Week 8
Week 8
Week 8
Subject: MC TEC 01
Course: BTLEd-1
Topic: Habits, attitudes, and abilities desirable for all citizens of an industrial and
technological civilization
Objectives:
Aware with the different characteristics of citizens in an industrial and
technological civilization.
Identify the effect to the citizens of the changing civilization
Week: Week 8
1
advance, stagnation and decline of industrial civilization in terms of world total energy-use and
world total population. Next, the subject of governing is analyzed in terms of ten requirements
for system control. The third theory is derived from this analysis. It relates the size, or
complexity, of a society over time to the average energy-use per person in that society. Historical
population and energy-use data and other considerations are used as the basis for the fourth
theory. This, a predictive theory, states that the life-expectancy of industrial civilization is less
than 100 years.
Technological Civilization
According to this schema, a properly technological civilization is a civilization that
takes technology as its central project, a properly technological civilization is a civilization that
takes technology as its central project.
2
The Electromechanical Age: 1840 - 1940.
The Industrial Revolution, now also known as the First Industrial Revolution, was the
transition to new manufacturing processes in Europe and the United States, in the period from
about 1760 to sometime between 1820 and 1840. This transition included going from hand
production methods to machines, new chemical manufacturing and iron production processes,
the increasing use of steam power and water power, the development of machine tools and the
rise of the mechanized factory system. The Industrial Revolution also led to an unprecedented
rise in the rate of population growth.
3
Finally, the inventions of the automobile, and the plane in the beginning of the 20 th century are
the reason why, to this day, the Second Industrial Revolution is considered the most important
one!
Industry 4.0
For many people, Industry 4.0 is the fourth Industrial Revolution, although there is a large
portion of people that still disagree. If we were to view Industry 4.0 as a revolution then we
would have to admit that it is a revolution happening right now. We are experiencing it everyday
and its magnitude is yet unknown.
Industry 4.0 started in the dawn of the third millennium with the one thing that everyone uses
every single day. The Internet. We can see the transition from the first industrial revolution that
rooted for technological phenomenon all the way to Industry 4.0 that develops virtual reality
worlds, allowing us to bend the laws of physics.
The 4 Industrial Revolutions shape the world. Worldwide economies are based on them. There
are programmes and projects being implemented all around the world, focusing on helping
people take advantage of the marvels of the fourth revolution during their everyday lives.
According to most historians, the Industrial Revolution began in Great Britain in the middle of
the 18th century. At the time, most people rarely traveled beyond the small and medium-sized
villages where they lived. Rural people worked as subsistence farmers, which meant they grew
crops to feed themselves and their families, not to trade or sell.
The European population grew substantially during the 18th century, and farmers increased
production to keep pace. Machines became widely used in farming, and consequently, farms
required fewer workers. Large, technologically advanced farms replaced subsistence farms.
The Industrial Revolution demonstrates an idea known as economies of scale. According to this
principle, increased production of goods leads to increased efficiency. For peasants, however,
large-scale production meant fewer economic opportunities. Conditions worsened due to
the enclosure movement. Previously, villages had shared lands for grazing animals that could be
used by all villagers. Once large-scale agriculture became widespread, wealthy people bought
these lands and used them for private farms.
More and more people in rural communities struggled. Many left their old lives behind and
4
headed for towns and cities to find new employment. The growth of British cities was further
accelerated by the development of factories. Industrial cities such as Manchester and Leeds grew
dramatically in just a few decades.
In 1800, about 20 percent of the British population lived in cities. In just 50 years, by the middle
of the 19th century, that number had risen to 50 percent. Other Western European nations,
including France, the Netherlands, and Germany, also saw an increase in the urban population,
although their changes proceeded at a slower rate.
Factory work in urban areas differed from farming. Before the Industrial Revolutions, artisans
such as jewellers, weavers, and blacksmiths produced most manufactured goods. The mains
sources of energy were human and animal muscle, along with the waterwheel.
The dawn of industrialization came alongside inventions such as the coal-powered steam engine,
and the pace of work increased as a result. In factories, coal mines and other industrial
workplaces, workers put in long hours in miserable and dangerous conditions. As countries
industrialized, factories became larger and produced more goods. Larger companies that were
able to achieve economies of scale did better in international trade. Earlier forms of work began
to disappear.
Perhaps the most harmful consequences of industrialization were those affecting families. Before
industrialization, families served both social and economic purposes. Married couples and their
children often worked together in farms or shops. In 18th-century Great Britain, women and men
often worked in their homes doing jobs such as spinning wool into textiles and weaving textiles
into cloth. They then sold their products in a system that was called the "putting-out" or domestic
system.
However, the rise of factories meant that most male workers no longer worked at home. Some
men left their families behind for jobs in the city. Even when men stayed with their families,
factory jobs were oftentimes so difficult that they had little time for relaxation and family life
after returning from work.
Women also worked outside the home. Unmarried women commonly worked as servants in
other families' homes. Many British women, including mothers, worked in textile mills. During
the first century of industrialization, child labor was common. Factory owners appreciated
workers whose fingers were small enough to weave thin threads in complex machines. Despite
their important contributions, women and children received low pay for their labor. They were
commonly forced to work 16 hours per day or longer. Although their work conditions could be
quite dangerous, women's jobs were perceived as less skilled than those of their male co-
workers.
Industrialization caused similar social changes in the United States. There, manufacturing began
after the nation gained independence from England in the 1770s. President Thomas Jefferson,
whose administration spanned from 1801 to 1809, later established a trade embargo. Jefferson's
embargo banned foreign countries from sending their goods to the United States. This would
mean those countries would not get the money from trading with the United States. It also
increased the demand for U.S.-made supplies.
During the War of 1812, the British navy prevented ships from going in and out of U.S. ports,
which further drove the development of U.S. industries. By the 1830s, the United States had
become one of the world's leading economic powers.
In the first 50 years after U.S. independence, many agricultural workers moved to take on
manufacturing jobs. As in Great Britain, textile production led the way. Industrialization, along
with advancements in transportation like the railroad, drove economic growth and urbanization
5
in the United States. A large working class developed, eventually leading to conflict between
workers and factory owners. Working men and women led labor strikes to demand safer working
conditions and higher pay.
By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, industrialized nations like Great Britain and the United
States began passing laws to improve conditions for factory workers. However, harsh conditions
then arose in other parts of the world alongside factories. We continue to live with the effects of
industrialization today.
Women and children were often employed in the textile industry during the first century of
industrialization. Their smaller fingers were often better at threading the machinery. Despite
routinely working 16 hours a day, or longer, they typically were paid little. Shown here are
power looms in the Boott Cotton Mills at Lowell National Historical Park, Massachusetts.
The First Industrial Revolution used water and steam power to mechanize production. The
Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and
information technology to automate production. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution is building
on the Third, the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It
is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical,
digital, and biological spheres.
There are three reasons why today’s transformations represent not merely a prolongation of the
Third Industrial Revolution but rather the arrival of a Fourth and distinct one: velocity, scope,
and systems impact. The speed of current breakthroughs has no historical precedent. When
compared with previous industrial revolutions, the Fourth is evolving at an exponential rather
than a linear pace. Moreover, it is disrupting almost every industry in every country. And the
breadth and depth of these changes herald the transformation of entire systems of production,
management, and governance.
Kindly watch the video about the 4th Industrial revolution: https://youtu.be/khjY5LWF3tg
6
Like the revolutions that preceded it, the Fourth Industrial Revolution has the potential to raise
global income levels and improve the quality of life for populations around the world. To date,
those who have gained the most from it have been consumers able to afford and access the
digital world; technology has made possible new products and services that increase the
efficiency and pleasure of our personal lives. Ordering a cab, booking a flight, buying a product,
making a payment, listening to music, watching a film, or playing a game—any of these can now
be done remotely.
In the future, technological innovation will also lead to a supply-side miracle, with long-term
gains in efficiency and productivity. Transportation and communication costs will drop, logistics
and global supply chains will become more effective, and the cost of trade will diminish, all of
which will open new markets and drive economic growth.
At the same time, as the economists Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee have pointed out,
the revolution could yield greater inequality, particularly in its potential to disrupt labor markets.
As automation substitutes for labor across the entire economy, the net displacement of workers
by machines might exacerbate the gap between returns to capital and returns to labor. On the
other hand, it is also possible that the displacement of workers by technology will, in aggregate,
result in a net increase in safe and rewarding jobs.
An underlying theme in my conversations with global CEOs and senior business executives is
that the acceleration of innovation and the velocity of disruption are hard to comprehend or
anticipate and that these drivers constitute a source of constant surprise, even for the best
connected and most well informed. Indeed, across all industries, there is clear evidence that the
technologies that underpin the Fourth Industrial Revolution are having a major impact on
businesses.
On the supply side, many industries are seeing the introduction of new technologies that create
entirely new ways of serving existing needs and significantly disrupt existing industry value
chains. Disruption is also flowing from agile, innovative competitors who, thanks to access to
global digital platforms for research, development, marketing, sales, and distribution, can oust
well-established incumbents faster than ever by improving the quality, speed, or price at which
value is delivered.
Major shifts on the demand side are also occurring, as growing transparency, consumer
engagement, and new patterns of consumer behavior (increasingly built upon access to mobile
networks and data) force companies to adapt the way they design, market, and deliver products
and services.
A key trend is the development of technology-enabled platforms that combine both demand and
supply to disrupt existing industry structures, such as those we see within the “sharing” or “on
demand” economy. These technology platforms, rendered easy to use by the smartphone,
convene people, assets, and data—thus creating entirely new ways of consuming goods and
services in the process. In addition, they lower the barriers for businesses and individuals to
create wealth, altering the personal and professional environments of workers. These new
platform businesses are rapidly multiplying into many new services, ranging from laundry to
shopping, from chores to parking, from massages to travel.
On the whole, there are four main effects that the Fourth Industrial Revolution has on business—
on customer expectations
on product enhancement
on collaborative innovation
on organizational forms.
7
As the physical, digital, and biological worlds continue to converge, new technologies and
platforms will increasingly enable citizens to engage with governments, voice their opinions,
coordinate their efforts, and even circumvent the supervision of public authorities.
Simultaneously, governments will gain new technological powers to increase their control over
populations, based on pervasive surveillance systems and the ability to control digital
infrastructure. On the whole, however, governments will increasingly face pressure to change
their current approach to public engagement and policymaking, as their central role of
conducting policy diminishes owing to new sources of competition and the redistribution and
decentralization of power that new technologies make possible.
Ultimately, the ability of government systems and public authorities to adapt will determine their
survival. If they prove capable of embracing a world of disruptive change, subjecting their
structures to the levels of transparency and efficiency that will enable them to maintain their
competitive edge, they will endure. If they cannot evolve, they will face increasing trouble.
This will be particularly true in the realm of regulation. Current systems of public policy and
decision-making evolved alongside the Second Industrial Revolution, when decision-makers had
time to study a specific issue and develop the necessary response or appropriate regulatory
framework. The whole process was designed to be linear and mechanistic, following a strict “top
down” approach.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution, finally, will change not only what we do but also who we are.
It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our sense of privacy, our notions of
ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, and how we
develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and nurture relationships. It is already
changing our health and leading to a “quantified” self, and sooner than we think it may lead to
human augmentation. The list is endless because it is bound only by our imagination.
I am a great enthusiast and early adopter of technology, but sometimes I wonder whether the
inexorable integration of technology in our lives could diminish some of our quintessential
human capacities, such as compassion and cooperation. Our relationship with our smartphones is
a case in point. Constant connection may deprive us of one of life’s most important assets: the
time to pause, reflect, and engage in meaningful conversation.
One of the greatest individual challenges posed by new information technologies is privacy. We
instinctively understand why it is so essential, yet the tracking and sharing of information about
us is a crucial part of the new connectivity. Debates about fundamental issues such as the impact
on our inner lives of the loss of control over our data will only intensify in the years ahead.
Similarly, the revolutions occurring in biotechnology and AI, which are redefining what it means
to be human by pushing back the current thresholds of life span, health, cognition, and
capabilities, will compel us to redefine our moral and ethical boundaries.
Neither technology nor the disruption that comes with it is an exogenous force over which
humans have no control. All of us are responsible for guiding its evolution, in the decisions we
make on a daily basis as citizens, consumers, and investors. We should thus grasp the
opportunity and power we have to shape the Fourth Industrial Revolution and direct it toward a
future that reflects our common objectives and values.
To do this, however, we must develop a comprehensive and globally shared view of how
technology is affecting our lives and reshaping our economic, social, cultural, and human
environments. There has never been a time of greater promise, or one of greater potential peril.
Today’s decision-makers, however, are too often trapped in traditional, linear thinking, or too
absorbed by the multiple crises demanding their attention, to think strategically about the forces
of disruption and innovation shaping our future.
In the end, it all comes down to people and values. We need to shape a future that works for all
of us by putting people first and empowering them. In its most pessimistic, dehumanized form,
8
the Fourth Industrial Revolution may indeed have the potential to “robotize” humanity and thus
to deprive us of our heart and soul. But as a complement to the best parts of human nature—
creativity, empathy, stewardship—it can also lift humanity into a new collective and moral
consciousness based on a shared sense of destiny. It is incumbent on us all to make sure the latter
prevails.