CHN 2 Lec Week 11 Community Organizing Participatory Action Research
CHN 2 Lec Week 11 Community Organizing Participatory Action Research
CHN 2 Lec Week 11 Community Organizing Participatory Action Research
A middle ground where the health care worker and the people need to
attain community organization.
A liberal freedom of the community where the people are allowed to
participate in the overall health care status of their community.
A transformation force, that enables the individuals, families and
communities to be responsible for their own health.
A phenomenon of interest's goals and objectives at the health care worker
and the people in their way to health citizenry.
It is a social development approach that aims to transform the apathetic,
individualistic and voiceless poor into dynamic, participatory and politically
responsive community.
Vital part of public health nursing.
Collective, participatory, transformative, liberative, sustained and
systematic process of building people’s organizations by mobilizing and
enhancing the capabilities and resources of the people for the resolution of
their issues and concerns towards effecting change in their existing
oppressive and exploitative conditions (1994 National Rural Conference).
Process by which a community identifies its needs and objectives, develops
confidence to take action in respect to them and in doing so, extends and
develops cooperative and collaborative attitudes and practices in the
community (Ross 1967).
A continuous and sustained process of educating the people to understand
and develop their critical awareness of their existing condition, working
with the people collectively and efficiently on their immediate and long-
term problems, and mobilizing the people to develop their capability and
readiness to respond and take action on their immediate needs towards
solving their long-term problems (CO: A manual of experience, PCPD).
IMPORTANCE OF COPAR:
COPAR is an important tool tor community development and people
empowernment as this helps the community workers to generate
community participation in development activities.
COPAR prepares people to eventually take over the management of a
deveiopment program in the future.
COPAR maximizes community participation and involvement, community
resources are mobilized for health development services.
PRINCIPLES OF COPAR:
People, especially the most oppressed, exploited and deprived sectors are
open to change, have the capacity to change and are able to bring about
change.
COPAR should be based on the interests of the poorest sectors of society.
COPAR should lead to a self-reliant community and society.
2. Consciousness-raising
Experiential learning is central to the COPAR process because it places
emphasis on learning that emerges irom concrete action and which
encircles succeeding action.
ACTIVITIES IN COPAR:
1. Integration
The health care worker becomes one with the people in order to immerse
hmself/herself in the community, understand deeply the Culture, economy,
leaders, history and litestyle in the community.
Methods of integration
participation in direct production activities of the people
conduct of house-to- house visits
Participation in activities on specinl occasions
conversing with the people where they usually gather
helpng out in household ehores
2. Social investigation
Known as community study
a systematic process of collecting, collating, analyzing data to draw a clear
picture of the community.
the health worker must remember the following:
Use of survey questionnaire is discouraged.
Community leaders can be trained to initially assist the community
worker.
secondary data should be thoroughly examined because much of the
information mighit already be available.
Social investigation is tacilitated it he health worker is properly
integrated and has acquired the trust of the people.
-Confirmation and vulzdatron of community should be done
regularly.
4. Groundwork
Going around and motivating the people on a one on one basis to do
something on community issue
5. The Meeting
The people collectively ratily what they have already decided individualy. lt
gives the people the collective power and confidence and the problems and
issues are discussed.
6. Role Play
It means acting out the meeting that will take place between the leaders of
the people and the government representatives. It is a way of training the
people to anticipute what will happen and prepare them for such
eventuality
7. Mobilization or Action
It is the actual experience of the people in confronting the powertul and
the actual exercise of people power
8. Evaluation
To determine whether the objectives were attained.
9. Refection
It gives the people time to retlect reality of life compared to the ideal one.
Community organizer is trying to build in the organization.
10. Organization
The people's organization is the result of many successive and similar
actions of the people. A linal organization structure is set up with elected
officers and supporting members.
Recommended Activities:
Statement of objectives, and realization of COPAR guidelines
Laying out the site criteria.
Site selection
ACTIVITIES:
Develop criteria for site selection
ldentily potenttal munieipuliucs Catchment areas through preliminary
social investigation (to gather information about the area)
Identify potential Barangay
Choose the final project Barangay
CRITERIA FOR SITE SELECTION:
Depressed, deprived and unserved rural communities with majority of the
people belong to poor sectors
Poor health status of the community
No serious peace and order problem
No strong resistance from the community
Not currently served by similar agencies or program
Meeting and courtesy call to the local government unit of the selected site.
Courtesy call to the barangay level.
Meeting with the "will be'" foster parents of the health care students
Setting the target date immersion, exposure, and departure.
Recommended Activities:
Courtesy Call to mayo, or the local government leader of the selected site
Courtesy call to the barangay level.
Meeting with the foster parents.
Appreciating the environment.
Meeting the community officials and residents.
General assembly.
Preparation of survey torms.
Actual survey.
Analysis of the data gathered.
ACTIVITIES:
Integration
Conduct information
HOW TO CONDUCT INFORMATION CAMPAIGN
Discussion during home visit
Small group discussion
Purok meetings and assemblies
General meeting
Conduct deepening social investigation( is systematically looking for issues
arournd which to organize the people)
Identificati on of potential leaders
PURPOSE:
Draw out the people's interest in the project
Enhances the team's integration into the community
Focus on health problems that may need immediate attention.
Recommended Activities:
Meeting with the officials.
Identitying problems
Spreading awareness and soliciting solution or suggestions.
Analysis of the presented solution.
Planning of the activities.
Organizing to build their own organization.
Registration of the organization. (Legality purposes.)
Implementation of the said activities.
Evaluation.
Recommended Activities:
Meeting with organizational leaders.
Evaluation of the programs
Re-implementation of the programs. (For unmet goals).
Education and training
Networking and linking
Conduct of mobilization on health and development concerms.
Implementation of livelihood projects.
Developing secondary leaders.
5. PHASE OUT
It is the phase when the health care workers leave the community to stand
alone. This phase should be stated during the entry phase so that the
people will be ready for this phase. The organizations built should be ready
to sustain the test of the community itself because the real evaluation will
be done by the residents of the community itself.
Recommended Activities:
Leaving the immersion site.
Documentation.
IDEAL COPAR AGAINST PRACTICED COPAR
1. TIME FRAME AND MODE OF EXPOSURE
Ideal COPAR:
Three (3) to six (6) weeks immersion.
Three to six weeks duty, cight hours a day. five to six days a week
Practiced COPAR
Sometimes eight to sixteen hours a week, for two to four weeks depending
on the time allotted by the school or institution.
3. NUMBER OF RECIPIENTS
Ideal COPAR:
30%, 60%, or 100% depending on the number of population and situation
of the community.
With allotted 10-15 data or tally sheets for deadfiles.
Practiced cOPAR
25-50 families or depending on the required number of families by the
school or institution.
5. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Ideal COPAR
The problems will only the stated ater the survey has been done, tallied
andanalyzed.
The problem will all be coming trom the survey torm and not from the
judgment of the healthcare worker, because of the simple reason that any
problem not perceived is not a problem
Any problem too big or too complicated to the health worker to manage
should not be prioritized. The principle within is that we should not
prioritize something that we can do nothing about.
Practiced COPAR:
Misjudging complex problems as simple ones.
Not considering the result of the survey form but the say of the few. Eg.
barangay officials.
6. IMPLEMENTATION
Ideal COPAR:
The "tishing rod effect" should be done "teach the man to fish, and he will
never be hungry, give the man fish and he will ask for more". The programs
that will be implemented should stand or remain feasible even after the
Phase out or even after the healthcare worker leave the community.
The programs should not be one day afTair, (eg. Medical mission, one-day
mother's class, one day feeding. or nutrition program) but should be
program that will last even after the phase out. It should be something that
you will leave with community.
Practice COPAR:
The "fish effect" programs that are meant to last.
One day programs are often done this programs also diminishes after the
health workers leave.
7. EVALUATION
Ideal COPAR:
The health worker should learn to accept reality that not all programs will
prosper and not all their goals will be met.
After evaluation there should be a re-implementation.
Practiced COPAR:
Some results are manipulated just to say that the goals are met.
No re-implementation
LEVEL Il
● On site toilet facilities of the water carriage type with water-sealed and
flush type with septic vault/tank disposal facilities.
LEVEL IlI
● Water carriage types of toilet facilities connected to septic tanks
and/or to sewerage system to treatment plant.
Sanitation Facilities:
● Bucket latrines should not be promoted because they pose health risks to
both users and collectors and may spread disease.
Pit latrine (pit privy)
● Fecal matter is eliminated into a hole in the ground that leads to
a dug pit. Generally, a latrine refers to toilet facilities without a
bowl. It can be equipped with either a squatting plate or a riser
with a seat.
Antipolo toilet
● It is made up of an elevated pit privy that has a covered latrine. This is a
pit privy in which the superstructure, constructed to provide the
necessary privacy and protection from the rain and sun, elevated to the
same level as the main building of the house.
Septic Privy
● Fecal matter is collected in a build septic tank that is not connected to a
sewerage system.
Aqua privy
● Fecal matter is eliminated into a water-sealed drop pipe that leads from
the latrine to a small water filled septic tank located directly below the
squatting plate. An aqua privy is similar to a septic tank; it can be
connected to flush toilets a take most household wastewater. It consists
of a large tank with a water seal formed by a simple down pipe into the
tank to prevent odor and fly problems. Its drawback is that water must be
added each day to maintain the seal, and this is often difficult to do unless
water is piped into the home .The tank is connected to a soak away to
dispose of effluent. Unlike a septic tank, the aqua privy tank is located
directly below the house, but it, too requires periodic emptying and must
be accessible to a vacuum tanker A are expensive and do not offer any
real advantages over pour-flush latrines.
Overhung latrine
● Fecal matter is directly eliminated into a body of water such as a flowing
river that is underneath the facility.
● A pit latrine with a screened air vent installed directly over the pit. When
air flows across the top of the vent pipe, air is drawn up the pipe from the
pit and fresh air is drawn into the pit from the building. Offensive odors
from the pit thus pass through the vent pipe and do not enter the
building. The location of VIP latrines is important: unless a clear flow of
air is maintained across the top of the vent, the ventilations may not be
effective. VIP latrines should therefore be located away from trees or high
buildings that may limit airflow. A dark vent pipe also helps the air to rise.
The top of the pipe is usually covered with mosquito meshing if the inside
of the building is kept partially dark, the flies will be to light at the top of
the pipe, where they will be trapped and die.
● When the VIP latrine is constructed and used properly, it provides great
improvements in fly and odour control, but may not eliminate either
completely. A VIP latrine is designed to work as a dry system, with any
liquid in the content infiltrating into the surrounding soil. Although some
liquid inevitably will enter the pit, it should be minimized. For example, it
would not be appropriate to dispose of household wastewater into the
pit as this may prevent decomposition of the contents. VIP latrines are
most appropriate where people do not use water for cleaning themselves
after defecating, but use solid materials such as paper, corncobs or leaves.
Concrete vault privy
● Fecal matter is collected in a pit
privy lined either a concrete in
such a manner so as to make it
water tight.
Chemical privy
● Fecal matter is collected into a tank that contains a caustic chemical
solution, which in turn controls and facilitates the waste decomposition.
Compost Privy
● Fecal matter is collected into a pit with urine ad anal cleansing materials with the
addition of organic garbage such as leaves and grass to allow biological decomposition
and production of agricultural or fishpond compost.
Foo
db
orne illnesses are a preventable and underreported public health
problem. These illnesses are a burden on public health and contribute
significantly to the cost of health care. They also present a major
challenge to certain groups of people. Although anyone can get a
foodborne illness, some people are at greater risk.
Safer food promises healthier and longer lives and less costly health
care, as well as a more resilient food industry.
Shredded paper
Achieving the SDGs through the Integrated Safe Water, Sanitation and
Hygiene Approach – iWaSH Governance.
GOALS
A. Increase the number of households, schools and health centers with
access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene.
B. Improve national and local policies on integrated safe water, sanitation
and hygiene.
CHALLENGES
Millennium Development Goals progress in terms of water, sanitation and
hygiene showed that use of improved drinking water sources was at 84 percent
in 1990 and rose to 92 percent in 2015. Use of improved sanitation facility was
measured at 57 percent in 1990 and by 2015 it was recorded at 74 percent.
Despite steady progress, it is estimated that 7 million Filipinos still
defecate in the open. Additionally, there are 323 municipalities in the
Philippines who continue to have no sustained access to safe water, sanitation
and hygiene. These municipalities are difficult to access and are clearly left
behind in terms of achieving SDG 6.
Exacerbating the problem is the fragmentation of structures, policies and
programs on safe water, sanitation and hygiene at the national and local levels
resulting in uncoordinated and ambiguous policies for the sector.
OPPORTUNITIES
The Philippines is a signatory of the 2030 Agenda and the 17 SDGs. These
are expressed in the Philippine Development Plan 2017 – 2022, providing an
opportunity to effectively sustain the implementation of the integrated safe
water, sanitation and hygiene (iWaSH) approach.
Through GoAL WaSH, there is an opportunity to institutionalize iWaSH in
national policies specifically in the water and sanitation roadmaps. The Regional
Water and Sanitation Hubs (RHubs), composed of partner state universities,
water districts, non-government organizations and civil society organizations,
are organized to assist the local government units in mainstreaming iWaSH in
local plans and budgets. The RHubs are tasked to support the government in
preparing local government units and communities to develop local projects in
establishing, improving and expanding water and sanitation systems and
facilities.
STRATEGIES
The iWaSH approach ensures a complete package of interventions
consisting of social preparation and community organizing, construction of
water supply and sanitation facilities and behavioral change campaigns. All
these interventions are implemented in an integrated manner. The project
focuses on 13 municipalities that are left behind in terms of achieving SDG 6.
GoAL WaSH will also support the development of policies and governance
instruments to broadening access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene.
Local citizens groups are being established to monitor the implementation
of integrated safe water, sanitation and hygiene at the community level.
Furthermore, GoAL WaSH is supporting coordination among WASH sector
institutions at the national level.
ACHIEVEMENTS
In total, 7,169 households in six regions received improved access to
water supply following the construction of water supply systems. Moreover, the
provision of the water quality monitoring kits by the project has been valuable
in the identification of the contaminated drinking water sources in the target
municipalities. In one municipality, drinking water sources tested revealed that
majority, 87 out of the 110 water sources, tested positive for E.Coli and Total
Coliform. Local government authorities had the opportunity to immediately
take action and communicate this to the community.
DEPED, DOH AND UNICEF UNITE TO BRING CLEAN HANDS FOR ALL ON
OCTOBER 15, 2020
Two of the most crucial government agencies in shaping the future and well-
being of a generation are coming together to mark the beginning of a stronger
partnership.
Manila, 15
October 2020 — As the
COVID-19 pandemic
continues, the world turns
to a simple age-old solution
to reduce the risk of disease
transmission – hand
washing with soap and
water.
On October 15,
2020, this year’s celebration
of Global Hand washing Day
will be its most significant
yet. For the first time, two of the most crucial government agencies in shaping
the future and well-being of a generation are coming together to mark the
beginning of a stronger partnership.
“DepEd has been celebrating Global Hand washing Day in schools since
2008, in recognition of the importance of building the habit of hand washing
among children to ensure their health. Through our WASH in Schools Program,
DepEd has institutionalized actions to improve hand washing facilities and instill
hand washing behaviour among learners. And now under the new normal, our
Basic Education-Learning Continuity Plan also integrates hand washing practice
as part of the required health standards. With the children continuing their
learning at home because of the pandemic, we call on families to make their
homes a safe environment to live and learn; and teach their children to make
hand washing a habit. And when we do return to school, hand washing will be
key in ensuring safety of our children,” says DepEd Secretary Leonor Briones.
Hand washing with soap is key in the fight against COVID-19. It destroys
the outer membrane of the virus and thereby inactivates it. One study found
that regular hand washing with soap can reduce the likelihood of common
coronavirus infection by 36%. However, based on 2019 data, over 7 million
Filipinos are unable to wash their hands due to lack of access to a hand washing
facility, water, and/or soap. This is found to be highest among poorest
households and those living in rural areas. From school year 2018-2019 data,
only half of schools have at least one group hand washing facility with soap.
The lack of access to hand hygiene facilities is not just in homes and
schools but can also be found in workplaces, healthcare facilities, and public
spaces as well. Even when awareness and knowledge around hand washing is
high – actual practice is often found to be much lower. In a study in 2018 by the
Department of Education and UNICEF among school children, observations
demonstrated that less than 8% did actually wash their hands after using the
toilet even when a handwashing facility with soap and water was available. The
issue is a detriment to public health and safety and requires structural change
from the whole of society and the government, acting together.
Environmental Management
Environmental Management seeks to change the environment in
order to prevent or minimize vector propagation and human contact
with vector-pathogen by destroying, altering, removing or recycling
non-essential containers that provide larval habitats. Such actions
should be the mainstay of dengue vector control. Three types of
environmental management are defined:
Environmental modification - long-lasting physical transformations
to reduce vector larval habitats
Environmental manipulation - temporary changes to vector habitats
involving the management of “essential” containers.
Changes to human habitation or behaviour - actions to reduce
human - vector contact.
Street Cleansing
A reliable and regular street cleansing system that removes
discarded water-bearing containers and cleans drains to ensure they do
not become stagnant and breed mosquitoes will both help to reduce
larval habitat and remove the origin of other urban pests.
Building Structures
During the planning and construction of buildings and other
infrastructure, including urban renewal schemes, and through legislation
and regulation, opportunities arise to modify or reduce potential larval
habitats of urban disease vector.
Chemical Control: Larvicides
Although chemicals are widely used to treat Ae. aegypti larval
habitats, larviciding should be considered as complementary to
environmental management and – except in emergencies – should be
restricted to containers that cannot otherwise be eliminated or managed.
Larvicides may be impractical to apply in hard-to-reach natural sites
such as leaf axils and tree holes, which are common habitats of Ae.
albopictus, or in deep wells. The difficulty of accessing indoor larval
habitats of Ae. aegypti (e.g. water-storage containers, plant vases,
saucers) to apply larvicides is a major limitation in many urban contexts.
Target Area
Productive larval habitats should be treated with chemicals only if
environmental management methods or other non-chemical methods cannot
be easily applied or are too costly. Perifocal treatment involves the use of hand-
held or power-operated equipment to spray, for example, wettable powder or
emulsifiable-concentrate formulations of insecticide on larval habitats and
peripheral surfaces. This will destroy existing and subsequent larval infestations
in containers of non-potable water, and will kill the adult mosquitoes that
frequent these sites.
Treatment Cycle
The treatment cycle will depend on the species of mosquito, seasonality of
transmission, patterns of rainfall, duration of efficacy of the larvicide and types
of larval habitat. Two or three application rounds carried out annually in a
timely manner with proper monitoring of efficacy may suffice, especially in
areas where the main transmission season is short.
Precautions
Extreme care must be taken when treating drinking-water to avoid dosages
that are toxic for humans. Label instructions must always be followed when
using insecticides.
Methods of Vermin Control
Hygiene
When houses and yards are kept clean, there is no food for pests
and nowhere for them to live and breed, and this in turn means that there
are few pests.
Water Quality
The built environment's plumbing infrastructure can affect water quality,
Lead pipes or solder either within buildings or connecting buildings to water
mains can contaminate water coming into homes with enough lead to cause
permanent harm to children's brains and also affect adult health.
Chlorine and other disinfectants added to water can interact with other
materials in water to create disinfectant by-products, such as
trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids. These by-products are associated with
some forms of cancer, reproductive health impacts and neural tube
defects in fetuses. Indoor chlorinated swimming pools can be a significant
source of exposures to chlorine and by-products.
Fluoride may be added to municipal water supplies, and in some places
occurs naturally in water. High levels can have health impacts, including
dental fluorosis, joint pain, bone deformity, and adverse cognitive
development in children
Lead Paint
Small chips of flaking paint can adhere to hands or dusty surfaces and then
be transferred to food and ingested. Crawling children and toddlers are
especially likely to encounter paint chips on floors, and they often put their
hands in their mouths.
Lead is toxic to people of any age but is especially damaging to fetuses and
young children. Very small amounts of lead cause permanent brain and
neurological damage to children. Other health impacts include reproductive
health effects, anemia, renal disease, cataracts, coronary artery
disease, hearing loss, hypertension, psychiatric disturbances, seizures and
more.
Pesticides
Pesticides are often used to control insects, rodents and other pests within
buildings, where residues on surfaces and in the air can expose occupants.
Various pesticides are associated with cancer, neurodevelopmental
impacts, reproductive impacts, asthma attacks, immune suppression,
hearing loss, psychiatric disturbance and other effects.
leaking plumbing
inadequately ventilated showers, laundry areas and
cooking areas; dishwashers can also create steam
seepage into basements and crawl spaces
overflow from heavy rain or floods
Noise
Noise levels indoors can sustained level at which hearing loss
occurs. Excessive indoor noise can come from appliances, such as hair dryers
and kitchen exhaust fans, or from music, television or recreational
electronics. Noise from outside buildings can also intrude into indoor spaces:
traffic, trains, airplanes, heavy equipment, generators, lawn equipment,
fireworks and more.
Lower levels of noise can produce sleep disturbance, cardiovascular
effects including heart attacks and stroke, learning impairment, psycho
physiological effects, psychiatric symptoms and impaired fetal development.
Noise also has widespread psycho-social effects including noise annoyance,
reduced performance and increased aggressive behavior.
Light
Artificial light has changed many
aspects of human life, from allowing us to
be productive long outside daylight hours
to reducing the risk of damage and injury
from uncontrolled fire. Light has its
negative side, however, in disrupting
circadian rhythms of sleep and wakefulness. Early research indicates that
artificial light, and especially blue light from electronic screens and some
energy-efficient bulbs, may contribute to the incidence of chronic disease
and obesity.
Temperature
Our ability to heat and cool indoor environments has a huge impact not only on
comfort but on our health. Controlled temperature environments bring these
benefits.
At the same time, the built environment can create problems by concentrating
ambient heat and creating urban heat islands. The annual mean air temperature
of a city with one million people or more can be 1.8–5.4°F (1–3°C) warmer than
its surroundings. In the evening, the difference can be as high as 22°F (12°C).
Indoor temperatures can be considerably greater than in nearby rural
areas. Dense urban areas without indoor cooling can experience substantial
health impacts during heat episodes.
Transportation
Beginning with the invention of the automobile, and accelerating after World
War II, environments from neighborhoods to regions worldwide have been
designed or adapted to allow and
promote automobile and other vehicle use.
These decisions and designs have had far-reaching consequences for
communities and societies:
These consequences all have implications for our health. Designing or altering
transportation systems to focus on clean community transit and walkability
could have far-reaching public health benefits.
Increased Traffic
Traffic noise-can directly impact health. For example, a 2016 study found that
the risk of myocardial infarction (heart attack) rose with exposure to road noise
or railroad noise. The association was strongest, and extended to airplane noise,
among those whose heart attacks were fatal. Traffic noise is also associated
with impacts on respiratory and metabolic health.
Reliance on Petroleum
Although there has been some movement toward vehicles that are not powered
by fossil fuels, as yet the overwhelming majority of vehicles rely on petroleum
products.
The oil and gas industry is the largest industrial source of emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), which contribute to the formation of ground-level
ozone. Exposure to ozone is linked to aggravated asthma, increased emergency
room visits and hospital admissions, and premature death.
Two scales of the built environment are typically considered: the regional and
the local.
The local scale, or that of the neighborhood, also focuses on transit but more on
household travel needs. The distance to frequent destinations, such as grocery
stores, schools and recreation areas, and the ease of traveling by foot or bike
both impact a person’s choices of active transportation. In disconnected
neighborhoods, families often have to drive to access schools or recreational
areas
Data gathering:
It is best to use a number of data gathering techniques and/or sources of
data to substantiate findings.
This is known as a process of triangulation — the use of multiple
investigative methods or information sources to get the answer to the
question at hand.
Data sources:
Students — prospective, current, past, withdrawn
Colleagues — teaching partners, tutors, teachers external to the project
Discipline/instructional design experts
Professional development staff
Graduates and employers
Documents and records — teaching materials, assessment records, past
SETLs, assessment statements and tasks
Selecting methods:
Paradigm for the study (empirical, interpretive, critical theory-based,
pragmatic)
Time involved in preparing to use the particular method/tool (e.g.
preparation of a bank of questions for a questionnaire)
Time involved in gathering or recording the data — on the part of the data
collector; on the part of the 'evaluee/s'
the time needed to analyse and report the data
the scale involved — the number of students, staff required for
valid/authentic data.
Method:
The skill/expertise required to use the method
The expertise, personnel and/or resources required to analyze and/or
report the data.
Storing the data:
Making sure that data is safe and not lost
Thinking through filing categories; e.g. by question type; data source; data
method
Considering confidentiality requirements & other safeguards arrangements
to access data
Ethical consideration:
In any evaluation, the rights and welfare of 'subjects' need to be respected
and protected.
Privacy: Some data gathering techniques may be perceived as an invasion
of privacy if prior consent on the part of the subject(s) has not been gained.
Confidentiality: Much information that subjects provide is given in
confidence unless specific permission to use 'private' information.
MONITORING
Continuous assessment that aims at providing all stakeholders with early
detailed information on the progress or delay of the ongoing assessed
activities. It is an oversight of the activity's implementation stage. Its
purpose is to determine if the outputs, deliveries and schedules planned
have been reached so that action can be taken to correct the deficiencies
as quickly as possible.
Good planning, combined with effective monitoring and evaluation, can
play a major role in enhancing the effectiveness of development
programs and projects. Good planning helps focus on the results that
matter, while monitoring and evaluation help us learn from past
successes and challenges and inform decision making so that current and
future initiatives are better able to improve people's lives and expand
their choices.
Monitoring and Evaluation is used to assess the performance of projects,
institutions and programmes set up by governments, international
organisations and NGOs. Its goal is to improve current and future
management of outputs, outcomes and impact.
EVALUATION
Process that critically examines a program. It involves collecting and
analyzing information about a program's activities, characteristics, and
outcomes. Its purpose is to make judgments about a program, to
improve its effectiveness, and/or to inform programming decisions.
Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subject's merit, worth and
significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. ... The primary
purpose of evaluation, in addition to gaining insight into prior or existing
initiatives, is to enable reflection and assist in the identification of future
change.
2. TYPES OF EVALUATION
PLANNING
Process of deciding in advance where we want to get to (our goal)
and how we will get there.
helps us to decide what that contribution should be and how to
achieve it.
evaluation plan is a written document that describes how you will monitor
and evaluate your program, as well as how you intend to use evaluation
results for program improvement and decision making. The evaluation
plan clarifies how you will describe the “What,” the “How,” and the “Why
It Matters” for your program.
FORMATIVE
Method for judging the worth of a program while the program
activities are forming (in progress).
Ongoing, flexible, and more informal diagnostic tool.
A formative evaluation (sometimes referred to as internal) is a method for
judging the worth of a program while the program activities are forming (in
progress). They can be conducted during any phase of the process. This
part of the evaluation focuses on the process.
SUMMATIVE
Evaluation of the sum product of the lesson.
More formal, structured, and often used to normalize performance
so they can be measured and compared.
Summative assessment, summative evaluation, or assessment of learning
is the assessment of participants where the focus is on the outcome of a
program. This contrasts with formative assessment, which summarizes the
participants' development at a particular time.