Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 32 views

    Case 2a and Case 2b Questions

    Uploaded by

    Katherine Joy Del Castillo
    This document contains questions about two court cases: 1) Civil Service Commission vs. Marilou T. Rodriguez, which questions the culpability of Rodriguez and her hospital in a case, as well as the evidence and penalties involved. 2) National Power Corporation vs. F. Cabanag and J. Panal, which questions the legality of appointments at NPC and the evidence supporting the court's decision, as well as remedies for Cabanag and Panal. The document seeks to understand the critical insights and lessons that can be learned from the exchanges between government agencies in these cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Case 2a and Case 2b Questions

    Uploaded by

    Katherine Joy Del Castillo
    32 views1 page
    This document contains questions about two court cases: 1) Civil Service Commission vs. Marilou T. Rodriguez, which questions the culpability of Rodriguez and her hospital in a case, as well as the evidence and penalties involved. 2) National Power Corporation vs. F. Cabanag and J. Panal, which questions the legality of appointments at NPC and the evidence supporting the court's decision, as well as remedies for Cabanag and Panal. The document seeks to understand the critical insights and lessons that can be learned from the exchanges between government agencies in these cases.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains questions about two court cases: 1) Civil Service Commission vs. Marilou T. Rodriguez, which questions the culpability of Rodriguez and her hospital in a case, as well as the evidence and penalties involved. 2) National Power Corporation vs. F. Cabanag and J. Panal, which questions the legality of appointments at NPC and the evidence supporting the court's decision, as well as remedies for Cabanag and Panal. The document seeks to understand the critical insights and lessons that can be learned from the exchanges between government agencies in these cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    32 views1 page

    Case 2a and Case 2b Questions

    Uploaded by

    Katherine Joy Del Castillo
    This document contains questions about two court cases: 1) Civil Service Commission vs. Marilou T. Rodriguez, which questions the culpability of Rodriguez and her hospital in a case, as well as the evidence and penalties involved. 2) National Power Corporation vs. F. Cabanag and J. Panal, which questions the legality of appointments at NPC and the evidence supporting the court's decision, as well as remedies for Cabanag and Panal. The document seeks to understand the critical insights and lessons that can be learned from the exchanges between government agencies in these cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Civil Service Commission vs. Marilou T.

    Rodriguez Case Questions (Case 2a)

    1. Is the Davao Oriental Provincial Hospital also at fault to a certain extent relative to the
    unfortunate case of Ms. Rodriguez? Why or why not?
    2. What should Ms. Rodriguez have done to prevent the unfortunate consequences of her actions?
    (Detail the potential steps Ms. Rodriguez should have done but be mindful of the time during
    the presentation)
    3. Which evidence presented in the court do you think is the most powerful evidence proving the
    misconduct done by Ms. Rodriguez? Provide substantial justification to your answer.
    4. Was it right for the Civil Service Commission (CSC) to pursue petition to reverse the decision
    made by the Court of Appeals (CA) relative to the case of Ms. Rodriguez? Why or why not? (you
    may also use the BNAJE framework for this question)
    5. In the “CSC vs. Marilou T. Rodriguez” case, you have seen the “exchanges” between two
    government agencies such as the CSC and CA, what critical insight or insights can you derive out
    of this decided case?
    6. At the third to the last paragraph of the case, the penalty given to Ms. Rodriguez is stated. Do
    you think these penalties are justified? Why or why not?
    7. Propose a mechanism or framework wherein the Davao Oriental Provincial Hospital could adopt
    to prevent further occurrences of unfortunate incidents such that of Ms. Rodriguez.

    National Power Corporation vs. F. Cabanag and J. Panal Case Questions (Case 2b) - Midterm

    1. Are the appointments of J. C. Facturan, M. Roxas, C. Bulandres, and A. J. Somoza as Principal


    Chemists C legal? Why or why not? (given the timeline of the case RA 754 is the one applicable
    for this case and not RA 10657)
    2. Which evidence presented in the court do you think is the most powerful evidence that denied
    the petition of NPC for review of the decision made by CA on November 17, 2010? Provide
    substantial justification to your answer.
    3. Could J. C. Facturan, M. Roxas, C. Bulandres, and A. J. Somoza be also held liable for the
    unfortunate “termination” of Ms. Cabanag and Mr. Panal? Why or why not?
    4. Was it right for NPC to pursue a petition for review on certiorari (CA decision on November 17,
    2010)? Why or why not? (you may also use the BNAJE framework for this question)
    5. If NPC would be given a chance to go back in time and rectify its mistake, what should NPC have
    done to uphold the legality of its decision to hire chemical engineers to the position of Principal
    Chemist C? (given the timeline of the case RA 754 is the one applicable for this case and not RA
    10657)
    6. Aside from the assumption that the rightful benefits (e.g., backwages) of Ms. Cabanag and Mr.
    Panal were delayed, what have also been taken away from Ms. Cabanag and Mr. Panal? Provide
    substantial details to your answer to this question. (you may go beyond the case facts for this
    question provided that cited sources are reputable)
    7. Propose a mechanism or framework wherein NPC could adopt to prevent further occurrences of
    unfortunate incidents such that of Ms. Cabanag and Mr. Panal.

    You might also like