IFRS 16 Sale and Leaseback Accounting

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Accounting

Tax

Insights into IFRS 16 Global

Sale and leaseback accounting


IFRS 16 makes significant changes to sale and leaseback Transfer of the asset is a sale
accounting. A sale and leaseback transaction is one where
an entity (the seller-lessee) transfers an asset to another If the transfer qualifies as a sale and the transaction is on
entity (the buyer-lessor) for consideration and leases that market terms the seller-lessee effectively splits the previous
asset back from the buyer-lessor. carrying amount of the underlying asset into:
• a right-of-use asset arising from the leaseback, and
A sale and leaseback transaction is a popular way for entities • the rights in the underlying asset retained by the
to secure long-term financing from substantial property, plant buyer-lessor at the end of the leaseback.
and equipment assets such as land and buildings.
The seller-lessee recognises a portion of the total gain or loss
IAS 17 covered the accounting for a sale and leaseback on the sale. The amount recognised is calculated by splitting
transaction in considerable detail but only from the perspective the total gain or loss into:
of the seller-lessee.
• an unrecognised amount relating to the rights retained by
As IFRS 16 has withdrawn the concepts of operating leases the seller-lessee, and
and finance leases from lessee accounting, the accounting • a recognised amount relating to the buyer-lessor’s rights
requirements that the seller-lessee must apply to a sale and in the underlying asset at the end of the leaseback.
leaseback are more straight forward. In addition, IFRS 16
The leaseback itself is then accounted for under the lessee
provides an overview of the accounting requirements for
accounting model.
buyer-lessors too.

When a seller-lessee has undertaken a sale and lease back


transaction with a buyer-lessor, both the seller-lessee and the
buyer-lessor must first determine whether the transfer qualifies
as a sale. This determination is based on the requirements for
satisfying a performance obligation in IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from
Contracts with Customers’.

The accounting treatment will vary depending on whether or


not the transfer qualifies as a sale. This is described below.
The buyer-lessor accounts for the purchase in accordance Adjustments are required if consideration for the sale is not
with the applicable standards (eg IAS 16 ‘Property, Plant and at fair value and/or payments for the lease are not at market
Equipment’ if the asset is property, plant or equipment or IAS 40 rates. These adjustments result in recognition of:
‘Investment Property’ if the property is investment property). • a prepayment to reflect below-market terms
The lease is then accounted for as either a finance lease or an • additional financing provided by the buyer-lessor to the
operating lease using IFRS 16’s lessor accounting requirements. seller-lessee to reflect above-market terms.

Example 1 – Sale and leaseback


SellCo sells a building to BuyCo for cash of CU1,800,000, which is its fair value at that date. The previous carrying value
of the building is CU1,000,000. At the same time, SellCo enters into a lease with BuyCo conveying back the right to use
the building for 18 years. Annual payments are CU120,000 payable at the end of each year, which is at market rate. The
transfer qualifies as a sale based on the guidance on satisfying a performance obligation in IFRS 15.

The rate implicit in the lease is 4.5%, which is readily determinable by SellCo.

Analysis

SellCo
The present value of the annual payments (18 payments of CU120,000, discounted at 4.5%) is CU1,459,200.

SellCo measures the right-of-use asset retained through the leaseback as a proportion of the previous carrying
amount of the building. This is calculated as: CU1,000,000 (previous carrying value) x [CU1,459,200 (PV of lease
payments)/ CU1,800,000 (fair value of building)]. The right-of-use asset calculated in this way is CU810,667.

SellCo recognises a portion of the total gain on the sale, to the extent it relates to the rights retained in the underlying
asset by BuyCo at the end of the leaseback. The total gain on sale of building is CU800,000 (CU1,800,000 –
CU1,000,000). This total is split into:
• the portion relating to the rights to use the building retained by SellCo, calculated as CU800,000 x [CU1,459,200/
CU1,800,000] which is CU648,533; and
• the portion relating to BuyCo’s rights in the underlying asset at the end of the leaseback, calculated as CU800,000 x
[(CU1,800,000 – CU1,459,200)/CU1,800,000], which is CU151,467.

At the commencement date, SellCo’s accounting entries are:

Debit (CU) Credit (CU)


Cash 1,800,000
Right-of-use asset 810,667
Building 1,000,000
Gain on sale 151,467
Lease liability 1,459,200

BuyCo
At the commencement date, BuyCo’s accounting entries are:

Debit (CU) Credit (CU)


Building 1,800,000
Cash 1,800,000

BuyCo classifies the lease as an operating lease taking into account, among other things, that the present value of
the lease payments is 19% less than the fair value of the building. BuyCo accounts for the lease accordingly.

Sale and leaseback accounting 2


Transfer of the asset is not a sale The following questions should be considered when determining
the correct accounting treatment on transition to IFRS 16:
If the transfer does not qualify as a sale the parties account
for it as a financing transaction. This means that: 1 Do entities re-assess sale and leaseback transactions arising
• the seller-lessee continues to recognise the asset on its before transition to assess whether they were a sale under
balance sheet as there is no sale. The seller-lessee accounts IFRS 15?
for proceeds from the sale and leaseback as a financial The answer is no. The IASB have said that the historic
liability in accordance with IFRS 9. This arrangement is judgements on previous sale and leaseback arrangements
similar to a loan secured over the underlying asset – in other are not re-opened.
words a financing transaction
IFRS 15 is only applicable when a sale and leaseback
• the buyer-lessor has not purchased the underlying asset
transaction has occurred on or after the date of initial
and therefore does not recognise the transferred asset on
application of IFRS 16.
its balance sheet. Instead, the buyer-lessor accounts for
the amounts paid to the seller-lessee as a financial asset 2 From the perspective of the seller-lessee, what if a
in accordance with IFRS 9. From the perspective of the transaction was a sale and finance leaseback under IAS 17?
buyer-lessor, this arrangement is a financing transaction. Where a transaction was a sale and finance leaseback the
entity continues to account for the finance leaseback like
any other finance lease at transition to IFRS 16.
Sale and leaseback transactions on For example, the seller-lessee will reflect a right-of-use asset
transition to IFRS 16 and a lease liability.
Where the overall sale and leaseback arrangement has been
Any deferred gain arising on the historical application of
settled (ie the lease has expired) before the date of initial
IAS 17 continues to be amortised going forward under IFRS 16.
application of IFRS 16 then there is nothing to consider.
3 From the perspective of the seller-lessee – what if a
However, those transactions that are important to consider on
transaction was a sale and operating leaseback under
transition to IFRS 16 are those sale and leaseback transactions
IAS 17?
entered into before the date of initial application of IFRS 16 and
The entity accounts for the operating leaseback like any other
which still have historic balances that need to be accounted for
operating lease at transition to IFRS 16. The seller-lessee will
until the end of the leaseback period.
again reflect a right-of-use asset and a lease liability.
Therefore, on applying IFRS 16 for the first time, an entity
However, this time the seller-lessee adjusts the right-of-use
will need to consider any on-going leases, and assets and
asset for any deferred gains or losses relating to off-market
liabilities that remain because of historic sale and leaseback
terms remaining on the balance sheet immediately prior to
transactions accounted for under IAS 17.
date of initial application of IFRS 16.

Sale and leaseback accounting 3

You might also like