Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    25M PG 19-20 MAR Completed

    Uploaded by

    Kimemia Kimotho
    The module assessment report summarizes student performance in the Managing People module from the 2019-2020 academic year. It found that while the average mark was a pass, more students passed this year compared to last year. However, student engagement in seminars was low, with few students coming prepared or willing to participate. As a result, the module coordinators plan to review using a more workshop-based delivery style to improve student engagement for the future.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    25M PG 19-20 MAR Completed

    Uploaded by

    Kimemia Kimotho
    14 views2 pages
    The module assessment report summarizes student performance in the Managing People module from the 2019-2020 academic year. It found that while the average mark was a pass, more students passed this year compared to last year. However, student engagement in seminars was low, with few students coming prepared or willing to participate. As a result, the module coordinators plan to review using a more workshop-based delivery style to improve student engagement for the future.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The module assessment report summarizes student performance in the Managing People module from the 2019-2020 academic year. It found that while the average mark was a pass, more students passed this year compared to last year. However, student engagement in seminars was low, with few students coming prepared or willing to participate. As a result, the module coordinators plan to review using a more workshop-based delivery style to improve student engagement for the future.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    14 views2 pages

    25M PG 19-20 MAR Completed

    Uploaded by

    Kimemia Kimotho
    The module assessment report summarizes student performance in the Managing People module from the 2019-2020 academic year. It found that while the average mark was a pass, more students passed this year compared to last year. However, student engagement in seminars was low, with few students coming prepared or willing to participate. As a result, the module coordinators plan to review using a more workshop-based delivery style to improve student engagement for the future.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    THE YORK MANAGEMENT SCHOOL

    Module Assessment Report to Students

    Module: Managing People (MAN00025M)


    Programme: Taught Masters
    Academic Year: 2019/20
    Module Co-ordinator: Carolyn Hunter

    General Comments

    The module marks were within the expected range. However there was a significant
    increase in the percentage of students’ marks in the pass range compared to the previous
    year. On a positive note, a lower percentage of students failed the module than in previous
    year. This resulted in a smaller standard deviation with a greater concentration around the
    55 mark.

    Specific Comments

    While students may have averaged a pass, this was actually a big increase from the
    percentage who passed the formative. The feeling from the module tutors was that the
    cohort missed some skills around essay writing and communicating arguments in their
    essay. Therefore in one sense, while the marks were not exceptional they did demonstrate
    that this cohort improved over the term.
    It was noticeable that the seminars were not very effective this year with students not
    coming prepared or not being willing to take part, and as a result a few complaints were
    made by students. A review of the module will be done to assess if a more workshop style
    delivery would benefit the cohort and produce a better engagement.

    Page 1 of 2
    Marks profile 2019/20

    No. of Lowest Mark Highest Mark Median Average Standard


    students Deviation
    254 20 78 55 55.81 7.61

    Distinction Merit 60-69 Pass 50-59 Fail 40-49 Fail <40


    14 (5.12%) 61 (24.02%) 155 (61.02%) 21 (8.27%) 3 (1.18%)

    Marks profile 2018/19

    No. of Lowest Mark Highest Mark Median Average Standard


    students Deviation
    187 0 80 58 57.67 11.10

    Distinction Merit 60-69 Pass 50-59 Fail 40-49 Fail <40


    25 (13.36%) 67 (35.82%) 63 (33.68%) 26 (13.9%) 6 (3.2%)

    Recommendation to Board of Examiners (delete as necessary)

    A. Marks profile within expected range for module type. No action required.
    B. Marks profile out with expected range for module type. Moderation required.
    C. Marks profile unexpected. Further discussion required.

    Action taken by Board of Examiners (to be completed after the Final BoE)

    Page 2 of 2

    You might also like