Economics Lta09
Economics Lta09
Economics Lta09
PROJECT
TOPIC:
Elasticity of Demand
SUBMITTED TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
This project would not have been possible without the contribution and
participation of a group of individuals, who have taken a lot of effort in this
project.
CONTENTS
1) Introduction
2) Creta
a) Price Elasticity
b) Cross Elasticity
c) Advertisement Elasticity
d) Income Elasticity
3) Venue
a) Price Elasticity
b) Cross Elasticity
c) Advertisement Elasticity
d) Income Elasticity
4) Verna
a) Price Elasticity
b) Cross Elasticity
c) Advertisement Elasticity
d) Income Elasticity
5) I20
a) Price Elasticity
b) Cross Elasticity
c) Advertisement Elasticity
d) Income Elasticity
6) Aura
a) Price Elasticity
b) Cross Elasticity
c) Advertisement Elasticity
d) Income Elasticity
Introduction
Elasticity of Demand refers to the responsiveness in quantity demanded due a
change in its factors/determinants.
The law of demand states that an increase in price reduces quantity demanded and
a decrease in price increases quantity demanded. The Law of Demand simply
states the direction of change, but it does not measure the quantum of change. To
measure by how much demand changes due to change in its factor the concept of
elasticity is used.
Degrees of Elasticity
1) Perfectly Elastic- It refers to those goods and services where slightest of
change in price leads to immeasurable/ indeterminant change in quantity
demanded. In this case elasticity is said to be infinite.
2) Perfectly Inelastic- It refers to those goods and services which do not change
with changes in price. Perfectly inelastic demand curve is completely
unresponsive to changes in price. Elasticity in this case is zero.
CRETA
Calculation of various Price Elasticity
To explain the concept of Elasticity I have taken HYUNDAI company from the
Automobile Sector.
Price Elasticity
Year Quantity Demanded Price
(Rs.)
2020 18985 776000
2021 18501 850000
= -8.71
ep = % change in Quantity Demanded
% change in price
= -2.55 = 0.29
-8.71
In this case Price Elasticity of Volkswagen Polo is less than one which means it is
Relatively Inelastic. This shows that proportionate change in Quantity Demanded
is less than proportionate change in Price.
Advertisement Elasticity
Year Quantity Demanded Advertisement
Expenditure(In Lakhs)
2020 18985 315
2021 18501 289
Income Elasticity
1) Price Elasticity
2) Cross Elasticity
3) Advertisement Elasticity
4) Income Elasticity
= -23.91 %
= 6.8 %
= 23.91 = 3.52
6.8
P1= 999000
P2= 1067000
Q1= 4600
Q2= 3500
Y
D
P2
Price
P1
Q2 Q1 X
0 Quantity Demanded
The X-axis shows the quantity demanded for Volkswagen Vento and
the Y-axis shows the price of Hyundai VENUE. From the above graph,
we can see that as the price increases from P1 to P2, the quantity
demanded decreases from Q1 to Q2.
From the given scenario Price Elasticity of Hyundai VENUE is more than
one which means it is Relatively Elastic. This also means that
proportionate change in Quantity Demanded (23.91%) is greater than
proportionate change in Price (6.8%). Under relative elasticity, the DD
curve of Vento car is flattened curve towards the X-axis as indicated
in the above graph.
= -23.91%
= 928000-964000 X 100
964000
= -3.73%
Symbolically:
eXY = ΔQX * PY
ΔPY QX
Where,
X= Hyundai VENUE
Y= Kia Seltos
= 6.41
Diagramatic Representation of Cross Elasticity of Demand
of Hyundai VENUE
P1 = 964000
Y P2 = 928000
P r ic e o f V e r n a
Q1 = 4600
Q2 = 3500
D
P1
P2
O X
Q2 Q1
The X-axis shows the quantity demanded for Hyundai VENUE and the
Y-axis shows the price of Kia Sonet. From the above graph, we can
see that as the price of Hyundai Verna (substitute commodity)
decreases from P1 to P2, the quantity demanded for Hyundai VENUE
(given commodity) also decreases from Q1 to Q2, as the consumers
shift towards the substitute commodity.
From the given scenario Cross Elasticity of Hyundai VENUE is more than
one which means it is Relatively Elastic. This also means that
proportionate change in Quantity Demanded of Hyundai VENUE (23.91%)
is greater than proportionate change in Price of its substitute product
i.e. Hyundai Verna (3.73%). Under relative elasticity, the DD curve of
Vento car is an upward sloping curve from left to right as indicated in
the above graph.
= 246-285 X 100
285
= -13.68 %
= -23.91 %
A1 = 285
Y A2 = 246
Advertisement Expenditure Q1 = 4600
Q2 = 3500
D
A1
A2
X
O Q2 Q1
Qunatity Demanded
The X-axis shows the quantity demanded for Volkswagen Vento and
the Y-axis shows the advertisement expenditure incurred by the
company. From the above graph, we can see that as the advertisement
expenditure decreases from A1 to A2, the quantity demanded also
decreases from Q1 to Q2.
= 128829-135050 X 100
135050
= -4.6 %
= -23.91 %
= 5.19
Diagramatic Representation of Income Elasticity of
Demand of Hyundai VENUE
I1 = 135050
Y I2 = 128829
Q1 = 4600
Q2 = 3500
Per Capita Income
D
I1
I2
D
X
O Q2 Q1
Quantity Demanded
The X-axis shows the quantity demanded for Volkswagen Vento and
the Y-axis shows the Per capita income. From the above graph, we
can see that as the per capita income decreases from P 1 to P2, the
quantity demanded also decreases from Q1 to Q2. The decrease in per
capita income from 2020 to 2021 was due to the outbreak of
Coronavirus pandemic across the globe, which had put many people
out of work especially in India.
PRICE ELASTICITY.
YEAR QUANTITY PRICE (RS)
DEMANDED
2020 1250 2800000
2021 972 2880000
= -7.27 %
Cross price elasticity = % change in quantity demanded (commodity X)
% Change in price (commodity Y)
X = HYUNDAI VERNA
Y= HONDA CITY
= 22.24
7.27
= 3.06
Cross price elasticity is relatively elastic. This means that the
proportionate change in demand is greater than proportionate change in
the price.
Advertisement Elasticity:
YEAR QUANTITY Advertisement
DEMANDED Expenditure
2020 1250 324
2021 972 296
= 22.24
8.64
= 2.57
INCOME ELASTICITY:
= -4.6 %
PRICE ELASTICITY:
YEAR QUANTITY PRICE (RS)
DEMANDED
2020 9202 19,99,000
2021 8201 20,68,000
= -6.58 %
X = i20
Y= Swift Dzire
= 10.87
6.58
= 1.65
Advertisement Elasticity:
YEAR QUANTITY Advertisement
DEMANDED Expenditure
2020 9202 324
2021 8201 296
= 10.87
8.64
= 1.25
INCOME ELASTICITY:
= -4.6 %
= 0.423
Hyundai Aura
Q 2−Q 1
%change ∈quantity= ∗100
Q1
1200−987
∗100=21.58
987
P 2−P1
% Change in price= ∗100
P1
2150000−2135000
∗100=0.70
2135000
%change∈quantity
Price Elasticity of Hyundai Aura =% Change∈ price
21.58
=30.82
0.70
P1
PRICE
Q1 Q2
QUANTITY DEMANDED
Cross Elasticity
Q2−Q1
∆Qd = ∗100
Q1
1970
= 3230 ∗100=60.99
%▲p
60.99
= 53.64 =1.13
—————————————————————–
Percentage Change in advertisement cost
= (∆Qd /∆A) X (Qd/A)
Where,
∆Q =Q1 – Q
∆A = A1 – A
63274
= 37
Percentage change in Advertisement cost ,
A2−A1
∆A= ∗100
A1
65-48
= ∗100
48
= 35.4
ΔI
%Change in income = I x 100
10000
= 120000 x 100
= 8.33%
ΔD
% Change in Quantity = D X 100
222
= 978 X100
= 22.7%
% Change∈Quantity
Income elasticity = %Change∈income
= 22.7/8.33
= 2.72
CONCLUSION
The project on elasticity of demand was very insightful. It helped us to
develop our understanding on how to calculate various types of
elasticities like price elasticity, cross elasticity, advertisement elasticity
and income elasticity using actual data of the company.