Grandini
Grandini
Grandini
ENDODONTIC TREATMENT:
THE PREREQUISITE FOR THE PLACEMENT
OF FIBER POSTS
SIMONE GRANDINI, ANIELLO MOLLO
T
he study and practice of Endodontics includes basic should not be under-estimated nor carried out superficially, as
clinical science comprising the biology of healthy pulp, an error at this stage could compromise the rest of the
and the etiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of treatment.
diseases and injuries of the pulp and associated periradicular If the tooth cannot be isolated, neither the endodontic nor
conditions.1 the restorative treatment can be performed. Apart from a
Until the middle of the 19th century, endodontics did not situation where the tooth is in such a poor state that extraction
play a significant role in dental therapeutics, as there was no is the only possible solution, there are cases where the isolation
prevention, no scientifically tested materials, no standardized of a tooth may be difficult. In endodontics, the pre-treatment
and reliable clinical protocols. During this era, endodontic phase may be defined as a set of techniques which prepare the
treatment was performed on a trial and error basis, with little tooth for endodontic treatment and which allows and/or
chance of predicting clinical outcomes. However, during the simplifies an optimal isolation of the operative field.3
last 50 years, a whole generation of dentists has become Root canal treatment, therefore, does not begin with the
committed to this field of dentistry, with the ultimate placing of the rubber dam, but rather with all the periodontal
realization of endodontics as a clinical speciality. and restorative procedures necessary to simplify its placement.
The innovations in restorative dentistry over the past decade In any endodontic treatment, it is of fundamental importance
have contributed significantly to improving the quality of the to have a sterile operative field. Once the dam is in position,
restorations of root-treated teeth, giving them a better long the clamp and the tooth must be disinfected with cotton wool
term prognosis. Microbiologic studies have demonstrated that soaked with a fast- evaporating antiseptic.4
controlling pulpal infection is of utmost importance for There are several disinfectants and techniques which can be
successful endodontic treatment, and directed the therapy to used to remove contaminated bacteria from treated surfaces,
a rational approach no longer founded on an empirical but on with simple and standardized protocols being suggested by
a scientific basis. some authors. Dental plaque should be removed with rubber
The introduction of new materials and instruments for the points and prophylactic pastes prior to the placement of the
preparation, cleaning, shaping and obturation of the root rubber dam after which the operative field should be cleaned
canals has contributed to the dissemination of endodontic initially with 30% hydrogen peroxide and subsequently with
practice among general dentists. While this has allowed an iodine-based disinfectant.5,6
clinicians to restore teeth that previously would have been The pre-treatment procedures which are used to prepare a
extracted, it has clearly demonstrated the limits of tooth for endodontic treatment may be divided into two types
contemporary endodontics. Like every discipline, endodontics according to their duration: provisional pre-treatment types
has guidelines and clinical protocols, which every dentist and semi-definitive pre-treatment types. The former are self-
should carefully follow to achieve success and reduce the explanatory and have a limited time duration, whereas the
number of failures. latter may be used even after the conclusion of endodontic
therapy. From a clinical point of view, however, pre-treatment
Pre-Endodontic Restoration procedures are separated into periodontal procedures and
The success of endodontic therapy depends on the correct restorative procedures. Not included in these descriptions are
cleaning, shaping and filling of the root canals,2 but before
starting these procedures, the tooth must be isolated with the
use of rubber dam and the cavity access prepared. These first
two steps of the therapy are of particular importance and
Aniello Mollo, DDS, Dept of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Figure 1: Examples of different methods of isolation of the operative
University of Siena, Italy field.
2a 2b
2c 2d 2e
Figure 2: Example of pretreatment; 2a: diagnostic x-ray; 2b: clinical situation; 2c: after initial opening of the pulp chamber, and use of the rubber dam,
the buccal side still needs further isolation; 2d: isolation completed with the help of fluid silicon (OpalDam, Manufact, Country); 2e: 1 yr post-op control.
clinical cases in which the prevailing periodontal conditions Once the clamp has been stabilized, any gap between the
must be first addressed before endodontic therapy can rubber dam and the crown of the tooth should be eliminated
commence. However, should clinicians find themselves even if one or more of the tooth walls are missing or if there
working under emergency conditions and are thus unable to has been pre-endodontic restoration. Common dental
request that the patient undergoes periodontal treatment, materials such as zinc oxide-eugenol cement, resins, or
they should still eliminate any plaque or calculus near the polyvinylsiloxane impression materials may be used for this
access cavity. purpose.9,10 There are also “fluid dams” available that are
Teeth requiring endodontic treatment seldom have the designed to prevent the infiltration of saliva, blood or irrigation
anatomy which is suitable for treatment “lege artis”. fluid into the operative field.
Reductions in the height of clinical crowns due to anatomical Walton and Torabinejad suggest that the best preparation
or pathological reasons may render the application of the for cavity access is to section the tooth at the cervical level, as
rubber dam difficult. However, if the operative field is this gives full visibility and allows for the most direct access as
inadequately isolated this could jeopardize the optimal seal the pulp chamber is completely exposed.6 Although the
that is required to prevent re-infection of the root canal space authors indicated that any restorative pre-treatment would
in the time between appointments. compromise subsequent endodontic procedures, there are
It has been suggested that the stabilization of the clamp in clinical cases where restorative pre-treatment is mandatory
order to position the rubber dam is the crucial moment for (Figure 2).
deciding whether or not to carry out endodontic The aim of restorative techniques of endodontic pre-
pretreatment.7 There are cases which appear difficult but treatment is to restore the previously mutilated dental anatomy
which may be solved with methods which do not change the to a state that makes endodontic therapy easier and gives
dental structure. The use of a rubber dam clamp which has not better post-endodontic coronal seals. Different restorative
been designed for that specific purpose may be a viable materials may be used, including reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol
alternative, such as using a clamp made for incisors for cements, glass-ionomer cements, and both auto- and light-
premolars or even molars (Figure 1). On other occasions, it may cured resin composites. It should be pointed out that pre-
be sufficient to modify the conformation of the clamp to adapt endodontic restorations with resin composites may be re-used
it to a tooth with poor crown structure. For example, the as the foundation for subsequent post-endodontic
clinician may tilt the top of the points that anchor the clamp to restorations. Mechanical devices such as copper bands and
the tooth.6 Alternatively, the clamp may be stabilized by using orthodontic bands are used less frequently than in the past due
a composite with adhesive properties.8 to the difficulties encountered in trying to ensure a hygienic
Hedstrom files and Gates-Glidden drills, but using the the transition of the alloy from an austenitic phase (more
instruments from the smallest to the largest. stable) to a martensitic phase (more dynamic). The two main
The “balanced force technique” was introduced by Roane et features of the alloy are shape memory and super-elasticity.30
al. in 1985.22 The technique was originally associated with the The elasticity of Ni-Ti instruments in bending and torsion is two
use of specially designed stainless-steel or nickel-titanium (NiTi) to three times higher than that of stainless steel instruments.
K-type instruments (Flex-R-Files) with modified tips in a step- The modulus of elasticity is significantly lower for Ni-Ti alloys
down manner. The instruments are introduced into the root than for stainless steel. As a result, lower forces are exerted on
canal with a clockwise motion of a maximum of 180 degrees intraradicular dentin when compared to stainless steel
and apical advancement (placement phase), followed by a instruments.31 In order to take advantage of these features, Ni-
counterclockwise rotation of a maximum of 120 degrees with Ti instruments should be kept active, through constant and
adequate apical pressure (cutting phase). The final removal continuous rotation within the root canal. Kazemi et al.
phase is then performed with a clockwise rotation and demonstrated that Ni-Ti instruments require less force to bend
withdrawal of the file from the root canal. Apical preparation and can sustain a greater strain than those made of stainless
should be larger than that recommended for other manual steel before surpassing the elasticity limit and fracturing.32
techniques, e.g., to size #80 in straight canals and size #45 in Because of the metallurgical properties of Ni-Ti, it was
curved canals. The major advantages of the “balanced force possible to engineer instruments with tapers greater than 2%,
technique” are: 1) good apical control of the file tip as the which is the norm for stainless steel instruments, as well as
instrument does not cut over the complete length; 2) optimal reduce the lateral forces during instrumentation. Greater taper
centering of the instrument because of the non-cutting safety instruments are well-suited to the “crown-down” technique.
tip; and 3) eliminating the need to pre-curve the instrument. During treatment, the part of the instruments with the greater
In 1993, Scianamblo et al. 23 described another root canal taper makes contact with the coronal third of the root canal
preparation procedure that is based on the aforementioned and enlarges it, eliminating any interference at this level. This
techniques, and stressed the concept of early coronal subsequently allows access to the apical third of the root canal
enlargement. Following pre-enlargement, the apical third is by instruments with reduced tapers. In this way a reduced
negotiated last, establishing patency, and confirming working lateral force is applied on the curved canal walls during
length. The apical zone is then finished so that a smooth instrumentation, decreasing the number of canal damages
uniform taper from the orifice level to the radiographic when compared with the results obtained using traditional
terminus is obtained. The disadvantage of this procedure is the stainless steel instruments.31 Recent studies have shown that
large amount of time required, the large number of Ni-Ti instruments: a) reduce the number of zips, ledges and
instruments used, and the risk, with Gates-Glidden drills, to apical transportations; b) remain more centered in the apical
provoke stripping at the middle and coronal level. lumen; c) remove less dentin, d) produce rounder preparations;
Many studies have shown that pre-enlargment (preflaring) of and e) are faster in shaping the root canal walls.33-36
root canals has several advantages.22,24 Firstly, preflaring removes Many Ni-Ti instruments are commercially available and their
the bulk of the necrotic and infected tissues from an infected manufacturers claim greater safety and easier instrumentation
root canal prior to apical instrumentation. The technique also than with stainless steel instruments. Although Ni-Ti
increases the tactile sensibility and control of the instrument tip instruments vary considerably in their design,31 the blades may
in the most difficult working area of the root canal. Enlargement be classified in two main categories: active cutting angles or
of the apical third may then be carried out without forcing the radial planes (rake angle). The former allows a cutting action
instruments, thus avoiding iatrogenic damages such as and a faster progression of the instruments than the latter,
displacement or blockage of the apical foramina. Finally, which works with a smoothing action rather than with a real
preflaring allows a greater penetration of the irrigants, and less cutting action. The instruments also vary considerably
extrusion of debris into the periapical regions 25-28 according to their transversal section. By reducing the area of
contact with the root canal walls, the cutting action is more
Canal Preparation with Rotary Ni-Ti Instruments efficient and torsional stress is reduced.31 The core of the
With the advent of the Ni-Ti alloy,29 endodontists have the instrument influences its flexibility and its mechanical
option of using a more pliable material that can follow the properties. When the core is reduced in dimension, the
canal curvature more easily. Ni-Ti is composed of instrument has a greater flexibility which respects the root
approximately 55% nickel and 45% titanium, and has a canal anatomy.31 A deep groove allows more debris
variable formula. It has the ability to alter its type of atomic transportation, increasing its cleaning effectiveness. Cutting
bonding, generating unique changes in the metallurgical efficiency and flexibility may also be regulated by balancing the
properties and crystallographic arrangement of the alloy. These flute angle. The greater the flute angle, the greater the
changes depend on temperature and stress, which can induce flexibility. Regarding the instrument tip, most of the recently
fractures.38 The former occurs when the tip of the instruments Lightspeed (LSX) 750-2000
is blocked in the root canal yet the shaft continues to rotate,
exceeding the elasticity of the alloy. This kind of fracture is of this cyclic stress is not usually visible to the naked eye.
often due to an excessive force applied to the instruments by However, evidence of microcrack formation may be observed
the dentist.39 However, cyclic fatigue is the most common when used instruments are examined with scanning electron
reason for the separation of Ni-Ti instruments.40 As an microscopy. These microcracks represent surface flaws that are
instrument rotates inside a canal, it undergoes alternate shifts generated during the manufacture of the instruments or slip-
from compression to tension during each rotation cycle, thus planes that are generated after clinical use of the instruments.
creating fatigue stress along the instrument surface. The result Crack initiation stress along these regions may be further
increased by dentin chip embedding and wedging. Once these
cracks are initiated, they propagate progressively during each
rotation cycle, creating heavy stress concentrations that rapidly
spread inward and eventually result in damage along the center
of the instrument shafts. To minimize instrument separation via
cyclic fatigue, several important issues must be borne in mind
regarding the use of rotary Ni-Ti instruments. This includes
limiting the re-use of these instruments, using low-speed, low-
torque motors, having pre-operative knowledge of the root
canal curvature, inserting the instruments along the correct
entry axis (i.e. straight line access), and limiting the length of
time in which an instrument is allowed to rotate within the
canal. Some practical suggestions are included below to reduce
the risk of instrument separation.
Endodontic Irrigants
Figure 6: Deteriorated instrument. If used again, separation is likely to
occur. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal is the combined result
bacterial flora inside the canal.49-51 Several studies have shown Phenolic compounds
that the inclusion of a chemical agent as a supplement to the Quaternary ammonium compounds
mechanical action makes the irrigant more effective in Alcohols
eliminating bacteria.48-56 The antibacterial effectiveness of
irrigants is evaluated using a sterile saline solution as the reducing the risk of instrument separation.
control. In an in vivo study on 40 teeth, Kuruvilla and Kamath • Low surface tension, to reach the apical delta and all of the
demonstrated that 0.9% saline solution reduced the CFU/ml areas which are not accessible to instrumentation.
(CFU - colony forming unit) by 25%, while chemical irrigants • No detrimental effect on subsequent filling of the root canal
are more than 60% effective.54 In an in vitro study on 30 case by endodontic filling materials and root canal sealers
mandibular premolars with pulpal pathology, Siqueira and co- • Possess substantivity by binding to root dentin to maintain its
workers found that using a saline solution as an irrigant bactericidal action
reduced the bacterial cells by 38.3% whereas 2.5% sodium • Be relatively innocuous for the patient and for the clinician.
hypochlorite was effective in reducing the bacterial flora by • Be easily acquired and have a low cost.
60%.55 Of the commonly used endodontic irrigants (Table III),
The efficacy of an endodontic irrigant also depends on its sodium hypochlorite has been the most thoroughly
capacity to reach un-instrumented areas. For this reason, investigated. Its most desirable characteristic is undoubtedly its
tensioactive substances have been included in the irrigant in wide spectrum anti-bacterial activity and anti-viral effect.
order to improve its penetration along the root canal walls. Direct contact with it eliminates bacteria, spores, fungi,
However, to facilitate the penetration of the irrigant, the root protozoa and viruses (including HIV, HSV-1, HSV-2, HBV and
canal walls must be properly instrumented. With the use of the HAV).48,55,59 It also has a solvent action on organic tissues, is
“crown-down” technique, early coronal flaring facilitates the easily acquired, has a low cost, and has a slight bleaching
penetration of the irrigant. Moreover, Ram demonstrated that effect on dentin. Unfortunately, it can have a potential
an irrigant can only reach the apex if the canal has been cytotoxic effect on the vital tissues, except for keratinized
enlarged to a dimension greater than ISO size 40.57 Ideally, an epithelia.59 It does not completely dissolve the smear layer, has
endodontic irrigant should have a potent bactericidal effect an unpleasant smell and taste, and can cause allergic
but exhibit minimal cytotoxicity on the periapical tissues. reactions.50,59 Household bleach, which is commercially
However, Spånberg et al. demonstrated, with in vivo and in available o the general public, contains 5.25% sodium
vitro studies, that no irrigant is able to combine all of these hypochlorite. The solution may be used clinically at this
characteristics.58 All antimicrobial agents have potential concentration or diluted with distilled water to a concentration
toxicity that could eliminate the potential advantages derived as low as 0.5%. However, it is still controversial whether the
from using these agents at higher concentrations. solution should be used in its diluted form, and whether it
should be used in combination with other irrigants.53,54
An ideal irrigant should have the following characteristics: Spånberg et al. found that 5.25% sodium hypochlorite is
• Bactericidal, to reduce the quantity of bacteria in an infected stronger than necessary and is toxic for the patient, and
canal system; suggested using it at 1% concentration. Conversely, other
• Solvent action, by means of proteolytic digestion and authors have demonstrated that diluting NaOCl diminishes the
dissolution of the necrotic tissues. antimicrobial properties and increases the time required to
• Ease of removal of dentinal debris, by maintaining them in destroy Enterococcus faecalis. 48,51,60-62 Others suggested the use
suspension. of 2.5-3% sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant.62,63
• Biocompatibility, in particular the irrigant should not be toxic or Mechanisms to increase the effectiveness of sodium
irritating to the periapical tissues should it flow out of the apex. hypochlorite include; increasing the temperature, applying
• Lubricating action, to facilitate the use of endodontic frequently, increasing contact time, using ultrasonic energy,
instruments, particularly in narrow canals, and consequently combining with chelating agents and other irrigants, adding
References
1. Council on Dental Education and Licensure, American Dental Association,
December, 1983.
2. Ingle JI.: Endodontics. 3rd ed. Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, 1985.
3. Schilder H.: Non surgical endodontics. Continuing educations course. Boston
University, Nov1978.
4. Grossmann LI, Oliet S, Del Rio CE.: Principles of endodontic practice, 11th ed. Lea
and Febiger: Philadelphia, 1988; 132-6.
5. Moller AJR: Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of
human teeth. Odontologisk Tidskrift 1996; 74(Suppl):1-380.
6. Walton RE, Torabinejad M: Principles and Practice of Endodontics, 2nd ed. W.B.
Saunders: Philadelphia, 1996; 201-22.
7. Glickmann G.: Preparation for treatment. In: Cohen S., Burns RC. Eds. Pathways
of the pulp. The C.V. Mosby Co.: St. Louis, 1998;, 80-116.
8. Lovdhal P., Wade C.: Problems in tooth isolation and post-endodontic
restorations. In: Problem solving in endodontics: prevention, identification and
management, James Gutmann, Editor 1997 CV Mosby Co: St. Louis, p.181-97.
9. Morgan LA, Marshall JG.: Solving endodontic isolation problems with interim
buildups of reinforced glass ionomer cement. J Endod 1990; 16:450-3.
10. Cavalli G.: Rimedi a problemi di isolamento del campo in terapia endodontica.
G.It.Endodon, 1993; 11:30-2.
11. Cathey G.: Molar endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1974; 18:345-66.
12. Vignoletti G, Mareschi P. Endodonzia, da arte a scienza, Promoden srl eds,
200; 15-55.
13. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 3rd ed. The CV Mosby Co: St. Louis, 1982; 207-55.
14. Schilder H, Fulton SY. Canal debridement and disinfection. In Cohen S., Burns
CLINICAL
R.C.: Pathways of the pulp. 3rd ed. The CV Mosby Co: St. Louis, 1984; 178. effects of established and potential root canal irrigants. J Endod 1995; 21:513-15.
15. Schilder H.: Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974; 52. Siqueira JF, Machado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, Uzeda M. Evaluation of the
18:269-96. effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the
16. Hulsmann M, Dummer M.H.: Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping elimination of Enterococcus Faecalis from the root canal. Int Endod J 1997;
goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 2005; 10:30-76. 30:279-82.
17. Lauricchese JM, Launay Y, Claisse A.: L’ampliazione sequenziale assistita. In: 53. Heling I, Chandler NP. Antimicrobical effect of irrigant combination within
Lauricchese JM, Maestroni F, Breillat J.: Endodonzia Clinica. Milano, Masson 1971; dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 1998; 31:8-14.
330-44. 54. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobical activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite
18. Riitano F.: The 3-stage method. Dent Cadmos. 1976 Apr;44(4):10-20. and 0.2% chlorexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigant. J
19. Abou Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH.: The anticurvature method to prepare the Endod 1998; 24:472-6.
curved root canal. J Amer Dent Assoc 1980; 101:792-4. 55. Siqueira JF, Rôças In, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the
20. Morgan LF, Montgomery S. An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%,
technique. J Endod 1984; 10:491-8. 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2000; 26:331-4.
21. Goering A. Michelich R, Schultz H. Instrumentation of root canals in molars 56. Spratt DA, Pratten J, Wilson M, Gulabivala K. An in vitro evaluation of the
using step-down technique. J Endod 1982; 8:550-4. antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates. Int Endod J 2001;
22. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The balanced force concept for 34:300-7.
instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985; 11:203-11. 57. Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
23. Ruddle CJ. Endodontic canal preparation: breakthrough cleaning and shaping 1977; 44:306-12.
strategies.Dent Today. 1994 Feb;13(2):44, 46, 48-9. 58. Spångberg L, Engstrom B, Langeland K. Biological effects of dental material.
24. Swindle RB, Neaverth EJ, Pantera EA, Ringle R. Effect of coronal radicular flaring Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36:856-71.
on apical transportation. J Endod 1991; 17:147-9. 59. Clarkson RM, Moule AJ. Sodium hypochlorite and its use as an endodontic
25. Leeb J. Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J irrigant. Aust Dent J 1998; 43:250-6.
Endod 1983; 9:463-70. 60. Ayhan H, Sultan N, Cirak M, Ruhi MZ, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various
26. Luiten DJ, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. A comparison of four endodontic irrigants on selected microorganism. Int Endod J 1999; 32:99-102.
instrumentation techniques on apical transportation. J Endod 1995; 21:26-32. 61. Siqueira JF, Batista MD, Fraga RC, De Uzeda M. Antibacterial effect of
27. Lim KC, Webber J.: The effect of root canal preparation on the shape of the endodontic irrigant on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative
curved root canal. Int Endod J 1985; 18:233-9. bacteria. J Endod. 1998; 24:414-6.
28. Gambarini G, Pongione G, Berruti E.: Flusso dell’irrigazione canalare con due 62. Gomes BPFA, Ferraz CCR, Vianna Me, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In
diverse metodiche di preparazione: Step Back e Crown Down. G It Endo 1994; 3:109-114. vitro activity of several concentration of sodium hypochlorite and chlorexidine gluconate
29. Walia H. Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2001; 34:424-8.
torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14:346-51. 63. Trepaginer CM, Madden RM, Lazzari EP. Quantitative study of sodium
30. Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int hypochlorite as an in vitro endodontic irrigant. J Endod 1977; 3:194-6.
Endod J 2000; 33:297-310. 64. Goldman LB, Goldman M, Kronman JH, Lin PS. The efficacy of several irrigating
31. Bergmans L, Cleynebrugel JV, Wevers MP. Mechanical root canal preparation solutions for endodontics: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med
with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the Oral Pathol 1981; 52:197-204.
American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 2001; 14:324-33. 65. Yamada RS, Armos A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A scanning electron microscopic
32. Kazemi R., Stenman E., Spånberg L. A comparison of stainless steel and NiTi H- comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part 3. J Endod
Type of identical design: torsional and bending tests. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Path, 1983; 9:137-42.
Endod 2000; 90:500-6. 66. Yoshida T, Shibata T, Shinohara T, Gomyo S, Sekine I. Clinical evaluation of the
33. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Brentdove S, Del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal efficacy of EDTA solution as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 1995; 21:592-3.
preparations NiTi hand, NiTi engine-driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 67. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four
1995; 21:146-51. root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 1987; 13:147-57.
34. Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of NiTi versus stainless steel instrumentation in 68. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of
resin simulated canals. J Endod 1997; 23:232-5. the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
35. Gambill JM, Alder M, Del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless Endod 2002; 94:658-66.
steel hand file instrumentation using computed tomography. J. Endod 1996; 69. Torabinejad M, Cho Y, Khademi AA, Bakland LK, Shabahang S. The effect of
22:369-75. various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the
36. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel- smear layer. J Endod 2003; 29:233-9.
titanium and stainless steel instruments. J. Endod 1995; 21:173-6. 70. Sabeti MA, Nekofar M, Motahhary P, Ghandi M, Simon JH. Healing of apical
37. Patiño PV, Biedma BM, Liébana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a periodontitis after endodontic treatment with and without obturation in dogs. J Endod
manual Glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J. Endod 2005: 2006; 32:628-33.
31:681-4. 71. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to
38. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A. Nickel titanium instruments-applications in the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995;
endodontics. Ishiyaku Euro-America Inc: St. Louis, 1994. 28:12-8.
39. Sattapan B, Palamara JE, Messer H. Torque during canal instrumentation using 72. Friedman CE, Sandrik JL, Heuer MA, Rapp GW. Composition and physical
rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod 2000; 26:156-60. properties of gutta-percha endodontic filling materials. J Endod 1977; 3:304-8.
40. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium 73. Marciano J, Michailesco PM. Dental gutta-percha chemical composition, x-ray
endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997; 23:77-85. identification, enthalpic studies and clinical implications. J Endod 1989;15:149-53.
41. Laszkiewicz JM., Gambarini G. Canal debridement with GT rotary files: SEM 74. Oliet S, Sorin SM. Effect of aging on the mechanical properties of hand-rolled
study. The 9th Biennial Congress of the ESE, 1999; Abs A10. gutta-percha endodontic cones. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977; 43:954-62.
42. Eggert C, Peters O, Barbakow F. Wear of nickel-titanium Lightspeed instruments 75. Johansson BI. A methodological study of the mechanical properties of
evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J Endod 1999; 25:494-7. endodontic gutta-percha. J Endod 1980; 6:781-3.
43. Wolcott S, Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, Meyers J. 76. Solomon SM, Oliet S. Rejuvenation of aged (brittle) endodontic gutta-percha
Separation incidence of ProTaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation. cones. J Endod 1979; 5:233-8.
J Endod 2006; 32:1139-41. 77. Moorer WR, Genet JM. Evidence for antibacterial activity of endodontic gutta-
44. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Wilson P, Speisser JM, Allemann C. Mechanical properties of percha cones. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53:503-7.
nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite 78. Sakhal S; Weine FS, Lemian L. Lateral condensation: inside view. Compend
treatment. J Endod 1998; 24:731-5. Contin Educ Dent 1991; 12:796, 798, 800.
45. Mandel E, Adib-Yazdi M, Benhamou LM, Lachkar T, Mesgouez C, Sobel M. 79. Schilder H, Goodman A, Aldrich W. The thermomechanical properties of gutta-
Rotary Ni-Ti profile systems for preparing curved canals in resin blocks: Influence of percha. I. The compressibility of gutta-percha. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;
operator on instrument breakage. Int Endod J 1999; 32:436-43 37:946-53.
46. Mesgouez C, Rilliard F, Matossian L, Mandel E. Influence of operator experience 80. Buchanan LS. The continuous wave of obturation technique: “centered
on canal preparation time when using the rotary Ni-Ti Profile system in simulated condensation of warm gutta-percha in 12 seconds”. Dent Today 1996; 36 :876-82.
curved canals. Int Endod J 2003; 36:161-5. 81. Goldberg M, Lacerda-Pinheiro S, Jegat N, Six N, Septier D, Priam F, Bonnefoix
47. Yared GM, Bou Dagher, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, M, Tompkins K, Chardin H, Denbesten P, Veis A, Poliard A. The impact of bioactive
torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002; molecules to stimulate tooth repair and regeneration as part of restorative dentistry.
35:7-12. Dent Clin North Am 2006; 50:277-98.
48. Harrison JW, Hand RE. The effect of dilution and organic matter on the
antibacterial property of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 1981; 7:128-32.
49. Bystrom A, Sundquist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent
sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg 1983; 55:307-12.
“The above article is an extract from the book, Fiber
50. Ohara P, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD. Antibacterial effects of various Posts and Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Compendium
endodontics irrigants on selected anaerobic bacteria. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;
19:498-500.
of Scientific and Clinical Perspectives, (Modern Dentistry
51. Yesilsoy S, Whitaker E, Cleveland D, Philips E, Trope M. Antimicrobial and toxic Media, Johannesburg, South Africa, in press)