Palg - Quality of Work Life
Palg - Quality of Work Life
Palg - Quality of Work Life
Submission Information
Result Information
Similarity 18 %
1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Exclude Information
A-Satisfactory (0-10%)
B-Upgrade (11-40%)
7 ojs.mruni.eu Publication
<1
10 ir.canterbury.ac.nz Publication
<1
16 dspace.nwu.ac.za Publication
<1
20 www.iajournals.org Publication
<1
23 repository.up.ac.za Publication
<1
26 Talking the talk or walking the walk A bibliometric review of the Publication
<1
literature by Boote-2015
27 uir.unisa.ac.za Publication
<1
28 www.eajournals.org Publication
<1
29 www.mmiwg-ffada.ca Publication
<1
30 ir.canterbury.ac.nz Publication
<1
31 core.ac.uk Publication
<1
32 digitalscholarship.unlv.edu Publication
<1
35 bmcbiotechnol.biomedcentral.com Publication
<1
46 pdfs.semanticscholar.org Publication
<1
47 rbgn.fecap.br Publication
<1
48 www.researchgate.net Internet Data
<1
49 Asset allocation versus security selection Evidence from global markets Publication
<1
by Kritzman-2002
50 The Black Media Entrepreneur and Economic Implications for the 21st Publication
<1
Ce by Ngwainmbi-2005
52 www.ebglaw.com Publication
<1
53 www.ncjrs.gov Publication
<1
55 www.arxiv.org Publication
<1
57 living-future.org Publication
<1
59 www.diva-portal.org Publication
<1
61 espace.etsmtl.ca Publication
<1
63 Healthy aging and myocardium A complicated process with various effec Publication
<1
by Nakou-2016
70 www.whiteblacklegal.co.in Publication
<1
72 apcz.umk.pl Publication
<1
76 ingoldwetrust.report Publication
<1
83 www.bbau.ac.in Publication
<1
84 www.network.bepress.com Publication
<1
85 www.researchgate.net Publication
<1
89 www.dx.doi.org Publication
<1
95 etd.uwc.ac.za Publication
<1
97 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Hip After Displaced Femoral Neck Publication
<1
Fractures by ASNIS-1994
109 How the relationship of attitudes toward mental health treatment and Publication
<1
service use by Jod-2011
111 Measuring the regional non-observed economy in China with nighttime Publication
<1
lights by Chen-2020
115 The perception of Ganoderma lucidum in Chinese and Western culture Publication
<1
by DOROTH-2004
123 IEEE 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC) - Publication
<1
Nanchang,
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION: 78
Companies now exploit improvements in employees' quality of life on the job as a competitive weapon in the
war for top talent. The potential of QWL policies to influence employees' quality of working life and, more
importantly, to assist employees in maintaining work-life balance with equal attention to performance and
commitment at work, is receiving increasing attention as QWL policies become a more integral part of
3
business strategies. Numerous studies have shown that the potential for advancement in one's profession is a
major factor in one's satisfaction with their QWL. QWL is predicted to be connected with worker
performance in studies. Concerns about the impact of one's job or line of work on one's health and happiness
led to the rise of the concept of quality of work life (QWL) in the late 1960s, along with the search for means
to improve workers' daily lives on the job. Employers focused on bettering work design and circumstances
until around the mid-1970s. However, in the 1980s, the notion of QWL expanded to encompass other factors
that impact workers' happiness and productivity, including pay and benefits, the quality of the physical
workplace, opportunities for participation, and respect for employees' individuality and dignity in the job
(Cummings and Worley, 2005).
Employees' conceptions of what makes a good company have shifted as a result of profound shifts in the
business landscape brought about by factors such as globalization, information technology, global business
competition, and scarcity of natural resources. In the past, it was common practice to use financial metrics
when describing what makes a firm "excellent." In today's corporate world, cutting-edge trends like ethics,
QWL, and job happiness are seen as indicators of a company's long-term success. Employees at TATA
MOTORS LIMITED are the focus of this research, which aims to characterize their quality of work life.
Further, it aims to discover the various influences on employee quality of life at work and how those factors
interact.
68 3
You can hardly pick up a newspaper or magazine these days without reading something about the quality of
work or the working life. Managers and executives alike are realizing the value of QWL in their pursuit of
9
increased productivity. Quality of Work Life (QWL) refers to the process of developing systems at work that
raise the quality of employees' daily lives on the job and, in turn, boost their dedication to and enthusiasm for
achieving the organization's stated objectives.
9
" QWL can be implemented in the context of workers' assessments of their own physical and mental health. It
covers almost everything that organized labor has fought for in the last two decades.
In his role as president of the Work in America Institute, Jerome M. Rosow has identified seven crucial
27
elements that will influence the quality of working life in the years ahead. These include things like
compensation, employee benefits, job security, flexible scheduling, the stress in the workplace, employee
input, and workplace democracy.
● Pay
For QWL to be successful, it must be based on a compensation plan that is fair for all employees. The trend
toward employees wanting a stake in the company's earnings suggests that this trend will only increase in the
future.
● Benefits
Workers throughout the globe are becoming more politically active and vocal, leading them to demand social
security and welfare payments from their employers as a matter of right rather than as part of the negotiating
process.
99
The employer is responsible for making sure all workers feel safe in their positions. We need a system where
people may feel safe and secure in their jobs without sacrificing their health. The aforementioned
considerations are fundamental to enhancing QWL in businesses.
73
Various Schedule Options The contemporary workplace has been experimenting with various sorts of
alternative work schedules, such as the four-day work week, flexi-time, and part-time employment, in an
effort to combat job monotony. The term "compressed work week" refers to a work schedule in which four
days of 10 hours each or three days of 12 hours each are examples of the QWL schedule rather than the
123
traditional five days of nine hours each. There are already some effective implementations of this in the
business world in India.
Those in charge of major factories say they have saved millions of dollars by cutting down on startup times
and boosting energy efficiency.
With the cost savings and improved morale that result from using the four-day work week, the most
traditional form of flexible scheduling. The shortened workweek gives workers no more say over when they
must put in their time. Conversely, a flexi-time schedule or flexible working hours provides this autonomy to
the worker.
There is a real chance for employees to reconcile personal and organizational demands when an organization
86
defines a core time (10 a.m.-3 p.m.) during which all employees are expected to work and then allows a range
9
of time before and after this core period in which employees can decide their own arrival and quitting times.
A high percentage of flex-time initiatives are successful, according to reports. Flexi-time has been linked to
positive outcomes including higher productivity, cheaper unit labor costs, and higher employee morale. Part-
time jobs, particularly in industrialized nations, have exploded in popularity over the last decade as a novel
approach to arranging employment. There has been a rise in the supply of part-time workers due to the rising
cost of living and the rising number of people entering the labor force, particularly women. Managers have
also come to appreciate the advantages of having part-time workers do specialized tasks, such as increased
excitement and reduced monotony.
As our means of subsistence, our jobs are an intrinsic component of our daily routines. We spend around one-
107
third of our lives at work, or twelve hours a day, so it has a significant impact on our well-being. It should
result in contentment in one's employment, relief from stress, and the knowledge that one's time was well
spent in doing something worthwhile. In the end, any progress toward our ultimate aim is a cause for
celebration and anticipation for the future.
Quality of work life is determined by, and influenced by, the following:
i. outlook
ii. setting
iii. possibilities
iv. job requirements
1
v. coworkers
vi. Stress
vii. Perspectives on a Profession
viii. Challenges risk and reward
ix. progress and expansion
Possibilities: Some careers have wonderful prospects for education, investigation, discovery, personal growth,
skill improvement, openness to new ideas, public acclaim, adventure, stardom, and fortune. The other options
96
are uninteresting in every way because they are routine and boring. Indeed, the former is just as engaging and
fulfilling as the latter.
There are vocations that need thoughtfulness and vision, some that require motor skills and perfection, and
52
yet others that require a high degree of carelessness and precision.
Human Resources: There are three types of coworkers that almost everyone may encounter at some point in
their career. These include one's superiors, peers, and reports. In addition, certain careers need regular contact
29
with members of the general public and the media, as well as clients, patients, victims of crime, members of
the public with special needs, minors, visitors from other countries, gang members, politicians, and
celebrities. Extreme caution, self-control, tact, humor, compassion, diplomacy, and sensitivity are called for
in such circumstances.
All the things we've discussed thus far, including your stress level, are interconnected. An individual's stress
level is not always inversely linked to their pay. There are several forms of stress, including mental, physical,
9
and emotional. All professionals experience stress, although the symptoms differ depending on the nature of
the work being done.
Professional Growth Opportunities (vii): Professional advancement opportunities should be available in all
108
occupations. That has a significant role in determining one's satisfaction with one's working conditions.
Everyone is motivated to work hard because he wants to advance in his position, get more praise from the
management, and be appreciated for his efforts. It's a win-win scenario when an employee is recognized for
his outstanding work, additional efforts, and sincerity, while a slacker is punished for his carelessness. This
encourages the former to work more while discouraging the latter to work more diligently.
The monotony of the work makes a person uninterested, unmotivated, unenthusiastic, unhappy, frustrating,
complacent, initiative-less, and boring, but the difficulties it presents allow the employee to improve his
knowledge, skills, and talents. The pursuit of difficulty is the fuel that sustains creativity and excitement.
Completing a difficult task successfully not only increases one's sense of accomplishment but also their sense
29
of self-worth, which is more valuable than any monetary reward.
51
If a company does not provide its employees with room for professional and personal development, it will
have a hard time attracting and retaining skilled workers of the future.
x. Danger and Payoff: In most cases, people are paid in direct proportion to the amount of effort they put in,
62
the number of hours they work, the amount of authority they are given, the degree of responsibility they are
64
entrusted with, the amount of risk they are expected to take, and how seriously they take their jobs.
104
trained workers, as well as the political and economic policies of a country. Despite the fact that every job
comes with some degree of danger, that risk differs from one position to the next. When everything is said
and done, the promise of financial gain is often enough to sway a job candidate to accept an offer.
100
Assessing the factors that affect job satisfaction and professional success
3
Important factors of Quality of Work Life (QWL) have been identified via studies, but QWL itself has been
understudied and underappreciated. Much of the existing empirical research on QWL has implicitly or overtly
incorporated a modern perspective on such issues as work satisfaction, stress, labor relations, and a holistic
view of employment. Many different conceptions and recommendations of QWL have been put forward by
many researchers throughout the years. To provide just one example, QWL is a collection of principles based
59
on the idea that people are an organization's most precious resource since they are reliable, accountable, and
able to make significant contributions while also deserving of being treated with respect and dignity. Task,
physical work environment, the social environment inside the company, administrative structure, and
interaction between life on and off the workplace are all essential variables that affect an individual's quality
of work life. Opportunities for workers and employers to work together to solve problems or create win-win
solutions are examples of quality work life (QWL). QWL is founded on collaboration between labor and
management. It is also common to think of QWL as an approach to improving employee morale and output
via measures like self-managing teams, job enrichment, and intensive participation on the job.
Thus, QWL is an all-encompassing concept that incorporates a person's sense of job satisfaction and the
absence of stress and other unfavorable personal outcomes.
Consequently, the increasing prevalence of two-income families has heightened interest in the quality of
working life. As more and more women enter the workforce, it is clear that men and women alike will need to
3
juggle careers and household responsibilities. Therefore, the emphasis shifted to the quality of the work
experience rather than the task itself, and workplace wellness became pivotal in fostering more positive and
1
healthy workplaces.
In conclusion, the research highlighted the limits of individual work satisfaction for measuring the QWL, and
there had been no prior effort to quantify QWL in terms of career elements and organizational environment.
This research aims to contribute to that mission by expanding the theoretical foundations of existing research
on QWL. Issues for QWL and for career and personal life planning are on the rise as people make use of this
new professional and personal options.
The vast majority of workers would benefit greatly from feedback detailing where they may make strides in
their performance and expressing appreciation for their efforts. It seems to reason that workers want to feel
like they're progressing in their careers and making meaningful contributions to their workplaces. For
example, QWL may include communicating to workers the organization's expectations for them in terms of
their job performance and its succession plans. QWL is associated with job advancement, and job
9
advancement is a result of such interpersonal interactions inside businesses.
A person's career develops as a result of the ways in which they engage with the institutions and people of
their society. In addition to its practical applications, meaning, and the generation of both meaning and
experience, a career is not solely a theoretical construct. An individual's career may be thought of as a series
of jobs or work experiences that the individual has had throughout the course of their life. CRITICALITY OF
THE STUDY:
You may hire a guy to show up at a certain location and do a set amount of skillful muscle movements at
regular intervals. However, without a full investment of one's intellect and spirit, one will struggle to generate
feelings of passion, initiative, pleasure, and loyalty. Only if the worker is happy and their work life is good
will this be achievable.
The environment fostered by QWL inspires them to grow as performers. It also results in harmonious
workplace relationships and ambitious workers eager to further their careers. QWL will provide a positive
60
and encouraging workplace where everyone has a chance to shine. The organization will benefit from having
someone with such a proud and fulfilling career on staff.
3
This research aims to provide a summary of the importance of work-life quality and employee perceptions of
that quality at TATA MOTORS LIMITED.
Purposes of the Research:
With the aim of gaining a thorough comprehension of the Quality of Work Life and its relevance in today's
workforce.
83
To learn how people feel about their jobs at TATA MOTORS LIMITED.
· Investigate the steps done by management to enhance workers' quality of life on the job.
• To identify the contributors to and effects of employee satisfaction with work life.
APPROACHES TO STUDY
Raw Materials
First-hand information I
80
Primary data is gathered using questionnaires that would be used as schedules for in-person interviews and,
more often than not, questionnaires distributed directly to the target population and taken back on response.
92
Data that has already been collected
Secondary sources such as articles, papers, and books from both domestic and international sources are used
to fill in research gaps and deepen understanding of abstract topics.
EMPLOYEE ADDRESS
Primary data is tallied and evaluated by employing statistical methods, and this is accomplished by means of
questionnaires. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the statistical significance of the hypotheses, and
the findings are presented independently.
Sample:
58
One hundred workers were randomly selected from throughout the company's hierarchy and functions.
Convenience sampling, a non-probability approach, was used for the study's data collection.
TATA MOTORS LIMITED was the company that this research examined in terms of how well its employees
59
balance their personal and professional lives. The purpose of the research is to get insight into the elements
that have an effect on workers' happiness and well-being on the job. The following elements are included in
the analysis:
● Motivation
Relations with Staff
Identification with a group
Instructional Courses
Supportive policies
● Compensation
1
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1. A new model of QWL is sought by Martel & Dupuis (2006). This study examines the
beginnings and the sequential development of QWL literature. Different QWL models from
54
the past are recognized and evaluated. Turcotte and Kohl & Schooler each provide different
parts that come together to make a model. It is estimated that the model limits 33 QWL
21
domains. The new paradigm purportedly allows for the development of an effective
measurement approach and the inseparability of QOL and QWL. The created model will aid
in evaluating QWL, allowing for more precise intervention. Research in this area has never
been more crucial to the working world, and the findings gained can only increase the
credibility of the research by better matching stakeholder expectations.
102
2. Quantitative Workload Load (QWL) of Staff at Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Hospital was studied by Saraji and Dargahi (2006). Occupational health and safety standards,
support from intermediate managers, support from coworkers, monetary compensation, type
of work, trust in senior management, work-life balance, stress at work, career prospects, and
87
so on are all factors that contribute to employee satisfaction, which can be determined through
an analysis of QWL factors. Occupational health and safety initiatives, financial incentives,
and encouragement from middle management were listed as the top three aspects that workers
said contributed to a happy work experience. Employees placed a far higher value on these
three indications than on the other often cited contributors to job satisfaction, such as work-
30
life balance, job stress, job security, job prospects, confidence in upper management, and the
nature of the work itself.
3.Italian health care employees have a good quality of life on the job, as explained by
13
Argentero et al. (2007). Five factors of quality of work life in the health care industry are
revealed by content analysis, including professional relationships, work organization, patient
121
care, professional competency, and career advancement. The quality of life of health care
professionals is explained by analyzing simply these factors. Therefore, it can be stated that a
structured interview may be administered among employees to discover the areas to be
improved in order to produce more QWL in the company.
4.The validity and utility of Walton's QWL model, the standard in most QWL research, are
highlighted by Timossi et al. (2008). The eight QL criteria defined by Walton are assessed
using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient in this research (1975). According to the findings, the
instrument's use is very consistent with the suggested clarification by Freitas and Rodrigues
109
(2005). The research concludes that Walton's model offers accurate findings from persons
with lower education levels without altering the criteria and goals of the original instrument.
5.There is an attempt to establish a connection between QWL and holistic well-being by Al-
Qutop & Harrim (2011). The focus of this piece is not on the implementation of QWL inside
specific companies and organizations, but rather on its global applicability. The research
concludes, based on an examination of the existing models, that QWL significantly affects
people's happiness. They go hand in hand with one another. The article lays forth a structure
connecting QWL to happiness. QWL encompasses all aspects of human flourishing, including
31
mental, physical, emotional, intellectual, social, and spiritual health. The increased worldwide
14
impact is expected as a consequence of the connection. Managers may maximize productivity
by prioritizing employee health and happiness in the workplace. To ensure the model's
validity and plausibility, the study also provides a large test region.
6.As part of the literature review and for guiding the study, Chandranshu Sinha (2012)
13
analyzed the twelve factors of QWL, including communication, career development and
growth, organizational commitment, emotional supervisory support, flexible work
11
arrangement, family responsive culture, employee motivation, organizational climate,
organizational support, job satisfaction, rewards & benefits, and compensation. The twelve
75
variables are sorted into three categories for the purpose of doing a three-factor analysis. Job
contentment, a family-friendly workplace, high morale, strong leadership, and competitive
pay all play a role. The second component consists of perks like raises, bonuses, and other
financial and in-kind compensation, as well as opportunities for professional and personal
growth. Relationship-sustenance orientation, career-focused and long-term thinking
orientation, and responsibility-driven and methodical orientation are the three identified
85
components. The factor analysis supports the notion that QWL is critical to the success of any
business, and that workers have a part to play in creating an optimal workplace.
7.In their 2012 paper, "Identifying the Relationship between Job Involvement, Job Security,
and Quality of Work Life," Noor and Abdullah (2012) examine a multinational company in
northern Malaysia in order to draw this connection. Methods like correlation and regression
analysis are used to pin out the connection. The findings demonstrate a strong correlation
between job fulfillment and occupational satisfaction. A lower correlation may be seen
between QWL and work satisfaction, job commitment, and employment stability. The
11
relevant multi-national corporation provides a variety of initiatives to its workers to ensure
that they like working there. These methods encourage workers to pool their knowledge for
18
the benefit of the company. Corporate social responsibility has emerged as the most
prominent. The essay concludes with a discussion of the current constraints and potential
future directions for investigation. The restrictions, such as not knowing enough about the
56
environment, etc. The results of this investigation might be used in future studies to shed light
on local businesses' efforts to improve their workers' quality of life on the job.
Without QWL, it is impossible for a business to achieve development and profitability in the
market, or to provide people with the tools they need to do their jobs efficiently and
effectively. Staff dedication to the company and quality of life are both enhanced by effective
122
supervision, compensation, and benefits. A positive and negative correlation was found
between participation management and QWL.
Some works argue that gender is not associated with QWL, while others find quite the
14
opposite to be true. A person's perspective may have a significant impact on their QWL, both
positively and negatively. There is a positive correlation between QWL and both work
experience and monetary benefits (such as pay).
10.In their 2014 research, Shefali Srivastava and Roma Kanpur attempt to dissect the
fundamentals and repercussions of QWL. Researchers concluded that human dignity and
progress, teamwork, participatory determination of work changes, and the assumption of
1
similarity between individual goals and those of the organization are the most important
factors in fostering QWL. They understand QWL's overall plan, its many uses, its goals, and
its significance. The research suggests that a high level of QWL is associated with work
satisfaction, which in turn increases productivity and efficiency on the job.
11.Ganesh & Ganesh (2014) make an effort to dissect the ways in which an individual's
supervisor, coworkers, and family members all have a role in shaping their work experience
for the better or worse. Public and private sector bank personnel are polled to advance the
7
study. The study's findings indicate that the gender binary did not have a major impact in
determining workers' subjective well-being (SWB) independently. Nonetheless, the QWL
interacted with the influence of gender that the employee acted in a way that demonstrated the
53
importance of acting in accordance with one's own gender if they want to have a high quality
of work life. When taken together, these three aspects of social support provide a substantial
contribution to QWL. The support of one's manager is the most important of any kind,
1
followed closely by that of one's coworkers and then one's family. Finally, there are no
statistically significant differences between the sexes on any of the social support factors,
however, men did report higher scores on the masculinity scale, and women did on the QWL
scale.
12. Private and public sector banks' adoption of Srinivasan and Ismail's (2016) QWL was the
primary subject of their research in the Madurai area. According to the study's results, public
119
and private sector bank workers are similarly satisfied with their quality of life on the job
82
regardless of their gender, age, educational background, marital status, or geographic location.
Accordingly, the quality of life at work is unrelated to the workers' individual characteristics.
31
When workers are compensated fairly, given opportunities for advancement and social
14
advancement inside the workplace, and are encouraged to workers at public banks are more
widely accepted than those at private banks in terms of their job, overall living space, and
social integration at work. The private sector bank workers' acceptance level is higher than
21
that of public sector employees due to the nature of the job, healthy working circumstances,
constitutionalism in the banks, characteristics of the grievance management method, and other
similar factors.
13.Kapadia & Shrimali (2016) conduct a review of the current research on educators' QWL.
113
There are four basic categories where QWL research may be categorized. Research on
8
educators' QWL is included in the first section. Second, research into the relationship between
teachers' QWL and factors including job satisfaction, dedication, stress, and motivation is
ongoing. Research on the link between QWL and behavioral outcomes such as organizational
citizenship behavior, performance, and productivity are included under the third heading. The
study concludes by summarizing the effect of demographic factors on educators' QWL. Here
is the article on educators' professional competence. Developing human capabilities, is also
revealed to be the most applicable one for conducting research. Management is urged to make
improvements to teachers' working conditions since, according to the findings of the many
studies undertaken to determine teachers' QWL, most instructors report only a low or average
QWL. In reviewing the research on the topic, a consistent positive correlation between QWL
and attitudes and actions in the workplace has been found. Teachers' QWL varied by
demographic factors such as gender, years of experience, family composition, job function,
and affiliation with a professional organization. Female educators are shown to have higher
1
QWL than their male counterparts in the literature review.
14.among the two ideas. The article also investigates how various demographic factors are
connected to QWL and OCB. The connections are determined by a study of the workforce of
an Iranian firm (Delshad Company). Spearman's rho test findings showed a significant,
positive association between QWL and its dimensions and OCB. The constitutionalism and
total life space variables in OCB fared better than the other variables, as shown by the
Friedman test, which indicates how each variable may be classified. And last, the integration
of society was the final one. According to the results of the one-way analysis of variance, the
effects of demographic factors on QWL and OCB are negligible.
15.As an example, Papi & Nuralizadeh (2014) focus on elementary school teachers in
Andimeshk to analyze how QWL has influenced the development of OCB in the region.
Measures of quality of life (QWL) were proposed by Walton (1975) with measures of
organizational climate and behavior (OCB) proposed by Organ (1988). The research suggests
30
that QWL is an all-encompassing, broadly beneficial program that helps employees deal with
challenges of management, change, and adjustment by raising their levels of happiness and
facilitating their learning in the empowerment of their own work. Dissatisfaction with one's
work life is detrimental to everyone, regardless of rank or responsibility (Seraji, 2006), and
under such conditions, workers are less likely to take initiative to improve their workplace.
7
16.Sandhya Nair (2013) investigated the impact of QWL on OCB in the context of higher
education faculty in the Thrissur District of Kerala. The results of the research show that there
is a significant gender gap in how college professors of different sexes evaluate their own
QWL. The article also elucidates the significance of the link between QWL and OCB based
on altruism and conscientiousness. According to this study, there is a significant discrepancy
56
between instructors' reported perceptions of QWL and their actual conduct. Researchers found
that most respondents scored around the middle on the QWL scale, with female educators
65
scoring higher than their male counterparts. Teachers' QWL is negatively impacted by
problems with intergenerational communication and trust. Since just two OCB variables,
altruism, and conscientiousness, were taken into account, the research had some significant
caveats.
17.Fattahi et al. (2014) conduct a comprehensive review of the interplay between QWL's
many facets and employees' dedication to their companies. The staff of the health facility in
Sari, City, are interviewed for this study. Fair compensation, opportunities for continuous
growth, and organizational support are just some of the six QWL factors shown to have a
substantial link with one another in this study security, lawfulness in the organization, social
dependency in occupational life, social cohesiveness, enhancing human capacities, and
organizational commitment of workers, yet there is none a statistically significant correlation
(R=.608) between job stability and employee dedication to the company. Regression analysis
reveals that workers' loyalty may be forecast using a number of factors related to their
11
working conditions, including the quality of their personal lives, the prospects for professional
advancement, and the strength of their communities.
18.Using data collected from Iranian city halls, Derakhshani and Mahmoudi (2015) explore
the connection between QWL and OCB. The researchers find that there is a direct and
positive relationship between the QWL factor and OCB after completing several studies,
including the Pearman Correlation, the Linear Regression analysis, and the Friedman test.
Employees' OCB is shown to rise in tandem with their perceived quality of life at work. In
addition, it was shown that the maximum QWL ratings were attained by characteristics like
fair and adequate compensation and legality in the company. That is to say, these two
7
elements had the most impact on the OCB.
8
Esmail, et al. (2014) investigate the connection between empowerment and organizational
citizenship behavior (OCB) at Kohkiloye and Boyer Ahmad. The theoretical notion of the
three concepts, including empowerment, quality of work life, and OCB, are explained in the
article. Then, the conceptual model connecting these factors is laid out and explained. Several
methods of analysis have shown that QWL has a beneficial effect on both empowerment and
31
OCB. It's believed that raising an organization's QWL will have a beneficial effect on
employee engagement and organizational commitment.
b. Using data from Oshnavieh Hospital's personnel, Kasraie et al. (2014) investigates the
connection between QWL, stress at work, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship
1
behavior (OCB). In order to determine the connections, the study employs a battery of
experiments. Findings from the analysis reveal a connection between QWL, the stress in the
15
workplace, job satisfaction, and pro-social actions. It is important to remember that there is a
negative relationship between employee stress levels and their quality of life on the job. There
is a positive correlation between the QWL and work stress, job happiness, and civic conduct,
as shown by the data.
This article summarizes the current level of theoretical knowledge on Quality of Employment
Life in an effort to further our understanding of the complex systems that govern the
18
relationship between an individual and his or her work (QWL). To achieve this, the first
section provides a short overview of the evolution of the QWL construct's definition,
15
highlighting the primary research venues and the conceptual issues that have dogged its
progress throughout its history. In what follows, I provide a critical evaluation of how others
49
have advocated resolving these issues. The paper concludes with several potential solutions to
the conceptual, methodological, and theoretical impasses outlined previously. Last but not
least, we provide an explanation of what QWL is and introduce the meter developed to
measure it the idea's inception and evolution
Although the term "Quality of Work Life" was not used until the 1960s, there were sporadic
efforts made beginning in the late 19th century to better the lives of workers. One such effort
was the practice of profit sharing by certain businesses. These efforts may be seen, from a
more modern point of view, as an attempt to enhance QWL (Goode, 1989). Not until the late
20th century did the social sciences and the humanities begin to take a serious interest in the
workplace, and more specifically, in the correlation between the mindsets and actions of
employees and the success of their employers. The now-classic research conducted by
sociologist Elton Mayo at Western Electric's Hawthorn facility in 1933 confirmed the impact
of environmental conditions on worker productivity. Once Mayo's findings were in, the
previously used Taylorian performance norms were moderated. After then, things at work
grew less humane (Mayo, 1960), which sparked the beginnings of the policy shift toward
humanizing working circumstances (Davis and Cherns,1975). The Development and Spread
of QWL Ideas. Within this setting, the first extensive studies of workplace structure were
conducted, primarily in Europe. The Swedish government's social-democratic policies
advocated a move toward more worker-friendly working conditions.
Unions, employers, and the two major Swedish political parties all endorsed this strategy
beginning in the 1960s (Davis and Cherns, 1975). The need to restructure work was also
becoming apparent in a number of other western European nations at the same time; but,
30
unlike in Sweden, the measures launched in the Netherlands, Denmark, France, Ireland,
England, and Norway were marked by disorganized and isolated efforts (Cherns and Davis,
1975). Increased pressure was being felt across the Atlantic to mirror the pattern set in
Europe.
Quality of work life wasn't coined until the late 1960s when a GM employee named Irving
Bluestone coined it.
89
original Form (Goode, 1989). Workers in the United States have never before had the
94
opportunity to have such a direct say in matters pertaining to their employment, but that all
1
changed with the introduction of this groundbreaking initiative. Its primary objective was to
gauge the level of contentment among workers so that initiatives might be devised to boost
output (Goode, 1989).
The postwar period is often cited as the time when a sudden, marked interest in QWL was
shown by researchers; Lawler (1975) cites workers' constantly increasing educational level
and budget problems in the government as reasons for this. The worldwide conference on the
quality of work life, held September 24-29, 1972 at Arden House in Harriman, New York,
was arguably the pinnacle of this boom. At least one takeaway from this meeting was the
realization that scholars and organizations need to work together to provide a unified
theoretical foundation for QWL study. To address the lack of attention paid to workplace
mental health, the International Council for the Quality of Working Life was established in
August 1973. Lawler (1975) looked back after the QWL summit and concluded that no
universally agreed definition of QWL had been established. He said this was because different
factions inside a company had different priorities. Some, for instance, prioritized secure
workplaces, while others prioritized energizing their staff to boost output. Nonetheless,
15
Lawler (1975) proposed several avenues for compromise in the absence of a definition that
13
would satisfy everyone's needs. Job satisfaction was identified as a key component of quality
of work life (QWL) and hence was addressed first. Lawler argues that it is psychologically
impossible to conceive of a high QWL in which all of the individual's desires for self-
actualization are not met. Nonetheless, he points out the limitations of the job satisfaction
37
paradigm and concludes that the two concepts are distinct. From an organizational
perspective, it is more likely to be hurt than benefited if all employees achieve a level of
contentment. Finally, he emphasizes that measurements of stress and tension that are likely to
7
be present in the workplace should be included in any definition of QWL, despite the fact that
these factors are often overlooked by studies on employee happiness on the job. For QWL to
be accurately measured, Lawyer (1975) argues, the technique used must account for four
Characteristics:
84
For starters, it has to be reliable, in the sense that it accurately measures key components of
31
QWL. In addition, it has to be credible to everyone who would utilize it. - It
54
must be neutral, in the sense that they can't be swayed one way or another, and hence easily
verifiable. It has to be able to recognize and account for variations among workers in the same
setting. Unlike Lawler (1975), Seashore (1975) criticized the prevailing paradigm for defining
QWL at the time, which was predicated on the assertion that one's degree of contentment or
unhappiness with life at 18 determined their QWL. He argued that a small set of
63 11
environmental factors accounted for about half of the variation in measures of work
satisfaction. It was also noted that the idea of satisfaction, when measured in isolation, is not
41
sensitive to changes in the organization, the work, or the person. Forty percent of the variation
in employees' satisfaction, and hence a percentage of absenteeism, sickness, and other
unproductive responses, might be attributed to the lack of objective and steady working
circumstances, as he had found. An additional 50% might be accounted for by less consistent
factors like worker demographics and personality. Caused by the ever-changing and
precarious
nature of satisfaction, a measuring method must be able to account for both immediate and
long-term outcomes stemming from the status quo in the workplace.
In addition, Seashore (1975) argued that QWL is inseparable from the concept of work
satisfaction and that the latter should be seen as a cause rather than an effect of QWL. Based
on his findings, he proposes a new framework for defining QWL as performance in one's job.
88
Effectiveness in one's job functions, as defined by Seashore (1975), is as follows. There are
three distinct facets of the working environment that must be taken into account: employer,
employee, and community. For businesses, QWL is reflected in metrics like productivity, cost
of manufacturing, and final product quality. The needs of the worker come first, therefore we
must think about things like pay, security, and the employee's ability to enjoy their job for its
own sake. In conclusion, the author discusses QWL from the community's point of view,
highlighting its effectiveness as a consequence of employment roles. Consider the degree to
which employees' skills and abilities are put to use. According to Seashore, society loses out
when these abilities go unused. He knows, for instance, that a sick employee is a drain on the
company's resources and on the health care and welfare systems in the communities where
those employees live. Sheppard (1975) details the methodological concerns that he sees as a
roadblock to the measurement of QWL.
He argues that assessing something as subjective as QWL is impossible with a battery of tests.
He also emphasizes the shift away from gauging work satisfaction based on intangible factors
like autonomy and toward more tangible ones like pay or material possessions. Sheppard
(1975) writes that there is no replacement for direct assessment of work satisfaction and that
changes in income do not always indicate changes in satisfaction, thus reminding readers that
job happiness must be recognized as a source of QWL. JEAN-PIERRE MARTEL AND
GILLES DUPUIS questions such as, "How often are you satisfied with your work?" are, in
his view, the easiest approach to gauge job satisfaction. To back up his decision, the author
appeals to the concept of parsimony by stating that a straightforward frequency question
30
about work happiness correlates substantially with the findings of test batteries. Even more
strongly, Trist and Westley (1981) disagree with the use of before-and-after comparisons to
determine the effectiveness of QWL enhancement programs. They argue that the
requirements for this topic may evolve during the length of the program, which is why they
differ.
116
How, therefore, can you make dare happy with your efforts? It's possible that after six
months, the subject may discover how much his work might be improved, causing him to
respond "Not at all" on the post-test while having answered "Fairly" on the pre-test.
These writers argue that the effectiveness of such initiatives may best be gauged by using
objective assessment criteria like productivity, absence rate, or staff turnover. Firstly, the
issue with measuring a dynamic construct, and secondly, the use of the idea of satisfaction as
a criterion for evaluating QWL, are both brought up by Trist and Westley's (1981) critiques of
the validity of the QWL measurement. Trist and Westley (1981) agree with Lawler (1975)
and Sheppard (1975) that satisfaction is frequently used as a measure of QWL. A cursory look
at the definitions reveals that satisfaction is the mental state resulting from the gap between
one's actual and ideal circumstances (Boisvert, 1981; Locke, 1976; Quality et al., 2003).
Therefore, the traditional approach of evaluating satisfaction—along a continuous scale—is
completely inappropriate when trying to gauge evolving concepts like QWL. In reality, a
dynamic design like QWL is, according to Golembiewski, Billingsley, and Yeager (1976).
Changes may take one of three forms and are indicative of this characteristic:
(1) shifts in the alpha value, which reflects a dynamic shift in a given circumstance;
57
Changes in beta correlate to shifts in condition over time, but may also include a shift in
perspective.
76
The third kind of shift, denoted by the letter gamma, is one that occurs as a result of a shift in
47
a person's condition through time: the adoption of a new model for the quality of their
working life, complete with shifting reference points and goals. Trist and Westley (1981)
stress the need of considering that a dynamic construct like QWL cannot be evaluated using a
static construct like satisfaction (which can only quantify alpha changes). Frustration and the
Quest for Common Ground. Since its inception in the 1960s, QWL has experienced a variety
of transformations and evolutions, as documented by Nadler and Lawler (1983) in the early
10
1980s. Beyond the era when it was closely tied work satisfaction, as discussed in the
preceding paragraphs, the authors report on three developments with which it was gradually
correlated. In the first place, QWL has become shorthand for a strategy advocating stronger
employer-employee cohesiveness as a direct consequence of the success of the first QWL
initiatives, in particular GMs. Additionally, QWL was widely linked to a technique because of
convincing studies undertaken in non-unionized workplaces with the purpose of better
adapting the workplace to workers. From this vantage point, QWL is a tool not unlike
employee groups or job enhancement.
31
Finally, the drop in popularity of the notion seen towards the end of the 1970s and the effort
4
by certain individuals to retain attention indicated to these writers that QWL had become a
movement, an ideology, a trend. Nadler and Lawler (1983) remark a little flippantly on the
many definitions of QWL, bringing attention to the repercussions of these theoretical
differences. They were concerned that the notion would come to signify anything anybody
said it meant, losing all significance if it failed to live up to the lofty expectations placed upon
it. Sashkin and Burke (1987) provide the following description of the concept to demonstrate
the uncertainty that surrounded it in the 1980s:
Therefore, a great work-life may have varying meanings for individuals in the same position
or for the same individual in different roles.
35
Nadler and Lawler (1983) noted a variety of factors for this growing uncertainty. One of the
most bothersome is that different persons in the same function may have different
perspectives of QWL, not only because of different personal beliefs but also because of
77
different talents and aptitudes. To begin, the recurring issue of a lack of a single,
comprehensive definition was rearing its ugly head once again. The authors noted that unless
the issue of defining QWL was resolved, progress in implementing and expanding related
research would be significantly hampered. Next, there was the spotlight on entry-level
positions. Because of this quality, many individuals erroneously assumed that QWL
exclusively applied to low-wage employees.
Finally, false hopes were aroused due to an erroneous belief that productivity and QWL were
causally related. The authors emphasize that although it is correct to assume that QWL would
24
boost employee morale, and job quality, and reduce absenteeism, it is incorrect to infer that
these same factors will also raise productivity. Despite first impressions, the efforts to
elucidate the construct were not completely fruitless. After riding the conceptual tide
81
throughout the 1970s, as we've seen above, QWL eventually became the topic of a consensus
34
in the 1980s and 1990s thanks to the work of writers like Nadler and Lawler (1983), Seashore
(1975), Sashkin and Burke (1987), and others. In the following lines, we will examine three
of the most significant contracts:
To define Quality of Work Life (QWL), we must consider the interplay of organizational,
human, and societal factors; and
Quality of Life (QOL) is inextricably intertwined with QWL was a synonym for employment
rate, job stability, wages, and benefits (Elizur and Shye,1990). Job satisfaction replaced the
4
original set of objective criteria as the primary measure of performance. The need for
objective criteria to measure QWL was maintained by some researchers despite the trend
toward a more subjective construct, and this included Lawler (1975). The different definitions
provided to QWL depending on an individual's (subjective criteria) or an organization's
30
39
(objective criteria) point of view only serve to aggravate the gap between the theoretical way
of thinking about the construct and the techniques employed to test it (Walton, 1975). Quality
of Life (QOL) research into health issues ran into the same snag. Despite this, scientists have
come to understand that quality of life (QOL) is about more than only the absence or presence
of illness-related impairment and that some people with a particular condition have a much
90
greater QOL than other patients with the same disease. The physical elements must be taken
into account since they are able to influence QOL to vary degrees for different people, as has
4
been acknowledged by several writers in recent years (Cella, 1992; Dazord et al., 1993;
35
Ferrans, 1990; WHOQOL, 1995). (Dupuis et al.,2000). Given this, it is reasonable to assume
97 4
that an individual worker's QWL may vary significantly from that of another worker under the
same objective circumstances. With this in mind, it has been proposed in the context of
quality of life (Dupuis et al., 2000) that it is crucial to assess both so-called objective
circumstances and people's subjective views in order to adequately describe the dynamic.
Furthermore, this author, still looking at things from an organizational perspective, sees QWL
as a philosophy that, although it may be expressed differently from organization to
organization, unites people around shared respect for human dignity. In a similarly astute
reflection on QWL's evolution, Nadler and Lawler (1983) explore editing as a method of
conceptualizing individuals, teams, and businesses. In their subsequent work, Kiernan and
Knutson (1990) defined QWL as follows: JEAN-PIERRE MARTEL AND GILLES DUPUIS
an employee's perception of his or her status in the workplace and how that relates to the
expectations of others. A person's definition of good work-life will vary depending on factors
such as his or her age, stage in their career, and/or professional standing. According to Elizur
and Shye (1990), "QWL reflects search individuals' experiences." (Page 102) Very few
79
authors have since then considered QWL to be a neutral concept. The challenge appears to lie
4
in determining how to operationally and validly evaluate a subjective construct like QWL
without resorting to objective criteria. As early as 1975, Seashore conceived QWL based on
three tiers of actors active in the work environment: the employee, the firm, and the
42
community. This method diverges from the QWL idea, which was previously applied only to
entry-level workers. According to this concept, the domains forming QWL vary depending on
whether one is looking at it from the standpoint of the individual, the firm, or the community
(Sashkin and Burke, 1987). Ten years after Seashore (1975) first raised the issue of
integration, the issue was revisited, this time with a more comprehensive picture of the
interplay between the three relevant structures. In this holistic view, QWL was seen as a
social movement whose effects went beyond formal structures (Kiernanand Knutson, 1990).
10
As a result, several writers have pointed out that employees are getting more and more
education, and that they see their jobs less as a means to an end and more as a means to
personal development and social support.
ways to get out of debt and start living on your own (Kerce and Booth-Kewley, 1993). QUEL
111 2
therefore comes to play a significant role in people's QOL. This model of QWL is the most
sophisticated and up-to-current version to date, according to Kiernan and Knutson (1990).
These construct-level descriptions of QWL set the stage for the third and last topic of this
31
article: the inseparable link between QOL and QWL.
The Interrelationship Between Quality of Life and Quality of Work-Life In the 1970s,
70
researchers began to focus on the potential impact of work on a person's other spheres of life
in tandem with clarifying the theoretical questions relating to the subjective nature and
holistic integration of the main actors in QWL (Loscocco and Roschelle, 1991).
In all, four theoretical frameworks were offered. According to the Transfer Model, also
known as the Spillover Effect, one's level of happiness at work has repercussions on one's
personal life (Georges and Brief, 1990). Several researchers have shown a favorable
relationship between employment and non-occupational domains, including Kavanagh and
Halpern (1977), Schmitt and Bedian (1982), and Korn Hauser (1965). But Staines (1980)
refines this discovery in important ways. After reviewing the data closely, he determines that
the positive correlation between work and non-work life is limited to certain areas. With this
55
in mind, Rousseau (1978) argues that the transfer model does not hold true for all work
settings. Certain types of work (those requiring extensive periods of isolation or physical
exertion, for example) are better suited to the structure of the pay scale. Leiter and Durup
(1996) note that the connection between work and life might be direct or indirect. Any time
an external factor (such as a move to a new job or the birth of a child) has an immediate and
112
noticeable impact on an individual's internal experience (their home or work life), this is an
example of a direct effect. An individual's subjective evaluation of an external factor as a
source of stress or happiness constitutes an indirect effect. If an employee isn't happy in their
job, the compensation model predicts that they'll look for fulfillment in other areas of their
lives (Rousseau, 1978; Schmittand Bedian, 1982; Schmitt and Mellon, 1980; Staines, 1980).
Again, Staines's (1980) study seems to confirm the JEAN-PIERRE MARTEL AND GILLES
DUPUIS compensation model under specific conditions and demonstrates that some facets of
23
work life correlate adversely with facets of life outside of work. For instance, the author notes
118
that people who have physically taxing jobs often look for low-effort forms of recreation in
114
order to help them recover faster. Several authors have pointed out that the compensation
31
model, when stretched to its extreme, predicts an inverse relationship between job satisfaction
and satisfaction outside of work, which contradicts the findings of the majority of studies. The
Segmentation Approach This model holds that one's professional and personal lives are
separate and do not impact one another (Georges and Brief, 1990). According to Foucheret et
al. (2003), the condition that defines someone who engages in this form of segmentation may
23
be categorized as psychological disengagement in the face of the divested life or work sphere.
The Theory of Accommodation The accommodation theory holds that one must willingly cut
down on one area of interest in order to appropriately address the needs of another
115
(Lambert,1990). This author notes that this strategy for balancing work and personal life is
especially popular among working moms with small children.
In light of the increasing emphasis placed on reconciling work and family responsibilities,
however, this approach is likely to be amenable to a growing number of worker subgroups,
whether they be men or women. None of the aforementioned three models is widely accepted,
93
as noted by Loscocco and Roschelle (1991). In particular, they point out that Schmitt and
43
Bedian (1982) confirm the most important assumptions of all of the models and so provide
30
the most convincing evidence in favor of them.
correlation between happiness in one's work and happiness in one's life. Results presented by
Staines (1980) and Rousseau (1978) qualified the adoption of any of the models and propose
that they should be implemented depending on the domains and occupations examined.
In a similar vein, Elizur and Shye (1990) sought to establish the connection between QOL and
QWL more generally. An effort to shed light on the matter led to the development of a
12
conceptual system in the form of a cone, with QOL at the base and QWL at the peak.
Job happiness, life contentment, and the evaluation of one's own performance at work were all
2
found to be inside the model's middle third, away from the cone's apexes. What the writers are
saying
106
The quality of life and the quality of work life both have an impact on how well one does
their job, as shown by these findings. Therefore, it is vital to include the components of work
likely to influence life outside of work when assessing the whole effect of the function of
work for an individual. As a result, the authors conclude that any measure taken to enhance
57
QWL or QOL, in general, has the potential to provide positive results in the workplace.
Using the Psyclit and Sociofile electronic publishing databases, we find that between 1973
and 2002, there were hardly any works that contributed to the theoretical development needed
12
to further elucidate the construct of QWL. It's also worth noting that there has been no
45
discernible change in the average monthly number of QWL articles published. The number of
articles filed away under Quality of Working Life (QWL) and its close relative, Quality of
Work Life (QOWL), has leveled off in recent years. Twelve articles were published annually
between 1973 and 1979, twenty-six between 1980 and 1984, fifty-four between 1985 and
1989, forty-two between 1990 and 1994, and forty-four annually between 1995 and 2002. The
number of articles listed under the descriptors "mental health at work" and "occupational
26
stress" in the same publication databases increased from 31 per year between 1973 and 1979
to 247 between 1980 and 1984 to 392 between 1985 and 1989 to 450 between 1990 and 1994
to 554 publications per year between 1995 and 2002.
These numbers seem to confirm academics' increased interest in constructs that may be more
defined than QWL. Several ideas might be put up to account for this development. Prolonged
theoretical fuzziness associated with JEAN-PIERRE MARTEL AND GILLES DUPUIS runs
the danger of developing a certain dissatisfaction and loss of interest among scholars and
practitioners working in the field, as suggested by Nadler and Lawler (1983). Over the course
31
of the concept's evolution, academics hit a number of theoretical and methodological
roadblocks, none of which have been sufficiently addressed to gather enough experts behind a
common understanding. In a conclusion, it indicates that QWL's popularity is quite responsive
to the economic condition. According to Nadler and Lawle (1983), the effects of the oil crisis
and the competitiveness of foreign markets (mainly Asian) on the U.S. economy explain the
10
fall in interest in QWL seen towards the end of the 1970s. That being said, let's think about
the economic realities of the 1990s, which were marked by
(1) the expansion of global markets, which has boosted competitiveness between countries
and, by extension, businesses worldwide;
Third, the proliferation of electronic means of communication (cell phones, e-mail, etc.) has
117
cut into people's personal space and made it harder for them to relax and unwind. Among
46
other things, this may explain why fewer studies are being conducted in this area. The
literature suggests that the observed decline in the QWL concept is attributable to both
theoretical deficiencies and to sputtering interest in the field. This is paradoxical given the rise
67
in the number of studies on workplace stress and mental health during the same time period,
12
likely due to the pressure put on by the aforementioned climate. Consensus on what QWL
implies and the ability to measure this construct for a specific person based on a given
definition are both impacted by the lack of a clear definition, both of which are vital to
researchers interested in the psychological elements affecting the work environment. In large
part, the methods presented in this essay are meant to address these two shortcomings. In
order to create a trustworthy, sensitive, and valid instrument to assess QWL, it is necessary to
34
provide a precise definition based on A NEW MODEL OF QUALITY OF WORK LIFE well-
established theoretical models. In conclusion, the theoretical idea of QWL has changed
somewhat linearly during the last three decades. As time went on, the structure softened and
evolved into something more subjective, dynamic, and systemic than it had been at the outset.
30
The term "quality of work life" refers to the interactions between an employee and his or her
surroundings, bringing the human element to the table alongside the technical and economic
considerations. the lens through which work is typically viewed and planned; the creation of
more engaging, satisfying, and productive jobs and work environments for people at all levels
of an organization; the integration of people's needs and growth into organizational decision-
making; the understanding that this vantage point is necessary for comprehending how the
working world can be adaptively evolved to deal with the uncertainty, complexity, and
turbulence of the environment.
Today's high-tech, the fast-paced world has created a vastly different work atmosphere than it
did even a decade ago. The Institute of Industrial Engineers estimates that the typical worker
will switch professions six times during the course of their working life. These days, it's
unusual for an employee to remain with the same firm for his or her whole career. Companies
need to develop methods to not only acquire competent individuals but also retain them since
74
workers are frequently eager to leave for better possibilities. Unfortunately, many workers
today feel that they are working harder, quicker, and longer hours than ever before.
Management should be concerned about the effects of job-related stress on employees since it
may lead to a loss of employee dedication, lower productivity, and even resignation.
Since it is so simple to do so nowadays, many workers often conduct work outside of the
2
office. QWL: Indeed, it is difficult to best conceptualize the quality of work-life elements,
such as the availability of cell phones, pagers, PDAs, and computers, which make it more
difficult for employees to get away from the office. One of the more stressful professions
today is in the Information Technology (IT) field. Walton offered eight broad concepts related
to QWL, including
Possibility for immediate human development Possibility for sustained development and
safety
Work and entire life space Social integration in the workplace Constitutionalism in the
workplace
The QWL domain's constructions and essential features of QWL programs have been the
subject of a number of works in print. Research by others, like Pelsma et al. and Hart,
indicated that teachers' QWL was affected just as much by their mental health as by their
motivation. They concluded that one's QWL may be gauged in the context of certain
employment by combining the quantity and intensity of stress experienced by the person with
his or her level of job satisfaction. It was hypothesized by Winter et al. that academics'
31
experiences, attitudes, and behaviors are influenced directly and indirectly by five different
dimensions of the work environment: role stress, job features, supervisory, structural, and
31
sectoral factors.
Job fulfillment:
24
To be satisfied with one's employment, by definition, one must like both the intrinsic and
extrinsic components of that work, such as compensation, promotion, and possibilities for
professional growth. In contrast, work satisfaction refers to a pleasant emotional state that an
individual reports feeling after reflecting on their job and their experiences within it.
Materialistic ethics is a theory that was created by Korma and colleagues. It suggests that a
job's attractiveness increases in proportion to its relative status, pay, and influence. Literature
reviews reveal that these are the most common criteria by which managers assess their
professional progress.
You may say that a person's level of professional satisfaction depends on how well their
career and life goals line up with the opportunities they have been given. Economic factors
48
(such as pay and retirement benefits) and occupational and familial factors also have a role in
establishing career goals (professional satisfaction, job satisfaction, advancement
2
opportunities, relocation, etc.). Some studies have shown a positive relationship between a
fulfilled home life and both subjective and objective measures of professional success. This
was corroborated by the research of Rapoport and Rapoport, who demonstrated that the
encouragement and distraction provided by loved ones is a significant role in determining
QWL. According to Judge et al., a person's professional success/achievement comprises both
their objective career success (such as their job title, pay, or level of advancement) and their
subjective career success (their own estimation of career accomplishment). In addition to
working long hours for a high wage and rising in rank, studies show that staying in the same
47
job for a long period and the overall number of years spent working in the same field are also
2
positively associated with success in one's chosen profession. Several studies of managers and
executives have indicated that desire is correlated with professional achievement. Herriot
acknowledges that there may be tension between one's private and professional lives, as well
as between one's own and others' definitions of what constitutes a successful life. Beliefs,
values, expectations, and goals all have a role in how a profession is understood.
example(s): Employment circumstances Satisfaction with one's career has been connected to a
number of crucial organizational outcomes including loyalty to the company, willingness to
adapt to new ways of doing things, and satisfaction with overall job performance. Career
satisfaction is inversely associated with the intention to quit, and this association is as strong
as the opinion of the labor market, the most dependable predictor in the study literature on
turnover. Among the interesting findings from studies on the topic of pay satisfaction is the
20
moderate strength of the correlation between actual pay and happiness with one's salary.
30
While there is a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two,
compensation alone explains less than 25% of the variation in how satisfied an employee is
with their pay. Even the best-paid workers may not be happy with their salary.
Staff Involvement
Neither employees nor supervisors have a firm grasp of the idea. Lack of backing from upper
management.
Job Relevance
Among the notable results from studies on the topic of pay satisfaction is the moderate
strength of the correlation between real compensation and happiness with one's salary. While
there is a positive and statistically significant correlation between the two, compensation
alone explains less than 25% of the variation in how satisfied an employee is with their pay.
Even the best-paid workers may not be happy with their salary.
2.Aspects of Relationships
4.Economic Consideration
30
CHAPTER- III
COMPANY PROFIL
31
INDUSTRY PROFILE
India's car sector is booming and rapidly expanding. Producing goods in this sector contributes
36
22% to the country's manufacturing GDP (GDP). There are a lot of direct and indirect jobs created by
the car industry. On average, it is thought that three to five supplementary employment are produced for
every direct position in the car industry.
Several international car manufacturers have shown considerable interest in the Indian domestic
market because of its size and prospective expansion. India now ranks third in global two-wheeler
19
exports, behind China and Japan. Standard Chartered Bank predicts that by 2020, India would have
surpassed Thailand as the world's second-largest exporter of automobiles.
Increased accessibility, higher earnings, and undiscovered markets are expected to fuel steady
but circumspect expansion over the next several years. As a result of government support and changes
5
in the worldwide market, such as the falling price of natural rubber, the Indian car sector is poised for
rapid expansion.
Investments
Many automakers have begun investing extensively in different parts of the business in recent
months in an effort to balance output with demand. Here are just a few of India's big car industry
investments and new developments:
Ashok Leyland is planning to spend between 450 and 500 crores (US$ 73.54 and 81.71 million)
on
India, in terms of both investment and capital expenditure (CAPEX) in FY15. The organization
is responsible for managing assets of Rs 6,000 crore (about $980.56 million) in seven different
countries.
When it comes to production, Tata Motors is using a "hub-and-spoke" approach, with its main
production facility located in India and smaller satellite facilities in other international markets. Smaller
operations will be established in promising areas including Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.
Governmental Efforts
Indian law permits full foreign direct investment (FDI) via the automatic route in the
automotive industry, which the government actively promotes. The government cut the excise tax on
small cars, motorbikes, scooters, and commercial vehicles from 12% to 8%, on SUVs from 30% to
24%, on mid-segment cars from 24% to 20%, on large-segment automobiles from 24% to a mere 2%.
Following the government's decision to settle VAT issues, many major Indian automakers
announced plans to spend around Rs 11,500 crore (US$ 1.87 billion) in Maharashtra.
38
Government initiatives like the Automobile Mission Plan for 2006–2016 attempt to boost the
industry and keep it booming. Another factor helping this industry forward is the existing regulatory
framework overseen by the Ministry of Highways.
SIAM and ACMA are government-appointed organizations charged with fostering growth in
India's automotive sector.
In addition, the Indian car industry anticipates a boom in hybrid vehicle sales in the next years,
keeping pace with global trends.
Sales of approximately 13.5 million units had been recorded by the end of October, with the
two-wheeler market being the only one to see positive growth at 12.9% YOY. According to Frost &
Sullivan's vice president for automotive and transportation practice, Vijay Kakade, "this may be linked
to the cheap cost of two-wheelers in India." He said that the light commercial vehicle (LCV) market
was struck the worst, with sales dropping to about 330,000 units, a decrease of 18.9 percent year-over-
year from 2013.
31
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Continual improvement and pursuit of excellence are top priorities for Tata Motors. We have
built state-of-the-art factories, research laboratories, and design studios in over twenty-six locations
spanning Asia, Africa, and Europe to help us reach our goal.
Manufacturing
Tata Motors' core value is creating vehicles of the highest quality possible. Our manufacturing
facilities check that every stage of the process, from planning to fabrication to final assembly, is carried
out to perfection. Our operations use state-of-the-art machinery and up-to-date production methods. We
possess the only comprehensive climatic test and pedestrian test facility in India, and we also house the
largest engine development center in all of India. Manufacturing and assembly lines at Tata Motors'
abroad facilities are also state-of-the-art, allowing the company to produce enormous quantities of
automobiles of varying models. Our dedication to automation and cutting-edge technology has helped
us become the commercial vehicle industry leader in India and one of the world's most prestigious
automakers.
Design
The design of a car may tell a lot about its owner. In the course of manufacturing both consumer
and commercial cars for over seventy years, we have gained a thorough grasp of our client's wants and
6
objectives, which we have codified into our exclusive Impact Design vocabulary. Our design studios in
India, the UK, and Italy are on the cutting edge of all the newest design techniques, including clay
modeling, 3D modeling, styling, architectural design, and product packaging. Cars like the Tigor and
Nexon, our most recent offerings, showcase our dedication to innovative, worldwide style. Our Ultra
vehicles are designed to have an international appearance, increased comfort while driving, and top-tier
efficiency.
Engineering
Tata Motors' commitment to quality is shown in every aspect of the company. In order to
provide our clients with the greatest possible vehicle experience, we employ dedicated engineers and
quality control specialists who assure the creation of top-notch cars, which has resulted in a meteoric
rise in demand for our goods throughout the world. We pay close attention to vital concerns such as the
vehicle's aesthetics, functionality, security, ease of use, upkeep, fuel economy, and total cost of
33
ownership. Through the use of cutting-edge 3D modeling and visualization tools, as well as the
incorporation of advanced electronic control systems for vehicles and hybrid-electric powertrains, our
top-tier engineering and research facilities are able to create highly sophisticated automobiles. Our most
recent products, Tigor and Nexon, as well as our newest commercial vehicles, Ultra and Sign a, are
25
direct results of the tireless work put in by our technological centers. Our unparalleled technological
superiority in the car sector has allowed us to further solidify our position as market leaders.
38
Markets
Our global reach has grown as a result of strategic partnerships with companies like Fiat and
5
Brazil's Marco polo, as well as the establishment of our own production facilities in the United
Kingdom, South Korea, Thailand, South Africa, Indonesia, Austria, and Slovakia.
Overview
Tata Motors is one of the few firms in the world to provide such a diverse selection of products
69
to its customers, with more than 8.5 million Tata-branded automobiles on the road today. As early as
1961, we began actively exporting goods throughout the world. The corporation dominates the market
for passenger vehicles across the board, from compact cars like hatchbacks and sedans to large SUVs
and multi-purpose vehicles like minivans. Tata Motors' extensive lineup of commercial vehicles
includes several variants adapted to regional circumstances and designed to conform to stringent
quality, safety, environmental, and user-comfort guidelines. The Tata Motors group now has a global
network of more than 8,400 contact points across more than 125 countries. R&D facilities for Tata
Motors may be found in the United Kingdom, Italy, India, and South Korea. Due to the company's
50
extensive international presence, it is well-equipped to meet the varying automotive standards and
consumer preferences in countries all over the world. Disclaimer: The locations and limits shown on
this map are intended to be illustrative only and may not reflect the true physical and political
boundaries of any area.
Africa
Since its founding in 1992, Africa has been one of Tata Motors' most important markets. Our
vehicles, buses, SUVs, and trucks may be seen driving in left- and right-hand-drive on the streets of
Africa. Trucks between 7 and 75 tons are produced at our plant in Rosslyn, South Africa.
South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Tunisia, Zambia, South Africa, Ivory Coast, Kenya,
Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, and South Africa.
6
The continent of Latin America
Since 2009, Tata Motors has been actively courting the Latin American market. The Indigo and
the Manza, both tiny and midsize sedans, the Vista, a hatchback, and the Tata Xenon, a truck, are our
biggest sellers in this market. Our cars provide a unique blend of high-octane performance and low total
cost of ownership.
Russia
31
Our plans for international growth include expanding our presence in Russia and the CIS.
Production n by us
base in Ukraine allows for localization, which improves delivery times and allows for more
individualized service. As a result of our extensive fleet, we can match each client with the perfect truck
or bus. In order to offer our clients the best possible service, we have forged relationships with dealers
and distributors in their respective areas.
Ukraine, Russia
APAC
In, Tata Motors became the first Indian automaker to sell vehicles in Sri Lanka and other Asian
countries.
36
1961. The Asian countries of Bangladesh, Nepal, Myanmar, Bhutan, Afghanistan, Indonesia,
6
Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam are also important markets for Tata Motors. Tata
Motors is well on its way to realizing its worldwide growth goal, with a presence in most regions and a
leading position in the commercial vehicle class in a number of countries.
Arab Peninsula
110
Since 1971, when our vehicles were initially marketed in Bahrain, Tata Motors has been
98
actively doing business in the Middle East region. The United Arab Emirates, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Turkey are all current markets for our automobiles. Ten percent of our exports
go to that area. We provide items with the dependability and toughness required to function in the
climatic and topographical circumstances found in your region. We have become the market leader for
17
medium-sized buses and are now branching out into the pickup and truck markets. Our most recent
releases in this market are the Tata Elanza, Xenon, and Prima.
All of Tata Motors' CSR efforts are aimed toward enhancing the standard of living in
economically disadvantaged areas close to our factories and offices.
Our programs target the historically and socially disadvantaged Scheduled Caste and Scheduled
Tribe populations with an emphasis on health, education, employment, and the environment in line with
the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs). Over 8.3 million Indians benefited from our CSR
initiatives in 2019–20.
Overview
38
Tata Motors Limited, a multinational automaker, is proud of its heritage and strives relentlessly
to fulfill the hopes and dreams of its local community. Our six-pronged CSR approach addresses a wide
range of social issues, from antenatal care through higher education, and beyond, all the way to
vocational training and employment.
In FY 2019-20, our CSR efforts impacted 830300 people, with 41% being members of the SC
and ST communities; these efforts directly contributed to the achievement of our Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs). We have been providing services in a variety of fields, from those aimed
at promoting long-term sustainability by means of active community participation to those focused on
promoting social and environmental improvement by means of fixing problems with healthcare and
sanitation, increasing family income, empowering women, and so on.
● Aarogya's 3,99,619 lives were impacted by efforts to combat hunger, raise public awareness,
and provide preventive medical treatment.
● Kaushalya Skilled 1,17,474 individuals via improved employability measures such as skill
development, vocational training, income supplement aid, and women's empowerment.
A total of 1,11,960 volunteer hours were contributed by the Seva Tata Motors family.
● Vidyadhanam Investment in the promotion of holistic educational efforts - affected the lives of 1,52,558
kids.
● Vasundhara Established 1,17,464 tree seedlings and raised awareness in 90,252 households.
Improve the lives of 3,000 indigenous communities with the use of Aadhaar's rural-focused initiatives for
integrated development using an Aadhaar-led strategy.
31
CHAPTER- IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
38
38
41
38
43
44
43
44
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
CHAPTER- V
FINDINGS SUGGESTIONS
&
CONCLUSION
FINDINGS
22 66
Seventy percent of those polled said they like going to work and are happy with the circumstances
there.
Nearly two-thirds (64%) of respondents agree that they are given enough latitude to provide opinions
and recommendations.
Sixty percent or more of those surveyed report a positive atmosphere amongst their coworkers.
Eighty-two percent of those polled believe that their company's divisions work well together and that
this fosters a stronger feeling of community.
91
The survey also found that just 30% of participants found their training programs to help develop the
knowledge and abilities they needed to do their jobs effectively. However, they believe that training
programs strengthen the bonds between workers.
22
Just 60% of those polled said they are paid fairly and adequately. Despite the obvious risks and
obligations, however, just half of the respondents believe they will be compensated financially.
Of those polled, 15 responded with a strong agreement that the company would pay wages based on
consideration of their job, 24 responded with the agreement, 18 responded with disagreement, and 17
44
responded with severe disagreement. The remaining 26 respondents have given a neutral response to
the question of whether or not pay should be adjusted based on duties.
Of those surveyed, 53% think that the company does a good job of correlating employee success with
financial compensation, while 26% disagree.
The vast majority of respondents believed that the company gives them the freedom to pursue projects
that interest them while still achieving organizational goals.
It's safe to assume that the aforementioned perks are not being used by the vast majority of staff
95
members. They do, however, have access to enough social protections and benefits.
38
Half of those surveyed said their company offered job security and social security benefits to its
workers, while 31% said their company did not.
Eighty-three percent of respondents, except seventeen percent, are content in their current positions.
Out of a total of 100 people surveyed, 41% are very satisfied with their work-life at the company,
36% are satisfied, 11% are lukewarm, 6% are terrible, and 5% are very dissatisfied.
57
SUGGESTIONS
40
Almost half of those polled did not believe they were an integral part of the group. Different factors may be at
play here, but whatever the case, this has a significant influence on the efficiency and effectiveness of the
company as a whole.
28
Employees believe the company does not take into account their tasks when determining their remuneration.
The corporation should reevaluate the salaries of its workers.
Also, workers aren't happy since they can't give their all to the company in their area of expertise. This is
something that the company should think about carefully.
103
Firms owe it to their staff to reassure them about their futures in the company and their access to social
security.
To hear it from the company's workers, the company's training programs aren't doing much good. As a result,
management must address the issue and help staff members move on.
28
The company has to take new, creative steps if it wants its employees to be more invested in their work and
happier in their careers.
71
There aren't many people who think their work-life balance is about par. These workers need extra attention to
reach their full potential.
59
CONCLUSION:
The purpose of the quality of the work-life study was to provide insight into the working conditions of the workforce.
72
The purpose of this research was to learn more about workers' experiences in the workplace and how they feel about
their jobs and other aspects of their work-related lives. It was conducted to shed light on how employees felt about the
quality of their work life in the business and what they wanted from it. All of the participants in this research are
workers at a single company in Hyderabad. Convenience sampling was utilized as the method of the sample. All of the
research relies on the assumption that individuals' work-life satisfaction is unaffected by their specific jobs, workplaces,
and other contextual circumstances. Time constraints, among others, were accounted for in the research.
16
We used the chi-square test, graphs, tables, and other suitable statistical tools to assess the data we gathered from the
main and secondary sources. The survey concluded that workers have a great quality of life in the workplace.
According to them, everyone gets along well, there is good communication between different teams, and the overall
120
atmosphere at work is inspiring. Not surprisingly, the research also revealed that many workers feel their efforts go
unrewarded.
As a company, it is responsible for fostering a culture where all workers feel like they belong. The compensation
16
structure has to be rethought and restructured in light of the duties held. Staff members will be more invested in their
job if they are allowed to do so in an area of particular interest to them. Constantly implementing new ways to improve
the quality of life for workers at work is essential.
60
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Quality of Your Work Life, by Marinalva Da Silva, VDM Verlag Publishing, 2009.
Human Resource Management, by Robert L. Mathis and John H. Jackson, published by Cengage Learning in
2010.
The 2008 edition of Dr. C. R. Kothari's Research Methodology was published by New Age International.
61
ANNEXURE-1
62
63