract which is less comprehensive is
seen in a more distinguished manner than a contract that is lengthy. A contract with a broad operational
content is used to manage the distribution processes of all sides, whereas a contract with a considerable
technical content tends to be used to monitor the output activities of the group. Relations between the
parties have a clear effect on the implementation of the contract. The transactional relationship tends to
lead to a distinct use of the deal, whereas the relational relationship leads to a non-differentiated use.
However, drawing up a contract, taking all these considerations into account, is a difficult and time-
consuming operation. It is also recommended to pursue the assistance of an expert counsel.
References.
https://www.lawyered.in/legal-disrupt/articles/importance-contracts-business/#:~:text=Contracts
%20guarantee%20a%20standard%20business,the%20loss%20for%20the%20service.
http://lib.oup.com.au/he/samples/clarke_cl3e_sample.pdf
https://businessjargons.com/contract.html#:~:text=Process%20of%20Contract,is%20known%20as%20a
%20contract.
Question No. 2:
‘X’ entered into a contract with ‘Y’ to supply him 1,000 water bottles @ ` 5.00 per water bottle, to
be delivered at a specified time. Thereafter, ‘X’ contracts with ‘Z’ for the purchase of 1,000 water
bottles @ ` 4.50 per water bottle, and at the same time told ‘Z’ that he did so for the purpose of
performing his contract entered into with ‘Y’. ‘Z’ failed to perform his contract in due course and
market price of each water bottle on that day was ` 5.25 per water bottle. Consequently, ‘X’ could
not procure any water bottle and ‘Y’ rescinded the contract. Calculate the amount of damages
which ‘X’ could claim from ‘Z’ in the circumstances? What would be your answer if ‘Z’ had not
informed about the ‘Y’s contract?
Answer:
X’ is entitled to claim from ‘Z’ Rs 500/- At the rate of 0.50 paise i.e. 1000 Water bottles x 0.50 paise
(difference between the procuring price of water bottles And contracted selling price to ‘Y’) being the
Amount of profit ‘X’ would have made by the performance of his contract with ‘Y’. 2. If ‘X’ had not
informed ‘Z’ of ‘Y’s contract, then the Amount of damages would have been the difference between the
contract price And the market price on the day of default. In other words, the Amount of damages would
be Rs 250/- (i.e. 1000 Water bottles x 0.25 paise).
Question no. 3: M Ltd., contract with Shanti Traders to make and deliver certain machinery to
them by 30.6.2017 for ` 11.50 lakhs. Due to labour strike, M Ltd. could not manufacture and deliver
the machinery to Shanti Traders. Later, Shanti Traders procured the machinery from another
manufacturer for ` 12.75 lakhs. Due to this Shanti Traders was also prevented from performing a
contract which it had made with Zenith Traders at the time of their contract with M Ltd. and were
compelled to pay compensation for breach of contract.
Advise Shanti Traders the amount of compensation which it can claim from M Ltd., referring to
the legal provisions of the Contract Act, 1872.
Answer:
1. Applying the above principle of law to the given case, M Ltd. is obliged to compensate for the loss of
Rs. 1.25 lakh (i.e. Rs 12.75 minus Rs 11.50 = Rs 1.25 lakh) which had naturally arisen due to default in
performing the contract by the specified date.
2. Regarding the amount of compensation which Shanti Traders were compelled to make to Zenith
Traders, it depends upon the fact whether M Ltd., knew about the contract of Shanti Traders for supply of
the contracted machinery to Zenith Traders on the specified date. If so, M Ltd is also obliged to reimburse
the compensation which Shanti Traders had to pay to Zenith Traders for breach of contract. Otherwise M
Ltd is not liable. (05)