Order 3219647

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

1

The youth presence in a society is present only when there is a problem. The life of

youths has been targeted since youths are associated with negative things in the society.

Prevention of complex societal problems such as gang violence requires efforts and

commitments from many sectors and disciplines. According to Dr Brotherman, he used Freirean

approach to mobilize students on how education is a key part in someone’s life. The life of youth

is drawn back from history perspectives. And hence, approaching the subject of gangs out of any

historical context is nearly impossible.

Coming from a highly stereotyped and marginalized community, you are loathed to

accept criminality and deviance as its face value, especially when it is claimed to be a societal

problem. The middle class are viewed differently from the working class. The “saints” could

never be seen hanging out on the blocks but the “roughnecks” could be seen in small groups

about every 100 yards. However, the presence of gatherings had little to do with deviance

behaviors, and it was just claims by people telling the negative side of us. During 2008 financial

crisis, many upper-class individuals went unpunished by banks, mortgage lenders, among others.

Many were involved in crisis such as corruption and illegal drug use which went unpunished.

We see an excellent example on the historical realist approach to the construction of

deviant groups. According to Pearson (1987), he investigates the presence of new dangerous

youths in Britain by going past to the past and uncovering same instances which had happened in

England. According to Pearson, a Pearson, people from a lower-class, racially abused

background were highly stereotyped. Thus, Pearson emphasizes that is in incumbent on social

scientists to fully compare claims of order and disorder from past instances, since social outrage

was also an issue in the past.


1

To fully understand the gang, both in history and with history you have to know about its

group and its members through experiences in the community. Joan More during her study of

Chicano gangs in LA, highlights the need for community context. Each gang has a normal, and

expressive life pattern that is experienced in the community. The Barrios had a different lifestyle

from other people in Los Angeles. They have a social system that emphasizes on large and

extended family and have relationships among other families in small town fashion. Thus, it is

difficult to see the gang outside of the making of the community from which it comes.

The origin and practices of gangs generally comes from the particular set of race, class

and gender traits of a community. These are formed under certain socio-historical conditions.

Many gang studies highlight similar community-based histories, and emergence of gangs is

based on enforced spatiality. For example, there are gangs in neighborhoods characterized by

minority-only public schooling, racially segregated public housing and socio-geographical

isolation.

Touraine’s argument of historicity is important; however, it is rarely brought into context

when analyzing US gangs. He refers to historicity as a process by which society acts on itself to

produce its own history outside of the laws of the political economy. He believed that men and

women produce their own history through social struggles and cultural creations and they are not

subject to material necessity and historical laws. For the native and immigrant subcultures, it is

difficult to develop knowledge of themselves and the people around them, even in projects that

are not associated with gang activity. As we have long observed, gangs produce their own

functions which are highly valued by their group members.


1

The history of a community influenced by global processes is part of analysis of a gang.

East European Jewish immigrants arriving in New York and Chicago, and African Americans

moving north in the post-slavery era pulled and pushed by supreme hardship and discrimination

inflicted by domestic elites at the turn of the century and before. Dominicans escaping from

poverty as their own democratic revolution is upended by US invasion in the 1960s. Al the major

global processes influence populations and have transformed much of the US landscape.

Gangs usually move from one generation to another or they develop out of other gangs

over time, hence they usually have substantial subcultural histories. These traditions and histories

are important as they help us understand the changes and continuities in social and cultural

practices over time. Many of these subcultural histories are not clearly known but their influence

is carried over in form of physical gestures, modes of communication, organizational norms and

historically based enmities and solidarities. For the most part, these subcultures are hidden or

obscured except if they are targets of crime control and it is the task of social scientists to unearth

them as a complex subterranean story of the young in marginalized communities.

To understand the nature and emergence of gangs, it is important to understand the

economic development in a community. During the last couple of decades, secure working-class

jobs are increasingly declining, with the state increasingly disinclined to protect employment and

ensure high standards of living. In increased financial corporate rate of the economy, there has

extraordinary growth of informal sector, particularly in illegal drugs market. Drug economy,

global narco-trafficking and money laundering activities has changed the culture, activities,

identities and organization of numerous gangs.


1

It has been more than 20 years into the so-called War on Drugs by the US state.

Gonzales, argues that cultures of control and government through fear, constitute a new form of

class and racial hegemony. The legal, institutional, and technological apparatuses amassed by the

state to defeat these gangs had a detrimental effect on the lower class and the most vulnerable

communities. This leads to disintegration in families and stigmatization of youths and adults who

have to first go through the criminal justice systems, which should be the last resort in solving

many crimes. This domestic hegemony is evident even in the international sphere where the US

actively deports 400,000 legal and undocumented residents annually. These deportees get the

state’s attention through anti-gang policies such as “Secure Communities.”

You might also like