Solution Manual For Engineering Mechanics, Statics - Sheri D. Sheppard, Thalia Anagnos, Sarah L. Billington
Solution Manual For Engineering Mechanics, Statics - Sheri D. Sheppard, Thalia Anagnos, Sarah L. Billington
Solution Manual For Engineering Mechanics, Statics - Sheri D. Sheppard, Thalia Anagnos, Sarah L. Billington
1
Derive conversion fractors for changing the following
U.S. Customary units to their SI equivalents:
GOAL : Derive conversion factors from U.S. Customary
to SI for:
(b):
1000 lb 4.4482 N
1 kip = 4448.2 N
1 kip 1 lb
(c):
3
0.3048 m
1 ft3 = 0.0283 m3
1 ft
(d):
2
2 0.3048 m
1 in = 0.0006452 m2
12 in
RESULTS :
a. Pressure, N/m2
b. Pressure, MPa
c. Volume, m3
d. Area, mm2
(b):
2
1x106 Pa
0.2248 lb 1m
1 MPa = 20, 885 lb/ft2
1MPa 1N 3.2808 ft
(c):
3
3 3.2808 ft
1m = 35.313 ft3
1m
(d):
2
3.2808 ft
1 mm2 = 0.0000108 ft2
1000 mm
RESULTS :
For mph:
100 m 3.2808 ft 1 mile 3600 s
= 24.66 mph
9.07 s 1m 5280 ft 1 hr
11.03 m/s
36.17 ft/s
24.66 mph
7.03%
RESULTS :
Weight in newtons:
Weight in pounds:
0.2248 lb
2589.8 N = 582.2 lb
1N
170 N − (−120 N)
= 14.5 N/mm = 14, 500 N/m
180 mm − 160 mm
Convert to U.S. Customary
0.2248 lb 1m
1.45E+04 N/m = 994 lb/ft
1N 3.2808 ft
Unstretched length
1 mm
180 mm − 170 N = 168.276 mm
14.5 N
RESULTS :
Event m cm in ft mi
High jump 2.45 245 96.5 8.04 1.52E-03
Pole vault 6.16 616 242.5 20.21 3.83E-03
Long jump 8.95 895 352.4 29.37 5.56E-03
Triple jump 18.29 1829 720.1 60.01 1.14E-02
Shot put 23.12 2312 910.2 75.85 1.44E-02
Discus throw 74.08 7408 2916.5 243.04 4.60E-02
Hammer throw 86.74 8674 3414.9 284.58 5.39E-02
Javelin throw 98.48 9848 3877.2 323.10 6.12E-02
Event m cm in ft mi
High jump 2.09 209 82.3 6.86 1.30E-03
Pole vault 5.06 506 199.2 16.60 3.14E-03
Long jump 7.52 752 296.0 24.67 4.67E-03
Triple jump 15.50 1550 610.2 50.85 9.63E-03
Shot put 22.63 2263 890.9 74.25 1.41E-02
Discus throw 76.80 7680 3023.6 251.97 4.77E-02
Hammer throw 81.08 8108 3192.1 266.01 5.04E-02
Javelin throw 72.28 7228 2845.7 237.14 4.49E-02
(a) yes
(b) no
(c) no
(d) no
2 in
GOAL : Sketch the front, side and top views for the five
objects in E1.5.4
GIVEN : five objects, (a)-(e)
ASSUME : No assumptions necessary
DRAW and RESULTS :
4:
PROBLEM 1.5.6
To get more experience inspecting and drawing systems,
complete exercise SA E.2 in Appendix E on how a beam
bridge works.
GOAL : Draw and inspect simple beam bridge design
GIVEN : Beam bridge build from 3 books.
ASSUME : No assumptions necessary
DRAW :
RESULTS :
(a) The arch is in compression and the ends of the arch
want to slowly move outwards under increased load.
1
Fdrag = CD ρV 2 A
2
Solving for CD :
RESULTS :
CD is dimensionless
CHECK :
2
1 (mass) (length) (mass)(length)
Fdrag = (1) (length)2 = = ( f orce)
2 (length)3 (time) (time)2
PROBLEM 1.6.3
The pressure within objects subjected to forces is called
stress and is given the symbol σ . The equation for stress
in an eccentrically loaded short column is:
P Pey
σ =− −
A I
where P is force, A is area, and e and y are lengths. What
are the dimensions of the stress σ and the second moment
of area I?
GOAL : Find the dimensions for stress, σ , and the second
moment of area, I
GIVEN : The equation for stress, where P is a force, A is
an area, and e and y are lengths.
ASSUME : none necessary
DRAW : none necessary
FORMULATE EQUATIONS and SOLVE :
P Pey
σ =− =−
A I
Using the first relationship:
P ( f orce)
σ =− =
A (length)2
Pey ( f orce)(length)(length)
I=− = = (length)4
σ ( f orce)
(length)2
RESULTS :
CHECK :
( f orce)(length)(length) ( f orce)
σ= 4
=
(length) (length)2
PROBLEM 1.6.4 FORMULATE EQUATIONS and SOLVE : (c)
In the expressions that follows, c1 and c2 are constants,
and θ is an angle. x = c1 v + c2 a2
GOAL : Determine the dimensions of c1 , c2 and θ for the Using the first half of the equation and solving for c1
given equations to be dimensionally correct
x (length)
GIVEN : four equations c1 = = = (time)
v (length)
ASSUME : none necessary (time)
DRAW : none necessary Using the second half of the equation and solving for c2
FORMULATE EQUATIONS and SOLVE : (a) x (length) (time)4
c2 = 2
= 2 =
a (length) (length)
v2 (time)2
a = c1
x
RESULTS : (c)
Solving for c1
(length)
(length)
ax (time)2 c1 = (time)
c1 = 2 = 2 = 1
v (length) c2 = (time)4 /(length) or time to the fourth power over length
(time)
CHECK :
RESULTS : (a) 2
(length) (time)4
(length)
(length) = (time) +
c1 is dimensionless (time) (length) (time)2
θ (degrees) (degrees)
FORMULATE EQUATIONS and SOLVE : (b) c1 = =
θ (radians) (radians)
1 2
mv = c1 x2 RESULTS : (d)
2
Solving for c1 c1 = (degrees)/(radians) or degrees over radians
2
(length)
(mass) CHECK :
mv2 (time) (mass)
c1 = 2 = = (degrees)
2x (length)2 (time)2 (degrees) = (radians)
(radians)
RESULTS : (b)
CHECK :
(length) 2 (mass)
1
(mass) = (length)2
2 (time) (time)2
PROBLEM 1.6.5
The ability to make good educated guesses (often called
engineering estimation or intuition) is an important engi-
neering skill that can be practiced. In this problem, you’ll
practice your skill in estimating how far an average indi-
vidual would have to run or jog in order to burn off the
calories found in a typical candy bar.
GOAL : Estimate how far an average person would have
to run to burn off the calories of a candy bar. Then solve
the problem using the given information. Calculate the
weight of fat this would convert to in newtons and pounds.
GIVEN : a typical runner burns 100 kcal per mile. 9.4
kcal converts to 1 gram of fat
ASSUME : earth gravity
DRAW : none necessary
FORMULATE EQUATIONS and SOLVE :
C
dmiles = = 0.01C mile/kcal
100kcal/mile
C 5280 ft 0.3048 m
dmeters = = 16.09C m/kcal
100kcal/mile 1mile 1 ft
C 0.00981 N
fNewtons = = 0.00104C N/kcal
9.4kcal/g 1g
C 0.00981 N 0.2248 lb
fpounds = = 0.000235C lb/kcal
9.4kcal/g 1g 1N
RESULTS :
Candy kcal mi m N lb
Crunch 230 2.3 3700 0.24 0.054
100 Grand 190 1.9 3100 0.20 0.045
Butterfinger 270 2.7 4300 0.28 0.063
Kit-Kat 220 2.2 3500 0.23 0.052
3 Musketeers 260 2.6 4200 0.27 0.061
Twix 280 2.8 4500 0.29 0.066
Snickers 280 2.8 4500 0.29 0.066
Milky Way 270 2.7 4300 0.28 0.063
M.W.-Lite 170 1.7 2700 0.18 0.040
M.W.-Midnight 220 2.2 3500 0.23 0.052
DRAW :
CHECK : Intuitively, an increase in frictional force
should decrease the necessary anchorage weight which is
the result we obtained.