No death and an enhanced life: Is

the future transhuman?

This article is more than 4 years old

Transhumanists believe that we should augment our bodies with new

technology. Composite: Lynsey Irvine/Getty
The 21st-century tech revolution is transforming human lives across the
globe
Robin McKie Science editor
Sun 6 May 2018 08.59 BST
T he aims of the transhumanist movement are summed up by Mark

O’Connell in his book To Be a Machine, which last week won the Wellcome
Book prize. “It is their belief that we can and should eradicate ageing as a
cause of death; that we can and should use technology to augment our
bodies and our minds; that we can and should merge with machines,
remaking ourselves, finally, in the image of our own higher ideals.”

The idea of technologically enhancing our bodies is not new. But the extent
to which transhumanists take the concept is. In the past, we made devices
such as wooden legs, hearing aids, spectacles and false teeth. In future, we
might use implants to augment our senses so we can detect infrared or
ultraviolet radiation directly or boost our cognitive processes by connecting
ourselves to memory chips. Ultimately, by merging man and machine,
science will produce humans who have vastly increased intelligence,
strength, and lifespans; a near embodiment of gods.

Is that a desirable goal? Advocates of transhumanism believe there are

spectacular rewards to be reaped from going beyond the natural barriers
and limitations that constitute an ordinary human being. But to do so would
raise a host of ethical problems and dilemmas. As O’Connell’s book
indicates, the ambitions of transhumanism are now rising up our
intellectual agenda. But this is a debate that is only just beginning.

There is no doubt that human enhancement is becoming more and more

sophisticated – as will be demonstrated at the exhibition The Future Starts
Here which opens at the V&A museum in London this week. Items on
display will include “powered clothing” made by the US company Seismic.
Worn under regular clothes, these suits mimic the biomechanics of the
human body and give users – typically older people – discrete strength
when getting out of a chair or climbing stairs, or standing for long periods.

In many cases these technological or medical advances are made to help the
injured, sick or elderly but are then adopted by the healthy or young to
boost their lifestyle or performance. The drug erythropoietin (EPO)
increases red blood cell production in patients with severe anaemia but has
also been taken up as an illicit performance booster by some athletes to
improve their bloodstream’s ability to carry oxygen to their muscles.

And that is just the start, say experts. “We are now approaching the time
when, for some kinds of track sports such as the 100-metre sprint, athletes
who run on carbon-fibre blades will be able outperform those who run on
natural legs,” says Blay Whitby, an artificial intelligence expert at Sussex
University.

The question is: when the technology reaches this level, will it be ethical to
allow surgeons to replace someone’s limbs with carbon-fibre blades just so
they can win gold medals? Whitby is sure many athletes will seek such
surgery. “However, if such an operation came before any ethics committee
that I was involved with, I would have none of it. It is a repulsive idea – to
remove a healthy limb for transient gain.”

Scientists think there will come a point when athletes with carbon blades will be
able to out-run able-bodied rivals. Photograph: Alexandre Loureiro/Getty Images

Not everyone in the field agrees with this view, however. Cybernetics expert
Kevin Warwick, of Coventry University, sees no problem in approving the
removal of natural limbs and their replacement with artificial blades. “What
is wrong with replacing imperfect bits of your body with artificial parts that
will allow you to perform better – or which might allow you to live longer?”
he says.

Advertisement

Warwick is a cybernetics enthusiast who, over the years, has had several
different electronic devices implanted into his body. “One allowed me to
experience ultrasonic inputs. It gave me a bat sense, as it were. I also
interfaced my nervous system with my computer so that I could control a
robot hand and experience what it was touching. I did that when I was in
New York, but the hand was in a lab in England.”

Such interventions enhance the human condition, Warwick insists, and

indicate the kind of future humans might have when technology augments
performance and the senses. Some might consider this unethical. But even
doubters such as Whitby acknowledge the issues are complex. “Is it ethical
to take two girls under the age of five and train them to play tennis every
day of their lives until they have the musculature and skeletons of world
champions?” he asks. From this perspective the use of implants or drugs to
achieve the same goal does not look so deplorable.

This last point is a particular issue for those concerned with the
transhumanist movement. They believe that modern technology ultimately
offers humans the chance to live for aeons, unshackled – as they would be –
from the frailties of the human body. Failing organs would be replaced by
longer-lasting high-tech versions just as carbon-fibre blades could replace
the flesh, blood and bone of natural limbs. Thus we would end humanity’s
reliance on “our frail version 1.0 human bodies into a far more durable and
capable 2.0 counterpart,” as one group has put it.

Advertisement

However, the technology needed to achieve these goals relies on as yet

unrealised developments in genetic engineering, nanotechnology and many
other sciences and may take many decades to reach fruition. As a result,
many advocates – such as the US inventor and entrepreneur Ray Kurzweil,
nanotechnology pioneer Eric Drexler and PayPal founder and venture
capitalist Peter Thiel have backed the idea of having their bodies stored in
liquid nitrogen and cryogenically preserved until medical science has
reached the stage when they can be revived and their resurrected bodies
augmented and enhanced.

Four such cryogenic facilities have now been constructed: three in the US
and one in Russia. The largest is the Alcor Life Extension Foundation in
Arizona whose refrigerators store more than 100 bodies (nevertheless
referred to as “patients” by staff) in the hope of their subsequent thawing
and physiological resurrection. It is “a place built to house the corpses of
optimists”, as O’Connell says in To Be a Machine.
The Alcor Life Extension Foundation where ‘patients’ are cryogenically stored in
the hope of future revival. Photograph: Alamy

Not everyone is convinced about the feasibility of such technology or about

its desirability. “I was once interviewed by a group of cryonic enthusiasts –
based in California – called the society for the abolition of involuntary
death,” recalls the Astronomer Royal Martin Rees. “I told them I’d rather
end my days in an English churchyard than a Californian refrigerator. They
derided me as a deathist – really old-fashioned.”

For his part, Rees believes that those who choose to freeze themselves in the
hope of being eventually thawed out would be burdening future generations
expected to care for these newly defrosted individuals. “It is not clear how
much consideration they would deserve,” Rees adds.

Advertisement

Ultimately, adherents of transhumanism envisage a day when humans will

free themselves of all corporeal restraints. Kurzweil and his followers
believe this turning point will be reached around the year 2030, when
biotechnology will enable a union between humans and genuinely
intelligent computers and AI systems. The resulting human-machine mind
will become free to roam a universe of its own creation, uploading itself at
will on to a “suitably powerful computational substrate”. We will become
gods, or more likely “star children” similar to the one at the end of 2001: A
Space Odyssey.
These are remote and, for many people, very fanciful goals. And the fact that
much of the impetus for establishing such extreme forms of transhuman
technology comes from California and Silicon Valley is not lost on critics.
Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, the entrepreneur who wants to send
the human race to Mars, also believes that to avoid becoming redundant in
the face of the development of artificial intelligence, humans must merge
with machines to enhance our own intellect.

This is a part of the world where the culture of youth is followed with
fanatical intensity and where ageing is feared more acutely than anywhere
else on the planet. Hence the overpowering urge to try to use technology to
overcome its effects.

It is also one of the world’s richest regions, and many of those who question
the values of the transhuman movement warn it risks creating technologies
that will only create deeper gulfs in an already divided society where only
some people will be able to afford to become enhanced while many other
lose out.
When man meets metal: rise of the transhumans
Read more

The position is summed up by Whitby. “History is littered with the evil

consequences of one group of humans believing they are superior to another
group of humans,” he said. “Unfortunately in the case of enhanced humans
they will be genuinely superior. We need to think about the implications
before it is too late.”

For their part, transhumanists argue that the costs of enhancement will
inevitably plummet and point to the example of the mobile phone, which
was once so expensive only the very richest could afford one, but which
today is a universal gadget owned by virtually every member of society.
Such ubiquity will become a feature of technologies for augmenting men
and women, advocates insist.

Many of these issues seem remote, but experts warn that the implications
involved need to be debated as a matter of urgency. An example is provided
by the artificial hand being developed by Newcastle University. Current
prosthetic limbs are limited by their speed of response. But project leader
Kianoush Nazarpour believes it will soon be possible to create bionic hands
that can assess an object and instantly decide what kind of grip it should
adopt.

Advertisement

“It will be of enormous benefit, but its use raises all sorts of issues. Who will
own it: the wearer or the NHS? And if it is used to carry a crime, who
ultimately will be responsible for its control? We are not thinking about
these concerns and that is a worry.”

The position is summed up by bioethicist professor Andy Miah of Salford

University.

“Transhumanism is valuable and interesting philosophically because it gets

us to think differently about the range of things that humans might be able
to do – but also because it gets us to think critically about some of those
limitations that we think are there but can in fact be overcome,” he says.
“We are talking about the future of our species, after all.”

Body count
Limbs
The artificial limbs of Luke Skywalker and the Six Million Dollar Man are
works of fiction. In reality, bionic limbs have suffered from multiple
problems: becoming rigid mid-action, for example. But new generations of
sensors are now making it possible for artificial legs and arms to behave in
much more complex, human-like ways.

Senses
The light that is visible to humans excludes both infrared and ultra-violet
radiation. However, researchers are working on ways of extending the
wavelengths of radiation that we can detect, allowing us to see more of the
world - and in a different light. Ideas like these are particularly popular with
military researchers trying to create cyborg soldiers.

Power
Powered suits or exoskeletons are wearable mobile machines that allow
people to move their limbs with increased strength and endurance. Several
versions are being developed by the US army, while medical researchers are
working on easy-to-wear versions that would be able to help people with
severe medical conditions or who have lost limbs to move about naturally.

Brains
Transhumanists envisage the day when memory chips and neural pathways
are actually embedded into people’s brains, thus bypassing the need to use
external devices such as computers in order to access data and to make
complicated calculations. The line between humanity and machines will
become increasingly blurred.
Robotic exoskeletons such as this one can help people who have suffered spinal
injuries. Photograph: Alamy
… as you’re joining us today from the Netherlands, we have a small favour
to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless
journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in
moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million
supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open
to all, and fiercely independent.
Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire
owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global
reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like
this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the
powerful.
And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we
believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of
the events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and
communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can
benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability
to pay for it.
Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and
sustains our future. Support the Guardian from as little as €1 – it
only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us
with a regular amount each month. Thank you.